| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 7 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Alchemy's blockchain RPC methods (eth_call, eth_getBalance, eth_sendTransaction, etc.) as MCP tools that can be called by Claude and other MCP clients. Implements a schema-based tool registry that maps Alchemy's JSON-RPC API surface to MCP's standardized tool-calling interface, handling parameter validation, request serialization, and response deserialization transparently.
Unique: Bridges Alchemy's full JSON-RPC API surface directly into MCP's tool-calling protocol without requiring developers to write custom tool definitions; handles Alchemy-specific enhanced methods (alchemy_getTokenBalances, alchemy_getNFTs) alongside standard Ethereum RPC, providing a unified interface for blockchain data access in agentic contexts.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom Claude tools for each Alchemy method and more feature-complete than generic Ethereum RPC MCP servers because it exposes Alchemy's proprietary enhanced APIs (token/NFT data, transaction simulation) natively.
Abstracts blockchain network selection by mapping network identifiers (mainnet, sepolia, polygon, arbitrum, etc.) to Alchemy endpoints, allowing MCP clients to specify target chains without managing endpoint URLs. Implements a configuration layer that routes RPC calls to the correct Alchemy endpoint based on network context, supporting both EVM and non-EVM chains that Alchemy serves.
Unique: Provides transparent network routing within the MCP protocol layer, allowing clients to specify chains as parameters rather than managing separate tool instances per network; integrates Alchemy's multi-chain endpoint infrastructure directly into the MCP tool registry.
vs alternatives: More convenient than managing separate MCP servers per blockchain network and more flexible than hardcoded single-chain RPC tools because it centralizes network routing logic in one server instance.
Wraps Alchemy's proprietary enhanced APIs (alchemy_getTokenBalances, alchemy_getNFTs, alchemy_getAssetTransfers, alchemy_getOwnersForToken) as MCP tools, providing high-level blockchain data queries without requiring clients to parse raw contract state or construct complex filter logic. These methods abstract away contract interaction complexity and return pre-indexed, normalized data from Alchemy's infrastructure.
Unique: Exposes Alchemy's proprietary indexed data APIs (not available through standard Ethereum RPC) as first-class MCP tools, allowing agents to query normalized token and NFT data without implementing custom indexing or contract parsing logic.
vs alternatives: More efficient than building agents that call raw eth_call methods to query token balances or NFT ownership because it leverages Alchemy's pre-indexed data; provides richer metadata than generic blockchain RPC servers.
Implements standard MCP server initialization, configuration loading, and resource management. Handles MCP protocol handshake, tool registry initialization, and graceful shutdown. Supports environment-based configuration (API keys, network settings) and exposes Alchemy API credentials securely through the MCP server process without leaking them to clients.
Unique: Implements the full MCP server specification for Alchemy, handling protocol compliance, tool registry initialization, and secure credential management within the server process boundary.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building a custom MCP server from scratch because it provides pre-built lifecycle management and Alchemy-specific tool definitions; more secure than passing API keys directly to clients because credentials stay server-side.
Implements error handling for blockchain RPC failures, network timeouts, and invalid parameters. Maps Alchemy-specific error codes and JSON-RPC errors to human-readable MCP error responses. Provides retry logic for transient failures (network timeouts, temporary endpoint unavailability) while failing fast on permanent errors (invalid addresses, insufficient gas).
Unique: Provides Alchemy-specific error handling that understands blockchain-domain failures (invalid addresses, contract reverts, gas estimation errors) and maps them to MCP error responses, rather than generic HTTP error handling.
vs alternatives: More robust than naive RPC proxies that fail on any error because it implements retry logic and error classification; more transparent than black-box error handling because it exposes error details to agents.
Validates MCP tool parameters against JSON schemas derived from Alchemy's RPC method signatures. Checks parameter types, required fields, and value constraints (e.g., valid hex addresses, block numbers) before sending requests to Alchemy. Provides detailed validation error messages to clients, preventing invalid RPC calls and reducing wasted API quota.
Unique: Implements JSON schema-based validation for Alchemy RPC parameters within the MCP tool registry, preventing invalid calls before they reach Alchemy's endpoints.
vs alternatives: More efficient than letting invalid calls fail at Alchemy because it catches errors earlier and provides better error messages; more maintainable than custom validation code because it uses standard JSON schemas.
Provides MCP tools for constructing unsigned transaction objects that conform to Ethereum standards (EIP-1559, legacy transactions). Accepts transaction parameters (to, from, value, data, gas, gasPrice) and returns a serialized transaction object ready for signing. Does not perform signing itself (that remains client responsibility) but validates transaction structure and estimates gas if requested.
Unique: Integrates Alchemy's gas estimation and transaction validation into the MCP tool layer, allowing agents to construct and validate transactions without implementing Ethereum transaction encoding logic.
vs alternatives: Simpler than agents implementing their own transaction encoding because it provides pre-built transaction construction tools; more flexible than hardcoded transaction templates because it accepts arbitrary parameters.
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs @alchemy/mcp-server at 30/100. @alchemy/mcp-server leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities