| 0 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 1 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements MCP-compliant tool registration that exposes arXiv search functionality with filters for date ranges, categories, and keywords. The search_papers tool routes user queries through the arXiv API client, applies server-side filtering logic, and returns structured metadata (title, authors, abstract, publication date, arXiv ID) formatted as MCP tool outputs. Uses async/await patterns for non-blocking API calls and integrates with the MCP server's tool registry for seamless AI assistant invocation.
Unique: Exposes arXiv search as a native MCP tool with server-side filtering logic, allowing AI assistants to invoke searches directly without external API key management. Uses async arXiv client library for non-blocking queries and integrates with MCP's tool registry for automatic discovery by compatible clients.
vs alternatives: Unlike REST API wrappers or direct arXiv client usage, this MCP integration allows Claude and other MCP-compatible assistants to search papers autonomously with built-in context awareness, without requiring the assistant to manage API keys or construct raw HTTP requests.
Implements a download_paper tool that retrieves PDF files from arXiv, converts them to markdown format using PDF parsing libraries (likely pdfplumber or similar), and stores the converted content in a local cache directory. The tool extracts text, preserves section structure, and handles multi-page documents. Subsequent reads of the same paper are served from the local cache, reducing API calls and improving response latency. Conversion happens server-side, so the AI assistant receives pre-processed markdown rather than raw PDFs.
Unique: Combines server-side PDF-to-markdown conversion with transparent local caching, eliminating the need for AI assistants to manage file downloads or conversion. The cache layer is transparent to the MCP client—repeated requests for the same paper are served from disk without re-downloading from arXiv.
vs alternatives: Unlike tools that return raw PDFs or require clients to handle conversion, this approach delivers pre-processed markdown directly to the LLM, reducing client-side complexity and enabling longer-context analysis. The local cache also reduces arXiv API load compared to stateless conversion services.
Implements a testing framework (likely pytest-based) with unit tests for individual tool handlers, integration tests for the full MCP server, and test fixtures for mocking arXiv API responses. Tests cover happy paths (successful paper searches, downloads, reads), error cases (API failures, missing papers), and edge cases (large papers, special characters in titles). Test coverage includes tool registration, prompt invocation, and protocol compliance. Tests use fixtures to mock external dependencies (arXiv API, file I/O) for fast, deterministic execution.
Unique: Provides comprehensive test coverage with pytest fixtures for mocking arXiv API responses and file I/O, enabling fast, deterministic testing without external dependencies. Tests cover protocol compliance, error handling, and edge cases.
vs alternatives: Unlike manual testing or ad-hoc test scripts, this framework provides automated, repeatable tests that catch regressions and verify protocol compliance. Fixtures enable fast test execution without hitting real arXiv servers.
Implements a list_papers tool that scans the local cache directory, extracts metadata from stored papers (title, authors, arXiv ID, download date), and returns a structured inventory. The tool maintains an in-memory or file-based index of downloaded papers, enabling quick lookups without re-scanning the filesystem. Metadata is extracted from paper headers or stored alongside the markdown files. This allows AI assistants to query what papers are available locally before attempting downloads.
Unique: Provides a lightweight inventory system that allows AI assistants to query cached papers without filesystem access. Metadata is extracted server-side and returned as structured JSON, enabling the assistant to make informed decisions about which papers to read or download.
vs alternatives: Unlike file-system-based approaches that require clients to parse directory listings, this tool abstracts the cache layer and provides semantic metadata queries. Enables AI assistants to reason about paper availability without exposing filesystem details.
Implements a read_paper tool that retrieves previously downloaded papers from the local cache and returns their markdown content. The tool validates that the paper exists in cache, handles missing or corrupted files gracefully, and may support partial reads (e.g., abstract only, first N pages) to manage context window constraints. Content is returned as plain text or structured sections (abstract, introduction, methodology, results, conclusion) to enable targeted analysis by the AI assistant.
Unique: Provides context-aware paper reading that abstracts the local cache layer from the AI assistant. The tool handles file I/O, error handling, and optional section extraction, allowing the assistant to focus on analysis rather than file management.
vs alternatives: Unlike raw file access or direct PDF readers, this tool returns pre-processed markdown and can support partial reads (e.g., abstract-only mode) to respect LLM context limits. Integrates seamlessly with the MCP protocol for transparent invocation by AI assistants.
Implements a prompt system (specifically the 'deep-paper-analysis' prompt) that provides AI assistants with a structured workflow for analyzing academic papers. The prompt defines a multi-step analysis process: extract key contributions, identify methodology, evaluate results, assess limitations, and synthesize findings. The prompt system is registered with the MCP server and can be invoked by clients to guide the assistant through systematic paper analysis. Prompts may include context injection (e.g., paper content, metadata) and chain-of-thought guidance to improve analysis quality.
Unique: Provides MCP-registered prompts that guide AI assistants through systematic paper analysis, combining structured workflows with the assistant's reasoning capabilities. Prompts are server-side, enabling consistent analysis methodology across multiple invocations and clients.
vs alternatives: Unlike ad-hoc prompting or unstructured analysis, this approach provides a reusable, consistent workflow that can be invoked by any MCP-compatible client. Prompts can be versioned and improved server-side without requiring client updates.
Implements the core MCP server that handles protocol compliance, tool registration, prompt registration, and request routing. The server uses the MCP SDK (likely mcp library) to expose tools (search_papers, download_paper, list_papers, read_paper) and prompts (deep-paper-analysis) as MCP resources. The server listens on stdio or network transport, parses incoming MCP requests, invokes the appropriate tool/prompt handler, and returns responses in MCP format. Implements async/await patterns for non-blocking operations and error handling for graceful failure modes.
Unique: Implements full MCP protocol compliance with async-first patterns, allowing AI assistants to discover and invoke paper tools without external API key management or custom integration code. Uses MCP SDK for protocol handling, reducing boilerplate and ensuring compatibility with future MCP clients.
vs alternatives: Unlike REST API wrappers or direct library usage, this MCP server provides a standardized interface that works with any MCP-compatible client (Claude, Cline, custom agents). Clients can discover tools and prompts automatically without hardcoding integration details.
Implements async/await patterns throughout the server for non-blocking I/O operations (arXiv API calls, PDF downloads, file I/O, markdown conversion). Uses Python's asyncio library to handle multiple concurrent requests without blocking the event loop. Tool handlers are defined as async functions that yield control while waiting for I/O, enabling the server to process other requests in the meantime. This architecture allows a single server instance to handle multiple concurrent AI assistant requests without thread management overhead.
Unique: Uses Python asyncio throughout the server stack for non-blocking I/O, enabling a single server instance to handle multiple concurrent AI assistant requests without thread management. Tool handlers are async functions that yield control during I/O operations, improving throughput and responsiveness.
vs alternatives: Unlike synchronous servers that block on I/O, this async-first architecture allows a single process to handle multiple concurrent requests efficiently. Reduces resource overhead compared to thread-per-request models and enables better scalability on resource-constrained deployments.
+3 more capabilities
Crawls 11+ heterogeneous platforms (Zhihu, Weibo, Bilibili, Twitter, Reddit, HackerNews, etc.) and RSS feeds using platform-specific scrapers, normalizes disparate data schemas into a unified NewsItem model, and deduplicates content across sources using fuzzy title matching and URL canonicalization. The system maintains platform-specific metadata (rank, heat value, engagement metrics) while presenting a single normalized feed, enabling cross-platform trend detection that would be invisible within individual platform silos.
Unique: Implements platform-specific crawler modules with unified NewsItem schema and fuzzy deduplication across 11+ heterogeneous sources (Chinese + international), rather than relying on single-platform APIs or generic RSS parsing. Maintains platform-specific metadata (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) for weighted hotspot scoring.
vs alternatives: Covers more platforms (especially Chinese social media) with deeper metadata extraction than generic RSS aggregators, and provides unified deduplication across sources unlike single-platform monitoring tools.
Implements a multi-stage filtering pipeline that matches news items against user-defined keywords using regex patterns, required word lists, and excluded word lists. The system applies frequency-based scoring (keyword occurrence count) combined with platform hotspot weights to rank filtered results. Configuration is stored in frequency_words.txt with support for regex patterns, AND/OR/NOT boolean operators, and per-keyword weighting. Filtering occurs at collection time (reducing storage) and again at report generation time (enabling dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling).
Unique: Combines regex pattern matching with frequency-based scoring and platform hotspot weighting (rank × 0.6 + frequency × 0.3 + platform hot value × 0.1) in a two-stage pipeline (collection-time and report-time filtering). Supports dynamic reconfiguration without re-crawling by applying filters at report generation.
TrendRadar scores higher at 58/100 vs arxiv-mcp-server at 34/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More flexible than simple keyword matching (supports regex and boolean logic) and more efficient than semantic filtering (no LLM overhead), making it suitable for real-time filtering at scale.
Detects newly emerged topics by comparing current crawl results against historical data stored in the system. Topics are marked as 🆕 (new) if they appear for the first time in the current crawl or if their hotspot rank increased significantly compared to previous crawls. The system tracks topic emergence velocity (how quickly a topic rises in rankings) and flags topics with unusual acceleration. New topic detection is performed at report generation time, enabling dynamic detection without re-crawling. The system maintains a historical hotspot index for comparison.
Unique: Detects new topics by comparing current hotspot rankings against historical data, marking topics with significant rank increases as 🆕. Tracks emergence velocity to distinguish breaking news from sustained trends.
vs alternatives: More efficient than semantic similarity detection (no LLM overhead) and more accurate than simple first-appearance detection (accounts for re-emerging topics), but requires historical baseline data.
Provides a web-based UI for editing TrendRadar configuration files (config.yaml, frequency_words.txt, timeline.yaml) with real-time validation and preview. The editor supports: (1) syntax highlighting for YAML and regex, (2) validation of keyword patterns (regex compilation check), (3) preview of filtered results based on current keyword configuration, (4) drag-and-drop channel configuration, (5) schedule preview (shows next 10 execution times). Changes are validated before saving, preventing configuration errors. The editor is optional; users can edit config files directly.
Unique: Provides web-based configuration editor with real-time validation, regex preview, and schedule visualization. Enables non-technical users to configure TrendRadar without editing YAML files.
vs alternatives: More user-friendly than manual YAML editing and provides validation feedback, but adds operational complexity compared to file-based configuration.
Integrates LiteLLM to provide vendor-agnostic AI analysis and summarization of filtered news items. Users configure their preferred LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models, etc.) once in config.yaml, and the system automatically routes analysis requests to that provider. The AI analysis capability includes: (1) automated summarization of long articles into key points, (2) sentiment analysis (positive/negative/neutral), (3) trend prediction based on historical patterns, and (4) custom analysis prompts. Analysis results are cached to avoid redundant API calls and can be pushed directly to notification channels.
Unique: Uses LiteLLM abstraction layer to support any LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, local models) with single configuration, enabling provider switching without code changes. Caches analysis results to reduce redundant API calls and costs.
vs alternatives: More flexible than hardcoded OpenAI integration (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than dedicated sentiment analysis APIs (can use local models), but slower than rule-based sentiment analysis.
Leverages LiteLLM to translate news content from source languages (primarily Chinese) to target languages (English, etc.) on-demand. The system detects source language automatically (via langdetect or similar), caches translations to avoid re-translating identical content, and batches translation requests to reduce API calls. Translations are stored alongside original content, enabling bilingual reports and multi-language notification delivery. Translation can be triggered at collection time (all news) or report time (only filtered news).
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic translation via LiteLLM with automatic language detection, content-based caching, and batch request optimization. Stores translations alongside originals for bilingual report generation.
vs alternatives: More flexible than dedicated translation APIs (supports any LiteLLM provider) and cheaper than commercial translation services when using local models, but slower than specialized translation APIs.
Implements a notification abstraction layer supporting 9+ delivery channels (WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc.). Each channel has a provider-specific formatter that converts normalized news items into channel-appropriate messages (e.g., WeChat card format, Telegram markdown, email HTML). The system batches notifications atomically—all news items for a report are sent as a single batch to each channel, ensuring consistency and reducing API calls. Message formatting respects channel constraints (character limits, attachment limits, etc.) and supports templating for customization.
Unique: Implements atomic message batching across 9+ heterogeneous channels with provider-specific formatters and constraint-aware truncation. Single configuration enables simultaneous delivery to WeChat, WeWork, Feishu, Telegram, Email, ntfy, Bark, Slack, etc. without code changes.
vs alternatives: Supports more channels (especially Chinese platforms like WeWork, Feishu) than generic notification services, and batching reduces API calls and spam compared to per-item notifications.
Exposes TrendRadar's data and analysis capabilities as an MCP server, enabling AI agents and LLM applications to query trends, perform analysis, and generate insights through natural language. The MCP server implements tools for: (1) querying filtered news by keyword/date/platform, (2) retrieving trend statistics and hotspot rankings, (3) running custom analysis on news subsets, (4) generating reports in various formats. Clients (Claude, other LLM agents) can invoke these tools via MCP protocol, enabling conversational exploration of trends without direct database access. The server maintains state across multiple requests, allowing multi-turn conversations about trends.
Unique: Implements full MCP server exposing trend data and analysis tools to LLM agents, enabling conversational queries and multi-turn analysis workflows. Maintains state across requests and supports complex tool invocations (filtering, analysis, report generation).
vs alternatives: Enables conversational access to trends (vs. API-only access) and integrates with LLM agent workflows (vs. standalone tools), but adds operational complexity compared to simple REST APIs.
+4 more capabilities