| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.90e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 8 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Implements DeepSeek R1's chain-of-thought reasoning capability distilled into a 32B parameter model, enabling step-by-step problem decomposition and multi-step logical inference without the computational overhead of the full R1 model. Uses knowledge distillation from R1's reasoning outputs to train Qwen 2.5 32B, allowing the model to produce explicit reasoning traces before final answers while maintaining inference efficiency suitable for production deployments.
Unique: Uses knowledge distillation to compress DeepSeek R1's reasoning capability into a 32B model, enabling explicit chain-of-thought reasoning at 1/3 the parameter count of full R1 while maintaining reasoning quality through supervised fine-tuning on R1 outputs
vs alternatives: Outperforms o1-mini on benchmarks while being 3-4x smaller and more cost-effective, with transparent reasoning traces unlike closed-source reasoning models
Leverages Qwen 2.5 32B's broad training corpus combined with R1 distillation to synthesize knowledge across mathematics, coding, science, and humanities domains. The model applies reasoning patterns learned from R1 to diverse problem types, using attention mechanisms trained on multi-domain reasoning examples to identify relevant knowledge and apply appropriate solution strategies.
Unique: Combines Qwen 2.5's broad multi-domain pretraining with R1's reasoning distillation, creating a model that applies consistent reasoning patterns across mathematics, code, science, and humanities without domain-specific adaptation
vs alternatives: Broader domain coverage than specialized reasoning models while maintaining reasoning quality comparable to o1-mini, making it more versatile for general-purpose applications
Generates and analyzes code by applying chain-of-thought reasoning to understand requirements, decompose problems into functions, and verify correctness. The model produces intermediate reasoning steps explaining algorithm choice, edge cases, and implementation strategy before generating final code, enabling developers to understand the reasoning behind generated solutions.
Unique: Applies explicit chain-of-thought reasoning to code generation, producing intermediate steps that explain algorithm selection, complexity analysis, and edge case handling before generating final code
vs alternatives: More transparent than Copilot for understanding code generation decisions, with reasoning traces that help developers learn why specific solutions were chosen
Solves mathematical problems by generating explicit step-by-step derivations, using the distilled reasoning capability to break down complex calculations into intermediate steps. The model applies symbolic reasoning patterns learned from R1 to handle algebra, calculus, probability, and discrete mathematics, with each step justified and verifiable.
Unique: Distills R1's mathematical reasoning capability to generate complete step-by-step derivations with intermediate justifications, making mathematical problem-solving transparent and verifiable
vs alternatives: Provides more detailed reasoning than standard LLMs and more cost-effective reasoning than o1-mini while maintaining educational value through explicit derivation steps
Processes documents up to 128K tokens while maintaining reasoning capability, enabling analysis of entire codebases, research papers, or legal documents with chain-of-thought reasoning applied to the full context. The model uses efficient attention mechanisms to handle long sequences without losing reasoning quality, allowing comprehensive analysis without context truncation.
Unique: Maintains chain-of-thought reasoning quality across 128K token context window using efficient attention patterns, enabling reasoning over entire documents without context truncation or quality degradation
vs alternatives: Larger context window than most reasoning models while preserving reasoning capability, making it suitable for comprehensive document analysis that would require chunking with other models
Maintains reasoning capability across multi-turn conversations by preserving context and applying chain-of-thought reasoning to each turn while building on previous reasoning steps. The model tracks conversation state and applies reasoning patterns consistently across turns, enabling iterative problem-solving and refinement.
Unique: Applies consistent chain-of-thought reasoning across multi-turn conversations while preserving context, enabling iterative problem-solving where each turn builds on previous reasoning
vs alternatives: Maintains reasoning quality across conversation turns better than standard LLMs, though with higher token cost than non-reasoning models
Achieves performance parity or superiority to OpenAI's o1-mini on standardized benchmarks (AIME, MATH, coding competitions) through knowledge distillation from R1, while operating at 32B parameters instead of o1-mini's larger size. The model is optimized for benchmark tasks through supervised fine-tuning on R1 outputs, enabling strong performance on structured reasoning problems.
Unique: Distilled to achieve o1-mini-competitive benchmark performance at 32B parameters through supervised fine-tuning on R1 outputs, enabling cost-effective reasoning without full R1 model size
vs alternatives: Matches o1-mini benchmark performance while being significantly smaller and more cost-effective, making it suitable for production deployments where o1-mini cost is prohibitive
Transfers reasoning capability from the larger DeepSeek R1 model to the 32B Qwen 2.5 base through knowledge distillation, where the model learns to mimic R1's reasoning patterns and outputs. This approach preserves R1's reasoning quality while reducing parameter count and inference cost, using supervised fine-tuning on R1-generated reasoning traces as training signal.
Unique: Uses knowledge distillation to transfer R1's reasoning capability to a 32B model, enabling R1-quality reasoning at 1/3 parameter count through supervised fine-tuning on R1 outputs
vs alternatives: More efficient than full R1 while maintaining reasoning quality, and more transparent than black-box reasoning models like o1 through explicit reasoning traces
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs DeepSeek: R1 Distill Qwen 32B at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training