Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) ranks higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) | Z.ai: GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 24/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $3.75e-8 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 11 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements RAG by accepting external document contexts and ranking them based on relevance to the query before generation, using a learned ranking mechanism that weights document importance during token generation. The model integrates retrieved context directly into the prompt context window, allowing it to synthesize answers grounded in provided documents while maintaining coherence across multiple sources.
Unique: Command R7B uses a learned document ranking mechanism that dynamically weights retrieved passages during generation, rather than simple concatenation — this allows the model to prioritize relevant documents and suppress irrelevant context within the same context window
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 on RAG tasks by 5-10% on TREC benchmarks due to specialized ranking architecture, while maintaining lower latency and cost than larger models
Supports structured tool invocation through a schema-based function registry where tools are defined as JSON schemas with parameters, descriptions, and return types. The model generates tool calls as structured JSON that can be routed to external APIs or local functions, with built-in support for multi-turn tool use where results are fed back into the conversation context for further reasoning.
Unique: Command R7B's tool-use implementation includes native support for tool result feedback loops, where tool outputs are automatically integrated back into the conversation context without explicit re-prompting, enabling multi-step agentic reasoning
vs alternatives: More reliable than Claude 3.5 Sonnet for multi-step tool use because it maintains explicit tool call history in context, reducing hallucinated tool invocations on long agentic chains
Follows complex, multi-part instructions with high fidelity, respecting constraints on output format, length, style, and content restrictions. The model is trained to parse and execute detailed prompts, maintaining compliance across multiple simultaneous constraints and handling edge cases gracefully.
Unique: Command R7B's instruction-following is optimized for RAG and tool-use contexts, where it must balance following user instructions with incorporating retrieved information and tool results
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction compliance than GPT-3.5 Turbo on complex multi-constraint prompts, comparable to Claude 3 Opus but with lower latency
Maintains conversation history across multiple turns with full context preservation, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, build on prior reasoning, and correct itself based on feedback. The model uses a sliding context window that prioritizes recent messages while optionally summarizing or truncating older turns to stay within token limits.
Unique: Command R7B uses a hierarchical attention mechanism that weights recent messages more heavily than older ones, allowing it to maintain coherence across 20+ turn conversations without explicit summarization
vs alternatives: Maintains conversation quality longer than GPT-3.5 Turbo before context degradation, and requires less aggressive summarization than Llama 2 due to better long-context attention
Supports explicit reasoning chains where the model breaks down complex problems into intermediate steps, showing work before arriving at conclusions. This is implemented through prompt-level instruction for step-by-step reasoning, combined with the model's training on reasoning tasks, enabling it to handle multi-hop logical inference, mathematical problem-solving, and structured decision-making.
Unique: Command R7B's reasoning is optimized for RAG and tool-use contexts, where intermediate steps can reference retrieved documents or tool outputs, enabling grounded reasoning that combines external knowledge with logical inference
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 on MATH and AIME benchmarks when combined with tool use for calculation, because it can delegate computation to tools rather than attempting symbolic math in-context
Generates coherent, contextually appropriate text across multiple styles and tones through instruction-based control, where prompts can specify desired voice (formal, casual, technical, creative), length constraints, and output format. The model uses instruction-tuning to respect these constraints while maintaining semantic accuracy and coherence.
Unique: Command R7B's instruction-tuning specifically optimizes for respecting style and format constraints in RAG and tool-use contexts, making it more reliable than base models at maintaining tone while incorporating external information
vs alternatives: More consistent tone control than Claude 3 Opus when generating content that references external documents, because it separates source material from stylistic directives in its attention mechanism
Extracts structured information (entities, relationships, attributes) from unstructured text by accepting JSON schema definitions and returning parsed data matching those schemas. The model performs entity recognition, relationship extraction, and attribute assignment through instruction-tuned prompting, with support for nested structures and optional fields.
Unique: Command R7B's extraction is optimized for RAG contexts where extracted entities can be grounded in retrieved documents, reducing hallucination by maintaining explicit references to source text
vs alternatives: More accurate than GPT-3.5 Turbo on domain-specific extraction because it was trained on diverse extraction tasks, and faster than fine-tuned BERT models while maintaining comparable accuracy
Generates code snippets, complete functions, and multi-file solutions in multiple programming languages through instruction-based prompting. The model understands code context, can refactor existing code, and provides explanations alongside generated code, leveraging its training on diverse codebases and technical documentation.
Unique: Command R7B's code generation is integrated with its tool-use capability, allowing it to generate code that calls external APIs or tools, and to reason about code correctness by simulating execution
vs alternatives: Faster code generation than GitHub Copilot for single-file solutions due to lower latency, though Copilot excels at multi-file codebase-aware completion through local indexing
+3 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Cohere: Command R7B (12-2024) scores higher at 24/100 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1 at 24/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities