| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $7.00e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates code solutions by leveraging a 32B parameter distilled variant of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning architecture, which uses chain-of-thought token prediction to decompose coding problems into intermediate reasoning steps before producing executable output. The model applies learned reasoning patterns from the larger R1 model through knowledge distillation, enabling structured problem-solving for algorithms, data structures, and multi-step implementations without requiring full R1 inference overhead.
Unique: Distilled variant of DeepSeek-R1 that compresses reasoning capability into 32B parameters through knowledge distillation, enabling chain-of-thought code generation at lower computational cost than full R1 while maintaining structured problem decomposition
vs alternatives: Smaller than full R1 (32B vs 671B) with faster inference while retaining reasoning-based code generation, vs standard code models like Codex that lack explicit reasoning traces
Solves mathematical problems by generating intermediate reasoning steps that can be verified before producing final answers, using the distilled R1 architecture's chain-of-thought capability to break down multi-step calculations, proofs, and symbolic manipulations. The model learns to show work explicitly, enabling detection of reasoning errors at intermediate stages rather than only validating final results.
Unique: Applies R1's chain-of-thought reasoning specifically to mathematics, generating verifiable intermediate steps rather than black-box final answers, enabling error detection and educational transparency
vs alternatives: More transparent than GPT-4 for math (shows reasoning steps explicitly) and more efficient than full R1 while maintaining reasoning capability, though less specialized than dedicated symbolic math engines
Solves logic puzzles, constraint satisfaction problems, and formal reasoning tasks by decomposing them into logical inference steps using the distilled R1 architecture's reasoning capability. The model learns to track constraints, eliminate possibilities, and derive conclusions through explicit logical steps, making reasoning patterns visible for validation and educational purposes.
Unique: Leverages R1's reasoning architecture to make logical inference steps explicit and traceable, enabling validation of constraint satisfaction reasoning rather than opaque final answers
vs alternatives: More transparent than general-purpose LLMs for logic problems and faster than full R1, though less complete than dedicated constraint solvers (no backtracking guarantees or optimality proofs)
Maintains conversation context across multiple turns while applying reasoning to each user query, using the model's transformer architecture to track prior exchanges and build on previous reasoning steps. Each turn can reference earlier context, enabling iterative problem-solving where the model refines solutions based on feedback or clarifications without losing the reasoning thread.
Unique: Combines R1's reasoning capability with multi-turn conversation, enabling iterative refinement of solutions where each turn builds on prior reasoning rather than treating queries in isolation
vs alternatives: More reasoning-aware than standard chatbots for iterative problem-solving, and more conversational than single-turn reasoning models, though context window limitations prevent very long conversations
Provides access to the Aion-1.0-Mini model through OpenRouter's REST API, supporting streaming token-by-token responses that enable real-time output display and early termination of long reasoning sequences. The API abstracts model deployment complexity, handling load balancing, rate limiting, and infrastructure while exposing standard HTTP endpoints for integration into applications.
Unique: Exposes Aion-1.0-Mini through OpenRouter's unified API with streaming support, abstracting deployment complexity while enabling token-by-token output for real-time reasoning visualization
vs alternatives: Simpler than self-hosting (no GPU management) and more cost-effective than full R1 inference, though slower than local inference and subject to API rate limits
Achieves reasoning capability in a 32B parameter model by applying knowledge distillation from the larger DeepSeek-R1 model, transferring learned reasoning patterns and problem-solving strategies into a smaller parameter footprint. This enables reasoning-based inference at lower computational cost, though with some capability trade-off compared to the full model.
Unique: Applies knowledge distillation to compress DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capability into 32B parameters, enabling reasoning-based inference at lower cost and latency than full R1
vs alternatives: More efficient than full R1 (32B vs 671B) while retaining reasoning capability, though with unknown performance trade-offs vs. non-distilled reasoning models
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs AionLabs: Aion-1.0-Mini at 22/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities