| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.00e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes sequential conversational exchanges with instruction-tuned weights optimized for following complex, multi-step directives across conversation turns. The model maintains coherence across dialogue context by leveraging transformer attention mechanisms trained on instruction-following datasets, enabling it to parse user intent, track conversation state, and respond with contextually appropriate actions without explicit state management from the caller.
Unique: 32B parameter scale with instruction-tuning specifically optimized for multi-turn dialogue, balancing model capacity for complex reasoning with inference efficiency — larger than many open-source alternatives (7B-13B) but smaller than frontier models (70B+), enabling cost-effective deployment while maintaining instruction-following fidelity
vs alternatives: Smaller footprint than Llama 3.1 70B with comparable instruction-following performance, reducing API costs and latency while maintaining multi-turn coherence better than smaller 7B-13B models
Applies learned patterns from instruction-tuning to unseen task types without domain-specific fine-tuning or few-shot examples. The model leverages transformer-based in-context learning to infer task structure from natural language prompts, enabling it to handle novel problem classes (summarization, translation, question-answering, creative writing) by recognizing task semantics and applying appropriate reasoning patterns learned during pretraining and instruction-tuning.
Unique: Instruction-tuning approach enables zero-shot task transfer by training on diverse task families with explicit instruction signals, rather than relying solely on pretraining patterns — this explicit task-instruction pairing during training improves generalization to novel task phrasings compared to base models
vs alternatives: Outperforms base language models on zero-shot task diversity due to instruction-tuning, while maintaining faster inference than larger 70B+ models that may have marginal performance gains on specialized domains
Solves complex problems by generating intermediate reasoning steps (chain-of-thought) before producing final answers. The model's instruction-tuning on reasoning tasks enables it to interpret prompts requesting step-by-step explanations and generate coherent reasoning chains that decompose problems into sub-steps, improving accuracy on multi-step reasoning tasks compared to direct answer generation without explicit reasoning.
Unique: Instruction-tuning on chain-of-thought datasets enables the model to generate coherent reasoning steps when prompted, without requiring explicit reasoning modules or external symbolic solvers — this implicit reasoning approach is more flexible than hard-coded reasoning systems but less precise than specialized solvers
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than direct answer generation, but lower accuracy on specialized domains than models fine-tuned exclusively on reasoning tasks; better for educational use cases than production problem-solving
Generates text tokens sequentially via streaming API, returning partial responses as they become available rather than waiting for full completion. This is implemented through OpenRouter's streaming endpoint integration, which uses server-sent events (SSE) or chunked HTTP transfer encoding to deliver tokens incrementally, enabling real-time UI updates and perceived responsiveness improvements while the model continues inference on the backend.
Unique: Streaming implementation via OpenRouter's unified API abstraction, which normalizes streaming across multiple backend providers (Ollama, Together, Replicate) using consistent SSE/chunked encoding — this abstraction hides provider-specific streaming protocol differences from the caller
vs alternatives: Unified streaming interface across multiple providers reduces client-side complexity compared to directly integrating provider-specific streaming APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama each have different streaming formats)
Generates responses that incorporate full conversation history as context, using the transformer's attention mechanism to weight relevant prior messages when producing new tokens. The model processes the entire conversation thread (user messages, assistant responses, system prompts) as a single sequence, allowing it to reference earlier statements, maintain consistency with prior commitments, and adapt tone/style based on conversation evolution without explicit conversation state management.
Unique: Instruction-tuned model trained on diverse conversation formats (system prompts, multi-speaker dialogues, role-play scenarios) enabling it to interpret conversation structure implicitly from message formatting rather than requiring explicit conversation state APIs — this makes it compatible with simple message-array interfaces without custom conversation management libraries
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than models requiring explicit conversation state management (e.g., some agent frameworks); works with standard message formats (OpenAI-compatible) reducing vendor lock-in compared to proprietary conversation APIs
Generates text constrained to specific formats (JSON, XML, YAML, CSV) by leveraging instruction-tuning and prompt engineering to bias the model toward producing well-formed structured data. While not using hard constraints (like token-level masking), the model's training on structured data examples and instruction-following enables it to reliably produce parseable output when prompted with format specifications, enabling downstream parsing and programmatic consumption without custom validation layers.
Unique: Instruction-tuning on diverse structured data formats (JSON, XML, code) enables format-aware generation without hard token-level constraints — the model learns format patterns implicitly, making it flexible for novel formats while maintaining reasonable reliability on common structures
vs alternatives: More flexible than hard-constrained models (e.g., with token masking) for novel formats, but less reliable than specialized extraction models or schema-enforcing frameworks; better for rapid prototyping than production extraction pipelines
Generates executable code snippets and explanations in multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C++, etc.) by leveraging instruction-tuning on code datasets and code-explanation pairs. The model understands code semantics, syntax rules, and common patterns, enabling it to produce functional code from natural language specifications and explain existing code logic without requiring language-specific fine-tuning or external code analysis tools.
Unique: Instruction-tuned on code-explanation pairs and code-to-code translation tasks, enabling bidirectional code understanding (generation and explanation) without separate specialized models — this unified approach reduces model count compared to separate generation and explanation models
vs alternatives: Broader language support than specialized code models (e.g., Codex), but lower code-specific performance than models fine-tuned exclusively on code; better for explanation and translation than pure generation-focused models
Generates creative text (stories, poetry, marketing copy, dialogue) with style and tone control through instruction-based prompting. The model's instruction-tuning enables it to interpret style descriptors ('write in the style of Hemingway', 'use a sarcastic tone', 'target audience: teenagers') and apply them consistently throughout generated content by leveraging learned associations between style descriptors and linguistic patterns from training data.
Unique: Instruction-tuning on diverse creative writing styles and tone-controlled generation tasks enables style interpretation from natural language descriptors without explicit style embeddings or control tokens — this makes style control accessible via simple prompting rather than requiring specialized control mechanisms
vs alternatives: More flexible style control than base models through instruction-tuning, but less precise than models with explicit style control tokens or embeddings; better for rapid ideation than production-grade content requiring strict style adherence
+3 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs AllenAI: Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training