Supabase ranks higher at 42/100 vs LinkedIn Profile Data Mining Server at 32/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | LinkedIn Profile Data Mining Server | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 32/100 | 42/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Accepts natural language search queries and automatically expands them using LLM-based query generation to improve search coverage across LinkedIn's API. The system analyzes user intent, generates semantic variations and related keywords, and executes multiple parallel searches against LinkedIn's search endpoints, then deduplicates and ranks results by relevance. This enables finding profiles that wouldn't match literal keyword searches.
Unique: Combines LLM-based query expansion with LinkedIn API search to overcome keyword matching limitations; generates multiple semantic variations of user intent before executing searches, enabling discovery of profiles that wouldn't match literal queries
vs alternatives: More intelligent than basic LinkedIn search filters because it understands user intent and generates contextually relevant query variations, reducing manual refinement cycles compared to static keyword-based tools
Aggregates professional profile data from multiple sources (LinkedIn, company websites, public databases) and cross-validates information to ensure accuracy and completeness. The system fetches data from each source, normalizes field mappings, detects conflicts, and applies confidence scoring based on source reliability and data freshness. Returns a unified profile object with enriched fields and validation metadata.
Unique: Implements cross-source validation with confidence scoring rather than simple data merging; detects conflicts between sources and applies heuristics to resolve them, providing transparency about data quality and source reliability
vs alternatives: More reliable than single-source enrichment because it validates data across multiple sources and flags conflicts, reducing the risk of acting on outdated or incorrect information compared to tools that rely solely on LinkedIn
Applies multi-dimensional filtering to profile search results using structured criteria (location, industry, company size, seniority, skills, experience duration). The system supports both simple AND/OR logic and complex nested filters, enabling precise audience segmentation. Filters are applied server-side before returning results, reducing client-side processing and enabling efficient pagination of large result sets.
Unique: Implements server-side filtering with support for complex nested boolean logic rather than simple AND/OR; enables efficient pagination and result counting without client-side processing, optimized for large result sets
vs alternatives: More flexible than LinkedIn's native filters because it supports arbitrary combinations of criteria and nested logic, enabling precise audience segmentation that would require multiple manual searches in LinkedIn's UI
Extracts contact details (email, phone, social profiles) from LinkedIn profiles and enriches them using email verification APIs and secondary sources. The system parses profile data for explicit contact information, applies pattern matching to infer email addresses from company domain and name patterns, and validates extracted emails through SMTP verification or third-party email validation services. Returns verified contact information with confidence scores.
Unique: Combines multiple contact extraction methods (direct extraction, pattern inference, secondary source lookup) with validation via email verification APIs; provides confidence scoring and verification status rather than unvalidated contact data
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual email lookup because it validates extracted addresses and provides confidence scores, reducing bounce rates in email campaigns compared to tools that return unverified contact information
Exports profile search results and enriched data to CSV format with customizable column selection, formatting, and encoding. The system supports batch export of large result sets with streaming to avoid memory overload, applies data transformation rules (e.g., flattening nested objects, formatting dates), and handles special characters and encoding issues. Exported files can be imported directly into CRM, ATS, or spreadsheet applications.
Unique: Implements streaming CSV export for large datasets with customizable column selection and data transformation; handles encoding and special character issues automatically rather than requiring manual post-processing
vs alternatives: More flexible than LinkedIn's native export because it supports arbitrary column selection and data transformation, enabling direct import into CRM/ATS systems without manual reformatting
Maintains a server-side cache of enriched profiles with automatic deduplication based on email, LinkedIn ID, and other unique identifiers. The system stores profiles in persistent storage (database or file system), implements cache invalidation strategies based on data freshness requirements, and detects duplicate profiles across multiple searches. Enables efficient reuse of enriched data and prevents redundant API calls for previously fetched profiles.
Unique: Implements intelligent deduplication across multiple search contexts using composite keys (email, LinkedIn ID, name+company) rather than simple ID matching; enables cache reuse while detecting when the same person appears in different searches
vs alternatives: More efficient than stateless profile lookup because it caches enriched data and detects duplicates, reducing API calls and enrichment costs for teams conducting repeated research
Exposes profile search, enrichment, and export capabilities as MCP tools with standardized schema-based function calling. The system defines tool schemas for each capability, handles parameter validation and type coercion, and returns results in a format compatible with Claude and other MCP-compatible agents. Enables autonomous agents to discover and invoke profile research capabilities without hardcoded integrations.
Unique: Implements MCP protocol for tool discovery and invocation, enabling agents to dynamically discover profile research capabilities and chain them with other tools; uses standardized schema-based function calling rather than custom integrations
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded integrations because agents can discover and invoke tools dynamically, enabling composition with other MCP tools without code changes
Accepts batch requests for profile research on multiple queries or profiles, executes searches asynchronously, and provides job status tracking and result polling. The system queues batch jobs, distributes work across worker processes, implements exponential backoff for API rate limiting, and stores results for later retrieval. Enables efficient processing of large-scale profile research without blocking the client.
Unique: Implements async batch processing with job queue and worker pool, enabling efficient processing of large-scale profile research; includes rate limit handling and exponential backoff to respect LinkedIn API quotas
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential processing because it distributes work across workers and implements rate limit handling, enabling bulk profile research at scale without API throttling
+1 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs LinkedIn Profile Data Mining Server at 32/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities