| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes academic conference and journal call-for-papers (CFP) data through the Model Context Protocol, allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query, filter, and retrieve structured CFP metadata without direct API calls. Implements MCP resource and tool handlers that translate natural language queries into CFP database lookups, returning standardized JSON with submission deadlines, conference dates, and venue details.
Unique: Bridges academic CFP discovery into Claude's native tool ecosystem via MCP, eliminating context-switching between research and AI assistant; implements standardized MCP resource handlers for CFP metadata rather than requiring custom API wrappers or manual data entry
vs alternatives: Tighter integration with Claude than standalone CFP websites or email alerts, and more discoverable than manual CFP aggregator browsing because queries happen within the assistant's reasoning loop
Parses and normalizes heterogeneous call-for-papers data from upstream sources into a consistent schema with standardized field mappings (deadline, conference date, venue, research areas, submission requirements). Uses schema validation to ensure all returned CFP records conform to a predictable structure, enabling reliable downstream filtering and ranking by MCP tools.
Unique: Implements schema-driven normalization specifically for academic CFP data, handling domain-specific fields like research areas, review types (single/double-blind), and tiered deadlines rather than generic data transformation
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual CFP aggregation because schema validation catches incomplete or malformed records; more flexible than rigid database schemas because normalization rules can be updated without code changes
Implements temporal and relevance-based filtering logic that ranks CFPs by submission deadline proximity, conference date, and match to user research interests. Uses date arithmetic and keyword matching against research area tags to surface the most actionable calls first, enabling researchers to prioritize submissions by urgency and fit.
Unique: Combines temporal urgency (deadline proximity) with semantic relevance (research area matching) in a single ranking function, surfacing both high-impact opportunities and time-sensitive submissions rather than treating them separately
vs alternatives: More actionable than simple chronological sorting because it weights deadline urgency; more relevant than keyword-only search because it factors in temporal context and user research interests
Implements the MCP server specification with tool handlers for querying CFPs and resource handlers for exposing CFP metadata as discoverable resources. Uses MCP's request-response protocol to translate Claude's natural language tool calls into structured CFP queries, with proper error handling and response formatting that conforms to MCP's JSON-RPC message structure.
Unique: Implements MCP as a first-class integration pattern rather than a wrapper around existing APIs, meaning CFP discovery is a native capability in Claude's tool ecosystem with proper schema definitions and error handling
vs alternatives: More seamless than REST API wrappers because MCP tools are discoverable and callable directly by Claude; more maintainable than custom Claude plugins because MCP is a standardized protocol with tooling support
Aggregates call-for-papers data from multiple upstream sources (e.g., WikiCFP, OpenReview, conference websites) and deduplicates records based on conference name, deadline, and venue matching. Uses fuzzy matching or exact field comparison to identify duplicate CFPs across sources, returning a unified view of available calls without redundant entries.
Unique: Implements source-aware deduplication that preserves source attribution, allowing users to see which aggregators have the most current information for a given conference rather than hiding source provenance
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than single-source CFP tools because it covers multiple aggregators; more reliable than manual aggregation because deduplication is automated and configurable
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs call-for-papers-mcp at 24/100. call-for-papers-mcp leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities