anz-legislation
MCP ServerFreeCLI and MCP tool for searching and retrieving ANZ legislation data
Capabilities5 decomposed
legislation-database-search-with-semantic-filtering
Medium confidenceSearches ANZ (Australia and New Zealand) legislation databases using keyword and semantic matching against indexed legislative documents. The MCP tool exposes search endpoints that query a pre-indexed legislation corpus, returning ranked results with metadata (act name, section, jurisdiction, effective date). Implementation likely uses full-text search with optional vector embeddings for semantic relevance, enabling both exact phrase matching and conceptual legislation discovery across multiple jurisdictions.
Purpose-built MCP integration for ANZ legislation specifically, enabling Claude and other MCP clients to directly query authoritative legislative databases without external API calls or web scraping, with jurisdiction-aware filtering for Australian states and New Zealand
More direct and jurisdiction-specific than generic legal document search tools; tighter integration with LLM agents via MCP protocol compared to REST API wrappers
jurisdiction-aware-legislation-filtering
Medium confidenceFilters and scopes legislation search results by jurisdiction (Australian states: NSW, VIC, QLD, WA, SA, TAS, ACT, NT; New Zealand; and Commonwealth). The tool maintains jurisdiction metadata for each legislative document and allows queries to be constrained to specific jurisdictions or cross-jurisdictional comparisons. Implementation uses jurisdiction tags in the indexed corpus and applies server-side filtering before returning results, avoiding irrelevant legislation from other regions.
Implements jurisdiction-aware filtering as a first-class feature in the MCP interface, allowing Claude and agents to naturally constrain searches to specific ANZ regions without manual post-processing or external jurisdiction lookup services
More granular than generic legislation APIs that treat all ANZ as a single corpus; avoids irrelevant cross-jurisdiction noise that generic legal search engines produce
legislation-text-retrieval-with-section-parsing
Medium confidenceRetrieves the full text of specific legislative provisions (acts, sections, subsections, schedules) with structured parsing of section hierarchies and cross-references. The tool parses legislation documents into a hierarchical structure (Act > Part > Division > Section > Subsection) and returns requested sections with their full context, including related sections and amendment history. Implementation uses regex or AST-based parsing to identify section boundaries and maintain parent-child relationships in the document structure.
Implements section-level parsing and hierarchical retrieval as a native MCP capability, allowing agents to request specific legislative provisions by section number and receive structured, contextual results without manual document navigation
More precise than full-document retrieval; avoids context bloat by returning only requested sections with their hierarchy, reducing token consumption in LLM agents compared to passing entire acts
cli-based-legislation-lookup
Medium confidenceProvides a command-line interface for searching and retrieving ANZ legislation without requiring MCP integration. The CLI accepts search queries, jurisdiction filters, and section identifiers as command-line arguments and outputs results in JSON, plain text, or markdown format. Implementation uses a Node.js CLI framework (likely Commander.js or similar) that wraps the same underlying legislation database queries as the MCP interface, enabling standalone usage for scripts, shell pipelines, and non-MCP environments.
Dual-mode architecture supporting both MCP (for LLM agents) and standalone CLI (for scripts and automation), using the same underlying legislation database to avoid duplication and ensure consistency across interfaces
More flexible than web-only legislation lookup tools; enables integration into shell pipelines and automation workflows without requiring a running MCP server or LLM client
legislation-metadata-extraction
Medium confidenceExtracts and returns structured metadata for legislation documents including act name, jurisdiction, commencement date, repeal date, amendment history, and related acts. The tool parses legislation headers and metadata sections to identify key administrative information and returns it as structured JSON. Implementation uses regex patterns and heuristic parsing to identify metadata fields from legislative document headers, supplemented by a metadata database for acts with non-standard formatting.
Provides structured metadata extraction as a dedicated capability, enabling agents and tools to assess legislation currency and status without manual document review, critical for compliance and legal research workflows
More comprehensive than simple text search; returns actionable metadata (commencement dates, repeal status, amendments) that generic legislation APIs often require separate lookups to obtain
Capabilities are decomposed by AI analysis. Each maps to specific user intents and improves with match feedback.
Related Artifactssharing capabilities
Artifacts that share capabilities with anz-legislation, ranked by overlap. Discovered automatically through the match graph.
Documind
Revolutionize document handling with AI: analyze, summarize, organize, and collaborate...
@memberjunction/ai-vectordb
MemberJunction: AI Vector Database Module
Leya Law
Revolutionize legal work with AI-driven accuracy and enhanced...
Everlaw
Revolutionize ediscovery with AI-driven, cloud-native legal...
Responsiv
Streamlines legal research and documentation with AI...
Humata AI
AI tool for summarizing, analyzing, and extracting insights from...
Best For
- ✓legal researchers and compliance officers building automated legal research workflows
- ✓LLM agents that need to ground legal advice in authoritative legislation
- ✓law firms integrating legislation lookup into document review pipelines
- ✓compliance teams managing multi-state or multi-jurisdiction legal obligations
- ✓legal AI agents that need to provide jurisdiction-specific advice
- ✓researchers analyzing legislative harmonization across ANZ jurisdictions
- ✓legal document drafters and citation tools that need authoritative legislation text
- ✓LLM agents generating legal opinions or compliance reports that must cite specific sections
Known Limitations
- ⚠Search results depend on indexing freshness — may lag behind latest legislative amendments by days or weeks
- ⚠No full-text OCR of scanned legislation; only works with digitized legislative text
- ⚠Jurisdiction coverage limited to ANZ (Australia and New Zealand) — does not include other Commonwealth or international legislation
- ⚠Search latency may increase with very broad queries matching thousands of sections
- ⚠Jurisdiction filtering is only as accurate as the metadata tagging in the indexed corpus — edge cases (e.g., legislation with mixed jurisdiction applicability) may be misclassified
- ⚠Does not handle temporal jurisdiction changes (e.g., when legislation scope changes between versions)
Requirements
Input / Output
UnfragileRank
UnfragileRank is computed from adoption signals, documentation quality, ecosystem connectivity, match graph feedback, and freshness. No artifact can pay for a higher rank.
Package Details
About
CLI and MCP tool for searching and retrieving ANZ legislation data
Categories
Alternatives to anz-legislation
Are you the builder of anz-legislation?
Claim this artifact to get a verified badge, access match analytics, see which intents users search for, and manage your listing.
Get the weekly brief
New tools, rising stars, and what's actually worth your time. No spam.
Data Sources
Looking for something else?
Search →