Baserun vs Framer
Framer ranks higher at 82/100 vs Baserun at 56/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Baserun | Framer |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 56/100 | 82/100 |
| Adoption | 1 | 1 |
| Quality | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $5/mo (Mini) |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Automatically captures complete execution traces for LLM application requests, including prompt inputs, model outputs, token counts, latency metrics, and intermediate steps across multiple API calls. Uses instrumentation hooks at the SDK level to intercept LLM provider calls (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) and structured logging to correlate related operations into unified traces without requiring manual span creation.
Unique: Provides LLM-native tracing that automatically captures model-specific metadata (token counts, model names, temperature settings) without requiring developers to manually define spans, using provider-agnostic instrumentation that works across OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, and other LLM APIs
vs alternatives: Deeper than generic APM tools (Datadog, New Relic) because it understands LLM semantics; simpler than building custom tracing because it requires zero manual span instrumentation
Executes user-defined evaluation functions against LLM outputs to measure quality, correctness, and safety. Supports both deterministic checks (exact match, regex, schema validation) and LLM-based evaluations (using another model to judge outputs). Evaluations run asynchronously on captured traces and can be parameterized with custom scoring logic, thresholds, and aggregation rules.
Unique: Combines deterministic and LLM-based evaluation in a unified framework where users write simple Python/JS functions that can call external APIs, use regex, or invoke another LLM for judgment — all executed server-side without requiring infrastructure setup
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed evaluation libraries (RAGAS, DeepEval) because it allows arbitrary custom logic; more integrated than standalone evaluation tools because evals run automatically on all captured traces without manual dataset creation
Automatically compares LLM outputs from new code versions against baseline traces to detect quality regressions. Integrates with CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, etc.) via webhooks and status checks, allowing tests to block deployments if evaluation scores drop below thresholds. Baselines are established from previous runs and can be manually curated or automatically selected.
Unique: Treats LLM outputs as testable artifacts with statistical regression detection, using baseline comparison rather than fixed assertions — automatically blocks deployments when evaluation scores degrade, integrated directly into Git workflows via status checks
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple output snapshot testing because it uses evaluation metrics rather than exact matching; tighter than external testing tools because it's built into the LLM observability platform with automatic trace correlation
Automatically instruments calls to multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, Azure OpenAI, self-hosted models) through a single SDK, normalizing responses into a unified trace schema regardless of provider. Handles provider-specific response formats, streaming responses, and error states transparently, allowing developers to switch providers without changing instrumentation code.
Unique: Provides transparent instrumentation across heterogeneous LLM providers by intercepting at the SDK level and normalizing to a unified schema, allowing cost/performance comparison without application code changes or provider-specific wrappers
vs alternatives: Simpler than building custom provider abstraction layers because normalization is built-in; more comprehensive than provider-specific monitoring because it works across OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, and others with identical instrumentation
Automatically extracts token counts and pricing information from LLM provider responses, aggregates costs by model/provider/user/feature, and provides dashboards showing cost trends and per-request breakdowns. Integrates with provider pricing APIs to stay current with rate changes and supports custom pricing configuration for self-hosted models.
Unique: Automatically extracts cost data from LLM provider responses without requiring separate billing API calls, providing real-time cost attribution at the request level with multi-dimensional aggregation (by model, user, feature, etc.)
vs alternatives: More granular than provider billing dashboards because it attributes costs to application features; more automated than manual cost tracking because it extracts token counts from every request without configuration
Provides web-based dashboards displaying traces, evaluation results, cost metrics, and performance trends with filtering, search, and drill-down capabilities. Includes trace timeline visualization showing request flow, latency breakdown by component, and side-by-side output comparison views for regression analysis. Built on time-series data from captured traces.
Unique: Provides LLM-specific visualizations including prompt/output side-by-side comparison, token count breakdown, and latency attribution across multi-step chains — not generic APM dashboards adapted for LLMs
vs alternatives: More intuitive for LLM debugging than generic APM dashboards because it shows prompts and outputs prominently; more accessible than query-based tools because exploration is visual and interactive
Monitors evaluation scores, cost metrics, and error rates in real-time, triggering webhooks or alerts when values exceed configured thresholds. Supports integration with Slack, PagerDuty, email, and custom webhooks. Alerts include context (affected traces, metric deltas, suggested actions) and can be configured per metric, time window, and alert severity.
Unique: Provides LLM-specific alert types (evaluation score drops, cost anomalies, token count spikes) with context-rich payloads including affected traces and metric deltas, integrated with standard incident management platforms
vs alternatives: More relevant than generic metric alerts because it understands LLM-specific failure modes; more integrated than building custom monitoring because it connects directly to Slack, PagerDuty, and other platforms
Manages multiple versions of prompts with version control, allowing developers to test different prompt variations against the same evaluation suite. Supports A/B testing by routing requests to different prompt versions and comparing evaluation results. Integrates with CI/CD to promote prompts to production based on evaluation metrics.
Unique: Treats prompts as first-class versioned artifacts with built-in A/B testing and statistical comparison, allowing data-driven prompt optimization without manual experiment setup or external tools
vs alternatives: More integrated than manual A/B testing because it's built into the evaluation framework; more rigorous than ad-hoc prompt changes because it requires evaluation comparison before promotion
+2 more capabilities
Converts text prompts describing website requirements into complete, multi-page responsive website layouts with copy, images, and animations in seconds. The system ingests natural language descriptions (e.g., 'three unique landing pages in dark mode for a modern design startup'), processes them through an undisclosed LLM pipeline, and outputs design variations as editable React-compatible components in the visual editor. Generation appears to be single-pass without iterative refinement loops, producing immediately-editable designs rather than requiring approval workflows.
Unique: Generates complete multi-page websites with layout, copy, images, and animations from single text prompts, outputting directly into a Figma-quality visual editor where designs remain fully editable rather than locked outputs. Most competitors (Wix, Squarespace) use template selection; Framer generates custom layouts per prompt.
vs alternatives: Faster than hiring a designer and more customizable than template-based builders, but slower and less flexible than human designers for complex brand requirements.
Browser-based visual design interface with design-tool-grade capabilities including responsive layout editing, effects/interactions/animations, shader effects (Holo Shader, Chromatic Aberration, Logo Shaders), and real-time multi-user collaboration. The editor supports role-based permissions (viewers read-only, editors can modify), direct copy editing on published pages, and simultaneous editing by multiple team members. Built on React component architecture allowing both visual design and custom code insertion without leaving the editor.
Unique: Combines Figma-level visual design capabilities with direct website publishing and custom React component integration in a single tool, eliminating the designer→developer handoff. Includes proprietary shader effects library (Holo, Chromatic Aberration) not available in standard design tools. Real-time collaboration uses Framer's infrastructure rather than relying on external sync services.
More design-capable than Webflow (which prioritizes no-code logic) and more publishing-integrated than Figma (which requires export to separate hosting), but less feature-rich for complex interactions than Webflow's visual logic builder.
Framer scores higher at 82/100 vs Baserun at 56/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables creation and management of website content in multiple languages with separate content variants per locale. Available as a Pro-tier add-on with undisclosed pricing. Allows content creators to maintain language-specific versions of pages, CMS items, and copy. Implementation details (language detection, URL structure, fallback behavior, supported languages) are not documented.
Unique: Integrates multi-language content management directly into the CMS and visual editor, allowing designers to manage language variants without external translation tools. Content structure is shared across languages; only content is localized.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Contentful with language variants because no separate content model configuration required, but less flexible for complex localization workflows or translation management.
Enables one-click rollback to previous website versions, allowing teams to quickly revert breaking changes or problematic updates. Available on Pro tier and above. Maintains version history of published sites with ability to restore any previous version. Implementation details (version retention policy, automatic snapshots, granular change tracking) are not documented.
Unique: Provides one-click rollback directly in the publishing interface without requiring Git or version control knowledge. Automatic version snapshots are created on each publish. Most website builders require manual backups or external version control; Framer includes it natively.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Git-based workflows for non-technical users, but less granular than Git for selective rollback of specific changes.
Provides a server-side API for programmatic access to Framer sites, CMS content, and site management operations. Listed in product updates but not documented in detail. Capabilities, authentication, rate limits, and supported operations are unknown. Likely enables external systems to read/write CMS data, trigger deployments, or manage site configuration.
Unique: Provides server-side API access to Framer sites and CMS, enabling external integrations and automation. Specific capabilities unknown due to lack of documentation, but likely enables content synchronization with external systems.
vs alternatives: Unknown without documentation, but likely enables deeper integrations than visual-only builders like Wix or Squarespace.
Enables password protection of individual pages or entire sites, restricting access to authorized users only. Available on Basic tier and above. Allows teams to share draft content or restricted pages with specific audiences without making them publicly accessible. Implementation details (password hashing, session management, per-page vs site-wide protection) are not documented.
Unique: Integrates password protection directly into the publishing interface without requiring external authentication services. Available on Basic tier, making it accessible to all users. Simple password-based approach is easier than OAuth or SAML for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Simpler than OAuth-based authentication for quick access control, but less secure for sensitive data because password-based protection is weaker than multi-factor authentication.
Integrated content management system supporting collections (content types), items (individual records), and relational data linking across collections. The CMS supports dynamic filtering of content on pages, multi-locale content variants (Pro add-on), and auto-publish/staging workflows. Data is stored in Framer's infrastructure with tiered limits: 1 collection/1,000 items (Basic), 10 collections/2,500 items (Pro), 20 collections/10,000 items (Scale). Relational CMS (linking between collections) is Pro-tier and above. Content can be edited directly on published pages without rebuilding.
Unique: Integrates CMS directly into the visual editor with no separate admin interface, allowing designers to manage content structure and pages in one tool. Supports relational data linking between collections (Pro+) and direct on-page editing of published content without rebuilds. Most website builders separate CMS from design; Framer unifies them.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Contentful or Strapi for non-technical users because CMS structure is defined visually, but less flexible for complex data models or external integrations.
One-click publishing of websites to Framer-managed global CDN with automatic responsive optimization across devices. Supports custom domain connection (free .com on annual plans), Framer subdomains, staging environments (Pro+), instant rollback (Pro+), site redirects (Pro+), and password protection (Basic+). Hosting includes 20 CDN locations on Basic/Pro tiers and 300+ locations on Scale tier. Bandwidth limits are 10 GB (Basic), 100 GB (Pro), 200 GB (Scale) with $40 per 100 GB overage charges. Page limits are 30 (Basic), 150 (Pro), 300 (Scale) with $20 per 100 additional pages.
Unique: Integrates hosting, CDN, and staging directly into the design tool with one-click publishing, eliminating separate hosting provider setup. Automatic responsive optimization and global CDN distribution are built-in rather than requiring external services. Staging and rollback are native features, not add-ons.
vs alternatives: Simpler than Vercel/Netlify for non-technical users because no Git/CI-CD knowledge required, but less flexible for complex deployment pipelines or custom server logic.
+6 more capabilities