Anubis MCP vs IntelliCode
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Anubis MCP | IntelliCode |
|---|---|---|
| Type | MCP Server | Extension |
| UnfragileRank | 27/100 | 39/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Anubis MCP provides both client and server implementations within a single Elixir library, allowing developers to build MCP-enabled applications that can simultaneously act as clients connecting to external MCP servers and as servers exposing capabilities to AI assistants. The architecture centers on Anubis.Server and Anubis.Client modules with shared transport abstraction, enabling code reuse and consistent patterns across bidirectional communication. This dual-mode design leverages Elixir's concurrency primitives (Process.send_after/3 for timeouts, GenServer patterns) to manage request state and session lifecycle.
Unique: Unified client-server SDK in a single library with shared transport abstraction, leveraging Elixir's lightweight processes and fault tolerance for concurrent request handling — unlike Python/Node.js MCP SDKs that typically separate client and server concerns
vs alternatives: Provides native Elixir concurrency advantages (thousands of concurrent MCP connections per process) and integrated fault tolerance that Python/Node.js SDKs must layer on top of their runtimes
Anubis MCP abstracts transport mechanisms through Elixir behavior modules, allowing the same client and server code to operate over STDIO, StreamableHTTP, WebSocket, and SSE transports without code changes. Each transport implementation (e.g., Anubis.Server.Transport.StreamableHTTP.Plug for Phoenix/Plug integration) handles serialization, connection lifecycle, and message framing independently. The behavior-based design enables runtime transport selection and seamless integration with existing Elixir web frameworks via Plug middleware.
Unique: Behavior-based transport abstraction allowing zero-code-change transport switching, with native Phoenix/Plug integration via Anubis.Server.Transport.StreamableHTTP.Plug — most MCP SDKs hardcode transport choice at initialization
vs alternatives: Eliminates transport lock-in and enables seamless web framework integration that Python/Node.js MCP libraries require custom adapters to achieve
Anubis MCP includes extensive documentation covering core concepts, architecture patterns, and step-by-step tutorials for building clients and servers. Example servers demonstrate common patterns and best practices, enabling developers to quickly understand MCP concepts and implement their own servers. The documentation is organized by use case (client building, server building, transport selection) and includes API reference material.
Unique: Comprehensive documentation with architecture-focused explanations and example servers covering multiple transport mechanisms, providing context beyond API reference — most MCP SDKs provide minimal documentation or API-only reference
vs alternatives: Architecture-focused documentation and example servers reduce learning curve compared to Python/Node.js SDKs with minimal documentation or community examples
Anubis MCP leverages Elixir's lightweight process model and OTP supervision trees to enable thousands of concurrent MCP operations with minimal resource overhead. Each MCP client connection, server session, or request can be managed by independent Elixir processes, enabling natural parallelism without explicit threading or async/await syntax. The OTP application framework provides fault tolerance, automatic process restart, and distributed deployment capabilities.
Unique: Native Elixir process model enabling thousands of concurrent MCP operations per VM with automatic fault recovery via OTP supervision trees — Python/Node.js SDKs require external infrastructure (thread pools, event loops, Kubernetes) for equivalent scalability
vs alternatives: Lightweight process overhead and built-in fault tolerance provide superior scalability and reliability compared to Python/Node.js SDKs that require external orchestration for high-concurrency scenarios
Anubis MCP provides a component system (Tools, Resources, Prompts) that developers register with Anubis.Server.Frame, which maintains session state including registered components and pagination settings. Components are defined as Elixir modules implementing specific behaviors, enabling type-safe, composable capability definitions. The Frame state management handles component lifecycle, discovery, and pagination for large capability sets, abstracting the complexity of MCP's capability advertisement protocol.
Unique: Frame-based state management with integrated pagination and component lifecycle handling, using Elixir's module system for type-safe capability composition — most MCP SDKs require manual protocol message construction or lack built-in pagination support
vs alternatives: Provides compile-time type safety and runtime state management that Python/Node.js MCP SDKs achieve through runtime validation or manual boilerplate
Anubis MCP includes a Schema DSL that enables developers to define tool parameters and resource schemas using Elixir syntax, generating MCP-compliant JSON Schema automatically. This DSL abstracts JSON Schema complexity, providing a higher-level interface for specifying input/output types, validation rules, and documentation. The schema definitions are compiled into MCP protocol messages, ensuring type consistency between Elixir code and AI assistant expectations.
Unique: Macro-based Schema DSL that compiles to JSON Schema at compile-time, eliminating runtime schema parsing overhead and enabling type-checking — Python/Node.js MCP SDKs typically use runtime schema builders or manual JSON Schema
vs alternatives: Compile-time schema validation and zero-runtime schema parsing overhead compared to Python/Node.js SDKs that validate schemas at request time
Anubis MCP's client implementation (Anubis.Client.State) manages pending requests using Anubis.Client.Request structs and handles timeout timers via Elixir's Process.send_after/3, enabling automatic request cleanup and timeout detection without external timer libraries. The state machine tracks request lifecycle from initiation through response receipt or timeout, supporting concurrent requests with independent timeout policies. This design leverages Elixir's lightweight process model to handle thousands of concurrent requests with minimal overhead.
Unique: Process.send_after/3-based timeout handling with automatic cleanup via Elixir's process model, enabling thousands of concurrent requests without external timer infrastructure — Python/Node.js SDKs typically use thread pools or event loop timers
vs alternatives: Native Elixir concurrency primitives provide lower-overhead request tracking than Python/Node.js SDKs that must manage thread/event loop overhead for timeout handling
Anubis MCP integrates with Phoenix and Plug applications through Anubis.Server.Transport.StreamableHTTP.Plug, enabling MCP servers to be deployed as HTTP endpoints within existing web applications. The Plug middleware handles HTTP request/response serialization, streaming response bodies for long-running operations, and connection lifecycle management. This integration allows developers to expose MCP capabilities alongside traditional REST APIs in a single Phoenix application.
Unique: Native Plug middleware integration with streaming response support, allowing MCP servers to coexist with Phoenix routes without separate processes — most MCP SDKs require standalone HTTP servers or custom middleware
vs alternatives: Eliminates separate server process overhead and enables unified request handling with Phoenix routing compared to Python/Node.js SDKs that typically require separate Flask/Express servers
+4 more capabilities
Provides IntelliSense completions ranked by a machine learning model trained on patterns from thousands of open-source repositories. The model learns which completions are most contextually relevant based on code patterns, variable names, and surrounding context, surfacing the most probable next token with a star indicator in the VS Code completion menu. This differs from simple frequency-based ranking by incorporating semantic understanding of code context.
Unique: Uses a neural model trained on open-source repository patterns to rank completions by likelihood rather than simple frequency or alphabetical ordering; the star indicator explicitly surfaces the top recommendation, making it discoverable without scrolling
vs alternatives: Faster than Copilot for single-token completions because it leverages lightweight ranking rather than full generative inference, and more transparent than generic IntelliSense because starred recommendations are explicitly marked
Ingests and learns from patterns across thousands of open-source repositories across Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Java to build a statistical model of common code patterns, API usage, and naming conventions. This model is baked into the extension and used to contextualize all completion suggestions. The learning happens offline during model training; the extension itself consumes the pre-trained model without further learning from user code.
Unique: Explicitly trained on thousands of public repositories to extract statistical patterns of idiomatic code; this training is transparent (Microsoft publishes which repos are included) and the model is frozen at extension release time, ensuring reproducibility and auditability
vs alternatives: More transparent than proprietary models because training data sources are disclosed; more focused on pattern matching than Copilot, which generates novel code, making it lighter-weight and faster for completion ranking
IntelliCode scores higher at 39/100 vs Anubis MCP at 27/100. Anubis MCP leads on quality and ecosystem, while IntelliCode is stronger on adoption.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Analyzes the immediate code context (variable names, function signatures, imported modules, class scope) to rank completions contextually rather than globally. The model considers what symbols are in scope, what types are expected, and what the surrounding code is doing to adjust the ranking of suggestions. This is implemented by passing a window of surrounding code (typically 50-200 tokens) to the inference model along with the completion request.
Unique: Incorporates local code context (variable names, types, scope) into the ranking model rather than treating each completion request in isolation; this is done by passing a fixed-size context window to the neural model, enabling scope-aware ranking without full semantic analysis
vs alternatives: More accurate than frequency-based ranking because it considers what's in scope; lighter-weight than full type inference because it uses syntactic context and learned patterns rather than building a complete type graph
Integrates ranked completions directly into VS Code's native IntelliSense menu by adding a star (★) indicator next to the top-ranked suggestion. This is implemented as a custom completion item provider that hooks into VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API, allowing IntelliCode to inject its ranked suggestions alongside built-in language server completions. The star is a visual affordance that makes the recommendation discoverable without requiring the user to change their completion workflow.
Unique: Uses VS Code's CompletionItemProvider API to inject ranked suggestions directly into the native IntelliSense menu with a star indicator, avoiding the need for a separate UI panel or modal and keeping the completion workflow unchanged
vs alternatives: More seamless than Copilot's separate suggestion panel because it integrates into the existing IntelliSense menu; more discoverable than silent ranking because the star makes the recommendation explicit
Maintains separate, language-specific neural models trained on repositories in each supported language (Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Java). Each model is optimized for the syntax, idioms, and common patterns of its language. The extension detects the file language and routes completion requests to the appropriate model. This allows for more accurate recommendations than a single multi-language model because each model learns language-specific patterns.
Unique: Trains and deploys separate neural models per language rather than a single multi-language model, allowing each model to specialize in language-specific syntax, idioms, and conventions; this is more complex to maintain but produces more accurate recommendations than a generalist approach
vs alternatives: More accurate than single-model approaches like Copilot's base model because each language model is optimized for its domain; more maintainable than rule-based systems because patterns are learned rather than hand-coded
Executes the completion ranking model on Microsoft's servers rather than locally on the user's machine. When a completion request is triggered, the extension sends the code context and cursor position to Microsoft's inference service, which runs the model and returns ranked suggestions. This approach allows for larger, more sophisticated models than would be practical to ship with the extension, and enables model updates without requiring users to download new extension versions.
Unique: Offloads model inference to Microsoft's cloud infrastructure rather than running locally, enabling larger models and automatic updates but requiring internet connectivity and accepting privacy tradeoffs of sending code context to external servers
vs alternatives: More sophisticated models than local approaches because server-side inference can use larger, slower models; more convenient than self-hosted solutions because no infrastructure setup is required, but less private than local-only alternatives
Learns and recommends common API and library usage patterns from open-source repositories. When a developer starts typing a method call or API usage, the model ranks suggestions based on how that API is typically used in the training data. For example, if a developer types `requests.get(`, the model will rank common parameters like `url=` and `timeout=` based on frequency in the training corpus. This is implemented by training the model on API call sequences and parameter patterns extracted from the training repositories.
Unique: Extracts and learns API usage patterns (parameter names, method chains, common argument values) from open-source repositories, allowing the model to recommend not just what methods exist but how they are typically used in practice
vs alternatives: More practical than static documentation because it shows real-world usage patterns; more accurate than generic completion because it ranks by actual usage frequency in the training data