| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $5/mo (Mini) |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts natural language text prompts into images using a two-stage pipeline: text embeddings are first processed through a diffusion prior (1B parameters in v2.1+) that maps text space to CLIP image embeddings, then fed into a latent diffusion U-Net (1.2-1.22B parameters) operating in compressed latent space. Kandinsky 2.0 uses dual text encoders (mCLIP-XLMR 560M + mT5-encoder-small 146M) while v2.1+ uses XLM-Roberta-Large-ViT-L-14 (560M). The diffusion prior acts as a bridge between modalities, enabling more coherent image generation than direct text-to-pixel approaches.
Unique: Implements a two-stage diffusion prior architecture that explicitly maps text embeddings to CLIP image space before pixel generation, enabling stronger semantic alignment than single-stage models. Kandinsky 2.1+ replaces standard VAE with MOVQ encoder/decoder (67M parameters) for better reconstruction quality in latent space.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Stable Diffusion v1.5 on multilingual prompts and achieves comparable quality to DALL-E 2 while remaining fully open-source and locally deployable without API calls.
Transforms existing images by encoding them into latent space via MOVQ encoder, then applying iterative diffusion steps guided by text prompts and a strength parameter (0-1) that controls how much the original image influences the output. The process uses the same diffusion prior and U-Net as text-to-image but initializes the noise schedule at a later timestep based on strength, allowing fine-grained control over preservation vs. modification. Supports both Kandinsky 2.0 (direct U-Net conditioning) and 2.1+ (diffusion prior + U-Net) architectures.
Unique: Uses MOVQ encoder (67M parameters) instead of standard VAE for input image encoding, providing better reconstruction fidelity in latent space. Strength parameter controls noise schedule initialization, enabling smooth interpolation between preservation and regeneration without separate model variants.
vs alternatives: Achieves finer control over image preservation than Stable Diffusion's img2img through explicit diffusion prior conditioning, and supports multilingual prompts natively unlike most open-source alternatives.
Classifier-free guidance (CFG) is implemented by computing both conditional (text-guided) and unconditional predictions, then scaling the difference: output = unconditional + guidance_scale * (conditional - unconditional). Higher guidance scales (10-15) increase semantic alignment with text prompts but reduce image diversity and may introduce artifacts. Lower scales (5-8) produce more diverse but less prompt-aligned images. Guidance scale is a hyperparameter exposed in all generation methods.
Unique: Exposes guidance scale as a simple float parameter that controls the strength of text conditioning without requiring model retraining. Enables smooth interpolation between unconditional and fully-conditional generation.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more intuitive than alternative guidance methods (e.g., attention-based guidance); widely adopted across diffusion models for its effectiveness and ease of use.
MOVQ (Multiscale Orthogonal Vector Quantization) is a 67M parameter encoder-decoder that compresses images into latent space for efficient diffusion processing. Unlike standard VAE, MOVQ uses vector quantization to discretize latent codes, improving reconstruction fidelity and reducing artifacts. Introduced in Kandinsky 2.1 as a replacement for VAE. The encoder downsamples images by 8x; the decoder upsamples latent codes back to pixel space with minimal quality loss.
Unique: Uses multiscale orthogonal vector quantization instead of standard VAE, providing better reconstruction fidelity and fewer artifacts in latent space. Enables high-quality image editing without pixel-level quality loss.
vs alternatives: MOVQ reconstruction quality exceeds standard VAE used in Stable Diffusion v1.5, reducing artifacts in image-to-image and inpainting tasks. Vector quantization provides discrete latent codes that may be more interpretable than continuous VAE latents.
Kandinsky 2.0 uses two text encoders in parallel: mCLIP-XLMR (560M parameters) for multilingual semantic understanding and mT5-encoder-small (146M parameters) for linguistic structure. Both encoders process the same text prompt independently, producing separate embeddings that are concatenated and fed into the U-Net. This dual-encoder approach enables strong multilingual support without requiring separate models per language. Kandinsky 2.1+ replaces this with a single XLM-Roberta-Large-ViT-L-14 encoder (560M).
Unique: Combines mCLIP-XLMR (semantic understanding) and mT5-encoder-small (linguistic structure) in parallel, enabling richer text representation than single-encoder approaches. Dual-encoder design is unique to Kandinsky 2.0.
vs alternatives: Dual-encoder architecture captures both semantic and linguistic information, potentially improving text understanding compared to single-encoder v2.1+. However, v2.1+ achieves comparable quality with lower latency using a unified encoder.
Negative prompts are text descriptions of unwanted content (e.g., 'blurry, low quality, distorted'). During generation, the model computes predictions for both positive and negative prompts, then uses the difference to steer generation away from negative content. Implemented via classifier-free guidance: output = conditional_positive + guidance_scale * (conditional_positive - conditional_negative). Negative prompts are optional but widely used to improve quality by excluding common artifacts.
Unique: Implements negative prompts via classifier-free guidance difference, enabling content exclusion without separate model components. Negative prompts are computed in the same forward pass as positive prompts, adding minimal overhead.
vs alternatives: Simpler and more flexible than hard content filtering; allows fine-grained control over excluded content through natural language. Comparable to negative prompts in Stable Diffusion but with multilingual support.
Fills masked regions of images by encoding the full image into latent space, zeroing out latent features corresponding to masked pixels, then running diffusion with text guidance to reconstruct masked areas while preserving unmasked context. The process uses the diffusion prior (v2.1+) or direct U-Net conditioning (v2.0) to guide generation toward text-aligned completions. Mask can be binary (0/255) or soft (grayscale 0-255) for graduated blending at boundaries.
Unique: Implements inpainting by zeroing latent features in masked regions rather than pixel-space masking, enabling coherent completion that respects both text guidance and unmasked image context. Supports soft masks (grayscale) for smooth boundary blending, reducing visible seams.
vs alternatives: Produces fewer boundary artifacts than Stable Diffusion inpainting due to diffusion prior conditioning, and supports multilingual prompts for non-English inpainting instructions.
Combines multiple images and text prompts by encoding each image into CLIP embeddings via the image encoder (ViT-L/14 in v2.1, ViT-bigG-14 in v2.2), interpolating or averaging embeddings, then using the diffusion prior to map the blended embedding to a coherent image. Supported in Kandinsky 2.1+ only. Allows weighted blending of image concepts (e.g., 0.7*image1 + 0.3*image2) with text guidance to steer the final output toward desired attributes.
Unique: Operates in CLIP embedding space rather than pixel or latent space, enabling semantic blending of image concepts. Uses diffusion prior to map interpolated embeddings back to coherent images, allowing fine-grained control over blend ratios without retraining.
vs alternatives: Provides explicit control over image blending weights and text guidance, unlike simple image averaging or GAN-based morphing, and leverages the diffusion prior for higher-quality outputs than direct embedding interpolation.
+6 more capabilities
Converts text prompts describing website requirements into complete, multi-page responsive website layouts with copy, images, and animations in seconds. The system ingests natural language descriptions (e.g., 'three unique landing pages in dark mode for a modern design startup'), processes them through an undisclosed LLM pipeline, and outputs design variations as editable React-compatible components in the visual editor. Generation appears to be single-pass without iterative refinement loops, producing immediately-editable designs rather than requiring approval workflows.
Unique: Generates complete multi-page websites with layout, copy, images, and animations from single text prompts, outputting directly into a Figma-quality visual editor where designs remain fully editable rather than locked outputs. Most competitors (Wix, Squarespace) use template selection; Framer generates custom layouts per prompt.
vs alternatives: Faster than hiring a designer and more customizable than template-based builders, but slower and less flexible than human designers for complex brand requirements.
Browser-based visual design interface with design-tool-grade capabilities including responsive layout editing, effects/interactions/animations, shader effects (Holo Shader, Chromatic Aberration, Logo Shaders), and real-time multi-user collaboration. The editor supports role-based permissions (viewers read-only, editors can modify), direct copy editing on published pages, and simultaneous editing by multiple team members. Built on React component architecture allowing both visual design and custom code insertion without leaving the editor.
Unique: Combines Figma-level visual design capabilities with direct website publishing and custom React component integration in a single tool, eliminating the designer→developer handoff. Includes proprietary shader effects library (Holo, Chromatic Aberration) not available in standard design tools. Real-time collaboration uses Framer's infrastructure rather than relying on external sync services.
More design-capable than Webflow (which prioritizes no-code logic) and more publishing-integrated than Figma (which requires export to separate hosting), but less feature-rich for complex interactions than Webflow's visual logic builder.
Framer scores higher at 82/100 vs Kandinsky-2 at 32/100. Kandinsky-2 leads on ecosystem, while Framer is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables creation and management of website content in multiple languages with separate content variants per locale. Available as a Pro-tier add-on with undisclosed pricing. Allows content creators to maintain language-specific versions of pages, CMS items, and copy. Implementation details (language detection, URL structure, fallback behavior, supported languages) are not documented.
Unique: Integrates multi-language content management directly into the CMS and visual editor, allowing designers to manage language variants without external translation tools. Content structure is shared across languages; only content is localized.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Contentful with language variants because no separate content model configuration required, but less flexible for complex localization workflows or translation management.
Enables one-click rollback to previous website versions, allowing teams to quickly revert breaking changes or problematic updates. Available on Pro tier and above. Maintains version history of published sites with ability to restore any previous version. Implementation details (version retention policy, automatic snapshots, granular change tracking) are not documented.
Unique: Provides one-click rollback directly in the publishing interface without requiring Git or version control knowledge. Automatic version snapshots are created on each publish. Most website builders require manual backups or external version control; Framer includes it natively.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Git-based workflows for non-technical users, but less granular than Git for selective rollback of specific changes.
Provides a server-side API for programmatic access to Framer sites, CMS content, and site management operations. Listed in product updates but not documented in detail. Capabilities, authentication, rate limits, and supported operations are unknown. Likely enables external systems to read/write CMS data, trigger deployments, or manage site configuration.
Unique: Provides server-side API access to Framer sites and CMS, enabling external integrations and automation. Specific capabilities unknown due to lack of documentation, but likely enables content synchronization with external systems.
vs alternatives: Unknown without documentation, but likely enables deeper integrations than visual-only builders like Wix or Squarespace.
Enables password protection of individual pages or entire sites, restricting access to authorized users only. Available on Basic tier and above. Allows teams to share draft content or restricted pages with specific audiences without making them publicly accessible. Implementation details (password hashing, session management, per-page vs site-wide protection) are not documented.
Unique: Integrates password protection directly into the publishing interface without requiring external authentication services. Available on Basic tier, making it accessible to all users. Simple password-based approach is easier than OAuth or SAML for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Simpler than OAuth-based authentication for quick access control, but less secure for sensitive data because password-based protection is weaker than multi-factor authentication.
Integrated content management system supporting collections (content types), items (individual records), and relational data linking across collections. The CMS supports dynamic filtering of content on pages, multi-locale content variants (Pro add-on), and auto-publish/staging workflows. Data is stored in Framer's infrastructure with tiered limits: 1 collection/1,000 items (Basic), 10 collections/2,500 items (Pro), 20 collections/10,000 items (Scale). Relational CMS (linking between collections) is Pro-tier and above. Content can be edited directly on published pages without rebuilding.
Unique: Integrates CMS directly into the visual editor with no separate admin interface, allowing designers to manage content structure and pages in one tool. Supports relational data linking between collections (Pro+) and direct on-page editing of published content without rebuilds. Most website builders separate CMS from design; Framer unifies them.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Contentful or Strapi for non-technical users because CMS structure is defined visually, but less flexible for complex data models or external integrations.
One-click publishing of websites to Framer-managed global CDN with automatic responsive optimization across devices. Supports custom domain connection (free .com on annual plans), Framer subdomains, staging environments (Pro+), instant rollback (Pro+), site redirects (Pro+), and password protection (Basic+). Hosting includes 20 CDN locations on Basic/Pro tiers and 300+ locations on Scale tier. Bandwidth limits are 10 GB (Basic), 100 GB (Pro), 200 GB (Scale) with $40 per 100 GB overage charges. Page limits are 30 (Basic), 150 (Pro), 300 (Scale) with $20 per 100 additional pages.
Unique: Integrates hosting, CDN, and staging directly into the design tool with one-click publishing, eliminating separate hosting provider setup. Automatic responsive optimization and global CDN distribution are built-in rather than requiring external services. Staging and rollback are native features, not add-ons.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Vercel/Netlify for non-technical users because no Git/CI-CD knowledge required, but less flexible for complex deployment pipelines or custom server logic.
+6 more capabilities