Supermaven ranks higher at 71/100 vs Alva - AI Assistant, Chat & Code Lab at 37/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Alva - AI Assistant, Chat & Code Lab | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Extension | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 37/100 | 71/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes the current file's code by sending it to OpenAI's GPT-3.5-turbo API to identify logical errors, runtime issues, and common bugs, then generates corrected code that can be clicked and pasted directly into the editor. The extension maintains the original code context and provides inline suggestions without requiring manual code submission or context switching.
Unique: Integrates directly into VS Code's editor UI with click-to-paste code blocks, eliminating context-switching between chat and code; uses GPT-3.5-turbo's semantic understanding rather than AST-based static analysis, enabling detection of logic errors beyond syntax issues
vs alternatives: Faster than traditional linters for semantic bug detection but less reliable than formal type checkers; more accessible than manual code review but requires API costs and internet connectivity
Sends the current file's code to GPT-3.5-turbo to identify performance bottlenecks, algorithmic inefficiencies, and resource-heavy patterns, then generates optimized versions with explanations of improvements. The extension suggests refactored code that reduces time complexity, memory usage, or redundant operations while preserving functionality.
Unique: Provides semantic optimization suggestions based on LLM understanding of algorithmic patterns rather than static analysis; integrates directly into editor workflow with inline code suggestions, avoiding manual context switching
vs alternatives: More accessible than profiling tools for developers unfamiliar with performance analysis, but less reliable than data-driven profiling; suggests architectural improvements beyond what linters can detect
Provides a direct integration between AI-generated code suggestions and the VS Code editor through clickable code blocks. When the assistant generates code (from bug fixes, refactoring, tests, etc.), developers can click a 'paste' button to insert the code directly at the cursor position, eliminating manual copy-paste workflows and reducing friction in the code generation loop.
Unique: Provides direct editor integration for code insertion via clickable UI elements, eliminating manual copy-paste; reduces friction in AI-assisted coding workflows by enabling single-click code application
vs alternatives: More seamless than copy-paste workflows, but less safe than explicit code review; trades friction for speed, suitable for trusted AI suggestions
Manages OpenAI API authentication by accepting user-provided API keys and routing all AI requests through OpenAI's GPT-3.5-turbo API. The extension requires no signup or login; developers simply provide their OpenAI API key once, and all subsequent requests are authenticated and billed to their OpenAI account. Key storage and management is handled by VS Code's secure credential storage (unknown if encrypted locally or stored in plaintext).
Unique: Eliminates signup/login friction by accepting raw API keys directly; routes all requests through user's own OpenAI account, ensuring cost control and data ownership, rather than proxying through a third-party service
vs alternatives: More transparent than proprietary authentication systems, but requires users to manage their own API keys and costs; suitable for developers with existing OpenAI relationships
Provides a persistent chat panel in VS Code's sidebar where developers can ask questions, request code generation, and receive conversational responses from GPT-3.5-turbo. The chat interface maintains context of the current file and allows multi-turn conversations without requiring manual code submission or context specification, enabling iterative refinement of suggestions.
Unique: Maintains automatic context of current file in sidebar chat, eliminating need for manual code pasting; enables multi-turn conversations with persistent context within a single file scope
vs alternatives: More integrated than external chat tools (ChatGPT web interface), but less powerful than full IDE-aware AI assistants like GitHub Copilot; suitable for supplementary assistance
Offers the extension itself at no cost, with all AI functionality powered by user-provided OpenAI API keys. Developers pay only for OpenAI API usage (per-token pricing), with no subscription required to Alva itself. The extension documentation indicates that future versions may introduce optional premium features or subscriptions, but current version is entirely free with API-based cost model.
Unique: Eliminates subscription costs by using user's own OpenAI API key; provides transparent, usage-based pricing without proprietary billing layer, allowing developers to control costs directly
vs alternatives: More cost-transparent than subscription-based AI coding tools, but requires users to manage their own API costs; suitable for developers with existing OpenAI relationships or high usage
Accepts source code in one programming language and uses GPT-3.5-turbo to generate semantically equivalent code in a target language. The extension maintains logic and functionality while adapting to the idioms, syntax, and standard libraries of the destination language, with generated code available for direct insertion into the editor.
Unique: Uses GPT-3.5-turbo's semantic understanding to preserve logic across language boundaries rather than syntactic transformation; integrates into editor workflow for immediate code insertion without external tools
vs alternatives: More flexible than regex-based transpilers for handling semantic differences, but less reliable than hand-written migration tools; useful for rapid prototyping but requires manual validation for production code
Analyzes the current file's functions and methods by sending them to GPT-3.5-turbo, then generates unit test code covering happy paths, edge cases, and error conditions. The generated tests follow the conventions and frameworks of the detected language (Jest for JavaScript, pytest for Python, etc.) and are provided as clickable code blocks for insertion.
Unique: Generates framework-specific test code (Jest, pytest, JUnit) by detecting language context, rather than generic test templates; integrates into editor workflow for immediate test insertion and execution
vs alternatives: Faster than manual test writing for basic coverage, but less reliable than human-written tests for complex logic; complements rather than replaces formal testing strategies
+6 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs Alva - AI Assistant, Chat & Code Lab at 37/100. Alva - AI Assistant, Chat & Code Lab leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities