MXBAI Embed Large (335M) ranks higher at 23/100 vs All-MiniLM (22M, 33M) at 21/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | All-MiniLM (22M, 33M) | MXBAI Embed Large (335M) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 21/100 | 23/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 10 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Generates fixed-dimensional dense vector embeddings from input text using self-supervised contrastive learning trained on large sentence-level datasets. The model encodes semantic meaning into a continuous vector space, enabling downstream similarity computations via cosine distance or dot product. Embeddings are computed locally via Ollama's inference runtime, with REST API and language-specific client bindings (Python, JavaScript) for integration.
Unique: Lightweight parameter count (22M-33M) trained via self-supervised contrastive learning on sentence-level datasets, enabling sub-100MB model size while maintaining semantic quality — deployed as a local-first Ollama model with no cloud dependency, unlike proprietary embedding APIs. Specific training datasets and embedding dimensionality are undocumented, making it difficult to assess exact semantic capacity vs. larger models.
vs alternatives: Significantly smaller and faster than OpenAI text-embedding-3 or Cohere embeddings (no API latency, no per-token costs, full data privacy), but with unknown semantic quality and no documented multilingual support — best for cost-sensitive or privacy-first RAG systems where embedding quality is secondary to inference speed and local control.
Exposes embedding generation through Ollama's standardized REST API endpoint (POST /api/embeddings) and language-specific client libraries (Python ollama.embeddings(), JavaScript ollama.embeddings()). Requests are routed to a locally-running Ollama daemon, which manages model loading, GPU/CPU inference, and response serialization. No authentication or API keys required for local deployment; cloud-hosted Ollama Cloud requires account credentials.
Unique: Ollama's unified inference platform abstracts model loading and GPU/CPU management behind a simple REST API, with language-specific client libraries that handle serialization — no need to manage transformers library dependencies or CUDA setup. Concurrency model is tier-based on Ollama Cloud, allowing teams to scale from local development (1 model) to production (10 concurrent models) without code changes.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than self-hosting sentence-transformers via FastAPI or Flask (no boilerplate server code), and cheaper than cloud embedding APIs (no per-token costs), but with synchronous-only API and no built-in batching — best for moderate-throughput applications where latency per request is acceptable and data residency is critical.
Provides two parameter-efficient model variants (22M and 33M parameters) designed for edge devices, mobile backends, and resource-constrained environments. Both variants fit in <100MB disk space and are quantized/optimized for Ollama's GGUF format (exact quantization method undocumented). The 22M variant prioritizes minimal footprint; the 33M variant trades slightly larger size for potentially improved semantic quality. Model selection is transparent to the API — clients specify 'all-minilm:22m' or 'all-minilm:33m' in requests.
Unique: Sentence-transformers' All-MiniLM family uses knowledge distillation and parameter reduction techniques to achieve <50M parameters while maintaining semantic quality — deployed as discrete Ollama variants (22M, 33M) that clients can select at runtime without code changes. Exact distillation approach and quality metrics are undocumented, making it difficult to assess semantic degradation vs. larger models.
vs alternatives: Dramatically smaller than general-purpose embeddings (e.g., all-MiniLM-L6-v2 vs. OpenAI text-embedding-3-large), enabling deployment on edge devices and reducing cloud inference costs, but with unknown semantic quality and no documented performance benchmarks — best for resource-constrained systems where embedding quality is secondary to model size and inference speed.
Embeddings generated by All-MiniLM are designed for semantic similarity computation using standard distance metrics (cosine similarity, dot product, Euclidean distance). The model's contrastive learning training objective aligns semantically similar texts to have high dot product in the embedding space. Similarity computation is performed client-side using standard linear algebra libraries (numpy, torch, etc.) — the model itself only generates embeddings; similarity scoring is the responsibility of the application layer.
Unique: All-MiniLM's contrastive learning training aligns the embedding space such that semantically similar sentences have high dot product — this is a design choice that makes dot product a valid similarity metric without explicit normalization, unlike some embedding models. However, the exact training objective (triplet loss, InfoNCE, etc.) and normalization properties are undocumented.
vs alternatives: Lightweight embeddings enable efficient similarity computation at scale (small vectors = fast dot products, low memory), but with unknown semantic quality and no documented similarity calibration — best for high-volume retrieval where speed and cost matter more than ranking precision, compared to larger models like OpenAI embeddings which may have better semantic alignment.
All-MiniLM is specifically designed for RAG pipelines where documents are pre-embedded and stored in a vector database, and user queries are embedded at runtime to retrieve semantically similar documents. The model encodes both documents and queries into the same embedding space, enabling direct similarity-based retrieval without fine-tuning. Integration with vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, etc.) is application-layer responsibility — the model provides only embedding generation.
Unique: All-MiniLM is explicitly designed for RAG use cases with symmetric query-document embeddings trained on sentence-level contrastive objectives — this enables simple, direct similarity-based retrieval without asymmetric query/document encoders. However, the exact training data and contrastive objective are undocumented, making it unclear how well embeddings generalize to domain-specific documents.
vs alternatives: Lightweight and fast compared to larger embedding models (e.g., OpenAI text-embedding-3), enabling cost-effective RAG at scale, but with unknown semantic quality and no documented domain adaptation — best for general-purpose RAG systems where embedding speed and cost are priorities, compared to specialized models like ColBERT or domain-fine-tuned embeddings which may achieve better retrieval precision.
All-MiniLM is available on Ollama Cloud, a managed inference platform that abstracts infrastructure management and provides API-based access without self-hosting. Concurrency limits are tier-based: Free tier allows 1 concurrent model, Pro tier allows 3, and Max tier allows 10. Billing is per-model-minute or subscription-based (exact pricing model undocumented). Cloud deployment uses the same REST API as local Ollama, enabling seamless migration from local to cloud without code changes.
Unique: Ollama Cloud provides a managed inference platform with tier-based concurrency scaling (Free: 1, Pro: 3, Max: 10 concurrent models) and API-compatible interface with local Ollama — this enables zero-code-change migration from development to production. However, pricing, SLAs, and data residency policies are undocumented, creating uncertainty around cost and compliance.
vs alternatives: Simpler than self-hosting Ollama on cloud infrastructure (no Kubernetes, Docker, or DevOps overhead) and cheaper than cloud embedding APIs (no per-token costs), but with undocumented pricing and concurrency limits that may be insufficient for high-throughput systems — best for teams prioritizing simplicity and cost over maximum scale and control.
Generates high-dimensional dense vector representations of arbitrary-length text inputs using a Bert-large-sized (335M parameter) architecture trained without MTEB benchmark data leakage. The model accepts raw text strings and outputs numerical embedding vectors optimized for semantic similarity and retrieval tasks, with inference available through Ollama's REST API, Python SDK, and JavaScript SDK for local or cloud execution.
Unique: Achieves state-of-the-art MTEB performance for Bert-large-sized models (335M parameters) through training without MTEB benchmark data leakage, enabling fair generalization across domains and text lengths. Outperforms OpenAI's text-embedding-3-large (commercial model 20x larger) while maintaining 670MB footprint suitable for local deployment, using Ollama's GGUF-based quantization for efficient inference across CPU and GPU hardware.
vs alternatives: Delivers commercial-grade embedding quality (matching 20x larger models) at 1/20th the parameter count with local-first deployment, eliminating API latency, cost, and data privacy concerns compared to OpenAI/Cohere cloud embeddings while maintaining MTEB-fair evaluation without benchmark contamination.
Exposes embedding inference through Ollama's standardized REST API endpoint (http://localhost:11434/api/embeddings) with native language bindings for Python and JavaScript, enabling seamless integration into existing applications without custom HTTP client code. The API abstracts model loading, inference execution, and vector serialization, supporting both local execution and cloud deployment through Ollama's subscription tiers.
Unique: Ollama's unified API abstraction layer automatically handles model quantization (GGUF format), hardware detection (CPU/GPU), and inference optimization without requiring users to manage CUDA, PyTorch, or model serving frameworks. The same Python/JavaScript SDK code executes identically on local hardware or cloud infrastructure, with transparent fallback from GPU to CPU inference if VRAM is insufficient.
MXBAI Embed Large (335M) scores higher at 23/100 vs All-MiniLM (22M, 33M) at 21/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than Hugging Face Transformers (no manual model loading/tokenization) and lower operational overhead than vLLM/TGI (no Docker/Kubernetes required), while maintaining compatibility with standard HTTP clients and supporting both local and cloud execution without code changes.
Leverages the model's MTEB-optimized dense embeddings to compute cosine similarity between query and document vectors, enabling semantic search, document ranking, and relevance scoring without explicit similarity computation code. The embedding space is trained to maximize similarity between semantically related texts across diverse domains, supporting both exact-match and semantic-fuzzy retrieval patterns.
Unique: The model's MTEB-fair training (no benchmark data leakage) ensures similarity computations generalize across diverse domains and text lengths without overfitting to specific retrieval tasks. The Bert-large architecture balances semantic expressiveness with computational efficiency, enabling cosine similarity to capture nuanced semantic relationships while remaining fast enough for real-time ranking on consumer hardware.
vs alternatives: Outperforms keyword-based search (BM25) by capturing semantic intent, while requiring less computational overhead than cross-encoder reranking models and avoiding API costs of commercial embedding services like OpenAI, enabling cost-effective semantic search at scale.
Ollama runtime automatically detects available hardware (GPU/CPU) and optimizes model inference execution without manual CUDA/PyTorch configuration. The model is distributed in GGUF quantized format, enabling efficient inference on consumer GPUs (likely <4GB VRAM) and CPU fallback, with transparent model loading and caching managed by Ollama's daemon process.
Unique: Ollama's GGUF quantization format and automatic hardware detection eliminate manual CUDA/PyTorch setup, enabling developers to run production-grade embeddings with a single 'ollama pull' command. The runtime transparently switches between GPU and CPU inference based on available hardware, with no code changes required.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Hugging Face Transformers + CUDA setup (no environment variables, no version conflicts) and more portable than Docker-based serving (no container overhead), while maintaining inference performance through GGUF quantization and hardware-specific optimization.
Ollama offers cloud deployment of mxbai-embed-large through subscription tiers (Free, Pro, Max) with increasing concurrent model limits (1, 3, 10 respectively), enabling elastic scaling without managing infrastructure. Cloud execution uses the same API and SDK as local deployment, allowing transparent migration from local to cloud without application code changes.
Unique: Ollama's cloud service maintains API compatibility with local execution, enabling developers to test locally and deploy to cloud with identical code. Concurrency-based pricing model (1/3/10 concurrent models) differs from traditional per-request pricing, optimizing for sustained workloads rather than bursty traffic.
vs alternatives: Simpler than managing self-hosted Ollama infrastructure while maintaining local-first development experience, though concurrency limits and undocumented pricing/SLA make it less suitable than specialized embedding APIs (Cohere, OpenAI) for high-scale production workloads.
The model is trained without MTEB benchmark data leakage, enabling fair evaluation and generalization across diverse domains, tasks, and text lengths. This training approach ensures embeddings capture genuine semantic relationships rather than overfitting to specific benchmark tasks, supporting robust performance on out-of-distribution text (medical, legal, code, social media, etc.).
Unique: Explicit training without MTEB benchmark data leakage ensures fair evaluation and genuine domain generalization, contrasting with models trained on contaminated benchmarks that overfit to specific retrieval tasks. This approach prioritizes semantic understanding over benchmark gaming, enabling robust performance on diverse real-world text.
vs alternatives: More trustworthy evaluation than models with potential benchmark contamination, though lacking domain-specific fine-tuning optimizations that specialized models (medical-BERT, legal-BERT) might provide for narrow use cases.
The Ollama REST API supports embedding multiple text strings in a single request, enabling efficient batch processing of documents without per-text API overhead. Batch requests reduce network latency and allow the inference engine to optimize computation across multiple inputs, improving throughput for large-scale embedding tasks.
Unique: Ollama's batch API enables efficient bulk embedding without requiring custom batching logic or model serving framework, supporting both local and cloud execution with identical API. Batch processing leverages hardware parallelism (GPU tensor operations) to improve throughput compared to sequential per-text requests.
vs alternatives: Simpler than implementing custom batching with Hugging Face Transformers, while maintaining compatibility with standard HTTP clients and supporting both local and cloud execution without infrastructure overhead.
The model supports optional task-specific prompting to optimize embeddings for different use cases, with documented guidance for retrieval tasks: 'Represent this sentence for searching relevant passages: [text]'. This prompt engineering approach adapts the embedding space without fine-tuning, enabling semantic search optimization while maintaining generalization across other tasks.
Unique: The model supports task-specific prompting without fine-tuning, enabling zero-shot adaptation to different embedding tasks by signaling intent through natural language prefixes. This approach maintains generalization while optimizing for specific use cases, contrasting with task-specific fine-tuned models that sacrifice generalization.
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed-purpose embedding models while avoiding fine-tuning overhead, though less optimized than task-specific fine-tuned models for narrow use cases.
+2 more capabilities