{"passport":{"unfragile":{"@version":"1.0","version":"2026-05","artifact":{"id":"tool_1clickclaw","slug":"1clickclaw","name":"1ClickClaw","type":"product","url":"https://1clickclaw.app/","page_url":"https://unfragile.ai/1clickclaw","categories":["app-builders","deployment-infra"],"tags":[],"pricing":{"model":"paid","free":false,"starting_price":null},"status":"active","verified":false},"capabilities":[{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_0","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.one.click.openclaw.deployment.to.cloud.infrastructure","name":"one-click openclaw deployment to cloud infrastructure","description":"Automates the entire OpenClaw self-hosting setup process into a single deployment action, eliminating manual Docker configuration, server provisioning, and dependency management. The system provisions a dedicated 2 vCPU / 2GB cloud server, installs OpenClaw runtime, and exposes the agent endpoint within <60 seconds. This abstracts away infrastructure complexity that typically requires DevOps expertise, allowing developers to focus on agent logic rather than deployment mechanics.","intents":["I want to deploy an AI agent without learning Docker or managing cloud infrastructure","I need to get an OpenClaw agent running in production within minutes, not hours","I want to avoid vendor lock-in while still having managed hosting convenience"],"best_for":["Solo developers and small teams building AI agents without DevOps resources","Teams requiring data residency compliance who want self-hosted infrastructure without operational burden","Rapid prototypers who need to move from local development to production quickly"],"limitations":["Deployment latency is claimed but unverified — no SLA or performance guarantees documented","Infrastructure is fixed at 2 vCPU / 2GB per deployment — no documented scaling options for high-traffic agents","No rollback or version management documented — unclear how to revert failed deployments","Tied to 1ClickClaw's infrastructure availability — no multi-region or failover options documented"],"requires":["Active 1ClickClaw subscription ($29/month minimum)","Valid OpenClaw agent configuration (format/schema unknown)","Internet connectivity to 1ClickClaw control plane"],"input_types":["OpenClaw agent configuration (format unknown)","Deployment metadata (name, description)"],"output_types":["Running OpenClaw instance with public endpoint","Deployment status and logs","Agent webhook URL for integration"],"categories":["automation-workflow","deployment-infrastructure"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_1","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.automated.messaging.platform.bot.integration","name":"automated messaging platform bot integration","description":"Connects deployed AI agents to messaging platforms (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp) by accepting platform-specific bot tokens and automatically configuring webhook endpoints, message routing, and authentication. The system handles OAuth token validation, webhook URL registration with the messaging platform, and bidirectional message serialization without requiring manual API configuration. This enables agents to receive messages from users and respond in real-time across multiple channels from a single deployment.","intents":["I want my AI agent to respond to users on Telegram/Discord/WhatsApp without manually setting up webhooks","I need to connect multiple messaging platforms to a single agent instance","I want to avoid managing bot token rotation and webhook authentication myself"],"best_for":["Developers building conversational AI agents for consumer or community use","Teams deploying chatbots across multiple messaging platforms simultaneously","Non-technical founders who need bots operational without API integration knowledge"],"limitations":["Limited to three messaging platforms (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp) — no support for Slack, Teams, or custom webhooks documented","No documented rate limiting or throttling per platform — unclear how agent handles platform-specific message quotas","Message format translation is opaque — no documentation on how rich media (images, files) are handled across platforms","No multi-language or locale-specific message handling documented","Token refresh mechanism unknown — unclear how long-lived bot tokens are managed or rotated"],"requires":["Valid bot token for target messaging platform (obtained from platform's developer console)","Messaging platform account with bot creation permissions","1ClickClaw deployment with active agent instance"],"input_types":["Platform-specific bot token (string)","Platform identifier (enum: telegram, discord, whatsapp)","Optional: webhook configuration parameters"],"output_types":["Webhook endpoint URL registered with messaging platform","Connection status (connected/failed/pending)","Message delivery logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_2","uri":"capability://planning.reasoning.smart.model.routing.for.token.cost.optimization","name":"smart model routing for token cost optimization","description":"Automatically selects and routes requests to different AI models based on complexity heuristics to minimize token consumption and API costs. The system analyzes incoming requests, determines appropriate model tier (e.g., lightweight vs. reasoning-heavy), and routes to the most cost-efficient model capable of handling the task. This reduces per-request token spend without requiring manual model selection or prompt engineering by the user.","intents":["I want my agent to use cheaper models for simple queries and expensive models only when necessary","I need to reduce my AI API costs without sacrificing response quality","I want automatic model selection without manually configuring routing rules"],"best_for":["Cost-conscious teams deploying high-volume agents with variable query complexity","Startups operating on tight API budgets who want to maximize throughput per dollar","Developers who want cost optimization without learning model selection heuristics"],"limitations":["Routing algorithm is opaque — no documentation on how complexity is measured or which models are available","No user control over routing thresholds — cannot customize cost vs. quality tradeoff","No per-request cost visibility — unclear if users can see which model was selected for each request","Supported models unknown — FAQ lists 'Which AI models are available?' but answer not provided","No fallback behavior documented — unclear what happens if preferred model is unavailable"],"requires":["Active 1ClickClaw subscription with sufficient usage credits","OpenClaw agent configuration (model routing configuration format unknown)","API keys for underlying model providers (if required)"],"input_types":["User message or query (text)","Optional: complexity hints or metadata"],"output_types":["Model selection decision (model name, tier)","Response from selected model","Token usage metrics (if available)"],"categories":["planning-reasoning","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_3","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.usage.based.billing.with.credit.system","name":"usage-based billing with credit system","description":"Implements a consumption-based pricing model where users pay for actual agent usage via a credit system. Each subscription tier includes a monthly credit allowance ($5 included with $29/month Starter tier), and additional usage is charged via credit top-ups. Credits are consumed based on agent activity (message processing, API calls, compute time — exact metrics unknown), enabling cost scaling with actual usage rather than fixed monthly fees.","intents":["I want to pay only for the agent usage I actually consume, not a fixed monthly fee","I need predictable costs that scale with my agent's traffic","I want to avoid overpaying for unused capacity"],"best_for":["Startups and small teams with variable or unpredictable agent usage patterns","Developers testing agents in production who want to minimize sunk costs","Cost-conscious teams who want granular visibility into per-request expenses"],"limitations":["Credit consumption metrics are undocumented — unclear what activities consume credits (messages, API calls, compute time, storage)","No cost visibility per request — users cannot see real-time credit burn or per-agent costs","No usage alerts or spending caps documented — risk of unexpected charges if agent goes viral","Credit expiration policy unknown — unclear if unused credits roll over or expire monthly","No cost forecasting tools documented — difficult to estimate monthly spend for variable workloads"],"requires":["Active 1ClickClaw account with subscription","Payment method on file for credit top-ups","Deployed agent instance consuming credits"],"input_types":["Subscription tier selection (Starter: $29/month)","Credit top-up amount (currency: unknown, likely USD)"],"output_types":["Credit balance (numeric)","Usage history (if available)","Invoice/billing statement"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_4","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.agent.deployment.status.monitoring.and.logging","name":"agent deployment status monitoring and logging","description":"Provides real-time visibility into deployed agent health, activity, and errors through a dashboard or API that exposes deployment status, message logs, error traces, and performance metrics. The system tracks agent uptime, message throughput, latency, and integration health across connected messaging platforms. This enables developers to diagnose issues, monitor agent behavior, and verify successful deployments without SSH access or log aggregation tools.","intents":["I want to see if my deployed agent is running and responding to messages","I need to debug why my agent isn't responding to users on a specific platform","I want to monitor agent performance and identify bottlenecks"],"best_for":["Developers deploying agents for the first time who need confidence the deployment succeeded","Teams operating agents in production who need visibility into agent health and errors","Debugging-focused developers who want centralized logs without managing log aggregation"],"limitations":["Monitoring interface is undocumented — unclear if logs are accessible via web dashboard, API, or CLI","Log retention policy unknown — unclear how long logs are stored or if they can be exported","Metrics granularity unknown — unclear if logs show per-message details or aggregated statistics","No alerting system documented — no way to be notified of agent failures or performance degradation","No custom metric support documented — limited to platform-provided metrics"],"requires":["Deployed agent instance on 1ClickClaw","1ClickClaw account with dashboard access","Active agent receiving messages (to generate logs)"],"input_types":["Deployment ID or agent name (to query logs)","Optional: time range, log level filter"],"output_types":["Agent status (running/stopped/error)","Message logs (timestamp, platform, user ID, message content, response)","Error traces and stack traces","Performance metrics (latency, throughput, uptime %)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","data-processing-analysis"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_5","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.data.residency.and.self.hosted.infrastructure.control","name":"data residency and self-hosted infrastructure control","description":"Ensures agent data and processing remain within 1ClickClaw's infrastructure (not routed through third-party SaaS platforms), providing data sovereignty and compliance with residency requirements. Unlike cloud-hosted SaaS alternatives that may route data through multiple regions or third-party processors, 1ClickClaw's self-hosted model keeps agent state, conversation history, and logs on dedicated infrastructure. This enables compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, or industry-specific data residency mandates.","intents":["I need my agent data to stay within a specific geographic region for compliance","I want to avoid sending sensitive customer data to third-party SaaS platforms","I need to demonstrate data residency compliance to auditors or regulators"],"best_for":["Enterprise teams handling regulated data (healthcare, finance, government) with strict residency requirements","Organizations in the EU or other regions with GDPR/data localization mandates","Teams with privacy-sensitive use cases (mental health, legal, financial advice) who want data control"],"limitations":["Data residency region is undocumented — unclear if infrastructure is single-region or multi-region, or if users can choose region","Backup and disaster recovery policies unknown — unclear if data is replicated or backed up, and where backups are stored","Data deletion policies unknown — unclear how long data is retained after agent deletion or subscription cancellation","Encryption at rest/in transit unknown — no documentation on encryption standards or key management","No audit logging documented — unclear if data access is logged for compliance audits","Third-party subprocessor list unknown — unclear if 1ClickClaw uses third-party services that may access data"],"requires":["1ClickClaw subscription (self-hosted infrastructure is included)","Compliance requirements documentation (for audit purposes)","Understanding of data residency regulations applicable to your use case"],"input_types":["Agent configuration with data sensitivity metadata (optional)","Compliance framework selection (GDPR, HIPAA, etc. — if supported)"],"output_types":["Confirmation of data residency (region, infrastructure details)","Compliance documentation (if available)","Data processing agreement (if available)"],"categories":["automation-workflow","safety-moderation"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_6","uri":"capability://tool.use.integration.openclaw.agent.framework.integration.and.abstraction","name":"openclaw agent framework integration and abstraction","description":"Provides a managed hosting layer for OpenClaw agents, abstracting away infrastructure concerns while preserving OpenClaw's agent-building capabilities. The system accepts OpenClaw agent configurations (format unknown), provisions runtime environments, and exposes agents via web endpoints. This allows developers to leverage OpenClaw's agent framework without managing Docker, networking, or server provisioning.","intents":["I want to use OpenClaw to build agents but don't want to manage self-hosting infrastructure","I need a managed OpenClaw hosting solution that handles deployment and scaling","I want to avoid vendor lock-in by using an open-source framework (OpenClaw) with managed hosting"],"best_for":["Developers already familiar with OpenClaw who want managed hosting without self-hosting overhead","Teams building complex agents that require OpenClaw's capabilities but lack DevOps resources","Organizations seeking open-source frameworks with managed hosting as a middle ground between DIY and proprietary SaaS"],"limitations":["Limited to OpenClaw's capabilities and ecosystem — cannot use other agent frameworks (LangChain, AutoGPT, etc.)","OpenClaw maturity unknown — no documentation on OpenClaw's stability, feature completeness, or community support","Agent configuration schema unknown — unclear what OpenClaw agent configurations look like or how to write them","No agent versioning or rollback documented — unclear how to manage agent updates or revert to previous versions","Upstream dependency risk — if OpenClaw is abandoned or changes direction, 1ClickClaw's value proposition is undermined"],"requires":["Familiarity with OpenClaw agent framework and configuration syntax","Valid OpenClaw agent configuration file","1ClickClaw subscription and account"],"input_types":["OpenClaw agent configuration (YAML/JSON format — exact schema unknown)","Agent metadata (name, description, version)"],"output_types":["Deployed OpenClaw agent instance","Agent endpoint URL","Agent status and logs"],"categories":["tool-use-integration","automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0},{"id":"tool_1clickclaw__cap_7","uri":"capability://automation.workflow.subscription.tier.management.and.feature.access.control","name":"subscription tier management and feature access control","description":"Manages user access to features and infrastructure based on subscription tier (Starter: $29/month documented, higher tiers unknown). The system enforces tier-specific limits on deployments, concurrent agents, message throughput, or feature availability. This enables tiered pricing where basic users get essential functionality while premium users unlock advanced features or higher resource allocation.","intents":["I want to start with a cheap plan and upgrade as my agent usage grows","I need to understand what features are available at my subscription tier","I want to manage multiple agents under a single subscription"],"best_for":["Startups and small teams with limited budgets who want to start cheap and scale","Developers prototyping agents who want low-cost entry before committing to production","Teams with variable usage who want flexibility to upgrade/downgrade tiers"],"limitations":["Tier structure is undocumented — only Starter ($29/month) is documented; Pro, Enterprise, or other tiers unknown","Feature differences between tiers unknown — unclear what features are locked behind higher tiers","Deployment limits unknown — unclear if tiers limit number of agents, concurrent users, or message throughput","Upgrade/downgrade policies unknown — unclear if changes take effect immediately or at billing cycle end","No trial or free tier documented — unclear if users can test before paying"],"requires":["1ClickClaw account","Payment method for subscription","Selection of subscription tier"],"input_types":["Tier selection (Starter, Pro, Enterprise — exact tiers unknown)","Billing cycle preference (monthly, annual — if available)"],"output_types":["Subscription confirmation","Tier-specific feature access","Resource allocation (vCPU, memory, concurrent agents — if applicable)","Billing invoice"],"categories":["automation-workflow"],"confidence":0.5,"matches":0,"success_rate":0}],"trust":{"score":39,"verified":false,"data_access_risk":"high","permissions":["Active 1ClickClaw subscription ($29/month minimum)","Valid OpenClaw agent configuration (format/schema unknown)","Internet connectivity to 1ClickClaw control plane","Valid bot token for target messaging platform (obtained from platform's developer console)","Messaging platform account with bot creation permissions","1ClickClaw deployment with active agent instance","Active 1ClickClaw subscription with sufficient usage credits","OpenClaw agent configuration (model routing configuration format unknown)","API keys for underlying model providers (if required)","Active 1ClickClaw account with subscription"],"failure_modes":["Deployment latency is claimed but unverified — no SLA or performance guarantees documented","Infrastructure is fixed at 2 vCPU / 2GB per deployment — no documented scaling options for high-traffic agents","No rollback or version management documented — unclear how to revert failed deployments","Tied to 1ClickClaw's infrastructure availability — no multi-region or failover options documented","Limited to three messaging platforms (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp) — no support for Slack, Teams, or custom webhooks documented","No documented rate limiting or throttling per platform — unclear how agent handles platform-specific message quotas","Message format translation is opaque — no documentation on how rich media (images, files) are handled across platforms","No multi-language or locale-specific message handling documented","Token refresh mechanism unknown — unclear how long-lived bot tokens are managed or rotated","Routing algorithm is opaque — no documentation on how complexity is measured or which models are available","builder identity is not verified yet","no observed match outcomes yet"],"rank_breakdown":{"adoption":0.31666666666666665,"quality":0.67,"ecosystem":0.25,"match_graph":0.25,"freshness":0.6,"weights":{"adoption":0.25,"quality":0.25,"ecosystem":0.1,"match_graph":0.35,"freshness":0.05}},"observed_outcomes":{"matches":0,"success_rate":0,"avg_confidence":0,"top_intents":[],"last_matched_at":null},"maintenance":{"status":"active","updated_at":"2026-05-24T12:16:28.696Z","last_scraped_at":"2026-04-05T13:23:42.562Z","last_commit":null},"community":{"stars":null,"forks":null,"weekly_downloads":null,"model_downloads":null,"model_likes":null}},"distribution":{"claim_url":"https://unfragile.ai/submit?claim=1clickclaw","compare_url":"https://unfragile.ai/compare?artifact=1clickclaw"}},"signature":"a2EBmMfCDcWxZ9LdDaGNKl3lYdcXWAtAOpv3zWZ0IVleRoQ6T9qnUfoB0qYisE4NuBpD/cYELy7QZ+5kChEnBQ==","signedAt":"2026-07-08T14:34:07.789Z","signedBy":"unfragile.ai","version":1},"_links":{"self":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/passport/1clickclaw","artifact":"https://unfragile.ai/1clickclaw","verify":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/verify?slug=1clickclaw","publicKey":"https://unfragile.ai/api/v1/trust-passport-public-key","spec":"https://unfragile.ai/trust","schema":"https://unfragile.ai/schema.json","docs":"https://unfragile.ai/docs"}}