Credo vs Relativity
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose.
| Feature | Credo | Relativity |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Product | Product |
| UnfragileRank | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 1 | 1 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Capabilities | 12 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Evaluates AI systems against regulatory requirements and compliance standards (SOC 2, ISO, industry-specific regulations). Generates compliance reports and identifies gaps in current implementations.
Provides structured methodology for evaluating AI systems against ethical principles and standards. Guides teams through ethical assessment processes and documents ethical considerations.
Tracks data sources, transformations, and usage in AI systems to ensure data governance compliance. Documents data lineage and identifies data governance risks.
Tracks AI model versions, performance metrics, and governance status throughout model lifecycle. Monitors model behavior for drift, bias, and compliance issues.
Systematically identifies and evaluates risks associated with AI system deployment including technical, operational, and organizational risks. Prioritizes risks by severity and likelihood.
Creates and maintains comprehensive documentation for AI systems including governance policies, audit trails, and compliance records. Ensures documentation meets regulatory standards and supports audit defense.
Maps applicable regulatory requirements to specific AI system components and processes. Identifies which regulations apply to the organization and AI systems, and tracks compliance status.
Integrates governance and compliance processes into AI development and deployment workflows. Embeds reviews, approvals, and documentation requirements into existing development cycles.
+4 more capabilities
Automatically categorizes and codes documents based on learned patterns from human-reviewed samples, using machine learning to predict relevance, privilege, and responsiveness. Reduces manual review burden by identifying documents that match specified criteria without human intervention.
Ingests and processes massive volumes of documents in native formats while preserving metadata integrity and creating searchable indices. Handles format conversion, deduplication, and metadata extraction without data loss.
Provides tools for organizing and retrieving documents during depositions and trial, including document linking, timeline creation, and quick-search capabilities. Enables attorneys to rapidly locate supporting documents during proceedings.
Manages documents subject to regulatory requirements and compliance obligations, including retention policies, audit trails, and regulatory reporting. Tracks document lifecycle and ensures compliance with legal holds and preservation requirements.
Manages multi-reviewer document review workflows with task assignment, progress tracking, and quality control mechanisms. Supports parallel review by multiple team members with conflict resolution and consistency checking.
Enables rapid searching across massive document collections using full-text indexing, Boolean operators, and field-specific queries. Supports complex search syntax for precise document retrieval and filtering.
Relativity scores higher at 35/100 vs Credo at 32/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Identifies and flags privileged communications (attorney-client, work product) and confidential information through pattern recognition and metadata analysis. Maintains comprehensive audit trails of all access to sensitive materials.
Implements role-based access controls with fine-grained permissions at document, workspace, and field levels. Allows administrators to restrict access based on user roles, case assignments, and security clearances.
+5 more capabilities