Lakera Guard
APIFreeReal-time prompt injection and LLM threat detection API.
Capabilities11 decomposed
real-time prompt injection detection with context-aware analysis
Medium confidenceAnalyzes user prompts and LLM inputs in real-time using a context-aware detection engine trained on the world's largest prompt injection dataset. Operates at sub-50ms latency by processing prompts through a specialized neural classifier that understands syntactic attack patterns (e.g., instruction overrides, delimiter escapes, role-play jailbreaks) while maintaining semantic context from the surrounding conversation. Returns binary classification (safe/unsafe) with confidence scores and attack type categorization.
Uses context-aware detection that analyzes prompts relative to surrounding conversation and system instructions, rather than pattern-matching in isolation. Trained on proprietary dataset claimed to be the world's largest for prompt injection attacks, enabling detection of sophisticated multi-turn jailbreaks and instruction override techniques that simpler regex or keyword-based systems miss.
Achieves 3-4 orders of magnitude risk reduction vs. rule-based filters by understanding semantic intent and attack context, not just syntactic patterns, while maintaining sub-50ms latency suitable for real-time production inference.
jailbreak attempt classification and prevention
Medium confidenceDetects and classifies jailbreak attempts—prompts designed to override system instructions, bypass safety guidelines, or manipulate LLM behavior through role-play, hypothetical scenarios, or authority manipulation. Uses a specialized classifier trained on jailbreak patterns (e.g., 'pretend you are an unrestricted AI', 'ignore previous instructions', 'act as DAN') and returns attack type labels (role-play jailbreak, instruction override, authority manipulation, etc.) with confidence scores. Integrates into request pipeline to block or flag suspicious inputs before LLM processing.
Provides granular attack type classification (role-play jailbreak, instruction override, authority manipulation, etc.) rather than binary safe/unsafe verdict. Trained specifically on jailbreak patterns and multi-turn manipulation techniques, enabling detection of sophisticated attacks that exploit conversational context and social engineering.
Outperforms generic content filters by understanding jailbreak semantics and intent, not just keyword matching, and provides attack type labels for security teams to understand threat landscape and improve system prompts accordingly.
threat detection with conversation context awareness
Medium confidenceAnalyzes threats relative to surrounding conversation context, system instructions, and user role rather than in isolation. Understands that the same prompt may be benign in one context (e.g., discussing security vulnerabilities in a security training chat) but malicious in another (e.g., attempting to override system instructions in a customer service bot). Uses conversation history, system prompts, and user metadata to reduce false positives and improve detection accuracy. Enables context-aware jailbreak detection that understands multi-turn manipulation and instruction override attempts.
Analyzes threats relative to conversation context, system instructions, and user role rather than in isolation. Enables context-aware detection of sophisticated multi-turn jailbreaks and instruction override attempts that simpler pattern-matching systems miss.
Reduces false positives by understanding context (e.g., legitimate security discussions vs. actual attacks) and detects sophisticated multi-turn jailbreaks that isolated prompt analysis cannot identify.
personally identifiable information (pii) leakage detection and prevention
Medium confidenceScans user prompts and LLM outputs for exposure of sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) such as email addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other regulated data. Uses pattern matching combined with context-aware classification to distinguish between legitimate references (e.g., 'email me at...') and accidental leakage. Operates in real-time with sub-50ms latency and supports 100+ languages for multilingual PII detection (e.g., Portuguese and Spanish banking data formats).
Combines pattern-based detection (regex for structured PII like SSN, credit card) with context-aware classification to reduce false positives from legitimate PII references. Supports 100+ languages with language-specific pattern matching for regional data formats (e.g., Portuguese/Spanish banking identifiers), enabling compliance across global applications.
Achieves lower false positive rate than simple regex-based PII detection by understanding context (e.g., distinguishing 'contact us at support@company.com' from accidental data leakage), while supporting multilingual PII detection that generic tools lack.
toxic content and harmful language detection
Medium confidenceDetects and classifies toxic, abusive, hateful, or otherwise harmful language in user prompts and LLM outputs using a trained classifier. Analyzes text for profanity, hate speech, threats, harassment, and other harmful content categories. Operates in real-time with sub-50ms latency and supports 100+ languages. Returns binary classification (toxic/non-toxic) with content category labels and confidence scores, enabling applications to block, flag, or quarantine harmful inputs before LLM processing.
Provides granular content category classification (profanity, hate speech, threats, harassment) rather than binary toxic/non-toxic verdict. Supports 100+ languages with language-specific toxic content patterns, enabling moderation across global applications with culturally-aware detection.
Outperforms generic profanity filters by understanding context and intent, not just keyword matching, and provides category labels for moderation workflows. Multilingual support enables consistent content moderation across diverse user bases and languages.
model-agnostic threat detection with unified api
Medium confidenceProvides a single, unified API endpoint for detecting multiple threat types (prompt injection, jailbreaks, PII leakage, toxic content) across any LLM application, regardless of which underlying LLM model is used (OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source models, etc.). Operates as a middleware layer that intercepts requests before LLM inference and responses after generation, enabling consistent security posture across heterogeneous model deployments. Abstracts threat detection logic from model-specific implementations, allowing teams to swap LLM providers without reconfiguring security rules.
Provides a single, model-agnostic API that detects threats across any LLM provider or model, abstracting threat detection from model-specific implementations. Enables teams to swap LLM providers (OpenAI to Anthropic, proprietary to open-source) without reconfiguring security rules or threat detection logic.
Decouples security from model choice, enabling flexible LLM provider selection and migration without security rework. Simpler than building model-specific threat detection for each provider or maintaining separate security pipelines per model.
sub-50ms latency threat detection for real-time inference
Medium confidenceExecutes threat detection (prompt injection, jailbreaks, PII, toxic content) with sub-50ms latency, enabling integration into real-time LLM inference pipelines without significant performance degradation. Achieves low latency through optimized neural classifiers, efficient tokenization, and cloud-native deployment with geographic distribution. Designed for production deployments handling hundreds of prompts per second with minimal added latency to user-facing LLM applications.
Optimizes threat detection for real-time inference pipelines through specialized neural classifiers and cloud-native deployment, achieving sub-50ms latency suitable for production LLM applications. Designed to scale from zero to hundreds of prompts per second without significant latency degradation.
Faster than local threat detection models (which require model loading and inference) and more responsive than batch processing, enabling real-time threat detection in user-facing LLM applications without noticeable latency impact.
scalable threat detection with elastic capacity management
Medium confidenceAutomatically scales threat detection capacity from zero to hundreds of prompts per second using cloud-native infrastructure and elastic resource allocation. Handles traffic spikes and variable load without manual scaling configuration or capacity planning. Designed for production deployments where threat detection must keep pace with LLM inference throughput without becoming a bottleneck. Manages concurrent requests, queuing, and resource allocation transparently to the client.
Provides automatic elastic scaling from zero to hundreds of prompts per second without manual capacity planning or infrastructure management. Cloud-native architecture abstracts scaling complexity from the client, enabling threat detection to scale transparently with LLM traffic.
Eliminates capacity planning overhead compared to self-hosted threat detection models, and avoids bottlenecks that occur when threat detection throughput lags behind LLM inference capacity.
multilingual threat detection across 100+ languages
Medium confidenceDetects prompt injection, jailbreaks, PII leakage, and toxic content across 100+ languages with language-specific pattern matching and context-aware classification. Supports regional data formats and cultural context (e.g., Portuguese and Spanish banking identifiers, multilingual PII patterns). Automatically detects input language or accepts explicit language specification. Enables consistent threat detection in global applications serving diverse linguistic user bases.
Provides language-specific threat detection across 100+ languages with support for regional data formats and cultural context. Enables consistent security posture in global applications without requiring separate threat detection pipelines per language or region.
Outperforms English-only threat detection systems in multilingual applications, and supports regional PII formats that generic tools miss (e.g., Portuguese banking identifiers, Spanish tax IDs).
production false positive rate optimization (0.01% claimed)
Medium confidenceOptimizes threat detection to achieve a claimed 0.01% production false positive rate through context-aware classification and confidence scoring. Reduces unnecessary blocking of legitimate user inputs while maintaining high true positive detection rate. Enables production deployments where false positives directly impact user experience and application usability. Provides confidence scores and severity levels to allow applications to implement tiered responses (block, flag, warn) rather than binary accept/reject.
Achieves claimed 0.01% production false positive rate through context-aware classification that understands legitimate use cases and provides confidence scores for tiered threat responses. Enables production deployments where false positives directly impact user experience.
Lower false positive rate than rule-based filters or simple pattern matching, enabling more aggressive threat detection without over-blocking legitimate content. Confidence scores enable tiered responses (block/flag/warn) rather than binary accept/reject.
threat severity scoring and risk quantification
Medium confidenceAssigns severity levels and risk scores to detected threats, enabling applications to implement tiered responses and prioritize security actions. Quantifies threat risk on a continuous scale (e.g., 0-1 confidence, low/medium/high severity) rather than binary safe/unsafe classification. Allows applications to block high-severity threats, flag medium-severity for review, and allow low-severity with warnings. Supports risk-based decision making in security workflows and incident response.
Provides continuous severity and confidence scores enabling tiered threat responses (block/flag/warn) rather than binary safe/unsafe classification. Allows applications to implement risk-based decision making and prioritize security actions based on threat severity.
More nuanced than binary threat detection, enabling applications to balance security and user experience by allowing low-risk threats while blocking high-confidence attacks.
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with Lakera Guard, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
Llama Guard 3
Meta's safety classifier for LLM content moderation.
Aim Security
Secure, manage, and comply GenAI enterprise applications...
llm-guard
A TypeScript library for validating and securing LLM prompts
Prompt Security
Safeguard GenAI applications with real-time, tailored security...
OpenAI: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is a safety reasoning model from OpenAI built upon gpt-oss-20b. This open-weight, 21B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model offers lower latency for safety tasks like content classification, LLM filtering, and trust...
Lakera
AI's ultimate shield: real-time threat detection, privacy,...
Best For
- ✓Teams deploying LLM applications in production with user-facing chat interfaces
- ✓Enterprise AI platforms handling sensitive workflows where prompt injection poses compliance risk
- ✓Developers building multi-turn conversational agents with strict instruction boundaries
- ✓Teams deploying public-facing LLM chatbots vulnerable to adversarial users
- ✓Enterprise applications where instruction override poses operational or compliance risk
- ✓Security teams needing attack classification for threat intelligence and red-teaming
- ✓Multi-turn conversational AI applications with complex context
- ✓Security training or red-teaming applications discussing attack techniques
Known Limitations
- ⚠Sub-50ms latency claim is inconsistent with 'sub-millisecond' marketing language; actual p95/p99 percentiles unknown
- ⚠No documented maximum prompt size; claims to handle 'very large prompts' but no concrete limits specified
- ⚠False positive rate of 0.01% is claimed without methodology documentation or recall/precision tradeoff transparency
- ⚠Detection accuracy may degrade on novel attack patterns not represented in training dataset composition (which is undocumented)
- ⚠Jailbreak detection relies on training data composition (undocumented); novel attack patterns may evade detection
- ⚠No documented support for multi-modal jailbreaks (e.g., image-based prompt injection)
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
About
Real-time API that detects and prevents prompt injection, jailbreaks, toxic content, and PII leakage in LLM applications. Trained on the world's largest prompt injection dataset with sub-millisecond latency for production deployment.
Categories
Alternatives to Lakera Guard
Local knowledge graph for Claude Code. Builds a persistent map of your codebase so Claude reads only what matters — 6.8× fewer tokens on reviews and up to 49× on daily coding tasks.
Compare →The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Compare →Are you the builder of Lakera Guard?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →