Firecrawl MCP Server ranks higher at 62/100 vs 한글 mcp hwpx MCP Server at 35/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | 한글 mcp hwpx MCP Server | Firecrawl MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 35/100 | 62/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 25 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Reads HWPX (Open XML-based Korean word processor format) documents without requiring persistent state or the native Hangeul application, using pure Python XML parsing via python-hwpx library. Each tool invocation explicitly specifies the filename, enabling stateless operation across distributed MCP clients. The implementation parses OPC (Open Packaging Convention) package structure to extract document metadata, text content, and structural hierarchy (sections, paragraphs, tables) with character-level position tracking for context-aware retrieval.
Unique: Implements stateless document reading where every tool call includes explicit filename parameter, eliminating session state management and enabling safe concurrent access from multiple MCP clients. Uses OPC package parsing to directly access document.xml without requiring Hangeul application or binary format reverse-engineering.
vs alternatives: Eliminates Windows/Hangeul dependency that COM-based automation requires, while maintaining full cross-platform support (Windows/macOS/Linux) with pure Python implementation.
Converts HWPX documents to Markdown format with configurable output strategies (full document or chunked by section/paragraph). The conversion pipeline parses document structure, maps heading levels to Markdown syntax (#, ##, ###), preserves table formatting as Markdown tables, and optionally splits output into chunks based on character limits or structural boundaries. Supports both file-based input (filename) and payload-based input (base64-encoded HWPX or HTTPS URL), enabling both local and remote document processing.
Unique: Supports dual input modes (file path + payload-based base64/URL) with identical tool interface, enabling both local document processing and remote document fetching. Chunking respects document structure (section/paragraph boundaries) rather than naive character splitting, preserving semantic coherence for LLM processing.
vs alternatives: Faster than Hangeul application export because it uses direct XML parsing; more flexible than pandoc because it understands HWPX-specific structure (sections, custom styles) natively.
Creates a safe copy of HWPX documents with validation to ensure copy integrity. The copy operation reads source document, validates structure, writes to destination path, and verifies copy completeness. Useful for creating backups before destructive operations or generating document variants.
Unique: Validates copy integrity by comparing source and destination structure, ensuring safe document duplication before risky operations.
vs alternatives: More reliable than OS-level file copy because it validates HWPX structure integrity; enables safe document variant generation.
Creates new tables in HWPX documents with specified row and column counts. The table creation engine inserts a table element at specified paragraph index, initializes cells with empty content, and optionally applies basic formatting (header row styling). Tables are fully editable after creation via cell-level operations.
Unique: Creates properly structured HWPX tables with configurable dimensions and optional header styling, enabling data-driven document generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than template-based tables because dimensions are configurable; more reliable than manual table insertion because it maintains HWPX structure integrity.
Modifies text content in table cells by table index, row, and column coordinates. The cell modification engine locates target cell, replaces content while preserving cell formatting, and supports batch operations for multiple cell updates. Enables data population in pre-created tables.
Unique: Provides cell-level table editing with coordinate-based access, enabling precise data population in tables.
vs alternatives: More granular than document-level editing because it operates at cell level; enables efficient data-driven table population.
Manages table cell merging and splitting operations to create complex table layouts. The merge operation combines adjacent cells horizontally or vertically, and the split operation divides merged cells back into individual cells. Supports both single-cell and range-based operations.
Unique: Supports both cell merging and splitting with directional control, enabling creation of complex table layouts programmatically.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed table structures because it allows dynamic layout adjustments; enables sophisticated report generation with merged headers and grouped data.
Applies basic formatting to tables including header row styling, border configuration, and cell alignment. The formatting engine applies predefined style templates to table elements, enabling consistent table appearance across documents.
Unique: Provides template-based table formatting that applies consistent styling across tables, enabling professional document appearance.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual cell-by-cell formatting because it applies templates; ensures consistent table appearance across documents.
Applies formatting attributes (bold, italic, underline, color, font size, font family) to text ranges within paragraphs. The formatting engine locates target text, applies formatting attributes to underlying XML runs, and preserves existing formatting for non-targeted attributes. Supports both single-range and multi-range formatting operations.
Unique: Applies multiple formatting attributes simultaneously to text ranges while preserving existing formatting on non-targeted attributes.
vs alternatives: More flexible than paragraph-level formatting because it operates at text range level; enables selective emphasis within paragraphs.
+17 more capabilities
Scrapes a single URL and converts HTML content to clean markdown using Firecrawl's content extraction pipeline. The firecrawl_scrape tool accepts a URL and optional parameters (formats, headers, wait time, screenshot capability) and returns structured markdown output with automatic cleanup of boilerplate, navigation, and ads. Implements MCP tool handler pattern that marshals arguments through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client library to Firecrawl's backend processing engine.
Unique: Integrates Firecrawl's proprietary content extraction engine (which uses ML-based boilerplate removal and semantic content identification) through MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to access production-grade web scraping without managing browser automation or parsing logic themselves. The markdown conversion is handled server-side rather than client-side, reducing latency and ensuring consistent output formatting.
vs alternatives: Cleaner markdown output than regex-based scrapers like Cheerio or Puppeteer-only solutions because Firecrawl uses ML models to identify main content; simpler than self-hosted solutions because it's fully managed and requires only an API key.
Scrapes multiple URLs in a single operation using Firecrawl's batch processing pipeline. The firecrawl_batch_scrape tool accepts an array of URLs and shared options, submitting them to Firecrawl's backend which processes them in parallel and returns an array of markdown-converted content objects. Implements batching through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client's batch method, which handles request queuing, parallel execution, and result aggregation without requiring client-side coordination.
Unique: Implements server-side parallel batch processing through Firecrawl's backend rather than client-side loop iteration, reducing network round-trips and enabling true concurrent scraping. The batch operation is atomic from the MCP client perspective — a single tool call returns all results, simplifying agent orchestration logic.
More efficient than sequential scraping loops because Firecrawl handles parallelization server-side; simpler than managing Promise.all() with individual scrape calls because batching is a first-class operation with built-in error handling.
Firecrawl MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs 한글 mcp hwpx MCP Server at 35/100. 한글 mcp hwpx MCP Server leads on ecosystem, while Firecrawl MCP Server is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Packages the Firecrawl MCP server as a Docker container with environment-based configuration, enabling deployment to containerized infrastructure (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, cloud platforms). The Dockerfile builds a Node.js runtime with the server code and exposes configuration through environment variables, allowing operators to deploy without modifying code. Supports both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through configuration.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker packaging with environment-based configuration, enabling zero-code deployment to containerized infrastructure. The Dockerfile handles Node.js runtime setup and dependency installation, reducing deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual deployment because Docker handles environment setup; more portable than binary distribution because containers run consistently across platforms.
Registers the Firecrawl MCP server in the Smithery registry, enabling one-click installation and discovery through Smithery's MCP client marketplace. The server is published to Smithery with metadata (description, tags, configuration schema) allowing users to discover and install it without manual setup. Smithery handles server distribution, version management, and client integration.
Unique: Leverages Smithery's MCP server registry to enable one-click installation without manual configuration, reducing friction for end users. Smithery handles server discovery, versioning, and client integration, abstracting deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual installation because Smithery handles discovery and setup; more discoverable than GitHub-only distribution because Smithery provides a centralized marketplace.
Supports connecting to self-hosted Firecrawl instances in addition to Firecrawl's cloud service through configurable API endpoint. The FIRECRAWL_API_URL environment variable allows operators to specify a custom Firecrawl endpoint, enabling deployment scenarios where Firecrawl runs on-premises or in a private cloud. The @mendable/firecrawl-js client library handles endpoint abstraction, routing all API calls to the configured endpoint.
Unique: Enables flexible deployment by supporting both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through simple endpoint configuration, allowing operators to choose deployment model without code changes. The endpoint abstraction is handled by @mendable/firecrawl-js, making self-hosted support transparent to MCP server code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-only solutions because self-hosted option is available; simpler than maintaining separate server implementations because endpoint configuration is unified.
Discovers all URLs within a website by crawling from a base URL and building a sitemap-like structure. The firecrawl_map tool accepts a base URL and optional parameters (max depth, include patterns, exclude patterns) and returns a hierarchical array of discovered URLs with metadata about page structure. Uses Firecrawl's crawler to traverse internal links up to specified depth, filtering by inclusion/exclusion patterns, and returns the complete URL graph without fetching full page content.
Unique: Provides lightweight URL discovery without content extraction, allowing agents to plan scraping strategy before committing credits to full content fetches. The depth-based crawling with pattern filtering enables selective discovery — agents can discover only URLs matching specific criteria (e.g., /blog/* paths) without exploring entire site.
vs alternatives: More efficient than scraping every page to build a sitemap because it skips content extraction; more reliable than parsing robots.txt or sitemaps.xml because it performs actual crawling and discovers dynamically-linked content.
Crawls an entire website and extracts content from all discovered pages in a single asynchronous operation. The firecrawl_crawl tool accepts a base URL and options (max pages, allowed domains, exclude patterns, scrape options) and returns a crawl ID for polling. The crawler discovers URLs, extracts markdown content from each page, and stores results server-side. Clients poll firecrawl_crawl_status to retrieve results as they complete, implementing an async job pattern rather than blocking until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side asynchronous crawling with job-based result retrieval, decoupling the crawl initiation from result consumption. The MCP server handles polling coordination through firecrawl_crawl_status, allowing AI agents to initiate long-running crawls and check progress without blocking. Firecrawl's backend manages the entire crawl lifecycle including URL discovery, content extraction, and result storage.
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential scraping because crawling happens server-side in parallel; simpler than managing Puppeteer/Playwright browser pools because Firecrawl abstracts browser automation and handles rate limiting internally.
Polls the status of an in-progress or completed website crawl and retrieves extracted content. The firecrawl_crawl_status tool accepts a crawl ID and returns current progress (pages crawled, pages remaining, completion percentage), status state (running/completed/failed), and paginated results. Implements polling pattern where clients repeatedly call this tool with the same crawl ID to check progress and incrementally retrieve content as pages are processed, supporting streaming-like result consumption.
Unique: Provides non-blocking status and result retrieval for asynchronous crawls, enabling agents to manage long-running operations without blocking. The polling pattern with pagination allows incremental result consumption — agents can start processing results before the entire crawl completes, reducing end-to-end latency for large crawls.
vs alternatives: More flexible than blocking crawl operations because agents can check progress and retrieve partial results; simpler than webhook-based result delivery because polling requires no external infrastructure setup.
+5 more capabilities