| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates dynamic trust scores for cryptocurrency tokens by analyzing on-chain and off-chain signals in real-time. Implements a multi-factor scoring algorithm that weights structural indicators (contract age, holder distribution, liquidity depth) and behavioral signals (transaction patterns, whale movements) to produce a single trust metric. Scores update continuously as new blockchain data becomes available, enabling detection of trust degradation before market collapse.
Unique: Combines on-chain structural analysis (contract bytecode patterns, holder concentration metrics) with behavioral signal detection (transaction velocity anomalies, liquidity withdrawal patterns) using a Bayesian updating framework that recalibrates trust scores as new data arrives, rather than static snapshot scoring
vs alternatives: Outperforms static token audit reports by detecting trust degradation in real-time through continuous signal monitoring, and provides explainable component scores (not a black-box risk rating) that developers can integrate into automated trading or portfolio management systems
Identifies and categorizes structural vulnerabilities in token contracts and ecosystems through pattern matching against known risk archetypes. Analyzes contract code patterns (reentrancy vectors, access control flaws, upgrade mechanisms), token economics (inflationary supply schedules, concentration in team wallets), and ecosystem health (validator/node centralization, bridge security). Returns categorized risk signals with severity levels and remediation guidance.
Unique: Uses multi-layer pattern matching combining bytecode-level analysis (via EVM opcode inspection), semantic contract analysis (via AST parsing of verified source), and ecosystem topology analysis (via on-chain relationship graphs) to detect risks that single-layer approaches miss, such as cross-contract reentrancy or cascading liquidity risks
vs alternatives: Provides explainable, categorized risk signals with severity levels and remediation guidance (not just a pass/fail audit), enabling developers to build nuanced risk policies that distinguish between critical code vulnerabilities and manageable economic risks
Forecasts potential token market collapses and distress events by analyzing leading indicators including liquidity withdrawal patterns, holder concentration changes, price volatility spikes, and on-chain transaction anomalies. Uses time-series analysis and anomaly detection to identify when a token's behavior deviates from its historical baseline, signaling impending market stress. Produces probabilistic predictions with confidence intervals and lead time estimates.
Unique: Combines time-series anomaly detection (isolation forests on normalized on-chain metrics) with causal inference (identifying which signal changes precede distress events) and ensemble forecasting (aggregating predictions from multiple models trained on different market regimes) to produce calibrated probability estimates rather than binary warnings
vs alternatives: Provides lead time estimates and confidence intervals (not just binary alerts), enabling developers to implement graduated response strategies; also explains which specific signals triggered the prediction, supporting human-in-the-loop decision making
Enables side-by-side comparison of multiple cryptocurrency tokens across security, compliance, economic, and ecosystem dimensions. Normalizes heterogeneous metrics (contract age, audit status, regulatory jurisdiction, liquidity depth, holder distribution, validator decentralization) into a unified comparison matrix. Supports custom weighting of dimensions to reflect user priorities, producing ranked asset lists and visual comparison profiles.
Unique: Implements dimension-aware normalization that preserves metric semantics (e.g., older contract age is safer, higher holder concentration is riskier) and supports custom weighting via a declarative configuration model, enabling users to encode their risk preferences without modifying code
vs alternatives: Provides normalized, multi-dimensional comparison with explainable component scores (unlike opaque rating systems), and supports custom weighting to reflect user priorities, making it suitable for both manual due diligence and automated portfolio construction algorithms
Evaluates cryptocurrency tokens against regulatory frameworks and compliance standards by analyzing token characteristics (jurisdiction of origin, regulatory status, KYC/AML requirements, securities law implications) and ecosystem governance (DAO structure, upgrade mechanisms, regulatory engagement). Produces compliance risk profiles indicating exposure to regulatory action, delisting risk, or legal challenges. Integrates with regulatory databases and legal precedent repositories.
Unique: Combines token characteristic analysis (via contract inspection and metadata) with jurisdiction-specific regulatory framework matching (via regulatory database queries) and legal precedent analysis (via case law repositories) to produce jurisdiction-aware compliance assessments rather than generic regulatory ratings
vs alternatives: Provides jurisdiction-specific compliance assessments (not one-size-fits-all ratings) and explains regulatory risks with reference to specific legal frameworks and precedents, enabling institutional investors to make informed decisions about regulatory exposure
Analyzes the distribution of token ownership across addresses to identify concentration risks and whale exposure. Calculates metrics including Gini coefficient (wealth inequality), Herfindahl index (market concentration), and holder tier distribution (top 1%, top 10%, etc.). Detects suspicious patterns such as sudden concentration changes, large transfers to exchange wallets, or coordinated holder movements. Provides early signals of potential rug pulls or coordinated dumps.
Unique: Combines statistical concentration metrics (Gini, Herfindahl) with behavioral anomaly detection (sudden concentration spikes, coordinated transfers) and exchange wallet tracking to identify both static concentration risk and dynamic signals of impending whale activity
vs alternatives: Provides both concentration metrics and behavioral anomaly detection (not just static snapshots), enabling detection of emerging rug pull risk before it materializes; also explains which specific holders are driving concentration changes
Evaluates token liquidity across DEX and CEX venues by analyzing order book depth, liquidity pool reserves, and historical slippage patterns. Calculates metrics including effective spread, impact of large trades, and liquidity stability over time. Identifies liquidity fragmentation across venues and detects sudden liquidity withdrawals. Provides slippage estimates for trades of various sizes and flags venues with insufficient depth.
Unique: Aggregates liquidity data across multiple DEX and CEX venues, normalizes for different pool architectures (constant product, concentrated liquidity, stable swap), and uses historical slippage patterns to produce venue-specific and trade-size-specific slippage estimates
vs alternatives: Provides multi-venue liquidity aggregation and trade-size-specific slippage estimates (not just current spot prices), enabling traders to plan large trades with accurate execution cost expectations and identify optimal venues
Monitors and reports on the audit and verification status of token contracts, including formal verification, security audits by reputable firms, bug bounty program participation, and code review coverage. Tracks audit history, identifies gaps in coverage, and flags tokens with unaudited or partially audited contracts. Integrates with audit databases and verification service APIs to provide current status.
Unique: Aggregates audit information from multiple sources (audit firms, verification services, bug bounty platforms) and tracks audit history including updates and re-audits, providing a comprehensive audit timeline rather than just current status
vs alternatives: Provides audit history and coverage details (not just binary audited/unaudited status), enabling investors to assess whether audits are current and comprehensive relative to contract complexity
Scrapes a single URL and converts HTML content to clean markdown using Firecrawl's content extraction pipeline. The firecrawl_scrape tool accepts a URL and optional parameters (formats, headers, wait time, screenshot capability) and returns structured markdown output with automatic cleanup of boilerplate, navigation, and ads. Implements MCP tool handler pattern that marshals arguments through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client library to Firecrawl's backend processing engine.
Unique: Integrates Firecrawl's proprietary content extraction engine (which uses ML-based boilerplate removal and semantic content identification) through MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to access production-grade web scraping without managing browser automation or parsing logic themselves. The markdown conversion is handled server-side rather than client-side, reducing latency and ensuring consistent output formatting.
vs alternatives: Cleaner markdown output than regex-based scrapers like Cheerio or Puppeteer-only solutions because Firecrawl uses ML models to identify main content; simpler than self-hosted solutions because it's fully managed and requires only an API key.
Scrapes multiple URLs in a single operation using Firecrawl's batch processing pipeline. The firecrawl_batch_scrape tool accepts an array of URLs and shared options, submitting them to Firecrawl's backend which processes them in parallel and returns an array of markdown-converted content objects. Implements batching through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client's batch method, which handles request queuing, parallel execution, and result aggregation without requiring client-side coordination.
Unique: Implements server-side parallel batch processing through Firecrawl's backend rather than client-side loop iteration, reducing network round-trips and enabling true concurrent scraping. The batch operation is atomic from the MCP client perspective — a single tool call returns all results, simplifying agent orchestration logic.
More efficient than sequential scraping loops because Firecrawl handles parallelization server-side; simpler than managing Promise.all() with individual scrape calls because batching is a first-class operation with built-in error handling.
Firecrawl MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs Zarq at 45/100. Zarq leads on adoption, while Firecrawl MCP Server is stronger on quality and ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Packages the Firecrawl MCP server as a Docker container with environment-based configuration, enabling deployment to containerized infrastructure (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, cloud platforms). The Dockerfile builds a Node.js runtime with the server code and exposes configuration through environment variables, allowing operators to deploy without modifying code. Supports both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through configuration.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker packaging with environment-based configuration, enabling zero-code deployment to containerized infrastructure. The Dockerfile handles Node.js runtime setup and dependency installation, reducing deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual deployment because Docker handles environment setup; more portable than binary distribution because containers run consistently across platforms.
Registers the Firecrawl MCP server in the Smithery registry, enabling one-click installation and discovery through Smithery's MCP client marketplace. The server is published to Smithery with metadata (description, tags, configuration schema) allowing users to discover and install it without manual setup. Smithery handles server distribution, version management, and client integration.
Unique: Leverages Smithery's MCP server registry to enable one-click installation without manual configuration, reducing friction for end users. Smithery handles server discovery, versioning, and client integration, abstracting deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual installation because Smithery handles discovery and setup; more discoverable than GitHub-only distribution because Smithery provides a centralized marketplace.
Supports connecting to self-hosted Firecrawl instances in addition to Firecrawl's cloud service through configurable API endpoint. The FIRECRAWL_API_URL environment variable allows operators to specify a custom Firecrawl endpoint, enabling deployment scenarios where Firecrawl runs on-premises or in a private cloud. The @mendable/firecrawl-js client library handles endpoint abstraction, routing all API calls to the configured endpoint.
Unique: Enables flexible deployment by supporting both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through simple endpoint configuration, allowing operators to choose deployment model without code changes. The endpoint abstraction is handled by @mendable/firecrawl-js, making self-hosted support transparent to MCP server code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-only solutions because self-hosted option is available; simpler than maintaining separate server implementations because endpoint configuration is unified.
Discovers all URLs within a website by crawling from a base URL and building a sitemap-like structure. The firecrawl_map tool accepts a base URL and optional parameters (max depth, include patterns, exclude patterns) and returns a hierarchical array of discovered URLs with metadata about page structure. Uses Firecrawl's crawler to traverse internal links up to specified depth, filtering by inclusion/exclusion patterns, and returns the complete URL graph without fetching full page content.
Unique: Provides lightweight URL discovery without content extraction, allowing agents to plan scraping strategy before committing credits to full content fetches. The depth-based crawling with pattern filtering enables selective discovery — agents can discover only URLs matching specific criteria (e.g., /blog/* paths) without exploring entire site.
vs alternatives: More efficient than scraping every page to build a sitemap because it skips content extraction; more reliable than parsing robots.txt or sitemaps.xml because it performs actual crawling and discovers dynamically-linked content.
Crawls an entire website and extracts content from all discovered pages in a single asynchronous operation. The firecrawl_crawl tool accepts a base URL and options (max pages, allowed domains, exclude patterns, scrape options) and returns a crawl ID for polling. The crawler discovers URLs, extracts markdown content from each page, and stores results server-side. Clients poll firecrawl_crawl_status to retrieve results as they complete, implementing an async job pattern rather than blocking until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side asynchronous crawling with job-based result retrieval, decoupling the crawl initiation from result consumption. The MCP server handles polling coordination through firecrawl_crawl_status, allowing AI agents to initiate long-running crawls and check progress without blocking. Firecrawl's backend manages the entire crawl lifecycle including URL discovery, content extraction, and result storage.
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential scraping because crawling happens server-side in parallel; simpler than managing Puppeteer/Playwright browser pools because Firecrawl abstracts browser automation and handles rate limiting internally.
Polls the status of an in-progress or completed website crawl and retrieves extracted content. The firecrawl_crawl_status tool accepts a crawl ID and returns current progress (pages crawled, pages remaining, completion percentage), status state (running/completed/failed), and paginated results. Implements polling pattern where clients repeatedly call this tool with the same crawl ID to check progress and incrementally retrieve content as pages are processed, supporting streaming-like result consumption.
Unique: Provides non-blocking status and result retrieval for asynchronous crawls, enabling agents to manage long-running operations without blocking. The polling pattern with pagination allows incremental result consumption — agents can start processing results before the entire crawl completes, reducing end-to-end latency for large crawls.
vs alternatives: More flexible than blocking crawl operations because agents can check progress and retrieve partial results; simpler than webhook-based result delivery because polling requires no external infrastructure setup.
+5 more capabilities