| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Detects misspelled words in code by splitting camelCase identifiers into constituent words and matching each against language-specific dictionaries, enabling detection of typos in variable names like 'getUserNme' without false positives on legitimate camelCase patterns. Uses offline dictionary matching rather than ML models, processing the current file in real-time as the developer types.
Unique: Implements camelCase-aware word splitting for identifier spell checking, treating 'getUserNme' as three words ('get', 'User', 'Nme') rather than a single unknown token, enabling detection of typos in naming conventions common to programming languages without flagging legitimate camelCase patterns as errors
vs alternatives: Outperforms generic spell checkers by understanding code-specific naming conventions (camelCase), whereas tools like Grammarly or native OS spell checkers would flag all camelCase identifiers as misspellings
Provides spell checking in 40+ languages through a modular architecture where the core extension includes English (US) by default, and additional language dictionaries are installed as separate VS Code extensions. Each language add-on extends the base spell checker with language-specific dictionaries and rules, allowing developers to switch languages via the `cSpell.language` configuration setting.
Unique: Uses a modular extension architecture where language support is decoupled from the core spell checker, allowing users to install only the languages they need rather than bundling all dictionaries, reducing extension size and improving performance for monolingual projects
vs alternatives: More flexible than monolithic spell checkers that bundle all languages, but requires more manual setup than tools like Grammarly that auto-detect language context
Allows developers to define custom dictionaries at the project, workspace, or user level to whitelist domain-specific terms, acronyms, brand names, and technical jargon that would otherwise be flagged as misspellings. Custom dictionaries are stored in configuration files and merged with the base language dictionaries during spell checking, enabling teams to maintain a shared vocabulary of approved terms.
Unique: Enables project-level vocabulary management through configuration-driven custom dictionaries, allowing teams to version-control approved terminology alongside code rather than relying on individual spell checker settings or external glossaries
vs alternatives: More flexible than fixed dictionaries but less sophisticated than ML-based spell checkers that can infer context and learn domain terminology automatically
Integrates with VS Code's Quick Fix UI (lightbulb icon) to display spelling correction suggestions directly in the editor. When a misspelled word is detected, developers can position their cursor on the underlined word and press Ctrl+. (or Cmd+. on Mac) to open a dropdown menu of suggested corrections, then click to apply the fix with a single action. This integrates into the standard VS Code diagnostics and code action pipeline.
Unique: Leverages VS Code's native Quick Fix and code action infrastructure to provide spell checking corrections as first-class editor actions, integrating seamlessly with other linters and code actions rather than requiring a separate UI panel or command
vs alternatives: More integrated into the editor workflow than external spell checkers, but less powerful than IDE-native spell checkers that can batch-correct multiple errors or provide context-aware suggestions
Continuously monitors the currently open file in VS Code and displays misspelled words as inline squiggly underlines (red wavy lines) in real-time as the developer types. Diagnostics are published to VS Code's diagnostics pipeline and appear in the Problems panel, allowing developers to see all spelling errors in the current file at a glance. Spell checking runs asynchronously to avoid blocking the editor.
Unique: Implements asynchronous real-time spell checking that publishes diagnostics to VS Code's standard diagnostics pipeline, allowing spell checking to coexist with other linters and type checkers without blocking editor responsiveness
vs alternatives: More responsive than batch spell checking tools, but less comprehensive than project-wide spell checkers that can identify errors across multiple files and provide unified reporting
Applies spell checking selectively to different code scopes: code comments (both single-line and multi-line), string literals, and identifiers (variable/function names). The spell checker distinguishes between these scopes and applies appropriate rules — for example, camelCase splitting is applied to identifiers but not to comments. This scope awareness reduces false positives by avoiding spell checking in contexts where misspellings are intentional or irrelevant.
Unique: Implements scope-aware spell checking that treats comments, strings, and identifiers as distinct contexts with different rules (e.g., camelCase splitting for identifiers but not comments), reducing false positives compared to naive spell checkers that treat all text equally
vs alternatives: More sophisticated than simple regex-based spell checkers that flag all unknown words, but less powerful than AST-based approaches that could provide even more precise scope detection
Integrates spell checker configuration into VS Code's standard settings system using the `cSpell.*` configuration namespace. Developers can configure spell checking behavior via VS Code's Settings UI, `settings.json` file, or workspace-level configuration files. Configuration options include language selection, custom dictionaries, and other spell checker parameters, allowing per-user, per-workspace, and per-project customization.
Unique: Leverages VS Code's native settings system and configuration hierarchy (user, workspace, folder) to provide multi-level spell checking configuration, allowing teams to define shared rules in workspace settings while allowing individual developers to override with user settings
vs alternatives: More integrated into VS Code than external spell checkers with separate configuration files, but less powerful than project-specific configuration files (like `.cspellrc.json`) that could be version-controlled and shared
Performs spell checking by comparing words against a pre-built dictionary loaded into memory at extension startup. The dictionary is stored as a compiled data structure (format unknown — likely a trie or hash set for O(1) lookup) and does not require network access. Validation is performed locally on the user's machine, ensuring privacy and fast response times. The extension does not use machine learning models or external APIs; it relies entirely on static dictionary matching.
Unique: Implements pure offline dictionary matching without ML models or external APIs. This is a deliberate design choice prioritizing privacy and performance over adaptive learning. The extension does not track user corrections or learn from usage patterns.
vs alternatives: Faster and more private than cloud-based spell checkers (e.g., Grammarly) because validation happens locally. No API calls or data transmission. Works offline without internet connectivity.
+2 more capabilities
Executes ESLint rules against the active editor file as the user types or on file save, rendering violations as colored squiggles and inline decorations directly in the editor gutter. The extension hooks into VS Code's diagnostic API to push linting results from the ESLint library (installed locally or globally) into the editor's rendering pipeline, enabling immediate visual feedback without requiring manual linting commands.
Unique: Integrates directly with VS Code's native diagnostic API and editor rendering pipeline, allowing ESLint violations to appear as native squiggles and gutter decorations rather than as separate panel output; uses the ESLint library's rule engine directly without wrapping or re-implementing linting logic.
vs alternatives: Tighter VS Code integration than generic linting tools because it leverages VS Code's built-in diagnostic system and respects editor theme colors for error/warning rendering, whereas standalone linters require separate output parsing.
Automatically applies ESLint's `--fix` capability to the active file when saved, modifying the file in-place to correct fixable violations (e.g., formatting, semicolon insertion, import sorting). The extension triggers the ESLint library's fix mode on the save event, applies the corrected code back to the editor buffer, and updates diagnostics to reflect the post-fix state.
Unique: Leverages ESLint's native `--fix` API rather than implementing a separate formatting engine; integrates the fix operation into VS Code's save event lifecycle, allowing fixes to be applied transparently without user interaction or separate command invocation.
vs alternatives: More reliable than Prettier-only solutions because it respects ESLint rule configuration and can fix non-formatting issues (e.g., import sorting, variable naming); more integrated than running ESLint as a separate task because fixes are applied synchronously on save.
Code Spell Checker scores higher at 57/100 vs ESLint at 57/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Caches linting results for files that have not changed, avoiding redundant ESLint execution and improving performance for large codebases. The extension tracks file modifications and only re-runs ESLint for changed files, reducing computational overhead and latency for real-time linting feedback.
Unique: Implements file-level caching to avoid redundant ESLint execution, tracking file modifications and only re-linting changed files; caching strategy is transparent to users and requires no configuration.
vs alternatives: More performant than re-linting all files on every change because it only processes modified files; more transparent than manual cache management because caching is automatic and invisible to users.
Maps ESLint rule severity levels (error, warning, off) to VS Code diagnostic severity levels (Error, Warning, Information), rendering violations with appropriate colors and icons in the editor. The extension translates ESLint's severity classification into VS Code's diagnostic system, enabling consistent visual representation across the editor and Problems panel.
Unique: Maps ESLint severity levels directly to VS Code's diagnostic API, enabling native severity rendering without custom UI; respects VS Code's theme and editor settings for diagnostic colors and icons.
vs alternatives: More integrated than custom severity rendering because it uses VS Code's native diagnostic system; more consistent than separate severity indicators because it leverages the editor's built-in visual language.
Aggregates all linting violations from the active file and workspace into VS Code's built-in Problems panel, displaying violations with severity levels (error, warning, info) and allowing filtering by severity. The extension pushes diagnostic data into VS Code's diagnostic collection, which automatically populates the Problems panel and respects the `eslint.quiet` setting to suppress info-level messages.
Unique: Uses VS Code's native diagnostic collection API to push ESLint violations into the Problems panel, allowing seamless integration with VS Code's built-in error aggregation and navigation UI rather than implementing a custom panel.
vs alternatives: More discoverable than inline-only linting because violations are visible in a dedicated panel even when the file is not in focus; more integrated than external linting tools because it uses VS Code's native UI rather than requiring a separate output window.
Automatically detects and loads ESLint configuration from either flat config format (`eslint.config.js`, `.mjs`, `.cjs`, `.ts`, `.mts`) or legacy format (`.eslintrc.*` in JSON, JS, YAML) based on what exists in the workspace. The extension respects the `eslint.useFlatConfig` setting to force flat config mode for ESLint 8.57.0+, and falls back to legacy config detection for older versions.
Unique: Implements automatic detection of both flat and legacy config formats without requiring explicit user configuration; uses the `eslint.useFlatConfig` setting to allow users to force flat config mode for ESLint 8.57+, enabling gradual migration from legacy to flat config.
vs alternatives: More flexible than tools that only support one config format because it handles both legacy and flat configs transparently; more user-friendly than requiring manual config path specification because it automatically discovers configs in standard locations.
Allows users to specify which file types should be linted by configuring the `eslint.validate` setting with an array of VS Code language identifiers (e.g., `["javascript", "typescript", "javascriptreact"]`). The extension checks each file's language identifier against the configured list before running ESLint, skipping linting for files not in the list.
Unique: Uses VS Code's language identifier system to filter files before linting, allowing granular control over which file types are processed; integrates with VS Code's language detection rather than implementing custom file type detection.
vs alternatives: More precise than file extension-based filtering because it respects VS Code's language detection (e.g., distinguishing between JavaScript and JSX); more flexible than ESLint's built-in ignore patterns because it operates at the extension level before ESLint is invoked.
Provides a `eslint.quiet` boolean setting that, when enabled, suppresses ESLint info-level diagnostic messages while preserving error and warning messages. The extension filters diagnostics before pushing them to VS Code's diagnostic collection, removing entries with severity below warning level.
Unique: Implements message filtering at the extension level after ESLint execution, allowing users to suppress info-level messages without modifying ESLint configuration or rules; provides a simple boolean toggle rather than complex filtering logic.
vs alternatives: Simpler than configuring ESLint rules to disable info-level messages because it requires only a single setting change; more effective than ESLint's built-in severity configuration because it applies uniformly across all rules.
+4 more capabilities