What can MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18 do?

large-scale multimodal document-image dataset curation and indexing, streaming dataset access with lazy loading and memory-efficient batching, document-image pair extraction and alignment from pdf sources, common crawl-sourced dataset with quality filtering and language detection, multimodal dataset sampling and stratification for balanced model training, metadata-rich document records with source attribution and quality scores

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

DatasetFree

Dataset by mlfoundations. 10,34,415 downloads.

Open Source

/ 100

6 capabilities

Capabilities6 decomposed

large-scale multimodal document-image dataset curation and indexing

Medium confidence

Provides a 1 trillion token-scale dataset of PDF documents paired with extracted images and text, curated from Common Crawl with deduplication and quality filtering applied at scale. The dataset uses HuggingFace's distributed dataset infrastructure to enable efficient streaming and sampling of 1M+ document-image pairs without requiring full local storage, with metadata indexing for retrieval by document type, language, and content characteristics.

Solves for

Train vision-language models on real-world document understanding tasks at scaleBuild datasets for PDF-to-text and image-to-text extraction modelsEvaluate multimodal model performance on document comprehension benchmarksCreate domain-specific training corpora by filtering and sampling from the full dataset

Best for

ML researchers training large vision-language models (LLaVA, GPT-4V competitors)

Teams building document processing pipelines requiring diverse training data

Organizations developing OCR and document understanding systems

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets library (>=2.14.0) for streaming access

Minimum 50GB free disk space for partial caching; 10TB+ for full local mirror

Python 3.8+ with PyTorch or TensorFlow for model training integration

Limitations

1T tokens requires significant computational resources for full training — most practitioners sample subsets

PDF extraction quality varies by document structure; scanned/image-heavy PDFs may have degraded text extraction

Dataset is English-dominant; limited multilingual coverage despite CC-BY-4.0 license allowing derivative works

What makes it unique

Combines PDF-level document structure preservation with extracted image-text pairs at 1T token scale, using Common Crawl's distributed crawl infrastructure and HuggingFace's streaming dataset format to avoid centralized storage bottlenecks — most competitors (e.g., LAION) focus on web images or require full downloads

vs alternatives

Larger and more document-focused than LAION-5B or Conceptual Captions, with native PDF structure metadata enabling document-aware training; more accessible than proprietary datasets like Google's internal document corpora due to CC-BY-4.0 licensing and HuggingFace Hub distribution

streaming dataset access with lazy loading and memory-efficient batching

Medium confidence

Implements HuggingFace Datasets' streaming protocol to load document-image pairs on-demand without downloading the full 1T token dataset, using memory-mapped Arrow format and distributed sharding across multiple processes. Batching is handled through configurable DataLoader wrappers that respect image tensor dimensions and text sequence lengths, enabling training on machines with limited VRAM through dynamic batch size adjustment.

Solves for

Train models on large datasets without requiring multi-terabyte local storageParallelize data loading across multiple GPUs/TPUs with automatic shard distributionPrototype and iterate on model architectures without waiting for full dataset downloadsMonitor data quality and distribution during training with streaming statistics

Best for

Researchers with GPU clusters but limited NVMe storage

Teams using cloud training (AWS SageMaker, GCP Vertex AI) with per-instance bandwidth constraints

Iterative model development requiring rapid experimentation cycles

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets >=2.14.0 with streaming support

PyTorch DataLoader or TensorFlow tf.data for batching integration

Network connectivity to HuggingFace Hub (CDN-cached, but requires ~100 Mbps sustained)

Limitations

Streaming introduces ~50-200ms latency per batch due to network I/O and decompression — not suitable for real-time inference

Deterministic shuffling requires maintaining epoch-level state; distributed training needs careful synchronization to avoid duplicate batches

Image tensor shapes vary (PDFs have different page dimensions); requires padding or resizing, adding preprocessing overhead

What makes it unique

Uses HuggingFace's Arrow-based streaming format with automatic shard distribution and epoch-level determinism, enabling true lazy loading without requiring dataset mirroring — most competitors (Petastorm, TFRecord) require pre-sharding or local caching

vs alternatives

More memory-efficient than downloading full datasets and faster to iterate than manual data pipelines; integrates natively with PyTorch/TensorFlow without custom serialization code

document-image pair extraction and alignment from pdf sources

Medium confidence

Extracts text and images from PDF documents using OCR and layout analysis, then aligns extracted text with corresponding page images through spatial coordinate matching and text-region association. The extraction pipeline handles multi-page PDFs, preserves document structure metadata (headers, footers, sections), and deduplicates near-identical documents using perceptual hashing and text similarity metrics to ensure dataset quality.

Solves for

Create training pairs for vision-language models that understand document layout and contentBuild datasets for document classification, information extraction, and table understanding tasksEvaluate OCR and document understanding models on real-world PDF diversityPreserve document structure information for downstream layout-aware model training

Best for

Teams building document understanding systems (invoice processing, form extraction, contract analysis)

Researchers developing layout-aware vision-language models

Organizations needing high-quality document-image pairs with minimal manual annotation

Requires

PDF parsing library (PyPDF2, pdfplumber, or similar) for text extraction

OCR engine (Tesseract, EasyOCR, or cloud-based) for image-based text recognition

Image processing library (Pillow, OpenCV) for page rendering and coordinate transformation

Limitations

OCR quality degrades on scanned documents with poor image quality, handwriting, or non-Latin scripts — affects ~15-20% of Common Crawl PDFs

Text-image alignment assumes regular document layouts; complex multi-column layouts or overlapping text regions may have misalignment errors

Deduplication uses heuristic similarity thresholds; near-duplicate documents with minor variations may not be fully deduplicated

What makes it unique

Combines PDF text extraction with rendered page images and spatial alignment metadata at scale, using perceptual hashing for deduplication — most document datasets (DocVQA, RVL-CDIP) are manually curated or use simpler extraction without alignment preservation

vs alternatives

Preserves document structure and layout information unlike text-only datasets; larger and more diverse than manually-curated document benchmarks; automated extraction enables continuous updates from Common Crawl

common crawl-sourced dataset with quality filtering and language detection

Medium confidence

Ingests documents from Common Crawl's WARC archives, applies language detection (likely using fastText or similar) to filter for English content, and runs quality heuristics (text-to-image ratio, document length, spam detection) to remove low-quality or malicious PDFs. The filtering pipeline is applied during dataset construction, reducing the raw crawl from billions of documents to 1M+ high-quality document-image pairs with reproducible filtering criteria.

Solves for

Access large-scale, diverse real-world document data without manual curationTrain models on naturally-occurring document distributions rather than synthetic or curated datasetsUnderstand document diversity and quality characteristics across the public webBuild reproducible datasets with transparent filtering criteria for research transparency

Best for

Researchers requiring large-scale, diverse training data with public provenance

Teams building production document systems that need to handle real-world document variety

Organizations prioritizing dataset transparency and reproducibility

Requires

Understanding of Common Crawl WARC format and S3 access (if processing raw crawl data)

Language detection library (fastText, langdetect) for filtering

Spam/quality detection heuristics (text entropy, domain reputation, etc.)

Limitations

Common Crawl has inherent biases toward English-language, Western-hosted content — non-English and non-Latin script documents are underrepresented

Quality filtering is heuristic-based and may remove valid documents (e.g., minimalist designs with low text-to-image ratio) or retain low-quality ones

Copyright and licensing compliance is user responsibility — CC-BY-4.0 license covers the dataset metadata, but source PDFs may have different licenses

What makes it unique

Applies reproducible quality filtering to Common Crawl at scale, with transparent filtering criteria and public provenance — most proprietary datasets (Google, OpenAI) do not disclose filtering methods; most academic datasets are manually curated at smaller scale

vs alternatives

Larger and more diverse than manually-curated datasets; more transparent and reproducible than proprietary web-scale datasets; enables research on real-world document distributions

multimodal dataset sampling and stratification for balanced model training

Medium confidence

Provides mechanisms to sample subsets of the 1T token dataset with control over document type distribution, image-text ratio, and content characteristics. Sampling can be stratified by document category (academic papers, web pages, forms, etc.) or by content properties (text length, image density, language) to ensure training data reflects desired distributions rather than raw web frequencies, which are heavily skewed toward common document types.

Solves for

Create balanced training sets that represent diverse document types equallyEvaluate model performance on specific document categories without training on full datasetMitigate dataset bias toward common document types (web pages) by oversampling rare types (forms, tables)Experiment with different data distributions to understand their impact on model performance

Best for

Researchers studying how document diversity affects vision-language model performance

Teams building domain-specific document systems (e.g., financial document processing) requiring balanced training data

Practitioners with limited compute wanting to train on representative subsets

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets with custom sampler implementation or PyTorch DistributedSampler

Pre-computed stratification metadata (document type, content properties)

Random seed for reproducible sampling

Limitations

Stratification requires pre-computed metadata (document type, content properties) — metadata quality affects sampling quality

Sampling without replacement can exhaust rare categories if subset size is large relative to category frequency

No built-in mechanism to enforce stratification across distributed training — requires custom sampler implementation

What makes it unique

Enables stratified sampling across document types and content properties at scale, allowing researchers to control training data distribution — most large datasets provide raw access without built-in stratification mechanisms

vs alternatives

More flexible than fixed dataset splits; enables targeted evaluation on specific document categories; supports research on dataset bias and distribution effects

metadata-rich document records with source attribution and quality scores

Medium confidence

Each dataset record includes rich metadata beyond image and text: source URL, crawl date, document type classification, quality score, OCR confidence, text-image alignment score, and deduplication information. Metadata is structured as JSON and queryable, enabling filtering and analysis without loading full images/text, and providing traceability for reproducibility and copyright attribution.

Solves for

Filter dataset by quality, document type, or source characteristics without loading full recordsTrace document provenance for copyright compliance and citationAnalyze dataset composition and quality distributionReproduce dataset construction by querying filtering criteria

Best for

Researchers requiring dataset transparency and reproducibility

Teams managing copyright and licensing compliance

Practitioners analyzing dataset bias and quality characteristics

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets with metadata column support

JSON parsing for metadata extraction

Query language or filtering library (pandas, DuckDB) for metadata analysis

Limitations

Metadata is only as good as extraction quality — OCR confidence scores may be inaccurate for complex layouts

Document type classification is automated and may have errors — manual verification required for critical applications

Metadata schema may not capture all relevant properties — users may need custom metadata extraction

What makes it unique

Provides queryable metadata with quality scores and source attribution for every record, enabling transparent dataset analysis and reproducibility — most large datasets provide minimal metadata or require custom extraction

vs alternatives

More transparent than proprietary datasets; enables reproducible research and copyright compliance; supports dataset bias analysis and quality-aware training

Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

Artifacts that share capabilities with MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.

Dataset26

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-06

Dataset by mlfoundations. 5,39,406 downloads.

large-scale multimodal document-image-text dataset curation and indexingimage-text pair extraction with layout-aware alignmentstreaming dataset access with lazy loading and batching

3 shared capabilities

Dataset26

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-23

Dataset by mlfoundations. 6,33,111 downloads.

multimodal image-text pair extraction from pdf documents at scalepdf-native image-text alignment extraction with layout preservation

2 shared capabilities

Dataset26

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-14

Dataset by mlfoundations. 5,72,108 downloads.

large-scale multimodal document-image-text dataset loadingocr-aligned image-text pair extraction from pdfs

2 shared capabilities

Dataset26

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-40

Dataset by mlfoundations. 8,57,357 downloads.

multimodal document-to-text extraction at scalepaired image-text dataset construction for vision-language training

2 shared capabilities

Product21

Chat With PDF by Copilot.us

An AI app that enables dialogue with PDF documents, supporting interactions with multiple files simultaneously through language models.

batch pdf processing with parallel indexingmulti-document pdf ingestion and indexing

2 shared capabilities

Dataset26

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-50

Dataset by mlfoundations. 7,96,577 downloads.

multimodal pdf-to-text extraction at scale

1 shared capability

Best For

✓ML researchers training large vision-language models (LLaVA, GPT-4V competitors)
✓Teams building document processing pipelines requiring diverse training data
✓Organizations developing OCR and document understanding systems
✓Researchers with GPU clusters but limited NVMe storage
✓Teams using cloud training (AWS SageMaker, GCP Vertex AI) with per-instance bandwidth constraints
✓Iterative model development requiring rapid experimentation cycles
✓Teams building document understanding systems (invoice processing, form extraction, contract analysis)
✓Researchers developing layout-aware vision-language models

Known Limitations

⚠1T tokens requires significant computational resources for full training — most practitioners sample subsets
⚠PDF extraction quality varies by document structure; scanned/image-heavy PDFs may have degraded text extraction
⚠Dataset is English-dominant; limited multilingual coverage despite CC-BY-4.0 license allowing derivative works
⚠No built-in document type stratification — requires custom filtering to balance document categories
⚠Streaming introduces ~50-200ms latency per batch due to network I/O and decompression — not suitable for real-time inference
⚠Deterministic shuffling requires maintaining epoch-level state; distributed training needs careful synchronization to avoid duplicate batches

Requirements

HuggingFace Datasets library (>=2.14.0) for streaming accessMinimum 50GB free disk space for partial caching; 10TB+ for full local mirrorPython 3.8+ with PyTorch or TensorFlow for model training integrationNetwork bandwidth for streaming from HuggingFace Hub (~100-500 Mbps recommended)HuggingFace Datasets >=2.14.0 with streaming supportPyTorch DataLoader or TensorFlow tf.data for batching integrationNetwork connectivity to HuggingFace Hub (CDN-cached, but requires ~100 Mbps sustained)Python 3.8+ with numpy and PIL/Pillow for image preprocessing

Input / Output

Accepts: PDF documents (raw binary), Common Crawl WARC records (source format), Metadata queries (document type, language, content hash), Dataset configuration (split name, streaming=True flag), Batch size and number of workers, Image preprocessing parameters (resize, normalize), PDF files (binary format, any size up to 100MB+), Page images (rendered from PDFs at 150-300 DPI), Document metadata (URL, crawl date, source domain), Common Crawl WARC records (raw crawl data), PDF URLs and metadata from crawl index, Quality filtering parameters (min text length, max spam score, etc.), Sampling parameters: {subset_size, stratification_key, distribution_target}, Stratification metadata: {document_type, text_length, image_count, ...}, Random seed for reproducibility, Metadata query filters: {document_type, min_quality_score, source_domain, ...}, Metadata fields to retrieve

Produces: Structured dataset records (image tensors, text strings, metadata JSON), Arrow/Parquet format for efficient columnar storage, Streaming batches for PyTorch DataLoader or TensorFlow tf.data pipelines, PyTorch tensors (images: [B, C, H, W], text: [B, seq_len]), TensorFlow tf.data.Dataset objects, Raw dictionaries with 'image', 'text', 'metadata' keys, Structured records: {image: PIL.Image, text: str, metadata: {page_num, source_url, ...}}, Alignment metadata: {text_regions: [{bbox, text, confidence}], ...}, Deduplication hashes: {perceptual_hash, text_hash, similarity_score}, Filtered dataset records with quality scores and filtering rationale, Metadata: {source_url, crawl_date, language, quality_score, filtering_reason}, Statistics: {total_documents, filtered_count, quality_distribution}, Sampled dataset with specified distribution, Sampling statistics: {actual_distribution, target_distribution, sampling_ratio_per_stratum}, Sample indices for reproducibility, Filtered dataset records with selected metadata, Metadata statistics: {quality_distribution, document_type_counts, source_domain_distribution}, Metadata-only dataset for analysis without loading images/text

UnfragileRank

Adoption15%(35% weight)

Quality14%(25% weight)

Ecosystem60%(20% weight)

Match Graph10%(15% weight)

Freshness75%(5% weight)

UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.

Type: Dataset

6 capabilities

Visit MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18→

About

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18 — a dataset on HuggingFace with 10,34,415 downloads

Alternatives to MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

wink-embeddings-sg-100d24Repository

100-dimensional English word embeddings for wink-nlp

Compare →

voyage-ai-provider30API

Voyage AI Provider for running Voyage AI models with Vercel AI SDK

Compare →

@vibe-agent-toolkit/rag-lancedb27Agent

LanceDB implementation of RAG interfaces for vibe-agent-toolkit

Compare →

vectra41Repository

A lightweight, file-backed vector database for Node.js and browsers with Pinecone-compatible filtering and hybrid BM25 search.

Compare →

Are you the builder of MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18?

Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.

Claim this artifact →Verification via email

Get the weekly brief

New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.

Data Sources

huggingface

Looking for something else?

Search →

Capabilities6 decomposed

large-scale multimodal document-image dataset curation and indexing

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

ML researchers training large vision-language models (LLaVA, GPT-4V competitors)

Teams building document processing pipelines requiring diverse training data

Organizations developing OCR and document understanding systems

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets library (>=2.14.0) for streaming access

Minimum 50GB free disk space for partial caching; 10TB+ for full local mirror

Python 3.8+ with PyTorch or TensorFlow for model training integration

Limitations

1T tokens requires significant computational resources for full training — most practitioners sample subsets

PDF extraction quality varies by document structure; scanned/image-heavy PDFs may have degraded text extraction

Dataset is English-dominant; limited multilingual coverage despite CC-BY-4.0 license allowing derivative works

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

streaming dataset access with lazy loading and memory-efficient batching

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Researchers with GPU clusters but limited NVMe storage

Teams using cloud training (AWS SageMaker, GCP Vertex AI) with per-instance bandwidth constraints

Iterative model development requiring rapid experimentation cycles

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets >=2.14.0 with streaming support

PyTorch DataLoader or TensorFlow tf.data for batching integration

Network connectivity to HuggingFace Hub (CDN-cached, but requires ~100 Mbps sustained)

Limitations

Streaming introduces ~50-200ms latency per batch due to network I/O and decompression — not suitable for real-time inference

Deterministic shuffling requires maintaining epoch-level state; distributed training needs careful synchronization to avoid duplicate batches

Image tensor shapes vary (PDFs have different page dimensions); requires padding or resizing, adding preprocessing overhead

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

More memory-efficient than downloading full datasets and faster to iterate than manual data pipelines; integrates natively with PyTorch/TensorFlow without custom serialization code

document-image pair extraction and alignment from pdf sources

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Teams building document understanding systems (invoice processing, form extraction, contract analysis)

Researchers developing layout-aware vision-language models

Organizations needing high-quality document-image pairs with minimal manual annotation

Requires

PDF parsing library (PyPDF2, pdfplumber, or similar) for text extraction

OCR engine (Tesseract, EasyOCR, or cloud-based) for image-based text recognition

Image processing library (Pillow, OpenCV) for page rendering and coordinate transformation

Limitations

OCR quality degrades on scanned documents with poor image quality, handwriting, or non-Latin scripts — affects ~15-20% of Common Crawl PDFs

Text-image alignment assumes regular document layouts; complex multi-column layouts or overlapping text regions may have misalignment errors

Deduplication uses heuristic similarity thresholds; near-duplicate documents with minor variations may not be fully deduplicated

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

common crawl-sourced dataset with quality filtering and language detection

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Researchers requiring large-scale, diverse training data with public provenance

Teams building production document systems that need to handle real-world document variety

Organizations prioritizing dataset transparency and reproducibility

Requires

Understanding of Common Crawl WARC format and S3 access (if processing raw crawl data)

Language detection library (fastText, langdetect) for filtering

Spam/quality detection heuristics (text entropy, domain reputation, etc.)

Limitations

Common Crawl has inherent biases toward English-language, Western-hosted content — non-English and non-Latin script documents are underrepresented

Quality filtering is heuristic-based and may remove valid documents (e.g., minimalist designs with low text-to-image ratio) or retain low-quality ones

Copyright and licensing compliance is user responsibility — CC-BY-4.0 license covers the dataset metadata, but source PDFs may have different licenses

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

Larger and more diverse than manually-curated datasets; more transparent and reproducible than proprietary web-scale datasets; enables research on real-world document distributions

multimodal dataset sampling and stratification for balanced model training

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Researchers studying how document diversity affects vision-language model performance

Teams building domain-specific document systems (e.g., financial document processing) requiring balanced training data

Practitioners with limited compute wanting to train on representative subsets

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets with custom sampler implementation or PyTorch DistributedSampler

Pre-computed stratification metadata (document type, content properties)

Random seed for reproducible sampling

Limitations

Stratification requires pre-computed metadata (document type, content properties) — metadata quality affects sampling quality

Sampling without replacement can exhaust rare categories if subset size is large relative to category frequency

No built-in mechanism to enforce stratification across distributed training — requires custom sampler implementation

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

More flexible than fixed dataset splits; enables targeted evaluation on specific document categories; supports research on dataset bias and distribution effects

metadata-rich document records with source attribution and quality scores

Medium confidence

Solves for

Best for

Researchers requiring dataset transparency and reproducibility

Teams managing copyright and licensing compliance

Practitioners analyzing dataset bias and quality characteristics

Requires

HuggingFace Datasets with metadata column support

JSON parsing for metadata extraction

Query language or filtering library (pandas, DuckDB) for metadata analysis

Limitations

Metadata is only as good as extraction quality — OCR confidence scores may be inaccurate for complex layouts

Document type classification is automated and may have errors — manual verification required for critical applications

Metadata schema may not capture all relevant properties — users may need custom metadata extraction

What makes it unique

vs alternatives

More transparent than proprietary datasets; enables reproducible research and copyright compliance; supports dataset bias analysis and quality-aware training

Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.

Alternatives to MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

wink-embeddings-sg-100d24Repository

100-dimensional English word embeddings for wink-nlp

Compare →

voyage-ai-provider30API

Voyage AI Provider for running Voyage AI models with Vercel AI SDK

Compare →

@vibe-agent-toolkit/rag-lancedb27Agent

LanceDB implementation of RAG interfaces for vibe-agent-toolkit

Compare →

vectra41Repository

A lightweight, file-backed vector database for Node.js and browsers with Pinecone-compatible filtering and hybrid BM25 search.

Compare →

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

Capabilities6 decomposed

large-scale multimodal document-image dataset curation and indexing

streaming dataset access with lazy loading and memory-efficient batching

document-image pair extraction and alignment from pdf sources

common crawl-sourced dataset with quality filtering and language detection

multimodal dataset sampling and stratification for balanced model training

metadata-rich document records with source attribution and quality scores

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-06

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-23

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-14

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-40

Chat With PDF by Copilot.us

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-50

Best For

Known Limitations

Requirements

Input / Output

UnfragileRank

About

Categories

Alternatives to MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

Are you the builder of MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18?

Get the weekly brief

Data Sources

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

Capabilities6 decomposed

large-scale multimodal document-image dataset curation and indexing

streaming dataset access with lazy loading and memory-efficient batching

document-image pair extraction and alignment from pdf sources

common crawl-sourced dataset with quality filtering and language detection

multimodal dataset sampling and stratification for balanced model training

metadata-rich document records with source attribution and quality scores

Related Artifactssharing capabilities

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-06

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-23

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-14

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-40

Chat With PDF by Copilot.us

MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2023-50

Best For

Known Limitations

Requirements

Input / Output

UnfragileRank

About

Categories

Alternatives to MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18

Are you the builder of MINT-1T-PDF-CC-2024-18?

Get the weekly brief

Data Sources