Awesome AI Market Maps
RepositoryFreeA curated list of AI market maps from 2026, 2025, and 2024, by [Joy Larkin](https://twitter.com/joy).
Capabilities12 decomposed
temporal-thematic market map aggregation and indexing
Medium confidenceAggregates 400+ AI market maps from 50+ sources (Tier 1 VCs, specialized investors, analysts) into a unified README.md single-source-of-truth using a two-dimensional taxonomy (temporal quarters/months × thematic AI domains). Implements hierarchical markdown structure with level-2 headers for quarters and level-3 headers for months, enabling deterministic parsing by downstream automation pipelines. The architecture enforces unidirectional data flow where README.md is the canonical source, preventing synchronization conflicts across derivative outputs (RSS, CSV, external platforms).
Uses a two-dimensional temporal-thematic taxonomy (quarters/months × AI domains) with markdown-native structure that enables both human browsing and deterministic machine parsing, avoiding the need for external databases or APIs. The single-source-of-truth pattern (README.md → all outputs) prevents synchronization drift that plagues multi-source systems.
More comprehensive and frequently updated than manual VC website browsing, and more discoverable than scattered Twitter threads; differs from commercial market research by being community-curated and open-source, trading depth for breadth and recency.
automated rss feed generation from markdown source
Medium confidenceTransforms README.md markdown structure into valid RSS/XML feed via GitHub Actions workflow (re-build-rss.yml) that runs on push events. The generate_rss.py script parses markdown hierarchically starting from the '## ▦ MARKET MAPS ▦' delimiter, extracts market map entries with metadata (title, source, date, URL), sanitizes text for XML compatibility, and generates timestamped RSS entries. Implements real-time syndication with near-zero latency between README.md updates and feed availability, enabling subscribers to receive new market maps via RSS readers without polling the repository.
Implements a push-triggered RSS generation pipeline that maintains feed freshness at near-zero latency by regenerating on every README.md commit, rather than polling or scheduled batch jobs. Uses markdown-native delimiters ('## ▦ MARKET MAPS ▦') as parsing anchors, avoiding the need for external configuration files or database schemas.
Faster and more reliable than manual RSS feed maintenance or third-party RSS generation services; tighter integration with source-of-truth than external feed aggregators, ensuring feed always reflects current README.md state.
external platform integration and cross-posting
Medium confidenceIntegrates with external platforms (Twitter, LinkedIn, Slack) to republish market map updates beyond the GitHub repository. Market map additions can be automatically or manually cross-posted to these platforms, extending reach to audiences who don't follow the GitHub repository directly. Integration points include Twitter API for tweet posting, LinkedIn API for article sharing, and Slack webhooks for channel notifications. This capability enables the market map collection to function as a content distribution hub, with GitHub as the source of truth and external platforms as distribution channels. Cross-posting can be triggered manually by the maintainer or automated via GitHub Actions workflows.
Implements external platform integration as optional, decoupled distribution channels rather than primary content sources, maintaining GitHub as the single source of truth. This architecture allows the system to add or remove platform integrations without affecting core functionality.
Extends reach beyond GitHub users without requiring them to maintain separate accounts or subscriptions; more flexible than platform-specific tools because it centralizes content in GitHub and distributes to multiple channels. Differs from social media management tools by being repository-native and open-source.
market map discovery and research support
Medium confidenceEnables researchers and analysts to discover relevant market maps for specific AI domains, time periods, or source organizations through browsing, filtering, and searching capabilities. Users can navigate the hierarchical README.md structure to find maps by quarter/month or domain, use CSV export to filter programmatically, or subscribe to RSS feed for specific categories. The repository also serves as a research artifact itself, enabling meta-analysis of market map creation patterns (e.g., 'which domains have the most maps?', 'how has VC focus shifted over time?'). This capability transforms the collection from a passive list into an active research tool for understanding AI market evolution.
Positions the market map collection as both a discovery tool and a research artifact, enabling users to study not just individual maps but patterns in how the market maps themselves are created and distributed. This meta-analytical capability is unique to curated collections and would not be possible with individual map sources.
More discoverable than scattered individual VC websites or Twitter threads; enables meta-analysis that would be impossible without aggregation. Simpler than building a custom search engine but less powerful than full-text search systems.
structured csv export with manual-refresh cadence
Medium confidenceExports aggregated market map metadata into a structured CSV dataset (ai_market_maps.csv) with columns for date, source organization, market map title, AI domain category, and direct URL link. The export is manually maintained with documented lag (typically bimonthly refresh cycle), allowing downstream tools (Pandas, Excel, Tableau, SQL databases) to ingest market map data for analysis, filtering, and visualization. Provides a machine-readable alternative to markdown for users who need tabular data structures, enabling programmatic access without parsing markdown syntax.
Intentionally implements a bimonthly manual refresh cadence rather than full automation, accepting latency in exchange for human quality control and the ability to add editorial context or corrections. This hybrid approach (automated RSS + manual CSV) reflects a deliberate trade-off between freshness and data quality.
More accessible than markdown-only format for non-technical users and data analysis workflows; less fresh than RSS feed but more structured than raw markdown, serving different user personas with different update frequency requirements.
multi-format content distribution with tiered freshness strategy
Medium confidenceDistributes aggregated market map data across three output formats (Markdown README, RSS feed, CSV export) with intentionally different update cadences: README.md updates on manual edits (immediate), RSS regenerates on every push (near-real-time), and CSV refreshes bimonthly (batch). This tiered freshness strategy allows different consumer personas to choose their preferred trade-off between recency and stability. The architecture maintains unidirectional data flow from README.md as single source of truth, preventing synchronization conflicts while enabling each format to optimize for its use case (human browsing, feed subscription, data analysis).
Deliberately implements a tiered freshness strategy with different update cadences per format (immediate → near-real-time → bimonthly) rather than attempting to keep all formats synchronized. This reflects a design philosophy that different consumer personas have different freshness requirements, and attempting to optimize for all simultaneously creates complexity and brittleness.
More flexible than single-format distribution (e.g., RSS-only or CSV-only); avoids the synchronization complexity of multi-source systems by maintaining strict unidirectional flow from README.md, reducing the operational burden compared to systems that try to keep multiple sources in sync.
ai domain taxonomy and hierarchical categorization
Medium confidenceImplements a fixed taxonomy of AI domain categories (agents, RAG, code generation, image generation, etc.) used to classify and organize market maps within the README.md structure. Market maps are grouped by both temporal dimension (quarters/months) and thematic dimension (AI domain), enabling discovery along either axis. The taxonomy is curated by the repository maintainer and applied consistently across all 400+ market maps, allowing users to filter by domain (e.g., 'show me all agent-related market maps') or track how investor attention shifts within specific domains over time.
Uses a curator-maintained flat taxonomy rather than automated semantic classification or community-driven tagging, accepting reduced flexibility in exchange for consistent, high-quality categorization. The taxonomy is embedded directly in README.md structure (as section headers) rather than stored in separate metadata, making it human-readable and editable without tooling.
More consistent and curated than user-generated tags or automated classification; simpler to maintain than hierarchical taxonomies but less flexible for maps spanning multiple domains. Reflects curator's domain expertise rather than algorithmic categorization, potentially higher quality but less scalable.
temporal market map organization with quarterly and monthly granularity
Medium confidenceOrganizes market maps along a temporal dimension using hierarchical markdown headers: level-2 headers for quarters (e.g., '## AI Market Maps - Q1 2026') and level-3 headers for months (e.g., '### January 2026'). This structure enables users to browse market maps by publication date, track how market maps evolve within specific time periods, and identify temporal trends (e.g., 'which domains had the most maps in Q4 2025?'). The temporal hierarchy is deterministically parseable by automation scripts, allowing RSS generation and CSV export to preserve publication dates and enable time-based filtering.
Implements temporal organization as markdown header hierarchy rather than metadata fields, making it human-browsable while remaining deterministically parseable. The quarterly granularity reflects a business-natural time unit (VC funding cycles, earnings reports) rather than arbitrary calendar divisions.
More discoverable than flat date-sorted lists because quarters group related market maps; simpler than full time-series databases but sufficient for the use case of tracking market evolution. Markdown-native structure avoids external dependencies while remaining queryable by automation scripts.
human-in-the-loop curation with quality filtering
Medium confidenceApplies manual curation to maintain Awesome List standards, where the repository maintainer (Joy Larkin) reviews candidate market maps for inclusion based on subjective 'taste' criteria. The curation process filters out low-quality, duplicative, or off-topic maps before adding them to README.md, ensuring the collection remains focused and high-signal. Curation decisions are made asynchronously via GitHub issues, pull requests, and direct contributions, with the maintainer as final arbiter of inclusion. This human-in-the-loop approach trades scalability for quality, keeping the collection curated rather than exhaustive.
Implements curation as a human-in-the-loop process with explicit maintainer authority rather than algorithmic filtering or community voting, reflecting the Awesome List philosophy that curation requires taste and judgment. The asynchronous GitHub-based workflow allows distributed contributions while maintaining centralized quality control.
Higher quality and more focused than exhaustive, uncurated databases; slower to update than fully automated systems but maintains editorial standards that build user trust. Differs from algorithmic recommendation systems by relying on human judgment rather than statistical models.
contribution workflow and community submission pipeline
Medium confidenceEnables community contributions via GitHub pull requests and issues, allowing users to propose new market maps for inclusion in the collection. Contributors submit market map URLs with metadata (title, source, date, category) following documented guidelines, which are then reviewed by the maintainer for quality and relevance. The workflow is asynchronous and GitHub-native, requiring no external tools or registration beyond a GitHub account. Accepted contributions are merged into README.md, while rejected submissions receive optional feedback. This distributed contribution model allows the repository to scale beyond the maintainer's personal discovery while maintaining quality control.
Uses GitHub's native pull request and issue workflows as the contribution interface rather than building a custom submission form or database, leveraging existing GitHub infrastructure and user familiarity. This approach requires no additional tooling or authentication beyond GitHub, lowering the barrier to contribution.
More accessible than custom submission forms because it uses familiar GitHub workflows; more transparent than email-based submissions because all discussions are public and auditable. Scales better than direct maintainer outreach while maintaining quality control through review process.
market map metadata extraction and normalization
Medium confidenceExtracts and normalizes metadata from market map entries in README.md, including title, source organization, publication date, AI domain category, and direct URL link. The extraction process is deterministic, parsing markdown link syntax and hierarchical headers to identify metadata fields. Normalization includes date standardization (converting various date formats to YYYY-MM-DD), source name deduplication (e.g., 'a16z' vs 'Andreessen Horowitz'), and URL validation. This normalized metadata feeds downstream systems (RSS generation, CSV export, external platform integrations), enabling consistent data representation across all output formats.
Implements extraction and normalization as part of the RSS generation pipeline (generate_rss.py) rather than as a separate data processing step, keeping the logic co-located with its primary consumer. Uses markdown structure (headers, links) as the source of truth for metadata rather than separate metadata fields.
Simpler than building a separate metadata extraction service because it leverages markdown's native structure; more maintainable than regex-based parsing because it uses proper markdown parsing libraries. Avoids the complexity of maintaining separate metadata stores by deriving metadata from the primary README.md source.
git history integration for publication date inference
Medium confidenceIntegrates Git commit history to infer or validate publication dates for market maps when explicit dates are unavailable or uncertain. The system can query Git metadata (commit timestamps, author information) to determine when a market map entry was added to the repository, providing a fallback date source. This capability enables temporal analysis even when source market maps lack explicit publication dates, and allows the system to track when maps were discovered/added relative to their actual publication. Git history integration is used by the RSS generation pipeline to populate pubDate fields and by temporal analysis tools to understand discovery lag.
Leverages Git commit history as a secondary source of truth for temporal metadata, avoiding the need for explicit date fields in markdown while maintaining temporal traceability. This approach is unique to Git-based repositories and would not be possible in non-version-controlled systems.
More robust than relying solely on curator-provided dates because it has an independent audit trail; enables discovery lag analysis that would be impossible without Git history. Differs from systems that require explicit date fields by inferring dates from existing Git metadata.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with Awesome AI Market Maps, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
TrendRadar
⭐AI-driven public opinion & trend monitor with multi-platform aggregation, RSS, and smart alerts.🎯 告别信息过载,你的 AI 舆情监控助手与热点筛选工具!聚合多平台热点 + RSS 订阅,支持关键词精准筛选。AI 智能筛选新闻 + AI 翻译 + AI 分析简报直推手机,也支持接入 MCP 架构,赋能 AI 自然语言对话分析、情感洞察与趋势预测等。支持 Docker ,数据本地/云端自持。集成微信/飞书/钉钉/Telegram/邮件/ntfy/bark/slack 等渠道智能推送。
Autoblogging.ai
Streamline blogging: auto-generate SEO-optimized, multilingual...
TrendRadar
⭐AI-driven public opinion & trend monitor with multi-platform aggregation, RSS, and smart alerts.🎯 告别信息过载,你的 AI 舆情监控助手与热点筛选工具!聚合多平台热点 + RSS 订阅,支持关键词精准筛选。AI 智能筛选新闻 + AI 翻译 + AI 分析简报直推手机,也支持接入 MCP 架构,赋能 AI 自然语言对话分析、情感洞察与趋势预测等。支持 Docker ,数据本地/云端自持。集成微信/飞书/钉钉/Telegram/邮件/ntfy/bark/slack 等渠道智能推送。
Stocknews AI
AI-curated real-time stock news from 100+...
Writesparkle.ai
Streamline your content creation process by seamlessly integrating Writesparkle with your favorite tools and...
Uptrends.ai
The first AI stock market news monitoring platform made for DIY investors. Uptrends.ai analyzes chatter to help you find the trends & events that...
Best For
- ✓AI investors and VCs evaluating market positioning and competitive landscapes
- ✓AI founders researching market saturation and emerging subcategories
- ✓Researchers analyzing AI industry trends and VC thesis evolution
- ✓Product managers tracking competitor market maps and positioning
- ✓Researchers and investors who use RSS readers as primary information intake
- ✓Automation enthusiasts building custom workflows on top of market map data
- ✓Teams integrating market intelligence into internal dashboards or Slack bots
- ✓Content aggregators republishing curated market maps to broader audiences
Known Limitations
- ⚠Manual curation process creates latency between map publication and inclusion (typically 1-7 days)
- ⚠No automated deduplication of maps published by multiple sources — requires manual review
- ⚠Taxonomy is fixed at collection time; retroactive category changes require README.md edits
- ⚠No semantic analysis of map content — only metadata (title, source, date, URL) is indexed
- ⚠RSS generation is fully automated but only triggers on GitHub pushes — manual README.md edits required
- ⚠Text sanitization for XML may strip formatting (bold, italics) from original markdown
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
About
A curated list of AI market maps from 2026, 2025, and 2024, by [Joy Larkin](https://twitter.com/joy).
Categories
Alternatives to Awesome AI Market Maps
Are you the builder of Awesome AI Market Maps?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →