| Ecosystem |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 9 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Delivers AI-powered mental health conversations across three distinct communication channels (phone with voice-to-text transcription, WhatsApp messaging, SMS text) using a unified conversation state backend that maintains context across channel switches. The system routes incoming messages through a natural language understanding pipeline that classifies user intent (emotional support, coping strategy request, crisis signal detection) and generates contextually appropriate responses using a fine-tuned language model trained on mental health conversation patterns. Channel abstraction layer handles protocol-specific formatting (SMS character limits, WhatsApp media support, phone call duration constraints) while preserving conversation continuity.
Unique: Unified conversation state management across three distinct communication protocols (voice, WhatsApp, SMS) with automatic channel-aware formatting, rather than isolated single-channel chatbots. Phone integration with voice transcription adds synchronous real-time interaction capability absent in text-only competitors.
vs alternatives: Reaches users via their existing communication habits (WhatsApp, SMS, phone) without requiring app installation, unlike Woebot or Wysa which require dedicated mobile apps; 24/7 availability without therapist scheduling constraints differentiates from human-delivered teletherapy platforms.
Analyzes user messages using a multi-label text classification model trained on mental health conversation datasets to identify emotional states (anxiety, depression, loneliness, anger, grief, etc.) and situational context (work stress, relationship conflict, health anxiety). Based on detected emotional state, the system retrieves and recommends evidence-based coping strategies from a curated knowledge base (cognitive reframing techniques, grounding exercises, breathing patterns, behavioral activation suggestions) matched to the specific emotion and user context. Classification confidence scores determine whether to offer direct strategy recommendations or ask clarifying questions to improve accuracy.
Unique: Combines emotion classification with evidence-based strategy retrieval from a curated knowledge base, rather than generating coping advice from scratch. Uses confidence thresholds to trigger clarifying questions when classification uncertainty is high, reducing false recommendations.
vs alternatives: More targeted than generic chatbot responses because it matches strategies to detected emotional state; more scalable than human therapists because it can deliver consistent, evidence-based recommendations 24/7 without therapist fatigue or variability.
Monitors incoming messages for linguistic markers of acute crisis (explicit suicidal ideation, self-harm intent, severe substance use, psychotic symptoms, acute trauma response) using a rule-based pattern matcher combined with a trained anomaly detection model that identifies unusual conversation patterns (rapid message escalation, emotional intensity spikes, topic shifts to harm). When crisis signals are detected above a confidence threshold, the system triggers an escalation workflow: generating a crisis-aware response, offering immediate resources (crisis hotline numbers, emergency contact options), and optionally routing to human review or emergency services depending on jurisdiction and user consent settings. The system maintains an audit log of all crisis detections for compliance and safety review.
Unique: Combines rule-based pattern matching for explicit crisis language with anomaly detection on conversation flow patterns (e.g., rapid emotional escalation, topic shifts), rather than relying solely on keyword matching. Maintains audit logs and integrates with external crisis resources rather than attempting to de-escalate in-system.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple keyword filtering because it detects indirect crisis signals and conversation pattern anomalies; more responsible than systems without crisis detection because it routes high-risk users to human review and emergency resources rather than continuing generic conversation.
Maintains conversation state across multiple messages and channel switches using a session store (Redis or DynamoDB) that persists user context, emotional history, and previous coping strategies discussed. The system implements a sliding context window that retains the last 10-20 messages (or ~2000 tokens) to provide coherent multi-turn conversation while managing memory constraints. When users switch channels (e.g., SMS to WhatsApp), the session lookup retrieves prior context and seamlessly continues the conversation. Session metadata includes user preferences (preferred coping strategies, communication style, crisis contact info), conversation tags (topics discussed, emotional themes), and timestamps for conversation analytics.
Unique: Implements unified session management across three distinct communication channels (phone, WhatsApp, SMS) with automatic context retrieval on channel switches, rather than isolated single-channel sessions. Uses sliding context windows to balance memory constraints with conversation coherence.
vs alternatives: Provides continuity across channels that single-channel chatbots cannot match; more efficient than storing full conversation history because sliding context windows reduce storage and inference costs while maintaining coherence.
Implements a freemium model with tiered access using a usage metering system that tracks conversations per user (free tier: 5 conversations/month, paid: unlimited) and enforces rate limits via a token bucket algorithm. Free users receive full feature access (emotional support, coping strategies, crisis detection) but with conversation quotas; paid users unlock unlimited conversations and optional premium features (conversation export, progress tracking, therapist integration). The system uses phone number or WhatsApp ID as the user identifier for quota enforcement; quota resets occur on a monthly calendar basis. Upgrade prompts are triggered when users approach quota limits (e.g., 'You have 1 conversation remaining this month').
Unique: Implements conversation-based quota metering (5 conversations/month free) rather than time-based limits (e.g., 5 minutes/day), allowing users to have deeper conversations within quota constraints. Integrates quota enforcement with multi-channel access, requiring unified user identification across phone/WhatsApp/SMS.
vs alternatives: Lower barrier to entry than subscription-only models because free tier requires no payment; more sustainable than fully free models because paid tier enables revenue for ongoing operations and safety infrastructure.
Generates automatic summaries of multi-turn conversations using extractive and abstractive summarization techniques (BART or T5 models fine-tuned on mental health conversations) to identify key emotional themes, discussed coping strategies, and user-reported outcomes. Summaries are stored in the session context and can be retrieved by users (in paid tier) to review conversation history without scrolling through full message logs. The system also tracks progress metrics over time (frequency of emotional states, coping strategy effectiveness ratings, user-reported mood trends) by aggregating summaries across multiple conversations, enabling users to visualize emotional patterns and treatment progress.
Unique: Combines conversation summarization with longitudinal progress tracking across multiple conversations, rather than summarizing individual conversations in isolation. Enables therapist integration via conversation export, positioning AI support as a complement to professional treatment rather than a replacement.
vs alternatives: More actionable than raw conversation history because summaries highlight key themes and progress metrics; more transparent than black-box mood tracking because users can review the actual conversations underlying progress claims.
Tracks user interactions with recommended coping strategies (which strategies were tried, user feedback on effectiveness, follow-up emotional state) and uses this feedback to refine future recommendations via collaborative filtering and contextual bandit algorithms. The system maintains a user-strategy interaction matrix where each user has implicit and explicit ratings for strategies (tried and reported helpful, tried but unhelpful, not tried). When recommending strategies, the system balances exploitation (recommending strategies with high historical effectiveness for this user) with exploration (suggesting new strategies to expand the user's toolkit). Recommendations are contextualized by emotional state, time of day, and previous conversation patterns.
Unique: Implements contextual bandit algorithms to balance exploitation (recommending proven strategies) with exploration (suggesting new strategies), rather than static recommendation rules. Incorporates user feedback loops to continuously refine recommendations based on actual effectiveness.
vs alternatives: More personalized than rule-based systems because it learns individual user preferences; more adaptive than one-size-fits-all approaches because it refines recommendations based on user feedback and interaction history.
Generates contextually appropriate, empathetic responses to user messages using a large language model (likely GPT-3.5 or similar) fine-tuned on mental health conversation datasets to adopt a supportive tone, validate emotions, and avoid harmful language. The generation pipeline includes prompt engineering (system prompt specifying role as supportive AI, constraints on medical advice), response filtering to remove harmful content (suicide methods, medication dosing, diagnostic claims), and tone adjustment to match user communication style (formal vs casual, verbose vs concise). The system uses temperature and top-p sampling to balance response diversity (avoiding repetitive canned responses) with consistency (ensuring responses stay on-topic and emotionally appropriate).
Unique: Fine-tunes general-purpose LLM on mental health conversation data to adopt supportive tone and emotional validation, rather than using generic LLM responses. Implements response filtering and tone adjustment to ensure generated responses are appropriate for mental health context.
vs alternatives: More empathetic and contextually appropriate than generic chatbot responses because it's trained on mental health conversations; more scalable than human-written responses because it generates novel responses for each user input rather than retrieving canned responses.
+1 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Clare & Me at 40/100. Clare & Me leads on adoption and quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities