| 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starting Price | — | $10/mo |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Analyzes code as it's typed in the editor and calculates a CodeHealth™ metric at the file level, displaying both current and previous scores with delta values to show degradation or improvement. The metric is computed using proprietary fact-based analysis rules and rendered inline in a real-time monitoring widget that updates continuously during the development session without requiring manual triggers.
Unique: Uses proprietary CodeHealth™ metric that claims to be 'fact-based' and backed by 'winning research' with delta tracking showing score changes between edits, rather than static snapshots like most linters. Integrates directly into VS Code's diagnostic system for inline rendering without separate panels.
vs alternatives: Provides continuous, file-level quality scoring with historical deltas during active coding, whereas traditional linters (ESLint, Pylint) only flag violations and most code quality tools require explicit analysis runs or CI/CD integration.
Identifies code smells (structural anti-patterns and maintainability issues) within the current file and renders them as inline diagnostic items in the VS Code editor, with actionable improvement guidance provided for each detected smell. Detection runs automatically as code is typed, leveraging CodeScene's proprietary analysis rules to flag issues like high cyclomatic complexity, code duplication, and other maintainability concerns.
Unique: Integrates code smell detection directly into VS Code's diagnostic system for inline rendering alongside syntax errors, rather than requiring a separate panel or external tool. Combines smell detection with actionable guidance text, not just flagging issues.
vs alternatives: Provides inline code smell detection during active editing (like SonarQube or Codacy), but integrated natively into VS Code diagnostics rather than requiring external CI/CD or web dashboard review, enabling faster feedback loops.
Leverages CodeScene's remote AI service (CodeScene ACE) to automatically refactor detected code smells and technical debt directly within the VS Code editor. The system identifies refactoring opportunities based on code health analysis, sends code context to CodeScene's hosted AI backend, and applies transformations back to the editor. Requires explicit organizational consent and activation before AI services become accessible.
Unique: Combines code smell detection with remote AI-powered refactoring that applies transformations directly in the editor, rather than suggesting changes or requiring manual implementation. Requires organizational consent model, indicating enterprise-focused design with governance controls.
vs alternatives: Automates refactoring of detected code smells end-to-end (detection + fix) within the editor, whereas GitHub Copilot requires manual prompting and most refactoring tools only suggest changes without applying them automatically.
CodeScene ACE integrates with multiple LLM providers (OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude) to power code analysis and refactoring capabilities. The extension abstracts away model selection and routing, allowing organizations to choose their preferred LLM provider while maintaining consistent code analysis and refactoring workflows. Model inference is executed on CodeScene's remote backend, not locally in the extension.
Unique: Abstracts multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Google Gemini, Anthropic) behind a unified code analysis interface, allowing organizations to select preferred providers without changing extension behavior. Model routing and selection is managed server-side by CodeScene, not in the extension itself.
vs alternatives: Provides flexibility to use multiple LLM providers for code analysis without vendor lock-in to a single model, whereas GitHub Copilot is locked to OpenAI and most code analysis tools use proprietary or single-provider models.
Maintains a real-time monitoring widget in VS Code that tracks code health metrics at the file level, displaying current CodeHealth score, previous score, and delta (change) value. The widget updates continuously as code is edited, providing visual feedback on whether recent changes improved or degraded code quality. Historical tracking enables developers to see the trajectory of code health changes within a single editing session.
Unique: Provides continuous file-level code health tracking with delta visualization during active editing, showing both absolute scores and change direction, rather than static snapshots. Widget updates in real-time without manual refresh or analysis triggers.
vs alternatives: Offers continuous, session-based code health tracking with delta visualization integrated into VS Code UI, whereas SonarQube and similar tools require explicit analysis runs and show results in external dashboards.
Implements an organizational-level consent and activation model where CodeScene ACE (AI-powered refactoring) must be explicitly enabled by organization administrators before any developers can access AI services. This governance layer ensures that organizations maintain control over AI service usage, data transmission, and compliance with internal policies. Consent is enforced at the extension level, preventing unauthorized use of AI capabilities.
Unique: Implements organizational-level consent and activation gates for AI services, requiring explicit admin approval before developers can access CodeScene ACE, rather than allowing individual opt-in. This governance model prioritizes organizational control over ease of use.
vs alternatives: Provides organizational consent controls for AI service usage, whereas GitHub Copilot and most AI coding tools allow individual user activation without organizational oversight or data transmission controls.
Analyzes source code across multiple programming languages using language-agnostic code health metrics and code smell detection rules. The extension automatically detects the language of the current file and applies appropriate analysis rules without requiring language-specific configuration. Supports 'most popular languages' but specific language coverage is not documented.
Unique: Uses language-agnostic CodeHealth™ metrics that apply across multiple programming languages without requiring language-specific configuration, rather than language-specific linters (ESLint for JS, Pylint for Python, etc.). Automatic language detection enables seamless analysis across polyglot codebases.
vs alternatives: Provides unified code quality analysis across multiple languages without language-specific setup, whereas traditional linters require separate tools and configuration per language (ESLint, Pylint, Checkstyle, etc.).
Automatically analyzes code as it's typed in the editor without requiring manual trigger, analysis commands, or explicit save events. The extension runs continuous background analysis on the current file, updating diagnostics and metrics in real-time as developers edit code. This passive analysis approach integrates code quality feedback directly into the natural development workflow without interruption.
Unique: Runs continuous, passive code analysis as code is typed without manual triggers or save events, integrating feedback directly into the editing experience. Most code quality tools require explicit analysis runs or CI/CD integration.
vs alternatives: Provides real-time as-you-type code analysis like ESLint or Pylint, but with proprietary CodeHealth™ metrics and code smell detection rather than rule-based linting, enabling higher-level maintainability feedback.
Generates single-line and multi-line code suggestions in real-time as developers type, using semantic indexing of the entire codebase to retrieve relevant type definitions, function signatures, and contextual patterns. The system maintains a 1M token context window (Pro/Team tiers) that enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file dependencies, constructed via local codebase semantic search rather than simple token-based recency. Suggestions adapt to detected coding style on Pro/Team tiers through implicit pattern learning from recent edits.
Unique: 1M token context window with codebase-wide semantic indexing enables suggestions informed by distant code definitions and cross-file patterns, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that typically use fixed context windows (4K-32K tokens) or file-local context. Claimed 250ms latency suggests optimized retrieval pipeline, though indexing mechanism and performance at scale remain undisclosed.
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GitHub Copilot (8K-32K tokens) and faster latency than unnamed competitors (250ms vs 783ms claimed), enabling suggestions on large codebases with minimal typing delay; trade-off is cloud dependency and undisclosed free tier limitations.
Provides a separate chat interface supporting multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4, others) for conversational code assistance. Users attach files, reference recent edits, and trigger compiler diagnostic uploads; the system generates diffs and applies code changes directly to the editor. Model selection is per-conversation, and $5/month in credits (included in Pro/Team) covers external model API costs; overage pricing is undisclosed. Hotkey-driven workflow enables rapid context switching between inline completion and chat.
Unique: Multi-model chat interface with per-conversation model selection and integrated diff application, combined with compiler diagnostic auto-upload. Unlike Copilot Chat (single model per tier) or standalone ChatGPT, Supermaven Chat unifies multiple LLM backends in a single hotkey-driven workflow with direct editor integration for change application.
Supermaven scores higher at 71/100 vs CodeScene at 35/100. CodeScene leads on ecosystem, while Supermaven is stronger on adoption and quality.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: Supports multiple LLM backends (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet) in one interface with included credits, whereas GitHub Copilot Chat is single-model per tier and requires separate ChatGPT subscription for model switching; trade-off is credit limits and unknown overage pricing.
Supermaven Chat can automatically upload compiler diagnostic messages (errors, warnings) alongside code context to provide error-aware suggestions and fixes. The mechanism is described as 'automatically uploading your code together with compiler diagnostic messages,' but specific language/compiler support and the upload trigger mechanism are undisclosed. This feature is Chat-only and not available in inline completion.
Unique: Automatic compiler diagnostic upload in Chat for error-aware suggestions, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual error context or have limited diagnostic integration. Supermaven's approach reduces friction but with undisclosed language/compiler support.
vs alternatives: Automatic diagnostic upload reduces manual context-gathering compared to manual copy-paste; trade-off is undisclosed language support and unclear upload trigger mechanism.
Supermaven offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro tier ($10/month), providing full access to 1M token context window, largest model, style adaptation, and $5/month chat credits. No credit card is required to start the trial (implied), and trial conversion to paid is automatic after 30 days unless cancelled. Trial terms and auto-renewal policy are not explicitly detailed.
Unique: 30-day free trial of Pro tier with full feature access (1M context, largest model, chat credits), versus competitors (Copilot 2-month free trial, Tabnine free tier only) with different trial lengths and feature access. Supermaven's approach is generous but with undisclosed auto-renewal terms.
vs alternatives: Full Pro feature access during trial compared to limited free tier; trade-off is undisclosed auto-renewal policy and potential unexpected charges if not cancelled.
Supermaven requires internet connectivity and server-side inference; no offline mode or local inference capability is mentioned or available. All code completion requests are sent to Supermaven's backend servers for processing, and responses are returned over the network. This creates a hard dependency on network connectivity and Supermaven's service availability; if the service is down or network is unavailable, code completion is not available.
Unique: Supermaven has no offline mode or local inference capability; all processing is server-side. GitHub Copilot also requires server-side inference, but Tabnine offers local inference options for some use cases. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a significant limitation for developers with connectivity constraints.
vs alternatives: Supermaven's server-side-only approach is comparable to GitHub Copilot; Tabnine offers local inference options, making Tabnine more suitable for offline work. Supermaven's lack of offline capability is a weakness vs. Tabnine.
Analyzes recent code edits and inferred coding patterns to adapt inline suggestions to match team conventions, naming patterns, and structural preferences. The mechanism is implicit (not explicit fine-tuning) and operates only on Pro/Team tiers, suggesting pattern learning from editor activity rather than explicit configuration. Free tier uses a single base model without personalization.
Unique: Implicit style adaptation via editor activity analysis without explicit configuration, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that require manual style guides or explicit fine-tuning. Supermaven's approach is transparent to the user but also non-configurable and undisclosed in mechanism.
vs alternatives: Requires no manual style configuration compared to tools requiring explicit style guides; trade-off is lack of transparency and inability to control or export learned styles.
Delivers code suggestions to the editor inline as the developer types, with a claimed baseline latency of 250ms from keystroke to suggestion display. The system uses a cloud inference backend and local editor plugin to minimize round-trip time. Latency claim is positioned against an unnamed competitor (783ms), but methodology is undisclosed and no independent verification is provided.
Unique: Claimed 250ms latency via optimized cloud inference pipeline and editor plugin architecture, versus competitors with higher latency (783ms unnamed baseline). Actual differentiation is undisclosed; mechanism may involve request batching, model quantization, or edge caching, but specifics are not public.
vs alternatives: Faster than unnamed competitor (250ms vs 783ms claimed); trade-off is cloud dependency and unverified latency claim with no SLA or performance guarantee.
Provides native editor extensions for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, etc.), and Neovim, enabling inline suggestion rendering, hotkey-driven chat access, and compiler diagnostic integration directly within the editor. Each plugin variant is maintained separately and integrates with the editor's native autocomplete UI, keybinding system, and file context APIs.
Unique: Native plugins for three major editor ecosystems (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim) with integrated chat and diff application, versus competitors (Copilot, Tabnine) that support broader editor ecosystems but with less deep integration in some cases. Supermaven's approach prioritizes depth over breadth.
vs alternatives: Deep integration with VS Code and JetBrains (native autocomplete UI, hotkey system) compared to web-based tools or lighter integrations; trade-off is limited editor support (no Sublime, Vim, Emacs) and undisclosed Neovim support details.
+5 more capabilities