| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.80e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B implements a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture where only 47B out of 300B total parameters are activated per token, reducing computational overhead while maintaining model capacity. The model uses a gating network to route tokens to specialized expert modules, enabling efficient inference through sparse activation patterns rather than dense forward passes through all parameters.
Unique: Uses selective 47B/300B parameter activation via MoE gating rather than dense forward passes, achieving inference efficiency comparable to 50-70B dense models while maintaining 300B-scale reasoning capacity through expert specialization
vs alternatives: More parameter-efficient than dense 300B models (GPT-4, Claude 3.5) and faster than full-activation MoE variants, but with less predictable output consistency than dense architectures due to routing variability
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B processes conversation history through explicit system/user/assistant message roles, maintaining coherent context across multiple exchanges without requiring manual context window management. The model implements sliding-window attention or similar context compression to handle extended dialogues while respecting token limits, enabling stateless API calls where conversation state is passed in each request.
Unique: Implements explicit role-based message routing (system/user/assistant) with implicit context compression, allowing stateless API design where conversation history is passed per-request rather than maintained server-side, reducing infrastructure complexity
vs alternatives: Simpler to integrate than stateful dialogue systems (e.g., LangChain memory backends) but requires client-side context management; more flexible than single-turn models but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory modules or retrieval-augmented generation
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B is trained on instruction-following datasets enabling it to interpret natural language task descriptions and adapt behavior accordingly. The model uses in-context learning to follow complex multi-step instructions, system prompts for behavioral constraints, and few-shot examples to guide output format — all without fine-tuning, leveraging the model's learned ability to parse and execute arbitrary instructions.
Unique: Combines instruction-following with MoE sparse activation, allowing task-specific expert routing — different instruction types may activate different expert subsets, enabling specialized behavior without explicit fine-tuning or model switching
vs alternatives: More flexible than task-specific models (e.g., CodeLlama for code-only) but less reliable than fine-tuned models for highly specialized domains; comparable to GPT-4 instruction-following but with lower cost due to MoE efficiency
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B supports text generation across multiple languages (Chinese, English, and others) through language-agnostic MoE routing where the gating network treats tokens uniformly regardless of language, allowing the model to leverage shared expert knowledge across linguistic boundaries. The model was trained on multilingual corpora, enabling code-switching and cross-lingual reasoning without language-specific model variants.
Unique: Uses language-agnostic MoE routing where experts are not language-specific but shared across all languages, enabling efficient multilingual support without separate expert pools — a design choice that trades per-language specialization for cross-lingual knowledge sharing
vs alternatives: More cost-efficient than maintaining separate language-specific models but may underperform specialized models like ChatGLM (Chinese-optimized) or Claude (English-optimized) in individual languages; better for code-switching than language-specific models
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B is accessed exclusively via OpenRouter or Baidu's API, supporting both streaming (token-by-token output for real-time UI) and batch (full completion returned at once) inference modes. The API abstracts away model deployment complexity, handling load balancing, rate limiting, and multi-user concurrency server-side, while clients manage request formatting and response parsing.
Unique: Provides API-only access through OpenRouter and Baidu endpoints, eliminating local deployment complexity but introducing provider dependency; streaming mode uses Server-Sent Events (SSE) for real-time token delivery, enabling responsive UI without polling
vs alternatives: Lower operational overhead than self-hosted models (Ollama, vLLM) but higher latency and ongoing costs; more cost-efficient than GPT-4 API for equivalent reasoning tasks due to MoE sparse activation, but less mature ecosystem than OpenAI/Anthropic APIs
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B exposes temperature, top-p (nucleus sampling), and top-k parameters allowing fine-grained control over output randomness and diversity. Lower temperatures (0.0-0.5) produce deterministic, focused outputs suitable for factual tasks; higher temperatures (0.7-1.0+) increase creativity and diversity for open-ended generation. The model implements standard softmax temperature scaling and nucleus sampling, enabling developers to tune the probability distribution over tokens without retraining.
Unique: Exposes standard sampling parameters (temperature, top-p, top-k) without proprietary extensions, enabling portable prompt engineering across models; MoE architecture may interact with sampling in subtle ways (e.g., expert routing may be affected by token probability distributions)
vs alternatives: Comparable to OpenAI/Anthropic APIs in parameter exposure; more transparent than some closed-source models but less sophisticated than models with adaptive sampling or dynamic temperature scheduling
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B allows clients to specify max_tokens parameter, controlling the maximum length of generated completions. This enables developers to enforce output length constraints without post-processing, useful for fitting responses into UI constraints or limiting API costs. The model respects the max_tokens limit during generation, stopping early if the limit is reached before natural completion.
Unique: Implements standard max_tokens parameter with hard cutoff behavior; no special handling for MoE expert routing or adaptive truncation — the limit applies uniformly regardless of which experts are active
vs alternatives: Standard feature across all LLM APIs; comparable to OpenAI/Anthropic but lacks sophisticated truncation strategies (e.g., Claude's 'stop_sequences' for graceful termination)
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B supports stop_sequences parameter allowing developers to specify custom tokens or strings that trigger generation termination. When the model generates a stop sequence, output is immediately halted and returned, enabling natural conversation boundaries (e.g., stopping at newlines for single-line outputs) or domain-specific delimiters without post-processing.
Unique: Provides standard stop_sequences parameter without advanced features like regex patterns or priority ordering; integrates with MoE routing transparently (stop sequences are checked post-generation regardless of expert activation)
vs alternatives: Comparable to OpenAI/Anthropic APIs; less sophisticated than models with grammar-based constraints (e.g., Outlines library) but simpler to implement and more widely supported
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training