| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Organizes multiple AI agents into a hierarchical structure defined by an agency chart that specifies which agents can communicate with which other agents. The Agency class serves as the central orchestrator that creates and initializes agents, establishes dedicated communication threads between agents according to the chart topology, and routes messages through the defined hierarchy. This enables complex multi-agent workflows where agents delegate tasks up/down the chain of command rather than all agents communicating freely.
Unique: Uses explicit agency-chart topology (similar to organizational structures) to define agent communication patterns, rather than allowing free-form agent-to-agent communication. The Agency class maintains thread objects for each defined communication channel, enforcing structured message flows through the hierarchy.
vs alternatives: Provides more explicit control over agent communication patterns than frameworks like LangGraph or AutoGen that allow more dynamic agent discovery, making it better suited for systems where communication topology must be strictly enforced.
Enables agents to delegate tasks to other agents through a thread-based message passing system where each agent pair has a dedicated Thread object that manages the conversation history and tool execution. When an agent needs to delegate work, it sends a message through the thread to another agent, which processes the message, executes tools if needed, and returns results back through the same thread. The Thread class handles OpenAI Assistants API integration, tool call processing, and maintains full conversation context.
Unique: Implements agent-to-agent communication through dedicated Thread objects that wrap OpenAI Assistants API conversations, maintaining full message history and handling tool execution within each thread. This differs from frameworks that use shared message queues or event buses by tying threads to specific agent pairs.
vs alternatives: Provides cleaner separation of concerns than agent frameworks using shared message buses, as each agent pair has isolated conversation context, but at the cost of higher API call overhead compared to in-process agent communication patterns.
Manages agent state including instructions, tools, model configuration, and conversation history. Agents maintain their own state objects that persist across interactions, storing role definitions, tool assignments, and model parameters. The framework enables agents to be configured once and reused across multiple conversations without reconfiguration.
Unique: Agents maintain persistent state objects that store instructions, tools, and configuration, enabling agents to be instantiated once and reused across multiple conversations without reconfiguration.
vs alternatives: Simpler than frameworks requiring agents to be reconfigured for each conversation, but lacks built-in persistence mechanisms for saving state across process restarts.
Provides observability into agent execution through callback handlers that track agent actions, tool calls, and message flows. The framework includes LocalCallbackHandler for local logging and TrackingManager for centralized execution tracking. Callbacks are invoked at key points in the execution flow (agent initialization, message processing, tool execution) enabling monitoring and debugging of agent behavior.
Unique: Implements callback-based observability system with LocalCallbackHandler and TrackingManager that capture execution events at key points in agent lifecycle, enabling detailed execution tracking without modifying agent code.
vs alternatives: Provides framework-native observability without external dependencies, but lacks integration with external monitoring platforms that frameworks like LangChain offer through LangSmith.
Provides Genesis Agency as a pre-built template agency that can be used as a starting point for creating custom agencies. Genesis Agency comes with pre-configured agents and communication patterns that can be extended or modified. This enables developers to start with a working multi-agent system and customize it rather than building from scratch.
Unique: Provides Genesis Agency as a pre-built, working agency template with configured agents and communication patterns that developers can extend or customize, reducing time to first working multi-agent system.
vs alternatives: Faster to get started than building agencies from scratch, but less flexible than frameworks providing only building blocks without opinionated templates.
Enables agents to be defined with natural language instructions and role descriptions that guide their behavior. Agents are instantiated with a name, description, and detailed instructions that specify their responsibilities, decision-making criteria, and interaction patterns. These instructions are sent to the OpenAI Assistants API and influence how the agent responds to messages and uses tools.
Unique: Agents are defined through natural language instructions and role descriptions that are passed to OpenAI Assistants API, enabling behavior specification through prompting rather than code configuration.
vs alternatives: More flexible than code-based configuration for behavior specification, but instruction quality is harder to validate and optimize compared to frameworks using formal behavior specifications.
Provides a BaseTool class that agents can inherit from to define custom tools with Pydantic model-based input validation and automatic schema generation. Tools are defined as Python classes where the run() method contains the implementation, and Pydantic models define the input parameters with type hints and validation rules. The framework automatically converts these tool definitions into OpenAI function-calling schemas that agents can invoke, ensuring type safety and input validation before tool execution.
Unique: Uses Pydantic models as the single source of truth for tool input schemas, automatically generating OpenAI function-calling schemas from Python type hints and validation rules. This eliminates manual schema definition and keeps tool logic and validation colocated in Python code.
vs alternatives: More developer-friendly than manually defining JSON schemas for each tool, and provides runtime validation that catches type errors before tools execute, unlike frameworks that rely on agent-side schema interpretation.
Provides a ToolFactory class that dynamically discovers and instantiates tools from Python modules or class definitions, enabling agents to access tools without explicit registration. The factory introspects tool classes, validates they inherit from BaseTool, and creates instances with proper initialization. This allows tools to be discovered at runtime from directories or module paths, reducing boilerplate tool registration code and enabling plugin-like tool loading patterns.
Unique: Implements runtime tool discovery through module introspection and factory pattern, allowing tools to be loaded from directories without explicit registration code. This contrasts with frameworks requiring manual tool registration for each agent.
vs alternatives: Reduces boilerplate compared to frameworks requiring explicit tool registration for each agent, but adds runtime introspection overhead and requires tools to follow discoverable naming conventions.
+6 more capabilities
Manages conversation history as immutable thread objects stored server-side, where each message appends to a thread rather than requiring clients to maintain conversation state. Threads persist across API calls and sessions, enabling stateless client implementations. The architecture decouples conversation management from model invocation, allowing assistants to be reused across multiple independent threads without state collision.
Unique: Server-side thread abstraction eliminates client-side conversation state management; threads are first-class API objects with immutable append-only semantics, not just message arrays. This differs from stateless LLM APIs where clients must manage context windows and history truncation.
vs alternatives: Eliminates context window management burden compared to raw LLM APIs (e.g., Claude API, GPT-4 completions), but adds latency and cost overhead vs. in-memory conversation state in frameworks like LangChain
Provides a managed Python 3.11 execution environment accessible via the Code Interpreter tool, where assistants can write and execute arbitrary Python code with access to common libraries (pandas, numpy, matplotlib, scikit-learn). Code runs in isolated sandboxes with file I/O, plotting, and data visualization capabilities. Execution results (stdout, stderr, generated files) are returned to the assistant for further processing.
Unique: Managed Python sandbox integrated directly into the agent loop — assistants can iteratively write, execute, and refine code without external compute provisioning. Execution results feed back into the LLM context, enabling self-correcting workflows. Differs from Replit or Jupyter APIs which require explicit session management.
vs alternatives: Simpler than provisioning Jupyter kernels or Lambda functions for code execution, but slower and less flexible than local Python execution; better for lightweight analysis than heavy ML workloads
OpenAI Assistants scores higher at 76/100 vs Agency Swarm at 59/100. However, Agency Swarm offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
When an assistant calls a tool, the run enters a 'requires_action' state. Clients must submit tool call results via the submit_tool_outputs API, which resumes the run with the tool results injected into context. This enables iterative workflows where assistants can call tools, receive results, and refine responses based on results. Tool results are stored in the thread and visible to subsequent runs, enabling multi-turn tool-assisted reasoning.
Unique: Tool results are submitted explicitly via API, not returned in-band — enables clients to process, validate, or transform results before injection. Runs pause in 'requires_action' state, giving clients full control over tool execution and result handling.
vs alternatives: More flexible than automatic tool execution (clients can implement custom logic), but requires more client-side code than frameworks like LangChain where tool execution is automatic; enables external tool integration without modifying assistant code
Assistants can be created from scratch or cloned from existing assistants, copying all configuration (instructions, tools, model, file attachments). Cloning enables template-based assistant creation where a base assistant is configured once and then cloned for different use cases or users. Cloned assistants are independent — changes to one don't affect others. This reduces setup overhead for creating similar assistants.
Unique: Assistants are cloneable objects — configuration can be copied to create new assistants without manual setup. Enables template-based assistant creation and multi-tenant provisioning patterns.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manually creating assistants with identical configuration, but less flexible than parameterized templates; no built-in versioning or rollback compared to infrastructure-as-code approaches
Files uploaded to assistants are stored in OpenAI's managed file storage and associated with assistants or threads. Files can be deleted explicitly via API, and OpenAI automatically cleans up files after 30 days of inactivity. File storage is charged per file per assistant; deleting unused files reduces costs. Files can be reused across multiple assistants and threads, but each association incurs a separate storage charge.
Unique: Files are managed server-side with automatic cleanup after 30 days — no manual file system management required. Files are associated with assistants and charged per association, enabling cost tracking at the file level.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing files in external storage (S3, GCS), but less flexible and more expensive for high-volume file usage; automatic cleanup reduces manual maintenance but limits retention control
The File Search tool indexes uploaded files (PDFs, text, code) using OpenAI's embedding model and enables assistants to retrieve relevant passages via semantic search. Files are chunked, embedded, and stored in a managed vector index. When an assistant queries the index, it retrieves the most relevant chunks based on cosine similarity, then includes them in the prompt context. This enables RAG-style retrieval without managing embeddings or vector databases.
Unique: Fully managed vector indexing and retrieval without exposing embedding or vector database layers — files are indexed automatically on upload, and search is invoked implicitly when assistants reference file_search tool. Abstracts away Pinecone/Weaviate setup but sacrifices control over chunking and embedding strategies.
vs alternatives: Faster to implement than building custom RAG with LangChain + Pinecone, but less flexible; no control over chunk size, embedding model, or retrieval parameters compared to self-managed vector databases
Assistants can invoke multiple tools (Code Interpreter, File Search, custom functions) in parallel or sequence based on task requirements. Tool calls are defined via JSON schema (OpenAI function calling format), and the assistant decides which tools to invoke and in what order. Results from tool calls are fed back into the assistant's context, enabling iterative refinement. Supports both parallel execution (multiple tools called simultaneously) and sequential chaining (tool output feeds into next tool's input).
Unique: Tool invocation is driven by the LLM's reasoning — the assistant decides which tools to call, in what order, and with what parameters based on task context. Supports both parallel and sequential execution patterns. Differs from static tool pipelines (e.g., Zapier) where execution order is pre-defined.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded tool chains, but less predictable than explicit DAGs; requires careful prompt engineering to ensure correct tool selection vs. frameworks like LangChain where tool routing can be more explicit
Assistants can receive file attachments (PDFs, images, code, data files) within messages, which are automatically indexed and made available for retrieval or analysis. Files are stored in OpenAI's managed file storage and can be referenced by subsequent messages in the thread. The assistant can analyze file content via Code Interpreter, search file content via File Search, or reference files in function calls. Files persist within a thread and are accessible across multiple turns.
Unique: Files are first-class message attachments with automatic indexing and managed storage — no separate file management API required. Files persist in thread context and are automatically made available to all tools (Code Interpreter, File Search, function calls) without explicit routing.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing files separately and passing file paths to tools; automatic indexing reduces setup vs. manual chunking and embedding, but less control over file processing compared to custom pipelines
+5 more capabilities