| 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Capabilities | 13 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
DBRX implements a 16-expert MoE architecture with 4 experts active per token, routing tokens through a learned gating mechanism to select the most relevant expert combination from 65x more possible expert combinations than coarser 8-expert designs. This fine-grained routing enables 36B active parameters (27% of 132B total) to achieve performance parity with much larger dense models while maintaining 2x inference speed advantage over LLaMA2-70B. The architecture uses rotary position encodings (RoPE), gated linear units (GLU), and grouped query attention (GQA) to optimize both training and inference efficiency.
Unique: Fine-grained 16-expert architecture with 4 active per token (65x more expert combinations than Mixtral/Grok-1's 8-expert, 2-active design) enables superior quality-to-efficiency ratio; trained on 12 trillion carefully curated tokens achieving 4x compute reduction vs. previous-generation MPT models for equivalent quality
vs alternatives: Faster inference than LLaMA2-70B (2x) and Mixtral (via finer-grained routing) while using 40% fewer parameters than Grok-1, with documented competitive performance on MMLU, HumanEval, and GSM8K benchmarks
DBRX Instruct surpasses CodeLLaMA-70B on programming benchmarks (HumanEval) through instruction-tuning on code-specific tasks. The model processes code context up to 32K tokens, enabling multi-file code understanding and generation. Inference is optimized to 150 tokens/second per user on Databricks Model Serving, making real-time code completion feasible. The model combines general language understanding with specialized code patterns learned during pretraining on mixed text and code data.
Unique: Instruction-tuned variant (DBRX Instruct) achieves superior code generation performance vs. CodeLLaMA-70B through fine-grained MoE routing and 12 trillion token training corpus; 32K context window enables multi-file code understanding without external retrieval
vs alternatives: Outperforms CodeLLaMA-70B on HumanEval while using 40% fewer parameters than Grok-1, with 2x faster inference than LLaMA2-70B and open-source availability for self-hosting vs. proprietary GitHub Copilot
DBRX is natively integrated into Databricks GenAI products, enabling seamless SQL generation, analytics assistance, and LLM-powered workflows within the Databricks platform. Integration includes Vector Search for RAG, Model Serving for inference, and SQL Assistant for query generation. Customers can access DBRX through Databricks APIs without managing separate inference infrastructure. Integration enables end-to-end workflows combining data processing, retrieval, and generation within a single platform.
Unique: Native integration into Databricks GenAI products (SQL Assistant, Vector Search) enables seamless LLM workflows without separate infrastructure; early rollouts demonstrate competitive SQL generation vs. GPT-4 Turbo; end-to-end platform integration reduces operational complexity
vs alternatives: Eliminates multi-vendor complexity for Databricks customers; native integration provides better performance and UX than external LLM APIs; SQL Assistant integration demonstrates production-ready capability vs. experimental LLM features in competitors
Distributes DBRX Base and Instruct model weights through Hugging Face Model Hub and GitHub repository, enabling direct download and integration into standard ML workflows. Models available in safetensors format (inferred) compatible with Hugging Face transformers library. Interactive demo available on Hugging Face Spaces for testing Instruct variant without local deployment.
Unique: Distributes through Hugging Face Model Hub and GitHub with interactive Spaces demo, enabling zero-friction evaluation and integration into standard ML workflows. Supports both Base and Instruct variants with consistent distribution.
vs alternatives: Hugging Face distribution enables standard transformers integration vs custom APIs; Spaces demo enables evaluation without local GPU; GitHub distribution provides version control and reproducibility.
Provides managed inference API through Databricks Model Serving platform, enabling production deployment without managing infrastructure. Achieves 150 tokens/second/user throughput on Databricks infrastructure, with automatic scaling and monitoring. API integrates with Databricks GenAI products for SQL generation and other specialized tasks, supporting both real-time and batch inference patterns.
Unique: Databricks Model Serving provides managed inference with 150 tokens/second/user throughput and integration into Databricks GenAI products. Eliminates infrastructure management while maintaining performance.
vs alternatives: Managed inference reduces operational overhead vs self-hosted; integrated with Databricks ecosystem vs standalone APIs; 150 tokens/second throughput competitive with cloud LLM APIs.
DBRX achieves competitive performance with GPT-4 Turbo and surpasses GPT-3.5 Turbo on SQL generation tasks through early rollouts in Databricks GenAI products. The model understands database schemas, natural language intent, and generates syntactically correct SQL queries. Integration with Databricks SQL products enables real-time query generation with schema context. The fine-grained MoE architecture routes tokens through specialized experts for SQL syntax and semantic understanding.
Unique: Early rollouts in Databricks GenAI products demonstrate competitive GPT-4 Turbo performance on SQL generation; fine-grained MoE routing enables specialized handling of SQL syntax and semantic understanding; native integration with Databricks SQL ecosystem
vs alternatives: Surpasses GPT-3.5 Turbo and matches GPT-4 Turbo on SQL generation while being open-source and self-hostable; 32K context window enables schema-aware generation without external retrieval for most databases
DBRX achieves leading performance among open models on RAG tasks through 32K token context window and instruction-tuning for information synthesis. The model processes retrieved documents, maintains coherence across long contexts, and generates answers grounded in provided sources. The fine-grained MoE architecture enables efficient processing of dense retrieved context without quality degradation. Integration with Databricks Vector Search and retrieval systems enables end-to-end RAG pipelines.
Unique: Leading RAG performance among open models through 32K context window, instruction-tuning for information synthesis, and fine-grained MoE routing that maintains coherence across dense retrieved context; native integration with Databricks Vector Search ecosystem
vs alternatives: Competitive with GPT-3.5 Turbo on RAG tasks while being open-source and self-hostable; 32K context enables single-pass RAG without iterative retrieval for most document sets; more efficient than dense models due to MoE architecture
DBRX Instruct variant is fine-tuned for instruction-following and conversational tasks, enabling natural multi-turn dialogue with coherent context management across up to 32K tokens. The model follows explicit instructions, maintains conversation state, and adapts tone/style based on user intent. Instruction-tuning methodology is not documented, but the variant demonstrates superior performance on MMLU and other benchmarks compared to base model. Inference throughput reaches 150 tokens/second per user on Databricks Model Serving.
Unique: Instruction-tuned variant (DBRX Instruct) achieves SOTA performance on MMLU and other benchmarks through fine-tuning methodology not publicly documented; 32K context enables extended multi-turn conversations without external memory; fine-grained MoE routing optimizes instruction-following efficiency
vs alternatives: Outperforms Llama 2 70B and Mixtral on MMLU while using 40% fewer parameters than Grok-1; 2x faster inference than LLaMA2-70B; open-source availability enables self-hosting vs. proprietary ChatGPT or Claude APIs
+5 more capabilities
Provides a standardized evaluation framework for code generation models that accepts generated code in 17 programming languages (C, C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, Go, Rust, Python, Ruby, PHP, JavaScript, Perl, Haskell, OCaml, Scala, D, Pascal) and validates correctness through actual execution against unit tests via the ExecEval Docker-based execution engine. Uses a centralized problem definition model with src_uid foreign keys linking generated code to shared problem descriptions and unittest_db.json, enabling consistent evaluation across language variants of the same problem.
Unique: Combines 25M training examples across 7,500 unique problems with an execution-based evaluation pipeline (ExecEval) that actually runs generated code in Docker containers against unit tests, rather than relying on static analysis or string matching. The src_uid linking system creates a normalized data model where problem descriptions and tests are stored once and referenced by all language variants, eliminating duplication and ensuring consistency.
vs alternatives: Larger scale (25M examples vs typical 10-100K) and true execution-based validation across more languages (17 vs 4-6) than HumanEval or CodeXGLUE, with explicit support for code translation and repair tasks beyond generation.
Implements a foreign key linking system where all task-specific datasets (program synthesis, code translation, APR, retrieval) reference shared problem definitions via src_uid identifiers. Problem descriptions and unit tests are stored once in centralized problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json files, then linked by src_uid to avoid duplication. The Hugging Face datasets API automatically resolves these links during data loading, returning enriched DatasetDict objects with problem context pre-joined to task examples.
Unique: Uses a normalized relational data model (src_uid as foreign key) for a code benchmark, treating problem definitions as a separate entity layer rather than embedding them in each task dataset. This is more sophisticated than typical flat-file benchmark structures and enables consistent multi-task evaluation on identical problems.
xCodeEval scores higher at 67/100 vs DBRX at 58/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
vs alternatives: More efficient than duplicating problem descriptions across 7 task datasets (reduces storage by ~30-40%), and enables automatic link resolution via Hugging Face API unlike manual CSV joins in CodeXGLUE or HumanEval variants.
Provides a Python API for loading xCodeEval datasets from Hugging Face Hub (NTU-NLP-sg/xCodeEval) with automatic src_uid-based linking between task datasets and shared problem definitions. The datasets library handles data downloading, caching, and streaming, while the xCodeEval integration automatically joins task examples with problem_descriptions.jsonl and unittest_db.json using src_uid foreign keys. Returns DatasetDict objects with enriched examples ready for model training or evaluation.
Unique: Integrates xCodeEval with Hugging Face datasets library, providing automatic src_uid resolution and streaming support. Treats data loading as a first-class concern with built-in linking logic, rather than requiring manual JSON parsing.
vs alternatives: More convenient than manual Git LFS downloads because it handles caching and automatic linking, and integrates seamlessly with Hugging Face training pipelines vs custom data loaders.
Provides an alternative data access method using Git LFS for users who prefer direct file access or need selective dataset downloads. Supports cloning the repository with LFS disabled, then pulling specific task files or problem definitions on demand. Useful for custom processing pipelines or environments where Python/Hugging Face is not available, though requires manual src_uid linking to join task examples with problem definitions.
Unique: Provides Git LFS-based alternative to Hugging Face API, enabling direct file access and selective downloads. Requires manual src_uid linking but offers more control over data access patterns.
vs alternatives: More flexible than Hugging Face API for selective downloads and custom pipelines, but requires more manual work for src_uid linking and lacks automatic caching/streaming.
Implements a standardized three-phase evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) that applies consistently across all 7 tasks (program synthesis, code translation, APR, tag classification, code compilation, NL-code retrieval, code-code retrieval). Phase 1 generates or retrieves code, Phase 2 executes it via ExecEval or computes retrieval metrics, and Phase 3 aggregates results into pass@k, MRR, NDCG, or other task-specific metrics. Enables direct comparison of model performance across tasks.
Unique: Defines a unified three-phase evaluation pipeline that applies to all 7 tasks, treating generation, execution, and metric computation as separate concerns. Enables consistent evaluation methodology across diverse task types (generation, translation, retrieval, classification).
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than task-specific evaluation scripts because it provides a unified framework for all 7 tasks, and enables direct comparison of model performance across different task types.
Evaluates code generation models on the program synthesis task by accepting natural language problem descriptions and generating code solutions in any of 17 languages. The evaluation pipeline (Phase 1: Generation, Phase 2: Execution, Phase 3: Metrics) runs generated code against unit tests via ExecEval, computing pass@k metrics (pass@1, pass@10, etc.) that measure the probability of finding a correct solution within k samples. Supports both single-solution and multi-sample evaluation modes for assessing model reliability.
Unique: Implements a three-phase evaluation pipeline (Generation → Execution → Metrics) with explicit pass@k computation that measures the probability of finding a correct solution within k attempts, rather than just binary pass/fail. Supports multi-sample evaluation across 17 languages with language-specific compiler configurations and timeout handling.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than HumanEval's simple pass@k because it handles language-specific compilation errors and timeouts explicitly, and scales to 25M training examples vs HumanEval's 164 problems.
Evaluates code translation models by accepting source code in one language and generated translations in a target language, then validating functional equivalence through execution against shared unit tests. The translation evaluation pipeline compiles and executes both source and translated code against the same unittest_db.json test cases, comparing outputs to detect translation errors. Supports all 17 language pairs (though not all pairs may have training data) and uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle syntax differences.
Unique: Validates code translation by executing both source and target code against identical unit tests and comparing outputs, ensuring functional equivalence rather than syntactic similarity. Uses language-specific compiler mappings to handle the complexity of 17 different compilation environments and their idiosyncrasies.
vs alternatives: More rigorous than BLEU-score-based translation metrics because it validates actual functional correctness through execution, and covers more language pairs (17 vs typical 2-4) with explicit compiler integration.
Evaluates program repair models by providing buggy code snippets and expecting corrected versions that pass unit tests. The APR evaluation pipeline executes repaired code against unittest_db.json test cases, measuring whether the repair successfully fixes the bug without introducing new failures. Supports repairs across all 17 languages and uses the same execution-based validation as program synthesis, enabling direct comparison of repair quality.
Unique: Treats program repair as an executable task where success is measured by unit test passage, rather than syntactic similarity to reference repairs. Integrates with the same ExecEval pipeline as program synthesis, enabling direct performance comparison between generation and repair models.
vs alternatives: More comprehensive than traditional APR benchmarks (Defects4J, QuixBugs) because it covers 17 languages and 7,500 problems vs 395 Java bugs, and uses consistent execution-based metrics across all repair types.
+5 more capabilities