| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Exposes Apify Actors as MCP tools that Claude and other MCP clients can invoke directly. Implements the Model Context Protocol specification to translate tool-call requests into Apify Actor API calls, handling authentication, payload marshaling, and result streaming back to the client. Uses MCP's standardized tool schema to describe Actor inputs and outputs, enabling seamless integration with LLM-based agents without custom integration code.
Unique: Native MCP server implementation that bridges Apify's Actor execution model directly into the Model Context Protocol, allowing LLMs to treat Apify Actors as first-class tools without custom adapters or API gateway code
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than REST API wrappers because it implements MCP's tool schema natively, enabling Claude to understand Actor capabilities and constraints at protocol level rather than through generic function descriptions
Automatically discovers all Actors available in an Apify account and generates MCP-compliant tool schemas describing their inputs, outputs, and execution parameters. Introspects Actor metadata (name, description, input schema, expected output format) from Apify's API and transforms it into MCP ToolDefinition objects that LLM clients can parse and present to users. Caches schema information to avoid repeated API calls during agent planning phases.
Unique: Implements automatic schema extraction from Apify's Actor metadata API, converting Apify's input/output schema format into MCP ToolDefinition objects with zero manual configuration per Actor
vs alternatives: Eliminates manual tool registration compared to generic MCP servers — new Actors are automatically discoverable without updating configuration files or restarting the server
Propagates execution context (user ID, session ID, request ID, custom metadata) through Actor invocations, enabling traceability and correlation across distributed executions. Injects context into Actor environment variables and logs, allowing Actors to include context in their output for audit trails. Supports custom metadata tags that agents can attach to Actor runs for filtering and analysis.
Unique: Implements context propagation as a first-class MCP feature, automatically injecting execution context into Actor invocations without requiring manual environment variable management
vs alternatives: More reliable than manual context passing because context is propagated at the MCP layer, ensuring consistency across all Actor invocations in a workflow
Enforces rate limits on Actor invocations to prevent overwhelming Apify infrastructure or exceeding account concurrency limits. Implements token-bucket rate limiting with configurable rates (e.g., max 10 concurrent Actors, max 100 invocations per minute). Queues excess invocations and executes them as capacity becomes available, providing agents with visibility into queue status and estimated wait times.
Unique: Implements token-bucket rate limiting at the MCP layer, preventing agents from exceeding Apify concurrency limits without requiring manual coordination or external rate limiting services
vs alternatives: More effective than agent-side rate limiting because it operates at the MCP server level, protecting shared Apify infrastructure from any single agent's runaway behavior
Streams Actor execution results back to the MCP client in real-time, handling pagination for large datasets and chunking output into manageable pieces. Implements streaming via MCP's text content blocks, allowing long-running Actors to return partial results as they complete. Automatically handles Apify's dataset pagination API, fetching results in batches and presenting them to the client without requiring manual offset/limit management.
Unique: Implements MCP streaming semantics for Apify dataset results, automatically handling pagination and chunking to present large result sets as continuous streams rather than monolithic responses
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Apify's native dataset API for pagination, reducing API calls and enabling true streaming rather than buffering entire results
Tracks Actor execution state (running, succeeded, failed, timed out) and exposes status information to the MCP client via tool results and optional status callbacks. Polls Apify's Actor run API at configurable intervals to detect completion, failures, and resource constraints. Provides structured error messages including failure reasons, logs, and resource usage metrics that help LLM agents understand why an Actor failed and decide whether to retry or escalate.
Unique: Implements polling-based status tracking integrated into MCP tool results, allowing LLM agents to await Actor completion and receive structured failure information without custom monitoring infrastructure
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom monitoring dashboards because status is embedded in tool results, enabling agents to make decisions based on execution outcomes without external observability tools
Validates Actor input parameters against the Actor's declared input schema before execution, catching configuration errors early and providing detailed validation error messages. Uses JSON schema validation to check required fields, type constraints, and value ranges. Returns validation errors to the LLM client before attempting execution, allowing agents to correct inputs or request user clarification rather than wasting Actor execution time on invalid inputs.
Unique: Integrates JSON schema validation directly into the MCP tool invocation path, rejecting invalid inputs before they reach Apify rather than relying on Actor-side validation
vs alternatives: Faster feedback than Actor-side validation because errors are caught at the MCP layer, saving network round-trips and Actor execution time for obviously invalid inputs
Enables sequential or parallel execution of multiple Actors within a single agent workflow, with output from one Actor automatically passed as input to the next. Implements dependency tracking to ensure Actors execute in the correct order, and provides utilities for transforming output from one Actor into the input format expected by the next. Handles error propagation — if an Actor in a chain fails, subsequent Actors are skipped unless the agent explicitly implements retry logic.
Unique: Provides MCP-native orchestration patterns for Apify Actors, allowing agents to compose Actors into workflows without external orchestration tools like Airflow or Prefect
vs alternatives: Simpler than dedicated workflow engines because orchestration logic lives in the agent itself, eliminating the need to learn separate DSLs or maintain separate pipeline definitions
+4 more capabilities
Automatically loads and parses documents from diverse sources (PDFs, Word docs, HTML, Markdown, code files, databases) into a unified in-memory representation using format-specific loaders and node-based document abstractions. Each document is decomposed into Document objects containing metadata, content, and relationships, enabling downstream processing without format-specific handling in application code.
Unique: Provides a unified loader abstraction (BaseReader interface) that normalizes 100+ data source connectors into a single Document/Node API, eliminating format-specific branching logic in application code. Loaders are composable and chainable, allowing sequential transformations (e.g., load → split → extract metadata → embed).
vs alternatives: Broader out-of-the-box loader coverage than LangChain's document loaders and more structured node-based decomposition than raw text splitting, reducing boilerplate for multi-source RAG pipelines.
Splits documents into semantically coherent chunks using multiple strategies (character-based, token-aware, recursive, semantic) with configurable overlap and chunk size. Preserves document hierarchy and metadata through a node tree structure, enabling retrieval systems to maintain context relationships and enable hierarchical re-ranking or parent-document retrieval patterns.
Unique: Implements a node-tree abstraction that preserves document hierarchy and enables parent-document retrieval patterns. Supports multiple splitting strategies (recursive, semantic, code-aware) with pluggable custom splitters, and automatically propagates metadata through the node tree.
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than LangChain's text splitters because it preserves hierarchical relationships and supports semantic splitting; better for complex document structures than simple character-based splitting.
LlamaIndex scores higher at 40/100 vs @apify/actors-mcp-server at 37/100. @apify/actors-mcp-server leads on adoption and ecosystem, while LlamaIndex is stronger on quality. However, @apify/actors-mcp-server offers a free tier which may be better for getting started.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Processes documents containing mixed content (text, images, tables, code) by extracting and understanding each modality separately, then synthesizing information across modalities. Uses vision models for image understanding, specialized parsers for tables and code, and integrates results into a unified document representation for retrieval and generation.
Unique: Integrates vision models, table parsers, and code extractors into a unified multi-modal document processing pipeline that synthesizes information across modalities. Preserves modality-specific structure (table schemas, code formatting) while enabling cross-modal retrieval and generation.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive multi-modal support than text-only RAG; built-in vision integration reduces boilerplate for document understanding compared to manual vision API calls.
Enables streaming of LLM responses token-by-token and real-time retrieval updates, allowing applications to display partial results as they become available. Supports streaming from retrieval (progressive document discovery) and generation (token-by-token output) with backpressure handling and cancellation support for responsive user experiences.
Unique: Provides first-class streaming support for both retrieval and generation with automatic backpressure handling and cancellation. Enables progressive result display without custom async/streaming code in application layer.
vs alternatives: More integrated streaming support than manual LLM API streaming; built-in retrieval streaming and backpressure handling reduce complexity compared to custom streaming implementations.
Tracks API costs for LLM calls, embeddings, and other operations with per-query and per-session cost attribution. Provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., batch processing, model selection, caching) and enables cost-aware query planning to balance quality and expense. Integrates with multiple LLM providers to normalize cost tracking across models.
Unique: Provides automatic cost tracking across multiple LLM providers with per-query attribution and cost optimization recommendations. Integrates with query execution to enable cost-aware planning without manual cost calculation.
vs alternatives: More integrated cost tracking than manual API billing review; built-in optimization recommendations reduce guesswork for cost reduction.
Enables building custom RAG pipelines by composing modular components (retrievers, synthesizers, agents, tools) through a declarative or programmatic API. Supports complex workflows with branching, loops, and conditional logic, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Pipelines are reusable, testable, and can be deployed as APIs or batch jobs.
Unique: Provides a flexible pipeline composition API supporting both declarative and programmatic definitions, with automatic dependency resolution and execution optimization. Enables complex workflows with branching and conditional logic without custom orchestration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible pipeline composition than fixed RAG architectures; better workflow support than manual component chaining.
Generates embeddings for documents/nodes using pluggable embedding providers (OpenAI, Hugging Face, local models) and stores them in a unified vector store interface that abstracts over multiple backends (Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, FAISS, Chroma, etc.). The abstraction layer enables switching vector stores without changing application code, and handles batching, retry logic, and metadata indexing.
Unique: Provides a unified VectorStore interface that abstracts 10+ vector database backends, enabling zero-code switching between providers. Handles embedding batching, retry logic, and metadata propagation automatically. Supports both cloud and local embedding models through a pluggable EmbedModel interface.
vs alternatives: Broader vector store coverage and more seamless provider switching than LangChain's vectorstore integrations; better abstraction consistency across backends than using raw vector store SDKs directly.
Retrieves semantically similar documents from vector stores using embedding-based similarity search, with optional re-ranking, filtering, and fusion strategies (hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval). Supports multiple retrieval modes (similarity, MMR, fusion) and enables custom retrieval logic through a pluggable Retriever interface that can combine multiple strategies.
Unique: Implements a pluggable Retriever abstraction supporting multiple retrieval strategies (similarity, MMR, fusion, custom) that can be composed and chained. Built-in support for re-ranking via LLM or cross-encoder, and hybrid search combining dense and sparse retrieval without custom integration code.
vs alternatives: More flexible retrieval composition than LangChain's retrievers; built-in re-ranking and fusion strategies reduce boilerplate for advanced retrieval pipelines.
+6 more capabilities