| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $25/mo |
| Capabilities | 14 decomposed | 15 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Monitors 20+ distributed AI agents simultaneously through a centralized dashboard, implementing heartbeat-based liveness detection via WebSocket connections to OpenClaw Gateway instances. Uses Server-Sent Events (SSE) for real-time status updates and smart polling that automatically pauses during active connections to reduce overhead. Tracks session state, agent spawn control, and connection health across multiple gateway instances without requiring external message brokers.
Unique: Implements zero-dependency heartbeat monitoring using native WebSocket + SSE without Redis or message queues; smart polling pauses during active connections to reduce database churn, and uses better-sqlite3 WAL mode for concurrent read access during high-frequency updates
vs alternatives: Lighter operational footprint than Kubernetes-based orchestration (no container overhead) while maintaining real-time visibility comparable to enterprise solutions like Temporal or Prefect
Provides a six-stage Kanban board (inbox → backlog → todo → in-progress → review → done) with drag-and-drop task movement, priority level assignment, and agent-to-task binding. Implements optimistic UI updates via Zustand state management with SQLite persistence, allowing teams to coordinate multi-agent work without external workflow engines. Task state transitions trigger webhook events and can be assigned to specific agents with capacity tracking.
Unique: Uses Zustand for optimistic UI updates with SQLite persistence, enabling instant visual feedback while maintaining consistency; implements webhook triggers on state transitions for downstream integrations without requiring a separate event bus
vs alternatives: Simpler and faster to deploy than Airflow or Prefect for small agent teams, with visual task management comparable to Jira but purpose-built for AI agent workflows
Implements the dashboard UI using Next.js 16 App Router for server-side rendering and incremental static regeneration; provides backend API endpoints via Next.js API routes (no separate backend server required). Uses React 19 concurrent rendering for responsive UI updates; implements middleware for authentication and request logging. Server components reduce JavaScript bundle size; client components use Zustand for state management.
Unique: Uses Next.js 16 App Router with React 19 concurrent rendering and server components to minimize bundle size; implements both frontend and backend in a single codebase with API routes, eliminating the need for a separate backend server
vs alternatives: Faster initial load than client-side SPAs (Vite + React) due to server-side rendering; simpler deployment than separate frontend/backend services; React 19 concurrent rendering provides better responsiveness than traditional React
Manages client-side application state (UI panels, filters, user preferences, task list) using Zustand 5 with minimal boilerplate; implements optimistic updates for task drag-and-drop and form submissions that revert on server error. Stores state in memory with optional localStorage persistence for user preferences. Zustand's subscription model enables fine-grained reactivity without Redux boilerplate.
Unique: Uses Zustand's subscription model for fine-grained reactivity with optimistic updates that revert on server error; minimal boilerplate compared to Redux while supporting localStorage persistence for user preferences
vs alternatives: Lighter than Redux with less boilerplate; optimistic updates provide better UX than waiting for server confirmation; simpler than TanStack Query for local state but less suitable for server state caching
Implements dashboard UI styling using Tailwind CSS 3.4 utility classes for responsive design across desktop, tablet, and mobile viewports. Uses Tailwind's dark mode support for theme switching; implements custom color schemes for agent status indicators and cost visualization. Tailwind's JIT compiler generates only used styles, minimizing CSS bundle size.
Unique: Uses Tailwind CSS 3.4 JIT compiler to generate only used styles, minimizing CSS bundle; implements dark mode and custom color schemes for agent status and cost visualization without custom CSS files
vs alternatives: Faster to develop than custom CSS; smaller CSS bundle than Bootstrap or Material-UI; less suitable for highly branded designs requiring custom components
Visualizes token usage trends, cost breakdowns, and agent metrics using Recharts 3 interactive charts (line charts for trends, bar charts for comparisons, pie charts for provider breakdown). Charts are responsive and support hover tooltips, legend toggling, and drill-down interactions. Data is sourced from SQLite time-series buckets; charts update in real-time as new metrics arrive.
Unique: Uses Recharts 3 for interactive, responsive cost visualization with real-time updates from SQLite time-series data; supports provider comparison and trend analysis without requiring external analytics platforms
vs alternatives: More interactive than static charts; simpler than Grafana or Datadog for cost visualization; responsive design works on mobile unlike some enterprise dashboards
Streams live agent activity events to the dashboard via WebSocket connections and Server-Sent Events, displaying a chronological feed of agent actions, task completions, and system events. Implements smart polling that detects active connections and pauses database queries to reduce load; uses better-sqlite3 WAL mode to support concurrent reads while events are being written. Provides both push-based (WebSocket) and pull-based (SSE) delivery mechanisms for resilience.
Unique: Combines WebSocket push and SSE pull mechanisms for resilience; implements smart polling that pauses during active connections to reduce database load, and leverages better-sqlite3 WAL mode to support concurrent reads/writes without blocking
vs alternatives: More responsive than polling-based dashboards (Airflow, Prefect) and requires no external event infrastructure like Kafka or RabbitMQ, making it suitable for self-hosted deployments
Aggregates token consumption metrics across multiple AI providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter, Ollama) with per-model breakdowns and trend visualization using Recharts. Stores token counts and pricing data in SQLite with time-series bucketing for efficient querying; calculates running costs based on provider-specific pricing models. Provides dashboard panels for cost trends, per-agent spending, and model-specific analytics without requiring external analytics platforms.
Unique: Implements provider-agnostic token tracking with per-model pricing configuration stored in SQLite; uses time-series bucketing for efficient trend queries and Recharts for interactive visualization without requiring external analytics services
vs alternatives: Provides cost visibility comparable to cloud provider dashboards but works across multiple providers in a single interface; lighter than dedicated cost management tools like Kubecost since it's purpose-built for LLM workloads
+6 more capabilities
Automatically inspects tabular data sources (Google Sheets, Airtable, Excel, CSV, SQL databases) to extract column names, infer field types (text, number, date, checkbox, etc.), and create bidirectional data bindings between UI components and source columns. Uses declarative component-to-column mappings that persist schema changes in real-time, enabling components to automatically reflect upstream data structure modifications without manual rebinding.
Unique: Glide's approach combines automatic schema introspection with declarative component binding, eliminating manual field mapping that competitors like Airtable require. The bidirectional sync model means changes to source column structure automatically propagate to UI components without developer intervention, reducing maintenance overhead for non-technical users.
vs alternatives: Faster to initial app than Airtable (which requires manual field configuration) and more flexible than rigid form builders because it adapts to evolving data structures automatically.
Provides 40+ pre-built, data-aware UI components (forms, tables, calendars, charts, buttons, text inputs, dropdowns, file uploads, maps, etc.) that automatically render responsively across mobile and desktop viewports. Components use a declarative binding syntax to connect to spreadsheet columns, with built-in support for computed fields, conditional visibility, and user-specific data filtering. Layout engine uses CSS Grid/Flexbox under the hood to adapt component sizing and positioning based on screen size without requiring manual breakpoint configuration.
Unique: Glide's component library is tightly integrated with data binding — components are not generic UI elements but data-aware objects that automatically sync with spreadsheet columns. This eliminates the disconnect between UI and data that exists in traditional form builders, where developers must manually wire component values to data sources.
vs alternatives: Faster to build than Bubble (which requires manual component-to-data wiring) and more mobile-optimized than Airtable's grid-centric interface, which prioritizes desktop spreadsheet metaphors over mobile-first design.
Glide scores higher at 70/100 vs mission-control at 40/100. mission-control leads on ecosystem, while Glide is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Enables multiple team members to edit apps simultaneously with role-based access control. Supports predefined roles (Owner, Editor, Viewer) with different permission levels: Owners can manage team members and publish apps, Editors can modify app design and data, Viewers can only view published apps. Team member limits vary by plan (2 free, 10 business, custom enterprise). Real-time collaboration on app design is not mentioned, suggesting changes may not be synchronized in real-time between editors.
Unique: Glide's team collaboration is built into the platform, meaning team members don't need separate accounts or complex permission configuration — they're invited via email and assigned roles directly in the app. This is more seamless than tools requiring external identity management.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable (which requires separate workspace management) and simpler than GitHub-based collaboration (which requires version control knowledge), though less sophisticated than enterprise platforms with audit logging and approval workflows.
Provides pre-built app templates for common use cases (inventory management, CRM, project management, expense tracking, etc.) that users can clone and customize. Templates include sample data, pre-configured components, and example workflows, reducing time-to-first-app from hours to minutes. Templates are fully editable, allowing users to modify data sources, components, and workflows to match their specific needs. Template library is curated by Glide and updated regularly with new templates.
Unique: Glide's templates are fully functional apps with sample data and workflows, not just empty scaffolds. This allows users to immediately see how components work together and understand app structure before customizing, reducing the learning curve significantly.
vs alternatives: More complete than Airtable's templates (which are mostly empty bases) and more accessible than building from scratch, though less flexible than code-based frameworks where templates can be parameterized and generated programmatically.
Allows workflows to be triggered on a schedule (daily, weekly, monthly, or custom intervals) without manual intervention. Scheduled workflows execute at specified times and can perform batch operations (process pending records, send daily reports, sync data, etc.). Execution time is in UTC, and the exact scheduling mechanism (cron, quartz, custom) is undocumented. Failed scheduled tasks may or may not retry automatically (retry logic undocumented).
Unique: Glide's scheduled workflows are integrated with the workflow engine, meaning scheduled tasks can execute the same complex logic as event-triggered workflows (conditional logic, multi-step actions, API calls). This is more powerful than simple scheduled email tools because scheduled tasks can perform data transformations and cross-system synchronization.
vs alternatives: More integrated than Zapier's schedule trigger (which is limited to simple actions) and more accessible than cron jobs (which require server access and scripting knowledge), though less transparent about execution guarantees and failure handling than enterprise job schedulers.
Offers Glide Tables, a proprietary managed database alternative to external spreadsheets or databases, with automatic scaling and optimization for Glide apps. Glide Tables are stored in Glide's infrastructure and optimized for the data binding and query patterns used by Glide apps. Scaling limits are plan-dependent (25k-100k rows), with separate 'Big Tables' tier for larger datasets (exact scaling limits undocumented). Automatic backups and disaster recovery are mentioned but details are undocumented.
Unique: Glide Tables are optimized specifically for Glide's data binding and query patterns, meaning they're tightly integrated with the app builder and don't require separate database administration. This is more seamless than connecting external databases (which require schema design and optimization knowledge) but less flexible because data is locked into Glide's proprietary format.
vs alternatives: More managed than self-hosted databases (no administration required) and more integrated than external databases (no separate configuration), though less portable than standard databases because data cannot be easily exported or migrated.
Provides basic chart components (bar, line, pie, area charts) that visualize data from connected sources. Charts are configured visually by selecting data columns for axes, values, and grouping. Charts are responsive and adapt to mobile/tablet/desktop. Real-time updates are supported; charts refresh when underlying data changes. No custom chart types or advanced visualization options (3D, animations, etc.) are available.
Unique: Provides basic chart components with automatic real-time updates and responsive design, suitable for simple dashboards — most visual builders (Bubble, FlutterFlow) require chart plugins or custom code
vs alternatives: More integrated than Airtable's chart view because real-time updates are automatic; weaker than BI tools (Tableau, Looker) because no drill-down, filtering, or advanced visualization options
Allows users to query data using natural language (e.g., 'Show me all orders from last month with revenue > $5k') which is converted to structured database queries without SQL knowledge. Also includes AI-powered data extraction from unstructured text (emails, documents, images) to populate spreadsheet columns. Implementation details (LLM model, context window, fine-tuning approach) are undocumented, but the feature appears to use prompt-based query generation with fallback to manual query building if AI fails.
Unique: Glide's natural language query feature bridges the gap between spreadsheet users (who think in English) and database queries (which require SQL). Rather than teaching users SQL, it translates natural language to structured queries, lowering the barrier to data exploration. The data extraction capability extends this to unstructured sources, automating data entry from emails and documents.
vs alternatives: More accessible than Airtable's formula language or traditional SQL, and more integrated than bolt-on AI query tools because it's built directly into the data layer rather than as a separate search interface.
+7 more capabilities