| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 5 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server specification, exposing tools and resources through a standardized bidirectional communication interface. The server handles MCP protocol negotiation, request/response routing, and resource discovery using the MCP transport layer (stdio, SSE, or custom), enabling Claude and other MCP-compatible clients to discover and invoke exposed capabilities without direct API integration.
Unique: Implements full MCP server specification with bidirectional protocol support, enabling tools to be discovered and invoked through a standardized interface rather than custom integrations or direct API calls
vs alternatives: Provides protocol-standard tool exposure compared to custom REST APIs or function-calling wrappers, enabling interoperability across multiple MCP-compatible clients without client-specific code
Provides a schema-based tool definition system where developers declare tool signatures, input parameters, and return types using a structured format (typically JSON Schema). The server validates incoming tool invocations against these schemas before execution, ensuring type safety and providing Claude with accurate capability metadata for planning and execution.
Unique: Enforces schema-based tool contracts at the MCP protocol level, validating all invocations before execution and providing Claude with precise capability metadata for improved planning
vs alternatives: More robust than untyped function calling because schema validation prevents invalid invocations at the protocol boundary, and provides Claude with explicit parameter constraints for better reasoning
Enables the MCP server to expose resources (documents, files, knowledge bases, or dynamic content) through a URI-based resource system. Clients can discover available resources through the MCP protocol and request content, which the server retrieves and returns. This pattern supports both static resources (files, documentation) and dynamic resources (database queries, API responses) without requiring separate HTTP endpoints.
Unique: Provides on-demand resource access through MCP protocol without requiring separate HTTP endpoints or file uploads, supporting both static and dynamic content with URI-based discovery
vs alternatives: More flexible than static context injection because resources are fetched on-demand, and more secure than exposing raw APIs because access is mediated through the MCP server with potential permission controls
Implements full-duplex communication between MCP server and client using JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol over configurable transports (stdio, SSE, WebSocket, or custom). The server can both respond to client requests and initiate requests to the client (e.g., requesting user input or notifications), enabling interactive patterns beyond simple request-response.
Unique: Enables server-initiated requests and notifications through JSON-RPC 2.0, allowing the MCP server to ask questions or send updates to the client rather than only responding to requests
vs alternatives: More interactive than unidirectional tool calling because the server can request clarification or send real-time updates, enabling more sophisticated workflows than simple request-response patterns
Abstracts the underlying transport mechanism (stdio, SSE, WebSocket, or custom) from the MCP protocol logic, allowing the same server implementation to work across multiple transport layers. The server handles protocol negotiation (version, capabilities, feature flags) during initialization, ensuring compatibility between client and server versions.
Unique: Abstracts transport layer from protocol logic, enabling the same MCP server code to work across stdio, SSE, WebSocket, and custom transports with automatic capability negotiation
vs alternatives: More flexible than transport-specific implementations because a single server codebase works across multiple deployment scenarios, and more robust than manual transport switching because negotiation is automatic
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs dsadare at 22/100. dsadare leads on ecosystem, while Supabase is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities