Firecrawl MCP Server ranks higher at 62/100 vs mlb-gameday-bot at 25/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | mlb-gameday-bot | Firecrawl MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 25/100 | 62/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes live MLB game data through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server interface, enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query current game scores, inning status, play-by-play events, and team statistics without direct API calls. Implements MCP resource and tool abstractions that translate MLB Gameday API responses into structured, LLM-consumable formats with automatic polling or event-driven updates.
Unique: Implements MCP server abstraction layer specifically for MLB Gameday API, allowing Claude and other MCP clients to access live baseball data through standardized protocol bindings rather than requiring direct API integration in each application
vs alternatives: Eliminates need for developers to implement MLB API authentication and polling logic themselves by providing MCP-native interface that works seamlessly with Claude and other MCP-compatible tools
Provides MCP resource endpoints that clients can subscribe to for streaming or polling live game events (plays, substitutions, score changes, game state transitions). Implements event filtering and formatting to deliver only relevant updates to the requesting client, reducing bandwidth and processing overhead compared to full game state polling.
Unique: Implements event filtering and subscription patterns within MCP resource model, allowing clients to subscribe to specific game events without receiving full game state updates on every poll
vs alternatives: More efficient than raw MLB API polling for event-driven use cases because filtering happens server-side before transmission, reducing client-side processing and bandwidth consumption
Exposes MCP tools that aggregate data across multiple concurrent MLB games, enabling queries like 'compare today's scores across all games' or 'find all games where the home team is winning by more than 5 runs'. Implements server-side aggregation logic that queries the MLB Gameday API for multiple games and returns structured comparison results without requiring the client to orchestrate multiple API calls.
Unique: Implements server-side aggregation and filtering logic within MCP tool definitions, allowing complex multi-game queries to be expressed as single tool calls rather than requiring client-side orchestration of multiple API requests
vs alternatives: Reduces client complexity and API call overhead compared to having Claude orchestrate multiple direct MLB API calls, by centralizing aggregation logic in the MCP server
Translates natural language questions from Claude into structured MLB Gameday API queries, then formats responses back into natural language suitable for LLM consumption. Implements query parsing logic that maps phrases like 'Who's winning?' or 'What inning are we in?' to appropriate API endpoints and parameters, with context awareness of previously queried games to avoid redundant API calls.
Unique: Bridges natural language input from Claude with structured MLB API queries by implementing context-aware query parsing that maintains game context across conversation turns, reducing the need for explicit game identifiers in follow-up questions
vs alternatives: More conversational than raw API access because it handles context and natural language interpretation, allowing users to ask follow-up questions without re-specifying game details
Provides MCP tools to query team and player statistics from the MLB Gameday API, including season-to-date stats, historical performance data, and comparative metrics. Implements caching or indexing of frequently-accessed statistics to reduce API call overhead, and formats results with contextual information (e.g., league rankings, historical comparisons) for LLM analysis.
Unique: Implements statistics lookup with optional caching and contextual enrichment (league rankings, historical comparisons), allowing Claude to answer statistical questions without requiring multiple API calls or external data aggregation
vs alternatives: More efficient than having Claude make individual API calls for each statistic because server-side caching and aggregation reduce redundant queries and provide pre-computed comparative metrics
Exposes MCP tools to query MLB schedule information, including upcoming games, past results, and fixture details (teams, start times, venues). Implements filtering by date range, team, or league, and returns structured schedule data suitable for calendar integration or game planning applications. Handles timezone conversion and daylight saving time adjustments automatically.
Unique: Implements automatic timezone conversion and daylight saving time handling within schedule queries, eliminating the need for client-side timezone logic and ensuring accurate start times across regions
vs alternatives: More reliable than raw API schedule data because it handles timezone complexity automatically, reducing errors in game time display and scheduling
Implements a fully-functional MCP server that exposes MLB Gameday data through standardized MCP resources and tools, enabling seamless integration with Claude and other MCP-compatible clients. Handles MCP protocol negotiation, resource discovery, tool registration, and request/response serialization without requiring client-side protocol implementation. Supports both resource-based (polling) and tool-based (function calling) access patterns.
Unique: Provides complete MCP server implementation for MLB data, handling all protocol-level concerns (negotiation, serialization, resource discovery) so developers can focus on data integration rather than protocol implementation
vs alternatives: Eliminates need for developers to implement MCP protocol themselves by providing a ready-to-deploy server that works with Claude and other MCP clients out of the box
Scrapes a single URL and converts HTML content to clean markdown using Firecrawl's content extraction pipeline. The firecrawl_scrape tool accepts a URL and optional parameters (formats, headers, wait time, screenshot capability) and returns structured markdown output with automatic cleanup of boilerplate, navigation, and ads. Implements MCP tool handler pattern that marshals arguments through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client library to Firecrawl's backend processing engine.
Unique: Integrates Firecrawl's proprietary content extraction engine (which uses ML-based boilerplate removal and semantic content identification) through MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to access production-grade web scraping without managing browser automation or parsing logic themselves. The markdown conversion is handled server-side rather than client-side, reducing latency and ensuring consistent output formatting.
vs alternatives: Cleaner markdown output than regex-based scrapers like Cheerio or Puppeteer-only solutions because Firecrawl uses ML models to identify main content; simpler than self-hosted solutions because it's fully managed and requires only an API key.
Scrapes multiple URLs in a single operation using Firecrawl's batch processing pipeline. The firecrawl_batch_scrape tool accepts an array of URLs and shared options, submitting them to Firecrawl's backend which processes them in parallel and returns an array of markdown-converted content objects. Implements batching through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client's batch method, which handles request queuing, parallel execution, and result aggregation without requiring client-side coordination.
Unique: Implements server-side parallel batch processing through Firecrawl's backend rather than client-side loop iteration, reducing network round-trips and enabling true concurrent scraping. The batch operation is atomic from the MCP client perspective — a single tool call returns all results, simplifying agent orchestration logic.
More efficient than sequential scraping loops because Firecrawl handles parallelization server-side; simpler than managing Promise.all() with individual scrape calls because batching is a first-class operation with built-in error handling.
Firecrawl MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs mlb-gameday-bot at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Packages the Firecrawl MCP server as a Docker container with environment-based configuration, enabling deployment to containerized infrastructure (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, cloud platforms). The Dockerfile builds a Node.js runtime with the server code and exposes configuration through environment variables, allowing operators to deploy without modifying code. Supports both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through configuration.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker packaging with environment-based configuration, enabling zero-code deployment to containerized infrastructure. The Dockerfile handles Node.js runtime setup and dependency installation, reducing deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual deployment because Docker handles environment setup; more portable than binary distribution because containers run consistently across platforms.
Registers the Firecrawl MCP server in the Smithery registry, enabling one-click installation and discovery through Smithery's MCP client marketplace. The server is published to Smithery with metadata (description, tags, configuration schema) allowing users to discover and install it without manual setup. Smithery handles server distribution, version management, and client integration.
Unique: Leverages Smithery's MCP server registry to enable one-click installation without manual configuration, reducing friction for end users. Smithery handles server discovery, versioning, and client integration, abstracting deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual installation because Smithery handles discovery and setup; more discoverable than GitHub-only distribution because Smithery provides a centralized marketplace.
Supports connecting to self-hosted Firecrawl instances in addition to Firecrawl's cloud service through configurable API endpoint. The FIRECRAWL_API_URL environment variable allows operators to specify a custom Firecrawl endpoint, enabling deployment scenarios where Firecrawl runs on-premises or in a private cloud. The @mendable/firecrawl-js client library handles endpoint abstraction, routing all API calls to the configured endpoint.
Unique: Enables flexible deployment by supporting both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through simple endpoint configuration, allowing operators to choose deployment model without code changes. The endpoint abstraction is handled by @mendable/firecrawl-js, making self-hosted support transparent to MCP server code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-only solutions because self-hosted option is available; simpler than maintaining separate server implementations because endpoint configuration is unified.
Discovers all URLs within a website by crawling from a base URL and building a sitemap-like structure. The firecrawl_map tool accepts a base URL and optional parameters (max depth, include patterns, exclude patterns) and returns a hierarchical array of discovered URLs with metadata about page structure. Uses Firecrawl's crawler to traverse internal links up to specified depth, filtering by inclusion/exclusion patterns, and returns the complete URL graph without fetching full page content.
Unique: Provides lightweight URL discovery without content extraction, allowing agents to plan scraping strategy before committing credits to full content fetches. The depth-based crawling with pattern filtering enables selective discovery — agents can discover only URLs matching specific criteria (e.g., /blog/* paths) without exploring entire site.
vs alternatives: More efficient than scraping every page to build a sitemap because it skips content extraction; more reliable than parsing robots.txt or sitemaps.xml because it performs actual crawling and discovers dynamically-linked content.
Crawls an entire website and extracts content from all discovered pages in a single asynchronous operation. The firecrawl_crawl tool accepts a base URL and options (max pages, allowed domains, exclude patterns, scrape options) and returns a crawl ID for polling. The crawler discovers URLs, extracts markdown content from each page, and stores results server-side. Clients poll firecrawl_crawl_status to retrieve results as they complete, implementing an async job pattern rather than blocking until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side asynchronous crawling with job-based result retrieval, decoupling the crawl initiation from result consumption. The MCP server handles polling coordination through firecrawl_crawl_status, allowing AI agents to initiate long-running crawls and check progress without blocking. Firecrawl's backend manages the entire crawl lifecycle including URL discovery, content extraction, and result storage.
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential scraping because crawling happens server-side in parallel; simpler than managing Puppeteer/Playwright browser pools because Firecrawl abstracts browser automation and handles rate limiting internally.
Polls the status of an in-progress or completed website crawl and retrieves extracted content. The firecrawl_crawl_status tool accepts a crawl ID and returns current progress (pages crawled, pages remaining, completion percentage), status state (running/completed/failed), and paginated results. Implements polling pattern where clients repeatedly call this tool with the same crawl ID to check progress and incrementally retrieve content as pages are processed, supporting streaming-like result consumption.
Unique: Provides non-blocking status and result retrieval for asynchronous crawls, enabling agents to manage long-running operations without blocking. The polling pattern with pagination allows incremental result consumption — agents can start processing results before the entire crawl completes, reducing end-to-end latency for large crawls.
vs alternatives: More flexible than blocking crawl operations because agents can check progress and retrieve partial results; simpler than webhook-based result delivery because polling requires no external infrastructure setup.
+5 more capabilities