| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 1 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Runs the official Anthropic Claude Code CLI inside a Docker container with pre-configured OAuth flow support for Claude Max/Pro plans and direct API key authentication. The container bootstraps the Claude Code environment during startup via s6-overlay service supervision, handling credential injection through environment variables and persistent configuration files mounted at runtime. This eliminates manual CLI setup, dependency resolution, and authentication friction while maintaining full feature parity with the native CLI.
Unique: Bundles the official Claude Code CLI with pre-configured s6-overlay process supervision and OAuth bootstrap logic, handling credential injection and persistent state management automatically — most alternatives require manual CLI installation and authentication setup
vs alternatives: Eliminates 30+ minutes of manual Claude Code setup, dependency installation, and authentication configuration compared to running the CLI natively or in a bare Docker image
Exposes a CloudCLI web interface running on port 3001 that provides HTTP/WebSocket access to the containerized AI agents (Claude Code and alternative CLIs). The web server is managed by s6-overlay as a supervised service with automatic restart on failure, and traffic is routed through the container's network stack. This enables browser-based interaction with AI agents without direct CLI access, supporting real-time streaming responses and multi-user concurrent sessions.
Unique: Integrates CloudCLI web UI with s6-overlay service supervision, providing automatic restart and graceful shutdown semantics for the web server — most containerized AI tools require manual service management or systemd integration
vs alternatives: Provides browser-based access to Claude Code without requiring SSH tunneling or CLI expertise, reducing friction for non-technical team members compared to CLI-only alternatives
Provides a production-ready docker-compose.yaml template that orchestrates the HolyClaude container with pre-configured volume mounts (workspace, configuration), network exposure (port 3001 for web UI), shared memory allocation (shm_size: 2g for headless browser), and resource limits. The compose file includes environment variable references (.env file) for credentials and identity mapping (PUID/PGID), enabling users to deploy HolyClaude with a single docker-compose up command without manual configuration. The template handles common Docker pitfalls (shared memory exhaustion, permission mismatches, port conflicts) automatically.
Unique: Provides a pre-configured docker-compose.yaml that solves common Docker pitfalls (shared memory exhaustion, UID/GID mismatches, port conflicts) automatically — most containerized tools require users to manually tune these settings or provide incomplete examples
vs alternatives: Reduces deployment time from 30+ minutes (manual Docker configuration) to 2-3 minutes (docker-compose up); eliminates common Docker configuration errors that cause silent failures or crashes
Implements a multi-stage bootstrap system that runs at container startup to initialize services, validate configuration, set up user identity (UID/GID), and prepare the environment for AI agent execution. The bootstrap process uses shell scripts executed before s6-overlay starts supervised services, performing tasks like creating workspace directories, validating API keys, initializing Claude Code settings, and installing on-demand packages (Slim variant). This ensures the container reaches a ready state without manual post-startup configuration, enabling immediate use after docker-compose up.
Unique: Implements a multi-stage bootstrap system with automatic service initialization, configuration validation, and on-demand package installation — most containerized tools require manual post-startup configuration or provide minimal initialization logic
vs alternatives: Eliminates manual post-startup configuration steps; enables fully-automated deployments in CI/CD pipelines without human intervention
Enables AI agents (Claude Code, alternative CLIs) to access the full workspace directory and inject codebase context into prompts, allowing models to generate code that is aware of existing project structure, dependencies, and coding patterns. The workspace is mounted as a Docker volume and accessible to all AI CLIs via a shared directory path. AI agents can read project files, analyze imports and dependencies, and generate code that integrates seamlessly with the existing codebase. This differs from stateless code generation by providing architectural context and reducing the need for manual context specification.
Unique: Provides seamless workspace mounting and context injection for AI agents without requiring explicit file selection or context management — most AI coding tools require manual file uploads or context specification
vs alternatives: Enables architecture-aware code generation that respects project structure and dependencies; reduces context specification overhead compared to stateless AI tools that require manual file inclusion
Bundles 7 distinct AI CLI tools (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, TaskMaster, Junie, OpenCode) into a single container with unified environment variable configuration and shared tool dependencies. Each CLI is pre-installed with its runtime dependencies and configured to use a common workspace directory. The container's bootstrap system detects which CLIs are enabled via environment variables and initializes only the necessary services, reducing startup time and memory overhead for users who only need a subset of providers.
Unique: Pre-installs 7 AI CLIs with unified workspace and environment variable configuration, using s6-overlay to selectively enable only configured providers at startup — most alternatives require separate installations and manual environment setup for each provider
vs alternatives: Reduces setup time from hours (installing 7 separate tools) to minutes (single docker-compose up), and enables side-by-side provider comparison without environment conflicts
Provides a pre-configured headless browser environment combining Chromium, Xvfb (X11 virtual framebuffer), and Playwright for automated web interaction, screenshot capture, and testing. The container allocates shared memory (shm_size: 2g) to prevent Chromium crashes during concurrent browser operations, and Playwright is pre-installed with bindings for Node.js. The browser stack is managed by s6-overlay as a supervised service, enabling AI agents to programmatically navigate websites, extract data, and generate visual artifacts without requiring a display server.
Unique: Solves shared memory exhaustion for headless browsers by pre-allocating shm_size: 2g and using Xvfb for display virtualization, with s6-overlay service supervision for automatic browser restart — most containerized browser setups require manual shm tuning and lack automatic recovery
vs alternatives: Eliminates Chromium crash debugging and shared memory troubleshooting that typically consumes hours in containerized browser deployments; pre-configured Playwright bindings enable immediate browser automation without dependency installation
Implements a volume-based persistence strategy using Docker named volumes and bind mounts to preserve Claude Code settings, AI CLI configurations, workspace files, and memory state across container lifecycle events. Configuration files (e.g., Claude settings, .env credentials) are mounted at container startup, and the bootstrap system initializes user identity (UID/GID) to match the host to prevent permission mismatches. SQLite databases used by AI CLIs are stored on local volumes rather than network-attached storage (NAS) to avoid locking issues, and a dedicated workspace directory persists generated code artifacts.
Unique: Solves UID/GID permission mismatches and SQLite locking issues specific to containerized AI workstations by implementing automatic identity mapping and enforcing local volume storage — most Docker setups ignore these issues, causing silent permission failures and database corruption
vs alternatives: Eliminates hours of debugging permission errors and SQLite locking issues that plague naive containerized AI tool deployments; automatic UID/GID mapping ensures host-container file synchronization works out-of-the-box
+5 more capabilities
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs HolyClaude at 32/100. HolyClaude leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities