| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Bootstraps an MCP server instance with built-in security constraints and validation layers before exposing any tools or resources. The server enforces authentication, authorization, and input validation at the protocol level rather than delegating to individual tool handlers, using a declarative configuration model to define allowed operations and access patterns.
Unique: Implements security as a first-class concern at the MCP server layer rather than as an afterthought in individual tool implementations, using declarative policy definitions that apply uniformly across all exposed tools and resources
vs alternatives: Provides centralized security enforcement for MCP servers whereas most MCP implementations delegate security to individual tool handlers, reducing the attack surface and ensuring consistent policy application
Registers tools and resources with the MCP server while enforcing fine-grained capability-based access control that determines which clients can invoke which tools based on their assigned roles or permissions. Each tool is wrapped with a security middleware that validates the caller's capabilities against a capability matrix before execution, preventing unauthorized tool invocation at the protocol level.
Unique: Implements capability-based access control at the MCP protocol layer using a declarative capability matrix that applies uniformly to all tools, rather than embedding access checks within individual tool implementations
vs alternatives: Provides centralized, auditable tool access control for MCP servers whereas typical implementations require per-tool authorization logic, reducing code duplication and ensuring consistent security policies
Intercepts all incoming MCP requests and validates them against defined schemas before passing them to tool handlers, including type checking, format validation, and sanitization of potentially malicious input patterns. The middleware uses JSON Schema or similar declarative validators to ensure requests conform to expected structures, preventing injection attacks and malformed data from reaching tool implementations.
Unique: Implements validation as a middleware layer in the MCP request pipeline using declarative schemas, ensuring all tools benefit from consistent input validation without requiring per-tool implementation
vs alternatives: Provides centralized input validation for MCP servers whereas most implementations require each tool to implement its own validation logic, reducing code duplication and ensuring consistent validation standards
Manages client authentication for MCP connections using pluggable authentication providers (API keys, OAuth tokens, mutual TLS, etc.) and maintains a credential store that validates incoming client credentials before allowing tool access. The system supports multiple authentication methods simultaneously and can revoke credentials without server restart, using a credential validation pipeline that checks authentication status before processing any MCP request.
Unique: Implements pluggable authentication providers that can be swapped at runtime without code changes, supporting multiple authentication methods simultaneously and enabling credential revocation without server restart
vs alternatives: Provides flexible, multi-method authentication for MCP servers whereas most implementations support only a single authentication method, enabling organizations to use different authentication strategies for different client types
Records all security-relevant events (authentication attempts, authorization decisions, tool invocations, validation failures) to an audit log with structured metadata including timestamp, client identity, action, result, and context. The logging system supports multiple output backends (files, databases, external logging services) and can be configured to alert on suspicious patterns or policy violations, providing a complete audit trail for compliance and forensic analysis.
Unique: Implements structured audit logging at the MCP server layer with support for multiple backends and configurable alerting, capturing all security-relevant events in a centralized, queryable format
vs alternatives: Provides comprehensive audit trails for MCP servers whereas most implementations offer minimal logging, enabling organizations to meet compliance requirements and conduct security investigations
Enforces rate limits on tool invocations per client, per tool, or globally to prevent abuse and resource exhaustion. The system uses token bucket or sliding window algorithms to track invocation rates and can enforce different limits for different clients based on their tier or role. Rate limit violations trigger configurable actions (request rejection, throttling, alerting) and are logged for security analysis.
Unique: Implements multi-level rate limiting (per-client, per-tool, global) with configurable algorithms and distributed state management, enabling fine-grained control over resource consumption across multiple server instances
vs alternatives: Provides sophisticated rate limiting for MCP servers whereas most implementations offer only basic per-client limits, enabling organizations to enforce complex usage policies and protect against various abuse patterns
Executes tools in isolated environments with restricted resource access (CPU, memory, file system, network) to prevent a misbehaving or compromised tool from affecting the MCP server or other tools. The system uses containerization, process isolation, or language-level sandboxing depending on the tool implementation, with configurable resource quotas and timeout enforcement to prevent resource exhaustion.
Unique: Implements multi-level resource isolation using containerization or process-level sandboxing with configurable quotas, preventing misbehaving tools from affecting server stability or other tools
vs alternatives: Provides strong isolation guarantees for MCP servers executing untrusted tools whereas most implementations run all tools in the same process, enabling safe execution of third-party or user-provided tools
Enforces organizational security policies and compliance requirements (e.g., data residency, encryption, audit requirements) by validating tool invocations against policy rules before execution. The system uses a policy engine that evaluates conditions (client location, data classification, tool type) and either allows, denies, or requires additional validation (e.g., multi-factor approval) for tool invocations, with detailed logging of policy decisions for compliance reporting.
Unique: Implements a policy engine that evaluates complex organizational policies against tool invocations, supporting conditional logic and approval workflows rather than simple allow/deny rules
vs alternatives: Provides sophisticated policy enforcement for MCP servers whereas most implementations offer only basic access control, enabling organizations to enforce complex compliance and security policies
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs secure-mcp-server at 25/100. secure-mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities