10 actions in 8 pieces of software · ranked by words, meaning and measured trust · 636 ms
- llm-evaluation
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
- llm-evaluation
skillyonatangross/orchestkitrecord
- llm-evaluation
LLM output evaluation and quality assessment. Use when implementing LLM-as-judge patterns, quality gates for AI outputs, or automated evaluation pipelines.
- llm-evaluation
skillmlflow/skillsrecord
- agent-evaluation
Use this when you need to EVALUATE OR IMPROVE or OPTIMIZE an existing LLM agent's output quality - including improving tool selection accuracy, answer quality, reducing costs, or fixing issues where the agent gives wrong/incomplete responses. Evaluates agents systematically using MLflow evaluation w
- agent-evaluation
skilldaymade/claude-code-skillsrecord
- promptfoo-evaluation
Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promp
- promptfoo-evaluation
skillmuratcankoylan/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineeringrecord
- evaluation
This skill should be used when the user asks to "evaluate agent performance", "build test framework", "measure agent quality", "create evaluation rubrics", or mentions LLM-as-judge, multi-dimensional evaluation, agent testing, or quality gates for agent pipelines.
- evaluation
skilldavila7/claude-code-templatesrecord
- agent-evaluation
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
- agent-evaluation
- 7LLM Evaluation Harness MCP Serverfound in code, not yet checkedno passport yet
- score_sample
Score a single RAG output on faithfulness, answer relevancy, and context precision using the LLM-as-a-Judge backend.
- run_eval
Run the full RAG evaluation on a JSONL dataset and return a report with per-metric aggregates and a pass/fail gate decision.
- score_sample
MCP serverrecord
- generate_eval_yaml
Generate a complete .ia-eval.yaml evaluation contract from a plain-language description of what your LLM should do. Uses Groq llama-3.3-70b (server-side, no API key needed). Returns ready-to-run YAML for the LLM Test Runner (run_eval_contract). Picks appropriate evaluators (cosine_similarity, contai
- run_eval_contract
Parse a .ia-eval.yaml LLM test suite, call the specified LLM model for each scenario, run all configured scorers, and return a structured JSON report with per-scenario Pass/Fail verdicts and a Markdown summary. Use list_local_tests to discover available test files.
- generate_eval_yaml
Labels are the instruments' verdict and are never changed by ranking. Agents and robots get this same answer as JSON at /api/v1/find?q=…&answer=1 and through the MCP server.