Firecrawl MCP Server ranks higher at 62/100 vs open-meteo-mcp at 25/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | open-meteo-mcp | Firecrawl MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 25/100 | 62/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Open-Meteo weather API endpoints through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query current weather, forecasts, and historical data without direct HTTP calls. Implements MCP resource and tool abstractions that translate natural language weather requests into Open-Meteo API parameters, handling coordinate lookup, unit conversion, and response formatting automatically.
Unique: Bridges Open-Meteo's free, open weather API directly into the MCP ecosystem, eliminating the need for custom HTTP client code in LLM applications. Uses MCP's tool and resource abstractions to expose weather queries as first-class capabilities that Claude can invoke naturally, with automatic parameter mapping and response normalization.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom REST API wrappers or weather plugins for each LLM framework because it leverages MCP's standardized tool-calling protocol, making it compatible with any MCP client without framework-specific adapters.
Translates human-readable location names (cities, regions, addresses) into latitude/longitude coordinates required by Open-Meteo's weather queries. Likely implements geocoding via Open-Meteo's Geocoding API or similar reverse-lookup service, handling ambiguous location names and returning ranked results so the LLM can disambiguate if needed.
Unique: Integrates geocoding as a transparent preprocessing step within the MCP protocol layer, so Claude can accept natural language locations without explicit coordinate parameters. Handles the full resolution pipeline (name → candidates → selection) within the MCP tool abstraction.
vs alternatives: More seamless than requiring users to manually specify coordinates or implement separate geocoding logic, because it's built into the MCP tool interface and handles disambiguation automatically through LLM reasoning.
Retrieves multi-day or hourly weather forecasts from Open-Meteo and formats them into structured, LLM-friendly representations. Handles variable selection (temperature, precipitation, wind, etc.), time-series aggregation, unit conversion (Celsius/Fahrenheit, metric/imperial), and response truncation to fit within LLM context windows. May implement caching of recent forecasts to reduce API calls.
Unique: Implements forecast aggregation and formatting as part of the MCP tool response pipeline, so Claude receives pre-processed, context-aware weather data rather than raw API responses. Likely includes intelligent variable selection and context-window-aware truncation to maximize relevance within LLM constraints.
vs alternatives: More efficient than having Claude parse raw Open-Meteo JSON responses because the MCP server handles formatting, unit conversion, and context optimization, reducing token overhead and improving response quality.
Provides access to historical weather records from Open-Meteo's archive, allowing queries for past weather conditions at any location and date. Implements time-range filtering, variable selection, and aggregation (daily, weekly, monthly summaries) to support weather analysis, trend detection, and climate pattern reasoning by LLMs.
Unique: Extends the MCP weather integration beyond real-time forecasts to include historical archives, enabling LLMs to perform temporal reasoning and trend analysis. Implements date-range filtering and aggregation within the MCP tool layer, abstracting Open-Meteo's historical API complexity.
vs alternatives: Provides historical context that real-time-only weather APIs lack, allowing Claude to perform comparative analysis and anomaly detection without requiring separate climate data sources or manual data aggregation.
Implements the MCP server-side tool registration and invocation framework, exposing weather capabilities as MCP tools that Claude and other MCP clients can discover and call. Handles tool schema definition (parameters, return types), request routing, error handling, and response serialization according to the MCP specification. Likely uses an MCP SDK or framework (e.g., mcp-python, mcp-node) to manage the protocol handshake and message passing.
Unique: Implements the MCP server-side framework that bridges Open-Meteo's REST API and Claude's tool-calling interface, handling all protocol-level concerns (schema registration, request routing, serialization) so weather tools appear as native capabilities to the LLM.
vs alternatives: Cleaner than custom REST API wrappers because MCP's standardized tool protocol eliminates the need for framework-specific adapters, making the server compatible with any MCP client without modification.
Automatically converts weather data between unit systems (Celsius/Fahrenheit, metric/imperial wind speeds, millimeters/inches precipitation) and formats output according to user preferences or locale. Implements unit mapping tables and conversion logic within the response formatting pipeline, ensuring Claude receives data in the requested system without manual transformation.
Unique: Integrates unit conversion and localization into the MCP response pipeline, so Claude receives pre-formatted data matching user preferences without needing to handle conversion logic. Supports both metric and imperial systems transparently.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than requiring Claude to perform unit conversions in prompts because the MCP server handles all formatting, reducing token overhead and improving response consistency across different locales.
Implements robust error handling for Open-Meteo API failures, network timeouts, invalid location queries, and out-of-range date requests. Provides meaningful error messages to Claude and may implement fallback strategies (e.g., returning cached data, degrading to lower-resolution forecasts, or suggesting alternative locations). Handles MCP protocol errors and ensures the server remains stable under adverse conditions.
Unique: Implements error handling at the MCP server layer, ensuring Claude receives clear, actionable error messages and can decide whether to retry, use fallback data, or inform the user. Abstracts API-level failures from the LLM, improving robustness.
vs alternatives: More reliable than exposing raw API errors to Claude because the MCP server handles retries, caching, and error translation, reducing the likelihood of conversation failures due to transient API issues.
Analyzes forecast data to identify extreme weather conditions (severe storms, heat waves, cold snaps, high wind, etc.) based on configurable thresholds. Implements condition detection logic that flags dangerous weather patterns and returns structured alerts with severity levels, allowing agents to proactively warn users or trigger contingency workflows. Detection rules can be customized per location or use case.
Unique: Implements configurable alert detection on top of Open-Meteo forecast data within the MCP server, allowing Claude to request 'alerts for dangerous weather' as a single tool call rather than fetching raw forecast and implementing detection logic separately
vs alternatives: More integrated than requiring agents to implement alert logic themselves; more flexible than hardcoded alert rules because thresholds can be customized per use case
Scrapes a single URL and converts HTML content to clean markdown using Firecrawl's content extraction pipeline. The firecrawl_scrape tool accepts a URL and optional parameters (formats, headers, wait time, screenshot capability) and returns structured markdown output with automatic cleanup of boilerplate, navigation, and ads. Implements MCP tool handler pattern that marshals arguments through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client library to Firecrawl's backend processing engine.
Unique: Integrates Firecrawl's proprietary content extraction engine (which uses ML-based boilerplate removal and semantic content identification) through MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to access production-grade web scraping without managing browser automation or parsing logic themselves. The markdown conversion is handled server-side rather than client-side, reducing latency and ensuring consistent output formatting.
vs alternatives: Cleaner markdown output than regex-based scrapers like Cheerio or Puppeteer-only solutions because Firecrawl uses ML models to identify main content; simpler than self-hosted solutions because it's fully managed and requires only an API key.
Scrapes multiple URLs in a single operation using Firecrawl's batch processing pipeline. The firecrawl_batch_scrape tool accepts an array of URLs and shared options, submitting them to Firecrawl's backend which processes them in parallel and returns an array of markdown-converted content objects. Implements batching through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client's batch method, which handles request queuing, parallel execution, and result aggregation without requiring client-side coordination.
Unique: Implements server-side parallel batch processing through Firecrawl's backend rather than client-side loop iteration, reducing network round-trips and enabling true concurrent scraping. The batch operation is atomic from the MCP client perspective — a single tool call returns all results, simplifying agent orchestration logic.
More efficient than sequential scraping loops because Firecrawl handles parallelization server-side; simpler than managing Promise.all() with individual scrape calls because batching is a first-class operation with built-in error handling.
Firecrawl MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs open-meteo-mcp at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Packages the Firecrawl MCP server as a Docker container with environment-based configuration, enabling deployment to containerized infrastructure (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, cloud platforms). The Dockerfile builds a Node.js runtime with the server code and exposes configuration through environment variables, allowing operators to deploy without modifying code. Supports both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through configuration.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker packaging with environment-based configuration, enabling zero-code deployment to containerized infrastructure. The Dockerfile handles Node.js runtime setup and dependency installation, reducing deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual deployment because Docker handles environment setup; more portable than binary distribution because containers run consistently across platforms.
Registers the Firecrawl MCP server in the Smithery registry, enabling one-click installation and discovery through Smithery's MCP client marketplace. The server is published to Smithery with metadata (description, tags, configuration schema) allowing users to discover and install it without manual setup. Smithery handles server distribution, version management, and client integration.
Unique: Leverages Smithery's MCP server registry to enable one-click installation without manual configuration, reducing friction for end users. Smithery handles server discovery, versioning, and client integration, abstracting deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual installation because Smithery handles discovery and setup; more discoverable than GitHub-only distribution because Smithery provides a centralized marketplace.
Supports connecting to self-hosted Firecrawl instances in addition to Firecrawl's cloud service through configurable API endpoint. The FIRECRAWL_API_URL environment variable allows operators to specify a custom Firecrawl endpoint, enabling deployment scenarios where Firecrawl runs on-premises or in a private cloud. The @mendable/firecrawl-js client library handles endpoint abstraction, routing all API calls to the configured endpoint.
Unique: Enables flexible deployment by supporting both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through simple endpoint configuration, allowing operators to choose deployment model without code changes. The endpoint abstraction is handled by @mendable/firecrawl-js, making self-hosted support transparent to MCP server code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-only solutions because self-hosted option is available; simpler than maintaining separate server implementations because endpoint configuration is unified.
Discovers all URLs within a website by crawling from a base URL and building a sitemap-like structure. The firecrawl_map tool accepts a base URL and optional parameters (max depth, include patterns, exclude patterns) and returns a hierarchical array of discovered URLs with metadata about page structure. Uses Firecrawl's crawler to traverse internal links up to specified depth, filtering by inclusion/exclusion patterns, and returns the complete URL graph without fetching full page content.
Unique: Provides lightweight URL discovery without content extraction, allowing agents to plan scraping strategy before committing credits to full content fetches. The depth-based crawling with pattern filtering enables selective discovery — agents can discover only URLs matching specific criteria (e.g., /blog/* paths) without exploring entire site.
vs alternatives: More efficient than scraping every page to build a sitemap because it skips content extraction; more reliable than parsing robots.txt or sitemaps.xml because it performs actual crawling and discovers dynamically-linked content.
Crawls an entire website and extracts content from all discovered pages in a single asynchronous operation. The firecrawl_crawl tool accepts a base URL and options (max pages, allowed domains, exclude patterns, scrape options) and returns a crawl ID for polling. The crawler discovers URLs, extracts markdown content from each page, and stores results server-side. Clients poll firecrawl_crawl_status to retrieve results as they complete, implementing an async job pattern rather than blocking until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side asynchronous crawling with job-based result retrieval, decoupling the crawl initiation from result consumption. The MCP server handles polling coordination through firecrawl_crawl_status, allowing AI agents to initiate long-running crawls and check progress without blocking. Firecrawl's backend manages the entire crawl lifecycle including URL discovery, content extraction, and result storage.
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential scraping because crawling happens server-side in parallel; simpler than managing Puppeteer/Playwright browser pools because Firecrawl abstracts browser automation and handles rate limiting internally.
Polls the status of an in-progress or completed website crawl and retrieves extracted content. The firecrawl_crawl_status tool accepts a crawl ID and returns current progress (pages crawled, pages remaining, completion percentage), status state (running/completed/failed), and paginated results. Implements polling pattern where clients repeatedly call this tool with the same crawl ID to check progress and incrementally retrieve content as pages are processed, supporting streaming-like result consumption.
Unique: Provides non-blocking status and result retrieval for asynchronous crawls, enabling agents to manage long-running operations without blocking. The polling pattern with pagination allows incremental result consumption — agents can start processing results before the entire crawl completes, reducing end-to-end latency for large crawls.
vs alternatives: More flexible than blocking crawl operations because agents can check progress and retrieve partial results; simpler than webhook-based result delivery because polling requires no external infrastructure setup.
+5 more capabilities