| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements a Model Context Protocol server that accepts tool definitions and exposes them through the standardized MCP interface, enabling LLMs to discover and invoke registered tools via a bidirectional message protocol. Uses a schema-based registration pattern where tools are defined declaratively and automatically marshaled into MCP-compliant tool schemas with input validation and response formatting.
Unique: Provides a flexible abstraction layer for tool registration that decouples tool implementation from MCP protocol details, allowing developers to define tools once and expose them to any MCP-compatible client without protocol-specific boilerplate
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded tool implementations because it supports dynamic tool registration and discovery, whereas REST API approaches require separate documentation and client-side schema management
Enables connection to external data sources and APIs (databases, REST endpoints, file systems, third-party services) through a pluggable adapter pattern where each resource type has a corresponding adapter that handles authentication, data transformation, and error handling. Adapters implement a common interface that abstracts away protocol-specific details, allowing tools to interact with diverse backends uniformly.
Unique: Uses a pluggable adapter architecture that allows new resource types to be added without modifying the core MCP server, enabling teams to extend integration capabilities independently through well-defined interfaces
vs alternatives: More maintainable than monolithic integration code because adapters are isolated and testable; easier to add new sources than hardcoded REST client approaches that require server redeployment
Validates incoming tool invocation requests against registered JSON schemas, transforms parameters into the format expected by underlying implementations, and executes tools with proper error handling and response formatting. Uses schema validation to catch malformed requests before execution, reducing wasted LLM context and preventing runtime errors that confuse the model.
Unique: Implements schema-based validation at the MCP protocol boundary, catching invalid tool calls before they reach backend systems and providing structured feedback that helps LLMs self-correct without wasting context on failed executions
vs alternatives: More robust than runtime error handling because validation happens before execution, preventing cascading failures and reducing the number of retries needed for LLMs to get tool calls right
Manages the full lifecycle of MCP protocol messages including tool discovery requests, tool invocation requests, and response formatting, implementing proper message sequencing and error handling to ensure reliable communication between LLM clients and the server. Handles both synchronous request-response patterns and asynchronous notification patterns defined in the MCP specification.
Unique: Implements full MCP protocol message handling including proper JSON-RPC sequencing, error codes, and response formatting, ensuring compatibility with any MCP-compliant client without requiring client-specific customization
vs alternatives: More standardized than custom REST APIs because it uses the MCP protocol specification, enabling interoperability with multiple clients (Claude, custom tools, future MCP implementations) without protocol translation
Exposes a tools list endpoint that returns all registered tools with their complete JSON Schema definitions, descriptions, and parameter specifications in a format that LLM clients can parse and use for prompt engineering and tool selection. Enables clients to dynamically discover available capabilities without hardcoding tool knowledge, supporting dynamic tool registration and removal.
Unique: Provides dynamic tool discovery through MCP protocol, allowing LLM clients to query available tools at runtime rather than relying on static tool definitions, enabling seamless addition of new integrations without client updates
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded tool lists because tools can be added/removed at runtime and clients automatically discover changes; better than REST API documentation because schemas are machine-readable and directly usable by LLMs
Implements comprehensive error handling across the tool execution pipeline including validation errors, execution failures, timeout handling, and resource exhaustion, returning structured error responses with diagnostic information that helps both developers and LLMs understand what went wrong. Supports error recovery strategies like retries with exponential backoff for transient failures.
Unique: Provides structured error responses with diagnostic context that helps both LLMs and developers understand failure modes, including error categorization (transient vs permanent) to guide retry decisions and resource exhaustion detection to prevent cascading failures
vs alternatives: More informative than generic error messages because it provides structured diagnostic data and error categorization; better than silent failures because it gives LLMs explicit feedback to adjust behavior
Executes tools in an isolated context where each invocation is independent by default, but optionally supports passing context between invocations through explicit parameters or a shared context object. Maintains separation of concerns between tool logic and state management, allowing tools to be composed into workflows without implicit dependencies.
Unique: Enforces stateless tool execution by default with optional explicit context passing, enabling horizontal scaling and concurrent execution without state synchronization overhead, while maintaining composability for multi-step workflows
vs alternatives: More scalable than stateful tool execution because tools can be distributed across multiple server instances without session affinity; more composable than implicit state because context dependencies are explicit and auditable
Implements the MCP protocol in a transport-agnostic way, supporting multiple transport mechanisms (stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, custom) through a pluggable transport layer. Allows the same tool definitions and business logic to be exposed through different transports without modification, enabling deployment flexibility.
Unique: Separates MCP protocol implementation from transport concerns through a pluggable transport layer, enabling the same tool definitions to be exposed through stdio, HTTP, WebSocket, or custom transports without code duplication
vs alternatives: More flexible than transport-specific implementations because tools can be deployed through multiple transports without modification; easier to migrate between deployment models than rebuilding for each transport
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Jama Abstract MCP Server at 32/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities