Magnum v4 72B ranks higher at 25/100 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Magnum v4 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 25/100 |
| Adoption | 0 | 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.70e-7 per prompt token | $3.00e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 8 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains coherent dialogue across extended conversation contexts by tracking semantic state and enforcing language consistency rules throughout multi-turn exchanges. The model uses attention mechanisms to preserve context alignment across turns while applying language-specific normalization to prevent code-switching artifacts and ensure uniform linguistic output within single conversations.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus specifically addresses reported language consistency issues through refined attention masking and language-aware token normalization, distinguishing it from base V3.1 which had documented code-switching artifacts in multilingual contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 in maintaining linguistic purity across turns while matching or exceeding their reasoning depth, with lower latency due to optimized inference routing
Breaks down complex user requests into executable sub-tasks with explicit reasoning chains, generating structured action plans that can be consumed by external tool-calling frameworks. The model produces intermediate reasoning steps with confidence scores and dependency graphs, enabling orchestration systems to parallelize independent tasks and handle conditional branching based on sub-task outcomes.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improvements to agent capabilities include refined planning heuristics that better handle real-world constraint satisfaction and improved dependency graph generation, addressing failure modes in base V3.1 where task ordering was suboptimal
vs alternatives: Generates more executable plans than Claude 3.5 Sonnet with fewer hallucinated tasks, while maintaining reasoning transparency that GPT-4 lacks through explicit confidence scoring
Generates syntactically correct, production-ready code across 40+ programming languages using deep language-specific knowledge of idioms, libraries, and best practices. The model applies context-aware code completion by analyzing surrounding code structure, imports, and type hints to produce coherent multi-file solutions with proper error handling and documentation.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus maintains DeepSeek's efficient code generation architecture (MoE routing for language-specific experts) while improving accuracy on complex algorithmic problems through enhanced reasoning chains, differentiating from base V3.1's occasional logic errors
vs alternatives: Generates code 15-20% faster than GPT-4 with comparable quality, while maintaining lower API costs; outperforms Copilot on algorithmic problems requiring multi-step reasoning
Solves mathematical problems through step-by-step symbolic reasoning, generating intermediate derivations and proofs with explicit algebraic manipulations. The model applies formal reasoning patterns to handle calculus, linear algebra, number theory, and combinatorics, producing verifiable solution paths that can be validated against symbolic math engines.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improves mathematical reasoning accuracy through enhanced chain-of-thought formatting and better handling of multi-step algebraic manipulations, addressing base V3.1's occasional sign errors and simplification mistakes
vs alternatives: Matches GPT-4's mathematical reasoning quality while providing more transparent derivation steps; outperforms Claude 3.5 on competition-level math problems requiring deep symbolic reasoning
Extracts information from unstructured text and generates structured outputs conforming to specified JSON schemas, using constraint-aware generation to ensure valid output format. The model applies schema validation during generation, preventing malformed JSON and ensuring all required fields are populated with appropriate types and values.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus implements improved schema-aware token generation using constrained decoding, reducing invalid JSON output by ~40% compared to base V3.1 which relied on post-hoc validation
vs alternatives: Produces valid JSON 95%+ of the time without post-processing, compared to GPT-4's ~85% success rate; faster than Claude 3.5 on large schema extraction due to optimized token routing
Synthesizes information across multiple domains to answer complex questions requiring cross-domain reasoning, generating comparative analyses that highlight trade-offs and relationships between concepts. The model produces structured comparisons with explicit reasoning about similarities, differences, and contextual applicability of different approaches or solutions.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improves comparative reasoning through better handling of multi-dimensional trade-off analysis and more balanced representation of competing approaches, addressing base V3.1's tendency toward favoring dominant paradigms
vs alternatives: Produces more balanced comparisons than GPT-4 with explicit trade-off reasoning; outperforms Claude 3.5 on cross-domain synthesis requiring deep technical knowledge
Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and code context to diagnose root causes and generate targeted fixes with explanations of why errors occur. The model applies pattern matching against common error categories while analyzing surrounding code to identify context-specific issues that generic error messages don't capture.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improves error diagnosis through better pattern recognition of error categories and more accurate contextual analysis, reducing false positive suggestions compared to base V3.1
vs alternatives: Diagnoses errors faster than manual debugging with better accuracy than GPT-4 on language-specific issues; provides more actionable suggestions than generic error documentation
Generates original written content (stories, articles, marketing copy) with controllable style, tone, and narrative structure through style-aware prompting and iterative refinement. The model maintains consistent voice across long-form content while respecting genre conventions and adapting to specified audience and purpose.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus maintains style consistency through improved attention to style tokens and better handling of long-form coherence, addressing base V3.1's occasional style drift in documents >3000 words
vs alternatives: Maintains narrative voice more consistently than GPT-4 across long documents; generates more engaging content than Claude 3.5 for creative writing while matching technical writing quality
+2 more capabilities
Generates natural language responses mimicking Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus writing style through fine-tuning on Qwen2.5 72B base model. Uses instruction-tuned architecture to follow complex multi-step prompts while maintaining coherent, well-structured prose with appropriate tone and formality levels. The model learns stylistic patterns from Claude outputs during fine-tuning rather than using retrieval or prompt engineering alone.
Unique: Fine-tuned specifically on Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus output patterns rather than generic instruction-tuning, creating a style-matched alternative that preserves Anthropic's prose characteristics while running on Qwen2.5's 72B architecture
vs alternatives: Offers Claude-quality writing at lower cost than Anthropic's API and with more deployment flexibility than proprietary models, though with less transparency about training methodology than fully open-source alternatives like Llama
Maintains coherent multi-turn dialogue through transformer-based attention mechanisms that track conversation history and speaker context. The instruction-tuned architecture processes entire conversation threads as input, allowing the model to reference previous exchanges, maintain consistent character/tone, and resolve pronouns and references across turns without explicit memory structures.
Unique: Inherits Qwen2.5's instruction-tuning approach to conversation, which explicitly trains on multi-turn formats with clear role markers, enabling better context resolution than models trained primarily on single-turn examples
vs alternatives: Simpler integration than systems requiring external memory stores (RAG, vector DBs) since context is handled natively, but less sophisticated than models with explicit memory architectures or retrieval-augmented approaches for very long conversations
Magnum v4 72B scores higher at 25/100 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
Generates code snippets and technical explanations by applying instruction-tuned patterns learned from fine-tuning on Claude outputs. The model understands code context from natural language descriptions, can generate multiple programming languages, and provides explanations alongside code. Implementation relies on transformer attention over code tokens and learned associations between natural language intent and code patterns.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's code generation outputs, capturing Anthropic's approach to code explanation and safety considerations (e.g., error handling suggestions) rather than pure code-to-code translation
vs alternatives: Provides better code explanations and safety context than specialized code models like CodeLlama, but likely slower and less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on code-only datasets
Applies learned chain-of-thought reasoning patterns from Claude fine-tuning to break down complex problems into steps. The model generates intermediate reasoning steps before final answers, using transformer attention to track logical dependencies across reasoning chains. This is achieved through instruction-tuning on examples where Claude explicitly shows reasoning work.
Unique: Inherits Claude's explicit chain-of-thought training approach, which emphasizes showing reasoning work as part of the output rather than reasoning internally, making reasoning patterns visible and auditable
vs alternatives: More transparent reasoning than models without explicit chain-of-thought training, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on mathematical reasoning datasets or formal logic
Condenses long-form text into summaries while preserving key information, using attention mechanisms to identify salient content and instruction-tuned patterns for summary formatting. The model learns from Claude's summarization style, which emphasizes clarity and hierarchical organization of information. Works by attending to important tokens and generating compressed representations.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's summarization outputs, which emphasize hierarchical structure and clear topic organization rather than extractive summarization, producing more readable abstracts
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and readability than extractive summarization tools, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on summarization tasks or using dedicated abstractive architectures
Executes complex, multi-part instructions by parsing task structure and maintaining execution context across steps. The instruction-tuned architecture learns to identify task boundaries, handle conditional logic (if-then patterns), and sequence operations correctly. Implementation relies on transformer attention to track task state and learned patterns from Claude's instruction-following training.
Unique: Trained on Claude's instruction-following patterns, which emphasize explicit acknowledgment of task structure and step-by-step execution reporting, making task progress transparent
vs alternatives: More reliable instruction-following than base models without instruction-tuning, but less specialized than models with explicit task planning architectures or reinforcement learning from human feedback on instruction compliance
Answers questions by understanding context, identifying relevant information, and generating coherent responses. Uses transformer attention to locate answer-relevant tokens and instruction-tuned patterns to format responses appropriately. The model learns from Claude's question-answering style, which emphasizes accuracy, nuance, and acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's QA outputs, which emphasize acknowledging uncertainty, providing nuanced answers, and explaining reasoning rather than simple factual retrieval
vs alternatives: Better answer quality and nuance than retrieval-based QA systems, but without external knowledge bases or web search, limited to training data knowledge unlike RAG-augmented systems
Generates creative text including stories, essays, marketing copy, and other original content by learning stylistic patterns from Claude's creative outputs. The model uses transformer attention to maintain narrative coherence, character consistency, and thematic development across generated text. Fine-tuning captures Claude's approach to balancing creativity with clarity.
Unique: Fine-tuned on Claude's creative outputs, which balance imaginative storytelling with clarity and coherence, producing more readable creative content than models trained purely on internet text
vs alternatives: Better prose quality and narrative coherence than base language models, but less specialized than models fine-tuned specifically on creative writing datasets or with explicit story structure training