MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) ranks higher at 61/100 vs ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B at 22/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B | MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Dataset |
| UnfragileRank | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| Quality | 0 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Starting Price | $1.00e-7 per prompt token | — |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 11 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Processes screenshots and visual layouts from desktop, web, mobile, and game interfaces to identify interactive UI elements (buttons, forms, menus, text fields) and their spatial relationships. Uses multimodal vision-language encoding to map visual pixels to semantic UI components, enabling structured understanding of application state without requiring DOM access or accessibility trees.
Unique: Trained specifically on GUI environments (desktop, web, mobile, games) using reinforcement learning to optimize for interactive element detection and action planning, rather than generic image captioning. Builds on UI-TARS framework with 1.5 iteration improvements for cross-platform consistency.
vs alternatives: Outperforms generic vision models (GPT-4V, Claude Vision) on GUI-specific tasks because it's optimized for UI element detection and action planning rather than general image understanding, with better performance on small UI components and text-heavy interfaces.
Decomposes high-level user intents (e.g., 'fill out a form and submit') into sequences of atomic GUI actions (click, type, scroll, wait) by reasoning about UI state transitions. Uses chain-of-thought reasoning to predict which UI element to interact with next based on current screen state and task progress, maintaining implicit state across multiple interaction steps.
Unique: Uses reinforcement learning optimization to learn which action sequences lead to successful task completion across diverse GUI environments, rather than rule-based or template-matching approaches. Trained on real user interaction logs to understand natural task decomposition patterns.
vs alternatives: Generates more natural and efficient action sequences than rule-based RPA tools because it learns from actual user behavior patterns, and handles novel UI layouts better than template-matching systems by reasoning about semantic UI properties.
Abstracts away platform-specific UI differences (web DOM vs mobile native vs desktop frameworks) to provide a unified interface understanding layer. Maps platform-specific UI concepts (web buttons, iOS UIButton, Android Button) to a common semantic representation, enabling single-model inference across heterogeneous environments without retraining or platform-specific branches.
Unique: Trained on diverse platform-specific UI datasets (web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS) with a unified encoder that learns platform-invariant representations of UI semantics, rather than using separate models or platform-specific adapters.
vs alternatives: Eliminates the need to maintain separate models or platform-specific logic, reducing complexity and improving consistency compared to platform-specific automation tools or generic vision models that don't understand UI semantics.
Recognizes and interprets game UI elements, HUD components, and interactive game objects (NPCs, items, environmental triggers) within game screenshots. Understands game-specific interaction patterns (inventory systems, dialogue trees, quest markers) and can identify valid actions within game rule systems, enabling AI agents to play games or automate game-based workflows.
Unique: Trained on diverse game environments (2D, 3D, different genres) to recognize game-specific UI patterns and interactive elements that generic vision models don't understand, with optimization for game rule systems and interaction mechanics.
vs alternatives: Outperforms generic vision models on game environments because it understands game-specific UI conventions (health bars, inventory, quest markers) and can reason about game mechanics, whereas general-purpose models treat games as arbitrary images.
Combines visual information from screenshots with textual task descriptions and optional interaction history to build a rich contextual understanding of what the user wants to accomplish. Fuses image and text embeddings through a shared multimodal representation space, allowing the model to ground language descriptions in visual elements and vice versa, improving action planning accuracy through cross-modal reasoning.
Unique: Uses a shared embedding space trained on paired image-text data from GUI interactions to fuse visual and textual information, enabling cross-modal reasoning where text can disambiguate visual elements and images can ground language descriptions.
vs alternatives: Provides better accuracy than vision-only or text-only approaches because it leverages both modalities for disambiguation and grounding, similar to GPT-4V but optimized specifically for GUI tasks rather than general image understanding.
Generates precise (x, y) coordinates for UI element interactions by analyzing visual layouts and element boundaries. Outputs interaction targets with sub-pixel precision, accounting for element size, padding, and clickable regions, enabling accurate automation of clicks, hovers, and text input targeting. Handles variable screen resolutions and DPI scaling by normalizing coordinates to the input image space.
Unique: Trained on diverse UI layouts to predict interaction coordinates with high precision, using visual context (element size, shape, text) to determine the optimal click target rather than simple center-of-bounding-box heuristics.
vs alternatives: More accurate than simple bounding box center calculations because it understands UI semantics and can identify the actual clickable region, and more robust than OCR-based coordinate detection because it works on non-text elements.
Extracts readable text content from UI elements, labels, buttons, form fields, and other text-bearing components in screenshots. Performs optical character recognition on rendered text to build a text-indexed representation of the UI, enabling text-based element search and understanding of UI content without requiring DOM access or accessibility APIs.
Unique: Integrated OCR optimized for UI text (buttons, labels, form fields) rather than document scanning, with context awareness to improve accuracy on small UI text and ability to associate text with UI elements.
vs alternatives: More accurate on UI text than generic OCR tools because it understands UI context and element boundaries, and faster than separate OCR + element detection pipelines because text extraction is integrated into the vision model.
Compares sequential screenshots to detect UI state changes (element appearance/disappearance, value changes, modal dialogs) and reasons about what action caused the transition. Builds a model of UI state evolution to understand whether an action succeeded, failed, or produced unexpected results, enabling error detection and adaptive action planning.
Unique: Uses visual difference detection combined with semantic understanding of UI elements to identify meaningful state changes, rather than simple pixel-level diff algorithms, enabling understanding of what changed and why.
vs alternatives: More intelligent than pixel-diff tools because it understands UI semantics and can distinguish between meaningful changes and visual noise, and more reliable than DOM-based change detection because it works on any UI without requiring DOM access.
+1 more capabilities
Provides 2.5 million manually-annotated object instances across 330,000 images with dual segmentation encoding: polygon coordinates for precise boundary definition and RLE (run-length encoding) for efficient storage and computation. Each instance includes bounding box coordinates in [x, y, width, height] format, category label from 80 object classes, and instance-level unique identifiers enabling per-object tracking and evaluation. Annotations are structured in JSON format with hierarchical organization linking images to annotations to categories, supporting both dense object scenes and sparse single-object images.
Unique: Dual segmentation encoding (polygon + RLE) in single dataset enables both precise boundary analysis and efficient computational workflows; 2.5M instances across 330K images provides scale unmatched by contemporaneous datasets (ImageNet had ~1.2M images, PASCAL VOC had ~11K images)
vs alternatives: Larger and more densely annotated than PASCAL VOC (11K images, ~6 objects/image) and more task-diverse than ImageNet (classification-only); RLE encoding enables 10-100x faster mask loading than polygon-only formats
Provides keypoint annotations for all people in images using a standardized 17-joint skeleton model (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hips, knees, ankles) with (x, y, visibility) tuples per joint. Visibility flag indicates whether keypoint is annotated (1), occluded (0), or outside image bounds (0). Keypoints are linked to parent person instances via instance ID, enabling pose estimation evaluation at both individual and crowd-level scales. Annotations follow COCO Keypoints task specification with consistent coordinate system across all 330K images.
Unique: Standardized 17-joint skeleton with explicit visibility flags enables robust evaluation of pose estimation under occlusion; linked to instance segmentation masks allows joint-level accuracy analysis within person bounding boxes
MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) scores higher at 61/100 vs ByteDance: UI-TARS 7B at 22/100. MS COCO (Common Objects in Context) also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than OpenPose dataset (no visibility flags) and larger scale than Human3.6M (3.6M frames vs 330K images); visibility annotations enable explicit occlusion handling unlike MPII (which lacks visibility metadata)
COCO ecosystem includes community-created extensions (COCO-Stuff, COCO DensePose, COCO Panoptic) that extend base dataset with additional annotations while maintaining compatibility with COCO API and evaluation infrastructure. Extensions follow COCO format and evaluation standards, enabling seamless integration into existing pipelines. Community contributions are vetted and published as official COCO variants, ensuring quality and standardization. Variant creation process is documented, enabling researchers to create custom extensions.
Unique: Standardized extension process enables community contributions while maintaining compatibility; official variants (Stuff, DensePose, Panoptic) are vetted and published, ensuring quality and discoverability
vs alternatives: More extensible than fixed datasets; community variants enable specialized use cases without forking; standardized format prevents fragmentation unlike ad-hoc dataset variants
Provides 1.65 million image-caption pairs (5 captions × 330K images) with natural language descriptions written by human annotators. Each caption is a free-form English sentence describing objects, actions, and scene context without enforced length limits or structured templates. Captions are stored in JSON format linked to image IDs, enabling training of vision-language models for image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. Multiple captions per image capture linguistic diversity and alternative descriptions of the same visual content.
Unique: 5 captions per image (vs 1 in most datasets) captures linguistic diversity and enables robust evaluation of caption generation variability; 1.65M caption-image pairs provide scale for training large vision-language models
vs alternatives: 5x more captions per image than Flickr30K (1 caption/image) enabling better linguistic diversity modeling; larger scale than Visual Genome (108K images) while maintaining natural language quality vs automated alt-text
Extends base 80 object categories with 91 additional 'stuff' categories (background materials, textures, regions like sky, grass, wall) enabling dense semantic segmentation of entire images. Stuff categories are annotated as pixel-level masks without instance boundaries — all sky pixels are labeled 'sky' regardless of continuity. COCO-Stuff combines instance segmentation (80 objects) with semantic segmentation (171 total categories including stuff), stored as single-channel PNG masks where pixel value encodes category ID. Enables panoptic segmentation evaluation combining instance and stuff predictions.
Unique: 171-category taxonomy combining 80 instance objects + 91 stuff categories enables panoptic segmentation in single dataset; pixel-level masks for stuff enable dense scene understanding without instance boundaries
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than ADE20K (150 categories) and larger scale than Cityscapes (5K images); unified instance+stuff annotation enables panoptic evaluation unlike separate semantic/instance datasets
Combines instance segmentation (80 object categories with boundaries) and semantic segmentation (171 stuff categories without boundaries) into single panoptic prediction task. Evaluation uses Panoptic Quality (PQ) metric decomposed into Segmentation Quality (SQ — IoU of matched predictions) and Recognition Quality (RQ — detection rate). Panoptic masks encode both category ID and instance ID, enabling evaluation of both 'what' (category) and 'which' (instance identity) predictions. Standardized evaluation protocol with server-side metric computation ensures consistent benchmarking across submissions.
Unique: Panoptic Quality metric with explicit SQ/RQ decomposition enables fine-grained analysis of segmentation vs recognition errors; unified instance+stuff evaluation in single task forces models to handle both prediction types efficiently
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than separate instance/semantic benchmarks; PQ metric better captures real-world scene understanding than independent metrics; standardized evaluation prevents metric gaming unlike custom evaluation scripts
Provides dense 2D-to-3D correspondence maps for human bodies, mapping each pixel in a person instance to a 3D human body model surface. Annotations include UV coordinates (parameterization of 3D body surface) and body part indices enabling pixel-level body surface understanding. DensePose enables training of models that predict where each image pixel corresponds to on a canonical 3D human body, useful for pose transfer, virtual try-on, and detailed human understanding. Available from 2020 dataset version onwards, extends keypoint annotations with dense surface coverage.
Unique: Dense 2D-to-3D surface correspondence enables pixel-level body understanding beyond skeleton keypoints; UV parameterization allows transfer of appearance and shape across different people and poses
vs alternatives: More detailed than keypoint-only annotations (17 joints vs millions of surface points); enables pose transfer unlike keypoint datasets; larger scale than DensePose-specific datasets
Provides standardized evaluation metrics for each task (Average Precision for detection, IoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, BLEU/METEOR/CIDEr for captions, PQ for panoptic) computed server-side on held-out test set. Leaderboard system accepts structured JSON result submissions in COCO format, validates format, computes metrics, and ranks submissions by primary metric. Evaluation infrastructure ensures consistent benchmarking across all submissions and prevents metric gaming through standardized computation. Metrics are task-specific: AP/AP50/AP75 for detection, mIoU for segmentation, OKS for keypoints, CIDEr for captions.
Unique: Server-side metric computation prevents metric gaming and ensures consistency; task-specific metrics (AP, OKS, CIDEr, PQ) are standardized across all submissions enabling fair comparison; public leaderboard provides transparency and reproducibility
vs alternatives: More rigorous than self-reported metrics (prevents cherry-picking); standardized evaluation prevents metric implementation variations unlike custom evaluation scripts; public leaderboard enables community comparison unlike proprietary benchmarks
+3 more capabilities