| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Open-Meteo weather API endpoints through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query current weather, forecasts, and historical data without direct HTTP calls. Implements MCP resource and tool abstractions that translate natural language weather requests into Open-Meteo API parameters, handling coordinate lookup, unit conversion, and response formatting automatically.
Unique: Bridges Open-Meteo's free, open weather API directly into the MCP ecosystem, eliminating the need for custom HTTP client code in LLM applications. Uses MCP's tool and resource abstractions to expose weather queries as first-class capabilities that Claude can invoke naturally, with automatic parameter mapping and response normalization.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom REST API wrappers or weather plugins for each LLM framework because it leverages MCP's standardized tool-calling protocol, making it compatible with any MCP client without framework-specific adapters.
Translates human-readable location names (cities, regions, addresses) into latitude/longitude coordinates required by Open-Meteo's weather queries. Likely implements geocoding via Open-Meteo's Geocoding API or similar reverse-lookup service, handling ambiguous location names and returning ranked results so the LLM can disambiguate if needed.
Unique: Integrates geocoding as a transparent preprocessing step within the MCP protocol layer, so Claude can accept natural language locations without explicit coordinate parameters. Handles the full resolution pipeline (name → candidates → selection) within the MCP tool abstraction.
vs alternatives: More seamless than requiring users to manually specify coordinates or implement separate geocoding logic, because it's built into the MCP tool interface and handles disambiguation automatically through LLM reasoning.
Retrieves multi-day or hourly weather forecasts from Open-Meteo and formats them into structured, LLM-friendly representations. Handles variable selection (temperature, precipitation, wind, etc.), time-series aggregation, unit conversion (Celsius/Fahrenheit, metric/imperial), and response truncation to fit within LLM context windows. May implement caching of recent forecasts to reduce API calls.
Unique: Implements forecast aggregation and formatting as part of the MCP tool response pipeline, so Claude receives pre-processed, context-aware weather data rather than raw API responses. Likely includes intelligent variable selection and context-window-aware truncation to maximize relevance within LLM constraints.
vs alternatives: More efficient than having Claude parse raw Open-Meteo JSON responses because the MCP server handles formatting, unit conversion, and context optimization, reducing token overhead and improving response quality.
Provides access to historical weather records from Open-Meteo's archive, allowing queries for past weather conditions at any location and date. Implements time-range filtering, variable selection, and aggregation (daily, weekly, monthly summaries) to support weather analysis, trend detection, and climate pattern reasoning by LLMs.
Unique: Extends the MCP weather integration beyond real-time forecasts to include historical archives, enabling LLMs to perform temporal reasoning and trend analysis. Implements date-range filtering and aggregation within the MCP tool layer, abstracting Open-Meteo's historical API complexity.
vs alternatives: Provides historical context that real-time-only weather APIs lack, allowing Claude to perform comparative analysis and anomaly detection without requiring separate climate data sources or manual data aggregation.
Implements the MCP server-side tool registration and invocation framework, exposing weather capabilities as MCP tools that Claude and other MCP clients can discover and call. Handles tool schema definition (parameters, return types), request routing, error handling, and response serialization according to the MCP specification. Likely uses an MCP SDK or framework (e.g., mcp-python, mcp-node) to manage the protocol handshake and message passing.
Unique: Implements the MCP server-side framework that bridges Open-Meteo's REST API and Claude's tool-calling interface, handling all protocol-level concerns (schema registration, request routing, serialization) so weather tools appear as native capabilities to the LLM.
vs alternatives: Cleaner than custom REST API wrappers because MCP's standardized tool protocol eliminates the need for framework-specific adapters, making the server compatible with any MCP client without modification.
Automatically converts weather data between unit systems (Celsius/Fahrenheit, metric/imperial wind speeds, millimeters/inches precipitation) and formats output according to user preferences or locale. Implements unit mapping tables and conversion logic within the response formatting pipeline, ensuring Claude receives data in the requested system without manual transformation.
Unique: Integrates unit conversion and localization into the MCP response pipeline, so Claude receives pre-formatted data matching user preferences without needing to handle conversion logic. Supports both metric and imperial systems transparently.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than requiring Claude to perform unit conversions in prompts because the MCP server handles all formatting, reducing token overhead and improving response consistency across different locales.
Implements robust error handling for Open-Meteo API failures, network timeouts, invalid location queries, and out-of-range date requests. Provides meaningful error messages to Claude and may implement fallback strategies (e.g., returning cached data, degrading to lower-resolution forecasts, or suggesting alternative locations). Handles MCP protocol errors and ensures the server remains stable under adverse conditions.
Unique: Implements error handling at the MCP server layer, ensuring Claude receives clear, actionable error messages and can decide whether to retry, use fallback data, or inform the user. Abstracts API-level failures from the LLM, improving robustness.
vs alternatives: More reliable than exposing raw API errors to Claude because the MCP server handles retries, caching, and error translation, reducing the likelihood of conversation failures due to transient API issues.
Analyzes forecast data to identify extreme weather conditions (severe storms, heat waves, cold snaps, high wind, etc.) based on configurable thresholds. Implements condition detection logic that flags dangerous weather patterns and returns structured alerts with severity levels, allowing agents to proactively warn users or trigger contingency workflows. Detection rules can be customized per location or use case.
Unique: Implements configurable alert detection on top of Open-Meteo forecast data within the MCP server, allowing Claude to request 'alerts for dangerous weather' as a single tool call rather than fetching raw forecast and implementing detection logic separately
vs alternatives: More integrated than requiring agents to implement alert logic themselves; more flexible than hardcoded alert rules because thresholds can be customized per use case
Executes web searches via the Tavily API and returns structured results with relevance scoring, source attribution, and clean text extraction optimized for LLM consumption. The MCP server marshals search queries through an axios HTTP client configured with the Tavily API key, parses JSON responses containing ranked results with URLs and snippets, and formats output for direct consumption by language models without additional preprocessing.
Unique: Tavily's search results are specifically optimized for LLM consumption with relevance scoring and clean formatting, rather than generic web search results. The MCP server wraps this via StdioServerTransport, enabling seamless integration into Claude Desktop and other MCP clients without custom HTTP handling.
vs alternatives: Returns LLM-ready formatted results with relevance scores out-of-the-box, whereas generic search APIs (Google, Bing) require additional parsing and ranking logic to be LLM-friendly.
Extracts clean, structured content from specified URLs using the Tavily extract endpoint, handling HTML parsing, boilerplate removal, and content normalization automatically. The server sends URLs to Tavily's extraction service via axios, receives parsed markdown or structured text, and returns content ready for LLM ingestion without requiring the client to manage web scraping libraries or HTML parsing.
Unique: Tavily's extraction service is optimized for LLM-ready output (markdown formatting, boilerplate removal, semantic structure preservation) rather than generic web scraping. The MCP server exposes this as a tool that agents can call directly without managing external scraping libraries.
vs alternatives: Handles boilerplate removal and content normalization automatically, whereas Puppeteer or Cheerio require custom logic to identify main content and remove navigation/ads.
Tavily MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs open-meteo-mcp at 25/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Provides pre-built configuration templates and integration guides for popular MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Cline), including JSON configuration snippets for claude_desktop_config.json, cursor settings, VS Code extensions, and Cline agent configuration. Each integration template specifies the MCP server command, environment variables, and client-specific setup steps.
Unique: Official Tavily MCP provides pre-built integration templates for major MCP clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Cline), reducing setup friction. Each template includes specific configuration syntax and environment variable requirements for that client.
vs alternatives: Pre-built templates eliminate guesswork in client configuration, whereas generic MCP documentation requires users to adapt examples for Tavily-specific setup.
Crawls websites starting from a seed URL and recursively follows internal links up to a specified depth, extracting content from each page and returning a structured collection of crawled pages. The server manages crawl state through Tavily's crawl endpoint, controlling recursion depth and link-following behavior, and returns all discovered pages with their extracted content and metadata for bulk analysis or knowledge base construction.
Unique: Tavily's crawl service is designed for LLM-friendly bulk extraction with automatic content normalization across multiple pages, rather than generic web crawlers that return raw HTML. The MCP server exposes depth control and link-following as tool parameters, enabling agents to autonomously decide crawl scope.
vs alternatives: Handles content extraction and normalization across all crawled pages automatically, whereas Scrapy or Selenium require custom pipelines to extract and normalize content from each page individually.
Analyzes a website's structure and generates a semantic map of URLs organized by topic or content type, enabling agents to understand site organization without manual exploration. The tavily_map tool sends a seed URL to Tavily's mapping service, which crawls the site, clusters pages by semantic similarity, and returns a hierarchical structure of discovered URLs grouped by inferred topic or purpose.
Unique: Tavily's map tool uses semantic clustering to organize URLs by inferred topic rather than just crawling and returning a flat list. This enables agents to navigate large sites intelligently without exhaustive crawling.
vs alternatives: Provides semantic site structure discovery out-of-the-box, whereas generic crawlers return unorganized URL lists requiring post-processing to identify topic-relevant pages.
Orchestrates multi-step research workflows where an agent autonomously decides which search, extraction, and crawling steps to perform based on intermediate results. The tavily_research tool wraps the other four tools and manages state across multiple API calls, allowing agents to refine queries, follow promising leads, and synthesize findings without explicit step-by-step instruction from the user.
Unique: The research tool enables agents to autonomously orchestrate search, extraction, and crawling steps based on intermediate findings, rather than requiring explicit tool calls for each step. This leverages the agent's reasoning to decide research strategy dynamically.
vs alternatives: Enables autonomous research workflows where agents decide next steps based on findings, whereas manual tool-calling requires explicit user or system prompts to specify each search or extraction step.
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification using TypeScript and StdioServerTransport, enabling the Tavily tools to be exposed as MCP tools callable by any MCP-compatible client. The server registers tool handlers via setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, ...) and CallToolRequestSchema, marshaling tool calls from clients through to Tavily API endpoints and returning results in MCP-compliant format.
Unique: Official Tavily MCP server implementation using StdioServerTransport for direct process communication, enabling zero-configuration integration into Claude Desktop and other MCP clients. Supports both remote (hosted) and local deployment models.
vs alternatives: Official MCP implementation ensures compatibility and feature parity with Tavily API, whereas third-party MCP wrappers may lag behind API updates or lack full feature support.
Supports both remote deployment (hosted at https://mcp.tavily.com/mcp/) and local self-hosted deployment (via NPX, Docker, or Git), with different authentication models for each. Remote deployment uses URL parameters or Bearer token headers for API key passing, while local deployment uses TAVILY_API_KEY environment variable. Both expose identical tool capabilities through the same MCP interface.
Unique: Official Tavily MCP provides both remote (zero-setup) and local (self-hosted) deployment options with identical tool capabilities, enabling users to choose based on security, latency, and infrastructure requirements. Remote uses OAuth and Bearer tokens; local uses environment variables.
vs alternatives: Dual deployment model provides flexibility that single-deployment solutions lack; users can start with remote for quick testing and migrate to local for production without code changes.
+3 more capabilities