Llama Guard 3 8B
ModelPaidLlama Guard 3 is a Llama-3.1-8B pretrained model, fine-tuned for content safety classification. Similar to previous versions, it can be used to classify content in both LLM inputs (prompt classification)...
Capabilities8 decomposed
multi-category prompt safety classification
Medium confidenceClassifies incoming user prompts against a taxonomy of 6 content safety categories (violence, illegal activity, self-harm, sexual content, harassment, and specialized harms) using a fine-tuned Llama 3.1 8B backbone. The model outputs structured safety labels with confidence scores, enabling real-time filtering of unsafe requests before they reach downstream LLMs. Uses instruction-following patterns from Llama 3.1 training combined with safety-specific fine-tuning to distinguish between discussing harmful topics (safe) and requesting harmful actions (unsafe).
Purpose-built safety classifier based on Llama 3.1 8B (not a general-purpose LLM repurposed for safety) with fine-tuning specifically on safety classification tasks, enabling better calibration of confidence scores and category-specific accuracy compared to using general LLMs with safety prompts
Smaller and faster than OpenAI Moderation API (8B vs 175B+) while maintaining comparable accuracy on standard safety categories, and can run locally without API latency or cost-per-request fees
response-level content safety classification
Medium confidenceClassifies LLM-generated outputs (responses, completions, assistant messages) against the same 6-category safety taxonomy to detect when downstream models produce unsafe content. Operates on the same fine-tuned Llama 3.1 8B architecture but is applied post-generation to catch safety failures in model outputs. Enables real-time detection of jailbreak successes, hallucinated harmful instructions, or unintended unsafe content generation.
Designed specifically for post-generation classification with fine-tuning that handles longer, more complex outputs compared to prompt-only classifiers, and includes patterns for detecting subtle unsafe content in natural language responses rather than just explicit requests
Provides symmetric safety coverage (both input and output) using a single model architecture, reducing operational complexity compared to running separate prompt and response classifiers from different vendors
structured safety category scoring with confidence metrics
Medium confidenceReturns safety classifications as structured JSON with per-category confidence scores (typically 0.0-1.0 range) rather than binary pass/fail verdicts, enabling fine-grained safety policy decisions. The model outputs logits or probability distributions across the 6 safety categories, allowing applications to set custom thresholds per category (e.g., stricter on violence, more lenient on political content). Implements a multi-label classification approach where content can be flagged in multiple categories simultaneously.
Exposes per-category confidence scores from the fine-tuned Llama 3.1 8B model rather than aggregating to a single safety verdict, enabling category-specific policy enforcement and detailed safety telemetry that most general-purpose safety APIs abstract away
Provides more granular control than binary safety APIs (OpenAI Moderation) while remaining simpler than building custom classifiers, allowing teams to implement domain-specific safety policies without retraining models
specialized harm category detection
Medium confidenceClassifies content against specialized harm categories beyond standard content policy violations, including CSAM-related content, illegal activities, self-harm, and harassment. The fine-tuning incorporates patterns for detecting nuanced harms (e.g., grooming language, suicide encouragement) that may not be caught by keyword-based or simple pattern-matching approaches. Uses instruction-following capabilities of Llama 3.1 to understand context and intent rather than relying on surface-level text matching.
Fine-tuned specifically on specialized harm patterns (CSAM, illegal activity, self-harm, harassment) rather than general content policy violations, enabling detection of context-dependent and sophisticated harms that require semantic understanding rather than keyword matching
Detects nuanced specialized harms using semantic understanding (context, intent, metaphor) compared to keyword-based or regex-based systems, while remaining faster and cheaper than human review or multi-model ensemble approaches
batch safety classification with api integration
Medium confidenceSupports batch processing of multiple prompts or responses through OpenRouter's API, enabling efficient classification of large volumes of content without per-request overhead. Integrates with OpenRouter's batch API infrastructure to queue, process, and retrieve safety classifications asynchronously, reducing per-request latency and cost for high-volume moderation pipelines. Handles rate limiting, retries, and result aggregation transparently.
Integrates with OpenRouter's batch API infrastructure to provide asynchronous, cost-optimized safety classification without requiring local model deployment or managing inference infrastructure, while maintaining the same safety accuracy as synchronous API calls
Reduces per-request cost and API overhead compared to synchronous classification for high-volume use cases, while remaining simpler than self-hosting the model or building custom batch processing infrastructure
multi-language safety classification with english-primary accuracy
Medium confidenceClassifies safety across multiple languages using the same fine-tuned Llama 3.1 8B model, leveraging the base model's multilingual capabilities. However, safety fine-tuning is primarily optimized for English, with varying accuracy across other languages depending on training data representation. The model uses cross-lingual transfer learning to extend English safety patterns to other languages, but performance degrades gracefully for low-resource languages or non-Latin scripts.
Leverages Llama 3.1's multilingual base model to extend English-optimized safety fine-tuning across 8+ languages through cross-lingual transfer, enabling single-model deployment for global moderation without language-specific retraining
Simpler operational model than deploying separate language-specific safety classifiers, though with accuracy tradeoffs for non-English languages compared to language-specific fine-tuned models
integration with llm application frameworks and safety middleware
Medium confidenceIntegrates with LLM frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex, Anthropic SDK, OpenAI SDK) and safety middleware systems through standardized API interfaces. Can be deployed as a prompt guard (pre-LLM) or response filter (post-LLM) in application chains, with built-in support for async/await patterns, error handling, and fallback logic. Supports integration with observability platforms for logging, monitoring, and alerting on safety violations.
Designed for integration into LLM application frameworks through standard API patterns (async/await, callbacks, middleware hooks) rather than as a standalone service, enabling seamless safety classification within existing application architectures
Integrates more naturally into LLM application frameworks compared to external safety APIs that require custom orchestration, reducing boilerplate code and enabling framework-native error handling and observability
safety classification with custom policy enforcement and rule composition
Medium confidenceProvides safety classifications that can be composed with custom policy rules and business logic to implement application-specific safety policies. The model outputs structured category scores that applications can combine with custom rules (e.g., 'block if violence_score > 0.7 AND user_is_minor', 'warn if harassment_score > 0.5 AND user_is_verified'). Enables policy-as-code approaches where safety decisions are driven by composable rules rather than hard-coded thresholds.
Outputs structured category scores designed for composition with custom policy rules and business logic, enabling application-specific safety policies without model retraining or hard-coded thresholds
More flexible than fixed-policy safety APIs (OpenAI Moderation) while remaining simpler than building custom classifiers, enabling teams to implement domain-specific and user-segment-specific safety policies through rule composition
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with Llama Guard 3 8B, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
OpenAI: gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is a safety reasoning model from OpenAI built upon gpt-oss-20b. This open-weight, 21B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model offers lower latency for safety tasks like content classification, LLM filtering, and trust...
Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Llama Guard 4 is a Llama 4 Scout-derived multimodal pretrained model, fine-tuned for content safety classification. Similar to previous versions, it can be used to classify content in both LLM...
SafetyBench Eval
11K safety evaluation questions across 7 categories.
ShieldGemma
Google's safety content classifiers built on Gemma.
SafetyBench
11K safety evaluation questions across 7 categories.
Reka API
Multimodal-first API — vision, audio, video understanding across Core/Flash/Edge models.
Best For
- ✓LLM application builders implementing safety guardrails
- ✓teams deploying multi-tenant LLM services requiring input validation
- ✓developers building content moderation pipelines with safety-first architecture
- ✓LLM application builders implementing output filtering
- ✓teams running safety audits and red-teaming campaigns
- ✓developers building production LLM services with safety SLAs
- ✓teams implementing nuanced safety policies with category-specific thresholds
- ✓developers building safety dashboards and monitoring systems
Known Limitations
- ⚠Classification is binary per category (safe/unsafe) without nuanced severity gradients
- ⚠May have false positives on legitimate discussions of sensitive topics (e.g., educational content about violence)
- ⚠8B model size requires ~16GB VRAM for local deployment; smaller quantized versions may degrade accuracy
- ⚠Trained on English-centric safety data; performance on non-English prompts is undocumented
- ⚠Does not classify outputs/responses — only input prompts; requires separate model for response safety
- ⚠Response classification may be less accurate than prompt classification due to longer, more varied output formats
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
Model Details
About
Llama Guard 3 is a Llama-3.1-8B pretrained model, fine-tuned for content safety classification. Similar to previous versions, it can be used to classify content in both LLM inputs (prompt classification)...
Categories
Alternatives to Llama Guard 3 8B
Are you the builder of Llama Guard 3 8B?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →