| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | $0.12/hr | — |
| Capabilities | 16 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Converts pre-recorded audio files to text using Universal-3 Pro or Universal-2 models via asynchronous REST API processing. Universal-3 Pro achieves market-leading accuracy across 6 languages (English, Spanish, German, French, Italian, Portuguese) with context-aware prompting; Universal-2 supports 99 languages at lower cost. Processing returns word-level timestamps, speaker segmentation, and confidence scores via polling or webhook callbacks.
Unique: Dual-model architecture (Universal-3 Pro for accuracy in 6 languages vs Universal-2 for breadth across 99 languages) allows developers to optimize for either precision or language coverage without switching providers. Context-aware prompting with keyterms enables domain-specific vocabulary injection (e.g., medical terminology, product names) directly in the API request rather than post-processing.
vs alternatives: Outperforms Google Cloud Speech-to-Text and AWS Transcribe on accuracy benchmarks for English while offering superior multilingual support at lower per-hour cost ($0.15-$0.21/hr vs $0.024-$0.048/min for competitors).
Processes live audio streams via WebSocket or streaming protocol, delivering near-real-time transcription with word-level timestamps and speaker diarization. Uses Universal-3 Pro Streaming model with same context-aware prompting and entity detection as pre-recorded variant. Designed for live call transcription, voice conference capture, and real-time voice agent interactions.
Unique: Streaming model maintains feature parity with pre-recorded Universal-3 Pro (context-aware prompting, entity detection, speaker diarization) while delivering partial results during streaming rather than waiting for full audio completion. WebSocket-based architecture enables bidirectional communication for dynamic prompt updates mid-stream.
vs alternatives: Offers real-time entity detection and speaker diarization in streaming mode, which Google Cloud Speech-to-Text and Azure Speech Services require separate post-processing steps or custom logic to achieve; simpler integration path for voice agents vs building custom streaming pipelines.
Automatically generates summaries of transcribed conversations and extracts key insights including action items, decisions, topics discussed, and sentiment trends. Summarization works on full transcripts or conversation segments. Returns structured summaries with configurable detail levels (brief, detailed, executive summary). Claimed in artifact description but detailed implementation unknown.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on implementation approach, model selection, and integration with transcription pipeline. Artifact description claims summarization capability but no technical details provided in source material.
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare against alternatives (OpenAI GPT-4 summarization, Google Cloud NLU, AWS Comprehend). Integration with transcription pipeline likely provides cost and latency advantages if implemented natively.
Analyzes emotional tone and sentiment in transcribed conversations, detecting speaker sentiment (positive, negative, neutral) and emotional states (anger, frustration, satisfaction, etc.). Returns sentiment scores per speaker, conversation segment, or overall. Enables customer satisfaction measurement, agent performance evaluation, and conversation quality assessment.
Unique: unknown — insufficient data on sentiment model architecture, training data, and emotion taxonomy. Artifact description claims sentiment analysis but no technical implementation details provided.
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data to compare against alternatives (AWS Comprehend Sentiment, Google Cloud NLU, Azure Text Analytics). Integration with transcription pipeline likely provides cost and latency advantages if implemented natively.
Provides precise word-level timestamps for every word in the transcript, enabling exact audio segment retrieval and temporal alignment with video or other media. Timestamps are returned in milliseconds with confidence scores. Enables video subtitle generation, audio clip extraction, and precise quote verification.
Unique: Word-level timestamps are included by default in all transcription responses (no add-on cost), enabling precise temporal alignment without separate synchronization services. Millisecond precision enables both video subtitle generation and audio clip extraction from a single API response.
vs alternatives: More precise than sentence-level timestamps from competitors (Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, AWS Transcribe); included by default rather than as premium add-on; enables both video and audio use cases without separate tools.
Specialized transcription mode optimized for medical conversations including clinical terminology, drug names, medical procedures, and patient information. Uses domain-specific language model tuning and medical vocabulary injection. Adds $0.15/hour to transcription cost. Supports both Universal-3 Pro and Universal-2 models.
Unique: Specialized medical language model tuning combined with medical vocabulary injection, enabling accurate recognition of clinical terminology without requiring custom fine-tuning. Available as add-on mode ($0.15/hr) for both Universal-3 Pro and Universal-2, providing cost-effective medical transcription.
vs alternatives: More cost-effective than specialized medical transcription services (Nuance, Philips) or building custom medical speech models; simpler integration than medical NLP pipelines (scispaCy, BioBERT); supports both English and multilingual medical terminology.
Official SDKs for Python and JavaScript enable developers to integrate AssemblyAI transcription into applications without building raw HTTP clients. SDKs provide type-safe API bindings, automatic retry logic, error handling, and streaming support. Integrations with LiveKit and Pipecat frameworks enable voice agent and real-time communication use cases.
Unique: Official SDKs with framework integrations (LiveKit, Pipecat) reduce boilerplate and enable rapid prototyping of voice applications. Type-safe bindings and automatic error handling reduce integration bugs compared to raw HTTP clients.
vs alternatives: More developer-friendly than raw REST API calls; simpler integration than building custom HTTP clients; framework integrations (LiveKit, Pipecat) enable faster voice agent development than manual orchestration.
Provides Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration enabling AI agents and LLMs to access AssemblyAI transcription capabilities through a standardized interface. Documentation available at `/llms.txt` and `/llms-full.txt` endpoints. Enables agents to transcribe audio, extract insights, and perform speech understanding tasks as part of multi-step reasoning workflows.
Unique: unknown — MCP integration details not documented in source material. Presence of `/llms.txt` and `/llms-full.txt` endpoints suggests standardized agent integration, but specific tools, parameters, and capabilities unknown.
vs alternatives: unknown — insufficient data on MCP implementation. If fully implemented, would enable AssemblyAI transcription in any MCP-compatible agent framework (Claude, GPT-4, open-source LLMs) without custom integration code.
+8 more capabilities
Transcribes audio in 98 languages to text in the original language using a Transformer sequence-to-sequence architecture trained on 680,000 hours of diverse internet audio. The system uses mel spectrogram feature extraction via FFmpeg integration, processes audio through an AudioEncoder that generates embeddings, then applies an autoregressive TextDecoder with task-specific tokens to produce language-native transcriptions. Language-specific models (e.g., tiny.en, base.en) optimize for English-only workloads with reduced parameter count.
Unique: Unified multitasking Transformer model replaces traditional multi-stage speech pipelines (VAD → language detection → ASR → post-processing) with single forward pass; trained on 680K hours of internet audio providing robustness to background noise, accents, and technical speech unlike studio-trained competitors
vs alternatives: Outperforms Google Cloud Speech-to-Text and Azure Speech Services on non-English languages and noisy audio due to diverse training data; open-source allows local deployment without API latency or privacy concerns
Translates non-English speech directly to English text in a single forward pass using the same Transformer architecture as transcription, but with a translation task token prepended to the decoder input. The model learns to skip intermediate transcription and generate English output directly from audio embeddings, avoiding cascading errors from intermediate transcription steps. Supports 98 source languages translating to English only.
Unique: Direct audio-to-English translation without intermediate transcription step — the decoder learns to skip source language text generation and output English directly, reducing error propagation and latency compared to cascade approaches (transcribe → translate)
vs alternatives: Faster and more accurate than Google Translate + Google Speech-to-Text pipeline because it avoids intermediate transcription errors; open-source allows offline deployment unlike cloud translation APIs
Whisper Large v3 scores higher at 59/100 vs AssemblyAI at 55/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Normalizes variable-length audio to exactly 30 seconds via `whisper.pad_or_trim()`: audio shorter than 30 seconds is padded with silence (zeros) to reach 30 seconds, audio longer than 30 seconds is trimmed to first 30 seconds. This ensures consistent input shape (80×3000 mel spectrogram) for the model, avoiding shape mismatches and enabling batch processing. Padding strategy is simple zero-padding rather than sophisticated techniques like repetition or interpolation.
Unique: Simple zero-padding strategy is computationally efficient and deterministic, but acoustically naive — alternative approaches (silence detection, repetition) not implemented in base library
vs alternatives: Simpler than librosa-based preprocessing with sophisticated padding; deterministic behavior aids reproducibility; zero-padding is fast but may introduce artifacts vs more sophisticated techniques
Returns transcription results as structured JSON objects containing: transcribed text, language code, duration, segments (with timing and text), and optional confidence metrics. The `model.transcribe()` API returns a dictionary with keys like 'text' (full transcript), 'language' (detected language), 'segments' (list of segment objects with start/end times and text). This structured format enables downstream processing (subtitle generation, database storage, API responses) without string parsing.
Unique: Structured output format is built into high-level API rather than requiring manual parsing — segments include timing and text, enabling direct use for subtitle generation or timeline-based applications
vs alternatives: More structured than raw text output; less detailed than forced alignment tools that provide phoneme-level information; JSON format is language-agnostic and integrates easily with web APIs
Detects the spoken language in audio by processing mel spectrograms through the AudioEncoder and using a language classification head that outputs probability distributions over 98 supported languages. The model leverages 680K hours of multilingual training data to recognize language characteristics from acoustic features alone, without requiring transcription. Language detection occurs as a preliminary step in the transcription pipeline and can be called independently via the language detection task token.
Unique: Language detection is integrated into the same Transformer model as transcription/translation via task tokens, allowing shared AudioEncoder computation and single model load — not a separate classifier, reducing memory footprint and inference overhead
vs alternatives: More accurate than acoustic-only language identification (e.g., librosa-based approaches) because it leverages semantic understanding from 680K hours of training; faster than transcription-based detection (identify language from first few words) because it uses acoustic features directly
Provides six model variants (tiny 39M, base 74M, small 244M, medium 769M, large 1550M, turbo 809M) with different parameter counts, VRAM requirements (1-10GB), and inference speeds (10x-1x relative to large). Each size trades accuracy for speed — tiny runs ~10x faster but with ~5-10% lower WER (word error rate), while large provides best accuracy at 10GB VRAM cost. Turbo variant (809M params) optimizes large-v3 for 8x speedup with minimal accuracy loss but lacks translation support.
Unique: Discrete model size family with published speed/accuracy/VRAM tradeoff matrix allows developers to make informed selection based on deployment constraints; turbo variant represents architectural optimization (knowledge distillation or pruning) achieving 8x speedup with <5% accuracy loss, distinct from simply using smaller base model
vs alternatives: More transparent tradeoff options than Whisper API (single model) or competitors like Deepgram (proprietary size selection); open-source allows local benchmarking on own hardware rather than relying on vendor performance claims
Automatically segments audio longer than 30 seconds into overlapping windows, processes each window independently through the transcription pipeline, and merges results with overlap handling to produce seamless full-length transcripts. The system uses `whisper.pad_or_trim()` to normalize each segment to exactly 30 seconds (padding with silence if needed), then applies the decoder to each segment and concatenates outputs while managing word-level boundaries and timestamp continuity across segment edges.
Unique: Sliding window approach with automatic overlap and boundary handling is built into high-level `model.transcribe()` API — developers don't manually implement segmentation, unlike lower-level APIs that require explicit window management
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom segmentation logic; more robust than naive concatenation because it handles word-level boundary issues; faster than streaming approaches because it processes segments in parallel on GPU
Generates precise word-level timestamps (start and end times in milliseconds) for each word in the transcript by leveraging the decoder's attention weights and token alignment information. The system maps output tokens back to audio frames using the attention mechanism, then converts frame indices to millisecond timestamps based on the mel spectrogram hop length (20ms per frame). Timestamps are returned as part of the structured output alongside transcribed text.
Unique: Word-level timestamps are derived from attention weight alignment rather than separate timestamp prediction head — leverages existing decoder computation without additional model parameters, but introduces ±100-200ms uncertainty from frame quantization
vs alternatives: More granular than segment-level timestamps (which only mark 30-second boundaries); less accurate than forced alignment tools (e.g., Montreal Forced Aligner) but requires no phonetic lexicon or manual annotation
+4 more capabilities