Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs Aide – A customizable Android assistant at 24/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Aide – A customizable Android assistant | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | App | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 24/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
This capability allows users to manage tasks through voice commands, utilizing natural language processing to interpret and execute user requests. It employs a customizable intent recognition engine that can be trained with specific user phrases, making it adaptable to individual preferences. The architecture supports integration with various task management APIs, enabling seamless task creation and updates across platforms.
Unique: Utilizes a customizable intent recognition engine that adapts to user-specific phrases, enhancing accuracy over time.
vs alternatives: More flexible than standard voice assistants by allowing users to train the system with their own phrases.
This capability enables users to select their preferred voice provider for responses, integrating with multiple TTS (text-to-speech) engines. It uses a modular architecture that allows easy swapping of TTS providers based on user preference, ensuring a personalized auditory experience. The system can dynamically load different TTS modules based on user settings, providing flexibility in voice tone and accent.
Unique: Supports multiple TTS providers with a modular architecture, allowing users to easily switch voices without app restarts.
vs alternatives: Offers more voice options than typical assistants, allowing for a truly personalized interaction.
This capability allows users to set reminders that are contextually aware, meaning they can trigger based on location, time, or user activity. It leverages geofencing APIs and activity recognition services to determine the best context for reminders, ensuring they are relevant and timely. The architecture integrates with the device's sensors to provide a seamless reminder experience that adapts to user behavior.
Unique: Utilizes device sensors and geofencing to create reminders that are highly relevant to user context, unlike standard time-based reminders.
vs alternatives: More intelligent than traditional reminder systems by incorporating location and activity data.
This capability allows users to customize the assistant's interface according to their preferences, using a modular design that supports various themes and layouts. Users can choose from a library of UI components or create their own, which are rendered dynamically based on user selections. This flexibility ensures that the assistant can cater to diverse user needs and aesthetic preferences.
Unique: Features a modular UI design that allows users to create and implement their own themes and layouts, enhancing personalization.
vs alternatives: More customizable than standard assistants, which typically offer limited theme options.
This capability enables the assistant to understand and respond in multiple languages, utilizing a language detection algorithm that identifies the user's preferred language based on input. It integrates with various translation APIs to provide real-time translation and response generation, allowing for seamless interaction in different languages. The architecture is designed to switch languages dynamically based on user input, enhancing accessibility for non-native speakers.
Unique: Employs a dynamic language detection algorithm that adjusts responses based on user input language, providing a fluid multilingual experience.
vs alternatives: More responsive to user language preferences than typical assistants, which often require manual language switching.
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Aide – A customizable Android assistant at 24/100. Aide – A customizable Android assistant leads on adoption, while Supabase is stronger on quality and ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities