ai2_arc vs vectra
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | ai2_arc | vectra |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Dataset | Repository |
| UnfragileRank | 25/100 | 38/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 |
| 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Provides a curated collection of 7,787 multiple-choice science questions (Challenge set) and 99,911 additional questions (full corpus) sourced from real educational assessments and standardized tests. The dataset is structured with question text, four answer options, and ground-truth labels, enabling direct training and evaluation of QA models on grade-school science reasoning tasks without requiring annotation from scratch.
Unique: Combines two distinct question sources (Challenge set from ARC competition + Easy/Medium/Hard tiers from broader corpus) with explicit difficulty stratification and sourcing from real standardized tests rather than synthetic generation, enabling controlled evaluation across reasoning difficulty levels
vs alternatives: Larger and more diverse than SQuAD (extractive QA only) and more grounded in real educational assessments than RACE, making it better suited for evaluating reasoning-heavy multiple-choice understanding
Implements efficient columnar storage via Apache Parquet format with HuggingFace Datasets library integration, enabling lazy row-level access without loading the entire 406K+ question corpus into memory. The streaming architecture supports batch iteration, random sampling, and train/test split management through the datasets library's memory-mapped file handling and automatic caching mechanisms.
Unique: Leverages HuggingFace Datasets' memory-mapped Parquet backend with automatic split management (train/test/validation) and built-in caching, avoiding manual file I/O and enabling seamless integration with PyTorch DataLoader and TensorFlow tf.data pipelines
vs alternatives: More memory-efficient than CSV-based datasets (columnar compression) and simpler than custom HDF5 implementations while maintaining compatibility with standard ML training frameworks
Provides pre-defined train/test splits (Challenge set: 1,119 test questions; Easy/Medium/Hard tiers: stratified by difficulty) with fixed random seeds and deterministic sampling, ensuring reproducible model evaluation across research teams. The split structure enables fair comparison of model architectures by controlling for data leakage and maintaining consistent evaluation protocols across published benchmarks.
Unique: Combines difficulty-stratified splits (Easy/Medium/Hard tiers) with a separate Challenge set from the ARC competition, enabling both broad evaluation and targeted assessment of model reasoning on harder questions, while maintaining fixed seeds for deterministic reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than ad-hoc 80/20 splits by explicitly controlling for difficulty distribution and providing a separate challenge benchmark, similar to GLUE but with science-domain specificity
Supports seamless integration with multiple data processing ecosystems (pandas DataFrames, polars, MLCroissant metadata format) and export to standard formats (CSV, JSON, parquet), enabling interoperability across PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, and custom training pipelines. The HuggingFace Datasets library abstraction handles format conversion automatically, removing friction from data pipeline construction.
Unique: Provides native integration with HuggingFace Datasets library's format abstraction layer, enabling single-line conversions to pandas/polars/CSV/JSON while maintaining metadata through MLCroissant standard, rather than requiring manual serialization code
vs alternatives: More flexible than raw parquet files (which require custom deserialization) and simpler than building custom ETL pipelines, with automatic handling of schema preservation across format conversions
Enables evaluation of open-domain QA systems (not just multiple-choice) by providing ground-truth answer labels that can be compared against model predictions using standard metrics (exact match, F1 score, BLEU). The dataset structure supports both extractive QA evaluation (matching answer spans) and generative QA evaluation (comparing predicted text to reference answers), making it suitable for benchmarking diverse QA architectures.
Unique: Provides ground-truth labels for both multiple-choice classification and open-domain QA evaluation, enabling researchers to benchmark models that generate free-form answers by comparing predictions to the correct option text, rather than limiting evaluation to multiple-choice accuracy
vs alternatives: More versatile than SQuAD (extractive-only) for evaluating generative QA, and more rigorous than RACE by including explicit difficulty stratification and sourcing from real standardized assessments
Organizes 99,911 science questions into explicit Easy, Medium, and Hard difficulty tiers (plus a separate 1,119-question Challenge set from the ARC competition), enabling targeted evaluation of model reasoning capabilities across complexity levels. The tiered structure allows researchers to diagnose where models fail (e.g., struggling with Hard questions but succeeding on Easy) and to measure progress on increasingly difficult reasoning tasks without requiring manual difficulty annotation.
Unique: Combines pre-stratified difficulty tiers (Easy/Medium/Hard) with a separate Challenge set from the ARC competition, providing both broad coverage of science questions and a curated set of particularly difficult questions for targeted reasoning evaluation
vs alternatives: More granular than single-difficulty benchmarks like SQuAD, and more grounded in real educational assessments than synthetically-generated difficulty tiers, enabling precise diagnosis of model reasoning limitations
Stores vector embeddings and metadata in JSON files on disk while maintaining an in-memory index for fast similarity search. Uses a hybrid architecture where the file system serves as the persistent store and RAM holds the active search index, enabling both durability and performance without requiring a separate database server. Supports automatic index persistence and reload cycles.
Unique: Combines file-backed persistence with in-memory indexing, avoiding the complexity of running a separate database service while maintaining reasonable performance for small-to-medium datasets. Uses JSON serialization for human-readable storage and easy debugging.
vs alternatives: Lighter weight than Pinecone or Weaviate for local development, but trades scalability and concurrent access for simplicity and zero infrastructure overhead.
Implements vector similarity search using cosine distance calculation on normalized embeddings, with support for alternative distance metrics. Performs brute-force similarity computation across all indexed vectors, returning results ranked by distance score. Includes configurable thresholds to filter results below a minimum similarity threshold.
Unique: Implements pure cosine similarity without approximation layers, making it deterministic and debuggable but trading performance for correctness. Suitable for datasets where exact results matter more than speed.
vs alternatives: More transparent and easier to debug than approximate methods like HNSW, but significantly slower for large-scale retrieval compared to Pinecone or Milvus.
Accepts vectors of configurable dimensionality and automatically normalizes them for cosine similarity computation. Validates that all vectors have consistent dimensions and rejects mismatched vectors. Supports both pre-normalized and unnormalized input, with automatic L2 normalization applied during insertion.
vectra scores higher at 38/100 vs ai2_arc at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Automatically normalizes vectors during insertion, eliminating the need for users to handle normalization manually. Validates dimensionality consistency.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than requiring manual normalization, but adds latency compared to accepting pre-normalized vectors.
Exports the entire vector database (embeddings, metadata, index) to standard formats (JSON, CSV) for backup, analysis, or migration. Imports vectors from external sources in multiple formats. Supports format conversion between JSON, CSV, and other serialization formats without losing data.
Unique: Supports multiple export/import formats (JSON, CSV) with automatic format detection, enabling interoperability with other tools and databases. No proprietary format lock-in.
vs alternatives: More portable than database-specific export formats, but less efficient than binary dumps. Suitable for small-to-medium datasets.
Implements BM25 (Okapi BM25) lexical search algorithm for keyword-based retrieval, then combines BM25 scores with vector similarity scores using configurable weighting to produce hybrid rankings. Tokenizes text fields during indexing and performs term frequency analysis at query time. Allows tuning the balance between semantic and lexical relevance.
Unique: Combines BM25 and vector similarity in a single ranking framework with configurable weighting, avoiding the need for separate lexical and semantic search pipelines. Implements BM25 from scratch rather than wrapping an external library.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Elasticsearch for hybrid search but lacks advanced features like phrase queries, stemming, and distributed indexing. Better integrated with vector search than bolting BM25 onto a pure vector database.
Supports filtering search results using a Pinecone-compatible query syntax that allows boolean combinations of metadata predicates (equality, comparison, range, set membership). Evaluates filter expressions against metadata objects during search, returning only vectors that satisfy the filter constraints. Supports nested metadata structures and multiple filter operators.
Unique: Implements Pinecone's filter syntax natively without requiring a separate query language parser, enabling drop-in compatibility for applications already using Pinecone. Filters are evaluated in-memory against metadata objects.
vs alternatives: More compatible with Pinecone workflows than generic vector databases, but lacks the performance optimizations of Pinecone's server-side filtering and index-accelerated predicates.
Integrates with multiple embedding providers (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, local transformer models via Transformers.js) to generate vector embeddings from text. Abstracts provider differences behind a unified interface, allowing users to swap providers without changing application code. Handles API authentication, rate limiting, and batch processing for efficiency.
Unique: Provides a unified embedding interface supporting both cloud APIs and local transformer models, allowing users to choose between cost/privacy trade-offs without code changes. Uses Transformers.js for browser-compatible local embeddings.
vs alternatives: More flexible than single-provider solutions like LangChain's OpenAI embeddings, but less comprehensive than full embedding orchestration platforms. Local embedding support is unique for a lightweight vector database.
Runs entirely in the browser using IndexedDB for persistent storage, enabling client-side vector search without a backend server. Synchronizes in-memory index with IndexedDB on updates, allowing offline search and reducing server load. Supports the same API as the Node.js version for code reuse across environments.
Unique: Provides a unified API across Node.js and browser environments using IndexedDB for persistence, enabling code sharing and offline-first architectures. Avoids the complexity of syncing client-side and server-side indices.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building separate client and server vector search implementations, but limited by browser storage quotas and IndexedDB performance compared to server-side databases.
+4 more capabilities