| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $1.25e-6 per prompt token | $6.00e-7 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 12 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Cogito v2.1 671B uses a sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture trained via self-play reinforcement learning to enable extended reasoning chains across complex multi-step problems. The model dynamically routes tokens to specialized expert sub-networks based on input characteristics, reducing computational overhead while maintaining reasoning depth. This architecture allows the model to handle longer context windows and more intricate logical dependencies than dense models of comparable parameter count.
Unique: Uses self-play reinforcement learning during training to optimize reasoning behavior, creating emergent multi-step problem-solving patterns not present in supervised-only models. The 671B MoE design activates only necessary expert pathways per token, enabling frontier-class reasoning at lower per-token computational cost than dense equivalents.
vs alternatives: Matches frontier closed-model reasoning quality while maintaining the efficiency benefits of sparse MoE routing, positioning it as a cost-effective alternative to GPT-4 or Claude 3.5 for reasoning-heavy workloads when accessed via OpenRouter.
Cogito v2.1 was trained using self-play reinforcement learning where the model generates candidate responses, evaluates them against reward signals, and iteratively improves instruction adherence. This training approach creates a model that better understands nuanced user intent and can follow complex, multi-part instructions with higher fidelity than models trained purely on supervised data. The self-play mechanism allows the model to explore solution spaces and learn from its own mistakes.
Unique: Self-play RL training creates a model that learns to evaluate and improve its own outputs during training, resulting in instruction-following behavior that generalizes better to complex, multi-constraint scenarios than supervised-only baselines. The model develops internal reasoning about instruction satisfaction rather than pattern-matching to training examples.
vs alternatives: Outperforms instruction-tuned models like Llama 2 or Mistral on complex multi-part instructions due to self-play optimization, while remaining more cost-effective than closed models when accessed via OpenRouter's pricing.
Cogito v2.1 applies its reasoning capabilities to code generation and analysis tasks, leveraging the self-play RL training to understand code structure, dependencies, and architectural patterns. The model can generate syntactically correct code, refactor existing code while preserving functionality, analyze code for bugs or inefficiencies, and explain architectural decisions. The MoE architecture allows it to route code-specific reasoning through specialized experts while maintaining context across multiple files.
Unique: Applies self-play RL-optimized reasoning to code tasks, enabling the model to understand architectural patterns and multi-file dependencies rather than generating code in isolation. The MoE architecture routes code-specific reasoning through specialized experts, improving both generation quality and analysis depth compared to general-purpose models.
vs alternatives: Provides deeper architectural understanding than GitHub Copilot for refactoring and analysis tasks, while being more cost-effective than Claude for code-heavy workloads when accessed via OpenRouter, though without IDE integration.
Cogito v2.1 maintains coherent multi-turn conversations by preserving context across exchanges and continuing reasoning chains from previous turns. The model uses the MoE architecture to efficiently manage growing context windows, routing relevant historical information through appropriate experts while avoiding redundant recomputation. Self-play RL training optimizes the model to recognize when previous reasoning is relevant and how to build upon it, enabling natural dialogue that accumulates understanding over multiple exchanges.
Unique: Uses MoE routing to efficiently manage growing context windows across turns, and self-play RL training to optimize recognition of when and how to reference previous reasoning. The model learns to explicitly acknowledge context dependencies and build reasoning chains across multiple exchanges rather than treating each turn independently.
vs alternatives: Maintains reasoning continuity more effectively than stateless models like GPT-3.5, while the MoE architecture handles context growth more efficiently than dense models, making it suitable for extended problem-solving sessions without excessive latency growth.
Cogito v2.1 excels at mathematical and logical reasoning tasks by generating explicit step-by-step derivations and proofs. The self-play RL training optimizes for correctness in multi-step logical chains, and the model learns to catch and correct errors within its own reasoning. The MoE architecture routes mathematical reasoning through specialized experts, enabling the model to handle complex algebra, calculus, formal logic, and proof verification. The model can explain each step and justify intermediate results.
Unique: Self-play RL training specifically optimizes for correctness in multi-step logical chains, creating a model that learns to verify its own intermediate steps and catch errors within derivations. The MoE architecture routes mathematical reasoning through specialized experts, improving accuracy on complex problems compared to general-purpose models.
vs alternatives: Provides more rigorous step-by-step reasoning than general LLMs, with self-play RL training creating better error-catching behavior, though still less reliable than symbolic math systems like Mathematica for exact computation.
Cogito v2.1 is accessed exclusively through OpenRouter's API, providing HTTP-based inference with support for streaming responses and batch processing. The API abstracts away model deployment complexity, handling load balancing, rate limiting, and infrastructure management. Streaming responses enable real-time output consumption for long-form generation tasks, while batch processing allows asynchronous handling of multiple requests. The API supports standard OpenAI-compatible request/response formats, enabling easy integration with existing LLM frameworks.
Unique: Provides OpenAI-compatible API access to a frontier-class 671B MoE model without requiring users to manage deployment infrastructure. OpenRouter handles load balancing and scaling transparently, enabling applications to access the model's reasoning capabilities with minimal integration overhead.
vs alternatives: Eliminates deployment complexity compared to self-hosted open models, while providing better cost-per-capability than direct OpenAI API access for reasoning-heavy workloads, though with added network latency compared to local inference.
Cogito v2.1 can generate diverse content types (essays, articles, creative writing, technical documentation) with fine-grained control over style, tone, and format. The self-play RL training optimizes the model to follow explicit style instructions and maintain consistency across long-form outputs. The model can adapt its writing to different audiences (technical vs. non-technical), adjust formality levels, and match reference styles or examples provided in the prompt.
Unique: Self-play RL training optimizes the model to explicitly follow style and tone instructions, creating content that maintains consistency with specified guidelines better than supervised-only models. The model learns to recognize style constraints and apply them consistently across long-form outputs.
vs alternatives: Provides better style consistency and tone control than general-purpose models like GPT-3.5, while being more cost-effective than specialized content generation services when accessed via OpenRouter.
Cogito v2.1 can answer questions across diverse domains while optionally providing source attribution and expressing uncertainty about answers. The self-play RL training optimizes the model to distinguish between confident and uncertain knowledge, and to acknowledge when information is outside its training data. The model can cite reasoning steps and explain how it arrived at answers, enabling users to evaluate answer reliability. The reasoning capabilities allow the model to handle complex, multi-part questions requiring synthesis of multiple concepts.
Unique: Self-play RL training optimizes the model to explicitly express uncertainty and distinguish between confident and uncertain knowledge, creating more reliable question-answering behavior than models trained purely on supervised data. The reasoning capabilities enable the model to explain answer derivation, supporting human evaluation of correctness.
vs alternatives: Provides better uncertainty handling and reasoning transparency than general LLMs, though without access to external knowledge bases like retrieval-augmented generation systems, making it suitable for domain-specific Q&A where training data coverage is sufficient.
+2 more capabilities
GLM-5 processes extended code contexts (supporting multi-file projects and large codebases) while maintaining semantic understanding of system architecture through attention mechanisms optimized for code structure. The model uses specialized tokenization for programming languages and maintains coherence across thousands of tokens of code context, enabling generation of complex features that respect existing patterns and dependencies.
Unique: Engineered specifically for complex systems design with attention mechanisms tuned for code structure and architectural patterns, rather than generic language modeling — enables understanding of system-wide dependencies and design constraints across extended contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms general-purpose models on large-scale programming tasks because it's optimized for architectural coherence and long-horizon code generation rather than treating code as generic text
GLM-5 supports extended reasoning chains for agentic workflows through structured prompt patterns that enable step-by-step decomposition of complex tasks. The model can maintain state across multiple turns, reason about tool outputs, and make decisions about next actions — designed for long-horizon agent loops where the model must plan, execute, observe, and adapt across dozens of steps.
Unique: Explicitly engineered for long-horizon agent workflows with architectural patterns optimized for extended reasoning chains, rather than single-turn tool calling — maintains coherence and decision quality across dozens of reasoning steps
vs alternatives: Better suited for multi-step agentic tasks than general-purpose models because reasoning and tool-use patterns are baked into the training, not bolted on via prompt engineering
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher at 24/100 vs Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5 analyzes code for performance bottlenecks and suggests optimization strategies through understanding of algorithmic complexity, memory management, and system-level performance patterns. The model can identify inefficient algorithms, suggest data structure improvements, and recommend caching or parallelization strategies — enabling targeted performance improvements with understanding of trade-offs.
Unique: Understands algorithmic complexity and system-level performance patterns, enabling identification of fundamental bottlenecks and suggestion of targeted optimizations rather than micro-optimizations
vs alternatives: Identifies more fundamental performance issues than profiling tools because it understands algorithmic complexity and can suggest architectural improvements, not just code-level optimizations
GLM-5 generates comprehensive API specifications, including endpoint definitions, request/response schemas, error handling, and usage examples through understanding of API design best practices and REST/GraphQL patterns. The model can produce OpenAPI/Swagger specifications, generate API documentation, and suggest design improvements — enabling rapid API specification and documentation.
Unique: Generates comprehensive API specifications that follow REST/GraphQL best practices and include error handling, authentication, and usage examples — not just endpoint definitions
vs alternatives: Produces more complete and best-practice-aligned API specifications than simple code-to-spec tools because it understands API design patterns and includes comprehensive documentation
GLM-5 generates high-quality technical documentation, design documents, and architectural specifications through training on expert-level technical writing patterns. The model understands domain-specific terminology, maintains consistency across long documents, and can generate structured documentation (API specs, RFC-style documents, architecture decision records) with appropriate technical depth and precision.
Unique: Trained on expert-level technical documentation patterns and domain-specific terminology, enabling generation of publication-ready documentation with appropriate technical depth rather than generic summaries
vs alternatives: Produces more technically precise and domain-aware documentation than general-purpose models because it understands architectural patterns, trade-offs, and expert writing conventions specific to software engineering
GLM-5 breaks down complex, ambiguous problems into structured task hierarchies and implementation plans through chain-of-thought reasoning patterns. The model can identify dependencies, suggest phased approaches, and generate detailed step-by-step plans for tackling large engineering challenges — useful for translating high-level requirements into actionable development roadmaps.
Unique: Optimized for expert-level problem decomposition through training on complex system design patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling generation of sophisticated multi-phase plans rather than simple task lists
vs alternatives: Produces more sophisticated and architecturally-aware plans than general-purpose models because it understands system design patterns, dependency relationships, and phased implementation strategies
GLM-5 analyzes code for quality issues, architectural violations, and design improvements through patterns learned from expert code review practices. The model can identify performance bottlenecks, suggest refactoring opportunities, flag architectural inconsistencies, and provide detailed feedback on code quality — going beyond simple linting to understand design intent and system-wide implications.
Unique: Trained on expert code review patterns and architectural reasoning, enabling detection of design issues and architectural violations rather than just syntax and style problems
vs alternatives: Provides more sophisticated architectural and design feedback than linting tools because it understands system-wide implications and expert design patterns, not just local code quality
GLM-5 translates code between programming languages while preserving semantic meaning and adapting to language-specific idioms. The model understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices, enabling translation that produces idiomatic code rather than mechanical line-by-line conversions — useful for migrating systems across language ecosystems or supporting polyglot architectures.
Unique: Produces idiomatic, language-specific code rather than mechanical translations because it understands language-specific patterns, libraries, and best practices learned from diverse codebases
vs alternatives: Generates more idiomatic and maintainable translations than simple pattern-matching tools because it understands semantic equivalence and language-specific idioms
+4 more capabilities