Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct ranks higher at 24/100 vs Cohere: Command A at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Cohere: Command A | Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.50e-6 per prompt token | $7.00e-8 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 14 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Command A processes natural language instructions across 100+ languages with a 256k token context window, enabling long-document understanding and multi-turn conversations without context truncation. The model uses a transformer-based architecture trained on diverse multilingual corpora with instruction-tuning to follow user intents accurately across linguistic boundaries. This extended context allows processing of entire codebases, research papers, or conversation histories in a single forward pass.
Unique: 111B parameter scale with 256k context window provides a middle ground between smaller models (limited context) and larger proprietary models (higher cost), specifically optimized for multilingual instruction-following rather than pure scale
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GPT-3.5 (4k) and comparable to Claude 3 (200k) but with open weights allowing local deployment, though smaller than Claude 3.5 (200k) and Llama 3.1 (128k) in raw parameter count
Command A supports function calling and tool orchestration through a schema-based interface, enabling the model to decompose complex tasks into subtasks and invoke external APIs or functions. The model learns to generate structured tool calls (function name, parameters) based on user intent, with built-in support for multi-step reasoning where tool outputs inform subsequent decisions. This is implemented via instruction-tuning on tool-use examples and constrained decoding to ensure valid JSON output.
Unique: Instruction-tuned specifically for agentic workflows with multi-step reasoning, allowing the model to decide not just what tool to call but also when to stop and return results, vs models that require external orchestration logic
vs alternatives: More capable at autonomous decision-making than GPT-3.5 (limited reasoning) but requires more explicit tool definitions than Claude (which infers tool use from context), with the advantage of open weights for local deployment
Command A generates, completes, and analyzes code across 40+ programming languages by leveraging transformer-based semantic understanding rather than syntax-specific rules. The model is trained on diverse code repositories and can perform tasks like code completion, bug detection, refactoring suggestions, and test generation. It understands code semantics (variable scope, function dependencies, type relationships) and can generate contextually appropriate code that integrates with existing codebases.
Unique: 111B parameter scale trained on diverse code repositories enables semantic understanding across 40+ languages without language-specific fine-tuning, with 256k context allowing analysis of entire files or multi-file dependencies
vs alternatives: Larger than Copilot (35B) for better semantic understanding but smaller than GPT-4 (1.7T), with open weights enabling local deployment and fine-tuning vs proprietary alternatives
Command A summarizes and extracts structured information from documents up to 256k tokens by maintaining coherence across the entire document and identifying key information without losing context. The model uses attention mechanisms to weight important sections and can extract specific data (entities, relationships, facts) while preserving document structure. This enables processing of entire research papers, legal documents, or knowledge bases in a single pass.
Unique: 256k context window enables single-pass processing of entire documents without chunking or sliding-window approaches, maintaining global context for accurate summarization vs models requiring document splitting
vs alternatives: Larger context than GPT-3.5 (4k) and comparable to Claude 3 (200k), with open weights allowing local deployment and fine-tuning for domain-specific summarization
Command A maintains coherent multi-turn conversations by tracking conversation history and context across 50+ exchanges without losing semantic understanding. The model uses attention mechanisms to weight recent and relevant context, enabling it to reference earlier statements, correct misunderstandings, and maintain consistent personality or knowledge across turns. This is implemented through instruction-tuning on dialogue data and careful context window management.
Unique: 256k context window enables 50+ turn conversations without explicit summarization, with instruction-tuning specifically for dialogue coherence and context relevance weighting
vs alternatives: Larger context window than GPT-3.5 (4k) enabling longer conversations, comparable to Claude 3 (200k) but with open weights for local deployment and fine-tuning
Command A follows complex, nuanced instructions by leveraging instruction-tuning and few-shot learning capabilities, allowing users to provide examples of desired behavior and have the model generalize to new inputs. The model can learn task-specific patterns from 2-5 examples without fine-tuning, adapting its behavior based on provided context. This is implemented through transformer attention mechanisms that weight example patterns and apply them to new inputs.
Unique: Instruction-tuned specifically for few-shot learning with high-quality example generalization, enabling task adaptation without fine-tuning while maintaining 256k context for complex examples
vs alternatives: More capable at few-shot learning than GPT-3.5 (limited example generalization) and comparable to Claude 3 (strong few-shot) but with open weights for local deployment
Command A integrates with semantic search systems by accepting retrieved context and generating responses grounded in that context, enabling retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) workflows. The model can process retrieved documents or passages and synthesize answers that cite or reference the source material. This is implemented through instruction-tuning on RAG tasks and the model's ability to maintain context awareness of source documents.
Unique: Instruction-tuned for RAG workflows with explicit support for context grounding and citation, enabling the model to distinguish between retrieved context and its own knowledge
vs alternatives: Comparable to Claude 3 and GPT-4 for RAG integration but with open weights enabling local deployment and fine-tuning for domain-specific grounding
Command A generates structured outputs (JSON, XML, YAML) that conform to user-specified schemas through instruction-tuning and constrained decoding. The model can be prompted to output data in specific formats with guaranteed schema compliance, enabling reliable integration with downstream systems. This is implemented via instruction-tuning on structured output tasks and optional constrained decoding to enforce schema validity.
Unique: Instruction-tuned for structured output generation with support for complex schemas, enabling reliable JSON/XML generation without external validation libraries
vs alternatives: Comparable to GPT-4 and Claude 3 for structured output but with open weights enabling local deployment and fine-tuning for domain-specific schemas
Generates code with awareness of multi-file repository context by leveraging a 30.5B parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 128 experts (8 active per forward pass), enabling efficient processing of large codebases without full context loading. The MoE design allows selective expert activation for different code domains (e.g., frontend vs backend patterns), reducing computational overhead while maintaining semantic coherence across file boundaries.
Unique: Uses sparse Mixture-of-Experts (128 experts, 8 active) instead of dense parameters, enabling efficient processing of repository-scale context while maintaining 30.5B effective capacity; expert routing allows domain-specific activation for different code patterns (web, systems, data, etc.)
vs alternatives: More efficient than dense 30B models for large codebases due to MoE sparsity, and more context-aware than smaller models like Copilot-base due to explicit repository-scale training
Supports function calling and tool orchestration through structured schema-based interfaces, enabling the model to invoke external APIs, libraries, and system commands as part of code generation and reasoning workflows. The model is trained to parse tool schemas, generate valid function calls with appropriate parameters, and reason about tool sequencing for multi-step tasks.
Unique: Trained specifically for agentic tool use with multi-step reasoning, allowing the model to generate valid function calls, handle tool errors, and compose tool sequences without explicit chain-of-thought prompting; MoE architecture allows expert specialization for different tool domains
vs alternatives: More reliable tool calling than general-purpose models due to specialized training, and more flexible than fixed tool sets because it supports arbitrary schema-based function definitions
Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct scores higher at 24/100 vs Cohere: Command A at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and generates optimized implementations by identifying inefficient patterns, suggesting algorithmic improvements, and applying performance-enhancing transformations. The model reasons about time and space complexity, considers trade-offs between performance and readability, and generates code with performance characteristics explained.
Unique: Analyzes and optimizes code by reasoning about algorithmic complexity and performance patterns; MoE experts can specialize in different optimization domains (memory, CPU, I/O) and apply domain-specific optimizations
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple profiling tools because it suggests algorithmic improvements, and more accurate than generic optimization patterns because it understands code context and constraints
Generates API designs, specifications, and contracts by analyzing code and requirements to produce well-structured, documented APIs. The model applies API design best practices, generates OpenAPI/GraphQL schemas, and creates client and server code that adheres to the specified contract.
Unique: Generates API designs and contracts by applying best practices and reasoning about API structure; can produce specifications in multiple formats (OpenAPI, GraphQL) with corresponding implementation code
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple code generation because it designs the entire API contract, and more maintainable than manual API design because it keeps specification and implementation synchronized
Designs database schemas and generates SQL queries by analyzing requirements and applying database design best practices. The model creates normalized schemas, generates efficient queries, and produces migration scripts while considering performance and maintainability implications.
Unique: Generates database schemas and queries by applying normalization principles and query optimization patterns; can produce code for multiple database systems with appropriate optimizations
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple query builders because it designs entire schemas, and more optimized than manual design because it applies best practices and considers performance implications
Generates infrastructure-as-code and deployment configurations by analyzing application requirements and applying cloud-native best practices. The model produces Terraform, Docker, Kubernetes, and CI/CD configurations that are production-ready and follow security and operational best practices.
Unique: Generates infrastructure and deployment code by applying cloud-native best practices and security patterns; can produce code for multiple platforms (Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform) with appropriate optimizations
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than simple configuration templates because it understands application requirements and generates appropriate infrastructure, and more maintainable than manual configuration because it applies consistent patterns
Generates code by following detailed natural language instructions with domain-specific reasoning about implementation trade-offs, performance characteristics, and architectural patterns. The model applies instruction-tuning to balance multiple objectives (correctness, efficiency, readability, maintainability) and reason about when to apply specific patterns based on context.
Unique: Instruction-tuned specifically for code generation with explicit reasoning about domain-specific trade-offs; MoE architecture allows different experts to specialize in different programming paradigms (imperative, functional, declarative) and apply appropriate reasoning for each
vs alternatives: More responsive to detailed specifications than base models, and more reasoning-aware than simple code completion tools because it explicitly considers multiple implementation approaches
Generates syntactically correct code across 40+ programming languages by maintaining language-specific syntax awareness and idiom knowledge. The model leverages training data spanning multiple language ecosystems to apply language-specific best practices, naming conventions, and error handling patterns appropriate to each language.
Unique: Trained on diverse language ecosystems with syntax-aware tokenization, allowing the model to maintain language-specific context and apply idioms without explicit language-specific prompting; MoE experts can specialize by language family (C-like, Python-like, functional, etc.)
vs alternatives: Broader language coverage than language-specific models, and more idiom-aware than generic code completion because it applies language-specific best practices learned from training data
+6 more capabilities