Firecrawl MCP Server ranks higher at 62/100 vs andy-weather-mcp-server at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | andy-weather-mcp-server | Firecrawl MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | MCP Server |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 62/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 6 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes weather data endpoints through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), allowing Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to query current conditions, forecasts, and meteorological data by invoking standardized MCP tools. The server implements MCP's tool definition schema to advertise available weather queries and marshals HTTP requests to an underlying weather API (likely OpenWeatherMap, WeatherAPI, or similar), returning structured JSON responses that conform to MCP's message format for seamless LLM integration.
Unique: Implements MCP's standardized tool protocol to expose weather queries, allowing Claude and other MCP clients to invoke weather lookups as first-class tools without custom integration code — the server handles protocol marshaling, schema advertisement, and response formatting automatically.
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom Claude plugins or REST API wrappers because MCP handles tool discovery and invocation semantics; more standardized than direct API calls because it works with any MCP-compatible client, not just Claude.
Accepts location identifiers (city names, geographic coordinates, postal codes, or IP addresses) and resolves them to weather data by performing geocoding or direct API lookups. The server likely implements location normalization logic to handle ambiguous inputs (e.g., 'Springfield' → user confirmation or default to most populous match) and may cache geocoding results to reduce redundant lookups, then passes resolved coordinates to the weather API.
Unique: Integrates location resolution directly into the MCP tool layer, allowing Claude to query weather by natural language location names without explicit coordinate specification — the server handles geocoding transparently as part of the tool invocation.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than requiring exact coordinates because it accepts natural language location names; more integrated than separate geocoding + weather API calls because resolution happens within a single MCP tool invocation.
Retrieves multi-day or hourly weather forecasts from the underlying API and formats them into a structured, LLM-friendly format (likely JSON arrays with time-indexed weather objects). The server may implement filtering logic to return only relevant forecast periods (e.g., next 7 days, next 24 hours) and may normalize units and field names across different weather API providers to ensure consistent output schema.
Unique: Normalizes forecast data from the underlying weather API into a consistent, LLM-optimized JSON schema, abstracting away provider-specific field names and units so Claude receives uniform forecast data regardless of the backend service.
vs alternatives: More LLM-friendly than raw API responses because it formats forecasts as structured arrays with consistent field names; more concise than full API responses because it filters to relevant time periods and omits redundant metadata.
Implements MCP's tools/list and tools/call endpoints to advertise available weather query capabilities and their parameters to MCP clients. The server defines JSON Schema for each tool (e.g., 'get_weather' with location and units parameters) and responds to client discovery requests with tool metadata, enabling Claude and other clients to understand what weather queries are available and what parameters they accept without hardcoding tool definitions.
Unique: Implements MCP's standardized tool discovery protocol, allowing clients to dynamically discover available weather tools and their parameter schemas at runtime — no hardcoding of tool definitions needed on the client side.
vs alternatives: More flexible than REST API documentation because tool schemas are machine-readable and discoverable; more standardized than custom tool registries because it uses MCP's official protocol.
Implements error handling for common failure modes (API unavailability, invalid locations, rate limiting, network timeouts) and returns structured error responses via MCP that Claude can interpret and act upon. The server may implement retry logic with exponential backoff for transient failures, graceful degradation (e.g., returning cached data if API is down), or informative error messages that help the LLM understand why a query failed and suggest alternatives.
Unique: Implements MCP-compliant error responses that Claude can interpret as structured failures, allowing the LLM to understand why a weather query failed and decide whether to retry, use cached data, or inform the user.
vs alternatives: More robust than simple error propagation because it includes retry logic and fallback strategies; more LLM-friendly than raw HTTP errors because it returns structured MCP error messages that Claude can parse and act upon.
Implements the full MCP server protocol specification, enabling compatibility with any MCP-compliant client (Claude Desktop, custom agents, multi-tool orchestrators). The server handles MCP protocol handshakes, capability negotiation, and request/response marshaling, abstracting away protocol details from weather data logic.
Unique: Fully implements MCP server specification, enabling plug-and-play integration with any MCP client without custom protocol adapters or client-specific code
vs alternatives: More portable than custom REST or gRPC endpoints because MCP standardizes the protocol, allowing the same server to work with multiple clients and agent frameworks
Scrapes a single URL and converts HTML content to clean markdown using Firecrawl's content extraction pipeline. The firecrawl_scrape tool accepts a URL and optional parameters (formats, headers, wait time, screenshot capability) and returns structured markdown output with automatic cleanup of boilerplate, navigation, and ads. Implements MCP tool handler pattern that marshals arguments through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client library to Firecrawl's backend processing engine.
Unique: Integrates Firecrawl's proprietary content extraction engine (which uses ML-based boilerplate removal and semantic content identification) through MCP protocol, enabling AI agents to access production-grade web scraping without managing browser automation or parsing logic themselves. The markdown conversion is handled server-side rather than client-side, reducing latency and ensuring consistent output formatting.
vs alternatives: Cleaner markdown output than regex-based scrapers like Cheerio or Puppeteer-only solutions because Firecrawl uses ML models to identify main content; simpler than self-hosted solutions because it's fully managed and requires only an API key.
Scrapes multiple URLs in a single operation using Firecrawl's batch processing pipeline. The firecrawl_batch_scrape tool accepts an array of URLs and shared options, submitting them to Firecrawl's backend which processes them in parallel and returns an array of markdown-converted content objects. Implements batching through the @mendable/firecrawl-js client's batch method, which handles request queuing, parallel execution, and result aggregation without requiring client-side coordination.
Unique: Implements server-side parallel batch processing through Firecrawl's backend rather than client-side loop iteration, reducing network round-trips and enabling true concurrent scraping. The batch operation is atomic from the MCP client perspective — a single tool call returns all results, simplifying agent orchestration logic.
More efficient than sequential scraping loops because Firecrawl handles parallelization server-side; simpler than managing Promise.all() with individual scrape calls because batching is a first-class operation with built-in error handling.
Firecrawl MCP Server scores higher at 62/100 vs andy-weather-mcp-server at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Packages the Firecrawl MCP server as a Docker container with environment-based configuration, enabling deployment to containerized infrastructure (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, cloud platforms). The Dockerfile builds a Node.js runtime with the server code and exposes configuration through environment variables, allowing operators to deploy without modifying code. Supports both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through configuration.
Unique: Provides production-ready Docker packaging with environment-based configuration, enabling zero-code deployment to containerized infrastructure. The Dockerfile handles Node.js runtime setup and dependency installation, reducing deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: Simpler than manual deployment because Docker handles environment setup; more portable than binary distribution because containers run consistently across platforms.
Registers the Firecrawl MCP server in the Smithery registry, enabling one-click installation and discovery through Smithery's MCP client marketplace. The server is published to Smithery with metadata (description, tags, configuration schema) allowing users to discover and install it without manual setup. Smithery handles server distribution, version management, and client integration.
Unique: Leverages Smithery's MCP server registry to enable one-click installation without manual configuration, reducing friction for end users. Smithery handles server discovery, versioning, and client integration, abstracting deployment complexity.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual installation because Smithery handles discovery and setup; more discoverable than GitHub-only distribution because Smithery provides a centralized marketplace.
Supports connecting to self-hosted Firecrawl instances in addition to Firecrawl's cloud service through configurable API endpoint. The FIRECRAWL_API_URL environment variable allows operators to specify a custom Firecrawl endpoint, enabling deployment scenarios where Firecrawl runs on-premises or in a private cloud. The @mendable/firecrawl-js client library handles endpoint abstraction, routing all API calls to the configured endpoint.
Unique: Enables flexible deployment by supporting both cloud and self-hosted Firecrawl instances through simple endpoint configuration, allowing operators to choose deployment model without code changes. The endpoint abstraction is handled by @mendable/firecrawl-js, making self-hosted support transparent to MCP server code.
vs alternatives: More flexible than cloud-only solutions because self-hosted option is available; simpler than maintaining separate server implementations because endpoint configuration is unified.
Discovers all URLs within a website by crawling from a base URL and building a sitemap-like structure. The firecrawl_map tool accepts a base URL and optional parameters (max depth, include patterns, exclude patterns) and returns a hierarchical array of discovered URLs with metadata about page structure. Uses Firecrawl's crawler to traverse internal links up to specified depth, filtering by inclusion/exclusion patterns, and returns the complete URL graph without fetching full page content.
Unique: Provides lightweight URL discovery without content extraction, allowing agents to plan scraping strategy before committing credits to full content fetches. The depth-based crawling with pattern filtering enables selective discovery — agents can discover only URLs matching specific criteria (e.g., /blog/* paths) without exploring entire site.
vs alternatives: More efficient than scraping every page to build a sitemap because it skips content extraction; more reliable than parsing robots.txt or sitemaps.xml because it performs actual crawling and discovers dynamically-linked content.
Crawls an entire website and extracts content from all discovered pages in a single asynchronous operation. The firecrawl_crawl tool accepts a base URL and options (max pages, allowed domains, exclude patterns, scrape options) and returns a crawl ID for polling. The crawler discovers URLs, extracts markdown content from each page, and stores results server-side. Clients poll firecrawl_crawl_status to retrieve results as they complete, implementing an async job pattern rather than blocking until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side asynchronous crawling with job-based result retrieval, decoupling the crawl initiation from result consumption. The MCP server handles polling coordination through firecrawl_crawl_status, allowing AI agents to initiate long-running crawls and check progress without blocking. Firecrawl's backend manages the entire crawl lifecycle including URL discovery, content extraction, and result storage.
vs alternatives: More scalable than sequential scraping because crawling happens server-side in parallel; simpler than managing Puppeteer/Playwright browser pools because Firecrawl abstracts browser automation and handles rate limiting internally.
Polls the status of an in-progress or completed website crawl and retrieves extracted content. The firecrawl_crawl_status tool accepts a crawl ID and returns current progress (pages crawled, pages remaining, completion percentage), status state (running/completed/failed), and paginated results. Implements polling pattern where clients repeatedly call this tool with the same crawl ID to check progress and incrementally retrieve content as pages are processed, supporting streaming-like result consumption.
Unique: Provides non-blocking status and result retrieval for asynchronous crawls, enabling agents to manage long-running operations without blocking. The polling pattern with pagination allows incremental result consumption — agents can start processing results before the entire crawl completes, reducing end-to-end latency for large crawls.
vs alternatives: More flexible than blocking crawl operations because agents can check progress and retrieve partial results; simpler than webhook-based result delivery because polling requires no external infrastructure setup.
+5 more capabilities