| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 9 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Executes arbitrary Python code in a containerized, isolated sandbox environment that prevents code from accessing the host system or other sandboxes. Uses cloud-hosted microVMs or containers with resource limits (CPU, memory, disk) and automatic cleanup, enabling safe execution of untrusted or user-generated code without security risks to the parent application.
Unique: Provides managed, multi-tenant sandboxed execution as a service with automatic resource provisioning and cleanup, rather than requiring users to manage their own Docker/Kubernetes infrastructure or relying on single-process interpreters like exec() that lack true isolation
vs alternatives: Safer and more scalable than local exec() or subprocess calls, and simpler to integrate than self-managed Docker containers while offering better isolation than in-process Python interpreters
Extends sandboxed execution beyond Python to support JavaScript/Node.js, Bash, and other languages by provisioning language-specific runtime environments within the sandbox. Each language gets its own pre-configured interpreter with common libraries and package managers (npm, pip, apt) available, enabling polyglot code execution in a single API call.
Unique: Manages multiple language runtimes within a single sandbox instance with unified API, allowing seamless language switching without spawning separate containers or managing language-specific infrastructure
vs alternatives: More flexible than language-specific services (like AWS Lambda with single-language support) and simpler than orchestrating multiple execution engines, while maintaining security isolation across languages
Provides official SDKs for Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and other languages that wrap the underlying HTTP/gRPC API with language-native abstractions. SDKs handle authentication, error handling, request serialization, and streaming, providing a developer-friendly interface that feels native to each language while maintaining consistent behavior across SDKs.
Unique: Provides language-specific SDKs with native async/await support and type hints, rather than requiring users to make raw HTTP calls or use generic HTTP client libraries
vs alternatives: More ergonomic than raw HTTP API calls and more maintainable than custom wrapper code, while providing better IDE support and error handling than generic HTTP clients
Captures and reports execution errors including syntax errors, runtime exceptions, timeouts, and resource limit violations with detailed error messages and stack traces. Errors are returned to the caller with structured metadata enabling programmatic error handling and recovery strategies (e.g., retry with different parameters, fallback execution).
Unique: Provides structured error information with categorization and stack traces, enabling programmatic error handling and recovery strategies rather than treating all failures as opaque errors
vs alternatives: More informative than simple success/failure status codes and more actionable than generic error messages, while simpler to implement than custom error parsing or log analysis
Provides a mounted filesystem within the sandbox where code can read, write, and manipulate files using standard language APIs (open(), fs.readFile(), etc.). Files are isolated per sandbox instance and can be uploaded before execution or generated during execution, with support for directory traversal and file streaming to handle large datasets.
Unique: Provides a persistent, writable filesystem within the sandbox that survives across multiple code executions in the same session, unlike stateless function-as-a-service platforms that require explicit state management
vs alternatives: More convenient than AWS Lambda's /tmp directory (which is read-only in some contexts) and more flexible than cloud storage APIs, while maintaining isolation from the host filesystem
Streams stdout/stderr output in real-time as code executes, enabling interactive feedback loops where the calling application can monitor progress, capture intermediate results, or terminate execution early. Uses WebSocket or HTTP streaming to deliver output chunks as they are generated, rather than buffering until completion.
Unique: Implements server-side output buffering and chunking to deliver real-time feedback without overwhelming the client, using adaptive batch sizing based on output rate
vs alternatives: More responsive than polling-based status checks and more efficient than capturing all output at the end, while simpler to implement than custom WebSocket servers
Allows passing environment variables and secrets into the sandbox at execution time, with support for masking sensitive values in logs and output. Variables are injected into the process environment before code execution, making them accessible via standard language APIs (os.environ in Python, process.env in Node.js) without exposing them in code or logs.
Unique: Provides server-side secret masking in logs and output streams, preventing accidental exposure of sensitive values in execution transcripts or monitoring systems
vs alternatives: Safer than passing secrets as code strings or command-line arguments, and more convenient than mounting secret files while maintaining compatibility with standard environment variable APIs
Enforces hard limits on execution time, CPU usage, memory consumption, and disk I/O to prevent resource exhaustion and runaway processes. Limits are configured per execution or per sandbox instance and are enforced by the underlying container runtime, with automatic termination of processes that exceed thresholds.
Unique: Provides multi-dimensional resource limits (time, memory, CPU, disk) enforced at the container level with automatic termination and detailed metrics, rather than relying on language-level timeouts or manual resource monitoring
vs alternatives: More reliable than Python's signal.alarm() or JavaScript's setTimeout() because it's enforced by the OS/container runtime, and more granular than AWS Lambda's fixed timeout-only model
+4 more capabilities
Executes SQL queries against Supabase PostgreSQL instances through the Model Context Protocol, translating natural language or structured query requests into parameterized SQL statements. Uses MCP's tool-calling interface to expose database operations as callable functions with schema validation, enabling LLM agents to perform CRUD operations, joins, and aggregations with automatic connection pooling and credential management through Supabase client SDK.
Unique: Exposes Supabase PostgreSQL as MCP tools with automatic credential injection from Supabase client SDK, eliminating manual connection string management and enabling seamless LLM-to-database queries within Claude or compatible agents
vs alternatives: Tighter integration than generic SQL MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in authentication and connection pooling rather than requiring separate database credential configuration
Exposes Supabase Auth session state and user metadata through MCP tools, allowing agents to inspect current authentication context, retrieve user profiles, and trigger auth-related operations. Integrates with Supabase's JWT-based auth system to validate sessions and access user claims without re-authenticating, using the Supabase client's built-in session management.
Unique: Integrates Supabase's JWT-based auth system directly into MCP tool interface, allowing agents to inspect and act on auth state without managing separate credential stores or re-authentication flows
vs alternatives: More seamless than generic auth MCP servers because it leverages Supabase's built-in session management and avoids redundant credential passing between agent and auth system
Invokes Supabase Edge Functions (serverless TypeScript/JavaScript functions) through MCP tools, passing parameters and receiving results with optional streaming support. Uses Supabase's edge function HTTP API to trigger functions with automatic authentication headers and response parsing, enabling agents to execute custom business logic without embedding it in the agent itself.
Supabase scores higher at 42/100 vs Code Interpreter SDK at 20/100. Code Interpreter SDK leads on quality, while Supabase is stronger on ecosystem. Supabase also has a free tier, making it more accessible.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Edge Functions as MCP tools with automatic authentication and response parsing, allowing agents to invoke custom serverless logic without managing HTTP clients or credential injection
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic HTTP MCP tools because it handles Supabase-specific authentication, error handling, and response formatting automatically
Subscribes to real-time changes on Supabase tables through MCP's event streaming interface, using Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism to push INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE events to agents. Maintains persistent WebSocket connections and filters events by table and row-level policies, enabling agents to react to database changes without polling.
Unique: Bridges Supabase's PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY real-time system with MCP's tool interface, enabling agents to subscribe to database changes without managing WebSocket connections or event serialization
vs alternatives: More efficient than polling-based approaches because it uses Supabase's native real-time infrastructure rather than repeated database queries
Manages files in Supabase Storage buckets through MCP tools, supporting upload, download, list, and delete operations with automatic authentication and path-based access control. Uses Supabase's S3-compatible storage API with built-in support for public/private buckets and signed URLs for temporary access, enabling agents to handle file I/O without managing cloud storage credentials.
Unique: Exposes Supabase Storage's S3-compatible API as MCP tools with automatic authentication and signed URL generation, eliminating the need for agents to manage cloud storage credentials or generate temporary access tokens
vs alternatives: More integrated than generic S3 MCP tools because it leverages Supabase's built-in bucket policies and authentication rather than requiring separate AWS credentials
Performs semantic similarity searches on vector embeddings stored in Supabase PostgreSQL using pgvector extension, translating natural language queries into embedding vectors and executing cosine/L2 distance searches. Integrates with embedding providers (OpenAI, Cohere) or uses pre-computed embeddings, enabling agents to retrieve semantically similar documents or records without full-text search limitations.
Unique: Integrates pgvector directly into MCP tools with automatic embedding generation and distance calculation, enabling agents to perform semantic search without managing separate vector database infrastructure
vs alternatives: More efficient than external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) for Supabase users because it colocates embeddings with relational data, reducing network latency and simplifying data synchronization
Exposes Supabase database schema information through MCP tools, allowing agents to discover table structures, column types, constraints, and relationships without manual schema documentation. Queries PostgreSQL information_schema and Supabase metadata tables to dynamically generate schema descriptions, enabling agents to construct valid queries and understand data relationships.
Unique: Queries Supabase's PostgreSQL information_schema directly through MCP tools, enabling agents to dynamically discover and adapt to database schemas without pre-configured schema definitions
vs alternatives: More flexible than static schema definitions because it reflects live database state, including recent migrations or schema changes
Enforces Supabase Row-Level Security policies within agent queries, ensuring that agents can only access rows permitted by RLS rules defined in the database. Evaluates policies based on authenticated user context (JWT claims, user ID) and applies WHERE clause filters automatically, preventing unauthorized data access at the database layer rather than application layer.
Unique: Delegates authorization enforcement to PostgreSQL RLS policies rather than implementing authorization in agent code, ensuring that data access rules are centralized and cannot be bypassed by agent logic
vs alternatives: More secure than application-level authorization because RLS is enforced at the database layer, preventing accidental data leaks even if agent code has bugs
+1 more capabilities