| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 7 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Reranks search results or retrieved passages by computing relevance scores using a cross-encoder neural network that jointly encodes query-passage pairs through XLM-RoBERTa backbone. Unlike bi-encoder approaches that embed query and passage separately, this model processes them together to capture fine-grained interaction patterns, producing a single relevance score per pair that reflects semantic and lexical alignment.
Unique: Uses XLM-RoBERTa cross-encoder architecture trained on large-scale relevance datasets (BAAI's proprietary corpus + public benchmarks) with explicit optimization for query-passage interaction modeling, enabling superior ranking accuracy compared to bi-encoder approaches while maintaining inference efficiency through ONNX export and batch processing support
vs alternatives: Outperforms bi-encoder rerankers (e.g., all-MiniLM-L6-v2) on MTEB benchmarks by 3-5 points NDCG@10 due to joint encoding, while remaining 10x faster than proprietary rerankers like Cohere's API through local inference
Scores relevance across English and Chinese text pairs using XLM-RoBERTa's shared multilingual embedding space, enabling zero-shot cross-lingual ranking where a query in one language can score passages in another. The model leverages XLM-RoBERTa's 100-language pretraining to generalize relevance patterns across linguistic boundaries without language-specific fine-tuning.
Unique: Leverages XLM-RoBERTa's 100-language pretraining with BAAI's domain-specific fine-tuning on English-Chinese relevance pairs, enabling zero-shot cross-lingual scoring without separate language models or translation pipelines
vs alternatives: Simpler and faster than translation-based reranking (query translation + monolingual scoring) while achieving comparable accuracy, and more cost-effective than proprietary multilingual APIs
Exports the cross-encoder model to ONNX format for optimized inference across CPUs, GPUs, and specialized accelerators (TPUs, NPUs) without PyTorch runtime dependency. ONNX Runtime applies graph-level optimizations (operator fusion, quantization, memory pooling) and enables deployment on edge devices or serverless functions with minimal latency overhead compared to native PyTorch inference.
Unique: Provides pre-converted ONNX artifacts on HuggingFace Hub with ONNX Runtime integration, enabling one-line deployment across heterogeneous hardware without custom conversion pipelines or framework-specific optimization code
vs alternatives: Faster deployment and lower latency than PyTorch inference (15-30% speedup on CPU, 5-10% on GPU) while maintaining model accuracy, and more portable than TensorFlow/TFLite alternatives for cross-platform compatibility
Processes multiple query-passage pairs in parallel using dynamic padding (padding to longest sequence in batch rather than fixed max length) and gradient checkpointing to reduce memory footprint. The sentence-transformers integration automatically handles batching, tokenization, and output aggregation, allowing efficient scoring of thousands of passages per query without manual memory management.
Unique: sentence-transformers integration provides automatic batch handling with dynamic padding and memory-efficient inference without explicit batch management code, combined with ONNX export for further optimization
vs alternatives: Simpler API and lower memory overhead than manual PyTorch batching, and 2-3x faster than sequential inference while maintaining accuracy
Loads model weights from safetensors format (a safer alternative to pickle-based PyTorch .pt files) that prevents arbitrary code execution during deserialization. The safetensors format is language-agnostic and enables fast, memory-mapped loading of large models without materializing the entire weight tensor in memory during load time.
Unique: Provides safetensors variant on HuggingFace Hub with automatic fallback to PyTorch format, enabling secure loading without code changes while maintaining backward compatibility
vs alternatives: Safer than pickle-based .pt files (prevents arbitrary code execution) while maintaining compatibility with PyTorch ecosystem, and faster loading than PyTorch format due to memory mapping
Model is evaluated on MTEB (Massive Text Embedding Benchmark) reranking tasks, providing standardized performance metrics (NDCG@10, MAP, MRR) across diverse domains and languages. MTEB evaluation enables direct comparison with other rerankers and tracking of model performance improvements across versions using a shared evaluation framework.
Unique: Evaluated on MTEB reranking tasks with published results on HuggingFace Model Card, enabling direct comparison with 50+ other rerankers on standardized metrics
vs alternatives: Transparent, reproducible evaluation using community-standard benchmarks vs proprietary evaluation claims, and enables easy comparison with open-source alternatives
Compatible with text-embeddings-inference (TEI) server, a high-performance inference server optimized for embedding and reranking models. TEI provides REST/gRPC APIs, automatic batching, dynamic padding, and GPU optimization without requiring custom inference code, enabling production deployment with minimal infrastructure setup.
Unique: Native compatibility with text-embeddings-inference server (Rust-based, optimized for embedding/reranking workloads) enabling production deployment with automatic batching, dynamic padding, and GPU optimization without custom code
vs alternatives: Simpler deployment than custom FastAPI/Flask servers and better performance than generic inference servers due to TEI's embedding-specific optimizations
Model is compatible with Azure Machine Learning endpoints, enabling one-click deployment to Azure's managed inference infrastructure. Azure integration provides automatic scaling, monitoring, and integration with Azure's ML ecosystem without custom deployment code.
Unique: Pre-configured for Azure ML endpoints deployment with automatic model registration and endpoint configuration, enabling one-click deployment vs manual infrastructure setup
vs alternatives: Simpler than self-hosted deployment for Azure-native teams, with built-in monitoring and auto-scaling vs manual Kubernetes management
+1 more capabilities
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to perform chained mathematical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparisons) across both structured tables and unstructured text extracted from SEC filings. The dataset provides ground-truth question-answer pairs where answers require synthesizing data from multiple locations within earnings reports and applying sequential arithmetic operations, testing whether models can decompose complex financial queries into discrete computational steps.
Unique: Combines real SEC filing documents (not synthetic) with crowdsourced questions requiring multi-step arithmetic, creating a hybrid dataset that tests both domain knowledge extraction and quantitative reasoning in a single evaluation task. Unlike generic math word problems, answers require locating figures within 10+ page documents first.
vs alternatives: More challenging than DROP or SVAMP because it requires financial domain knowledge AND document retrieval before arithmetic, whereas generic math benchmarks assume figures are already extracted
Assesses whether AI systems understand financial terminology, accounting concepts, and domain-specific metrics by requiring them to answer questions about real earnings reports from S&P 500 companies. The dataset tests recognition of financial line items (revenue, COGS, operating expenses, net income), ability to distinguish between different financial statements (income statement vs balance sheet), and understanding of financial ratios and metrics without explicit instruction on their definitions.
Unique: Uses authentic SEC filings rather than synthetic financial data, exposing models to real-world accounting variations, footnote complexity, and the actual structure of professional financial documents. This tests transfer learning from general text to specialized domain without domain-specific pretraining.
vs alternatives: More authentic than synthetic financial QA datasets because it uses real earnings reports with their inherent complexity, but narrower than general financial knowledge benchmarks because it focuses only on historical data interpretation
FinQA scores higher at 60/100 vs bge-reranker-base at 48/100. bge-reranker-base leads on adoption and ecosystem, while FinQA is stronger on quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables evaluation of AI systems' ability to extract numerical data from both structured HTML/text tables and unstructured prose within the same document, then reason over the extracted values. The dataset contains questions where relevant data appears in different formats — some figures are in formatted tables with clear row/column headers, while others are embedded in narrative text or footnotes — requiring robust parsing and entity linking before computation can occur.
Unique: Combines structured table data with unstructured narrative in the same evaluation, forcing systems to handle format heterogeneity and resolve references across different data representations. Most table QA datasets use clean, isolated tables; this tests real-world document complexity.
vs alternatives: More realistic than isolated table QA benchmarks (like SQA or WikiTableQuestions) because it requires handling narrative context and format mixing, but simpler than full document understanding because tables are already in text format (no OCR needed)
Provides a curated, crowdsourced-annotated dataset of 8,281 question-answer pairs with multi-step reasoning requirements, enabling systematic evaluation of AI systems on financial numerical reasoning. The dataset includes quality control mechanisms through crowdworker annotation, answer validation against ground truth, and coverage across diverse financial metrics and company types within the S&P 500, creating a reproducible evaluation standard for the financial AI community.
Unique: Provides a publicly available, reproducible benchmark specifically designed for financial numerical reasoning with real SEC filings, enabling standardized comparison across different financial AI systems. Most financial datasets are proprietary or synthetic; this is open-source and authentic.
vs alternatives: More specialized and challenging than generic QA benchmarks (SQuAD, MRQA) because it requires financial domain knowledge and multi-step arithmetic, but narrower in scope than comprehensive financial understanding benchmarks because it focuses only on numerical reasoning
Assesses AI systems' ability to perform multi-hop reasoning by requiring them to locate and combine information from different sections of earnings reports. Questions may require finding a figure in the income statement, then locating a related metric in the balance sheet, then performing arithmetic across both — testing whether models can maintain context across document boundaries and understand relationships between different financial statement sections.
Unique: Embeds multi-hop reasoning requirements within authentic financial documents where hops correspond to real relationships between financial statement sections, rather than synthetic reasoning chains. This tests whether models understand domain structure, not just generic multi-hop patterns.
vs alternatives: More realistic than synthetic multi-hop datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA) because reasoning hops follow actual financial relationships, but less controlled because document structure varies and reasoning paths are implicit rather than explicitly annotated
Enables evaluation of whether AI systems can identify which arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, comparison) are required to answer financial questions, then execute them correctly. The dataset implicitly tests operation selection — a question asking 'what is the profit margin' requires division (net income / revenue), while 'what is total assets' requires addition — forcing models to understand financial semantics before applying math.
Unique: Embeds arithmetic operation selection within financial domain context, requiring models to understand that 'margin' semantically maps to division and 'total' maps to addition. This tests semantic grounding of operations, not just arithmetic execution.
vs alternatives: More semantically grounded than generic math word problem datasets because operation selection is implicit in financial terminology, but less explicit than datasets with annotated operation types because operations must be inferred
Provides evaluation capability for AI systems to compare financial metrics across multiple S&P 500 companies or aggregate metrics across different time periods within the same company's earnings reports. While individual questions reference single documents, the dataset structure enables evaluation of systems that can retrieve and compare relevant companies, requiring understanding of which metrics are comparable across entities and how to normalize for company size or accounting differences.
Unique: Provides a foundation for evaluating cross-company financial comparison by including diverse S&P 500 companies with different business models and scales, enabling assessment of whether systems can normalize and compare metrics appropriately. Most financial QA datasets focus on single-document questions.
vs alternatives: Enables cross-company evaluation unlike single-document QA datasets, but requires external retrieval and comparison logic because the dataset itself contains only single-document questions