| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes search queries across seven distinct academic repositories (arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, IACR) through a single MCP tool endpoint. Abstracts away source-specific API differences and query syntax variations, routing requests to appropriate backends and aggregating results into a consistent schema for downstream processing.
Unique: Implements a unified search abstraction layer that handles source-specific API quirks (arXiv's OAI-PMH protocol, PubMed's E-utilities, Google Scholar's anti-bot measures) within a single MCP tool, eliminating the need for clients to manage multiple search SDK integrations
vs alternatives: Broader source coverage (7 repositories) than single-source tools like arxiv-cli, and MCP integration enables direct use in Claude and other LLM agents without custom wrapper code
Fetches full-text PDFs from academic repositories using source-aware download strategies. Handles authentication, redirects, and format variations across sources (arXiv direct downloads, PubMed Central's FTP structure, bioRxiv/medRxiv preprint servers). Implements fallback chains when primary sources are unavailable, attempting alternative mirrors or formats.
Unique: Implements source-specific download handlers that understand repository-specific access patterns (arXiv's versioning system, PubMed Central's hierarchical structure, preprint server conventions) rather than generic HTTP fetching, enabling reliable downloads across heterogeneous sources
vs alternatives: More robust than generic PDF downloaders because it handles source-specific authentication and redirect patterns; broader than single-source tools like arxiv-downloader by supporting 7 repositories with fallback chains
Extracts and parses text content from downloaded PDFs into structured, normalized formats. Applies heuristics to identify paper sections (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion), handles multi-column layouts, and removes boilerplate (headers, footers, page numbers). Outputs clean text suitable for downstream NLP analysis, embedding generation, or LLM consumption.
Unique: Applies domain-specific heuristics for academic paper structure (section detection, boilerplate removal) rather than generic PDF-to-text conversion, producing cleaner input for downstream NLP tasks and LLM consumption
vs alternatives: More specialized than generic PDF extractors like pdfplumber because it understands academic paper conventions; produces structured section output vs plain text, enabling targeted analysis of methodology or results
Transforms source-specific metadata schemas (arXiv's XML structure, PubMed's MEDLINE format, Google Scholar's HTML scraping results) into a unified JSON schema. Normalizes author names, dates, identifiers (DOI, PMID, arXiv ID), and subject classifications. Handles missing fields gracefully with fallbacks and confidence scores, enabling consistent filtering and citation generation.
Unique: Implements source-aware metadata extraction that understands each repository's data model (arXiv's category taxonomy, PubMed's MeSH indexing, Google Scholar's ranking signals) and normalizes into a unified schema with confidence scores for missing fields
vs alternatives: More robust than generic metadata extractors because it handles source-specific quirks (e.g., arXiv versioning, PubMed's PMID vs PMCID distinction); enables consistent filtering across sources vs single-source tools that expose raw metadata
Exposes all paper search, download, and extraction capabilities as MCP tools that Claude and other LLM agents can invoke directly. Implements MCP's tool schema specification with proper input validation, error handling, and streaming support for long-running operations. Enables agents to autonomously discover, retrieve, and analyze papers without human intervention.
Unique: Implements MCP server pattern that exposes academic paper operations as first-class tools for LLM agents, enabling multi-step reasoning chains where agents autonomously search, retrieve, and analyze papers as part of larger tasks
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than REST API wrappers because it uses MCP's native tool-calling protocol, enabling Claude to invoke paper search with proper context and error handling; more composable than single-function tools by supporting chained operations
Supports querying multiple search terms or downloading multiple papers in a single operation, with progress tracking and error recovery. Implements rate-limit awareness to avoid triggering source API throttling, uses exponential backoff for retries, and provides detailed status reporting per item. Enables efficient bulk literature discovery without manual iteration.
Unique: Implements rate-limit-aware batch processing with exponential backoff and per-item error recovery, allowing efficient bulk operations across multiple sources without triggering API throttling or losing progress on partial failures
vs alternatives: More robust than naive batch loops because it handles rate limiting and retries automatically; provides progress visibility vs fire-and-forget approaches, enabling monitoring of long-running operations
Translates high-level search queries into source-specific query syntax and parameters. Maps common search fields (author, title, year range, subject) to each source's native query language (arXiv's field prefixes, PubMed's MeSH terms, Google Scholar's operators). Optimizes queries for each source's search algorithm to improve result relevance and reduce noise.
Unique: Implements source-aware query translation that understands each repository's native search syntax (arXiv field prefixes like 'cat:cs.AI', PubMed's MeSH hierarchy, Google Scholar's operators) and optimizes queries for each source's ranking algorithm
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple string concatenation because it translates structured search parameters into source-specific syntax; enables consistent search behavior vs exposing raw source APIs that require users to learn each source's query language
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Paper Search scores higher at 49/100 vs Supabase at 42/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities