Z.ai: GLM 5.1 ranks higher at 24/100 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus at 23/100. Capability-level comparison backed by match graph evidence from real search data.
| Feature | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Z.ai: GLM 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Model | Model |
| UnfragileRank | 23/100 | 24/100 |
| Adoption |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| Quality | 0 | 0 |
| Ecosystem | 0 | 0 |
| Match Graph | 0 | 0 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starting Price | $2.70e-7 per prompt token | $1.05e-6 per prompt token |
| Capabilities | 10 decomposed | 13 decomposed |
| Times Matched | 0 | 0 |
Maintains coherent dialogue across extended conversation contexts by tracking semantic state and enforcing language consistency rules throughout multi-turn exchanges. The model uses attention mechanisms to preserve context alignment across turns while applying language-specific normalization to prevent code-switching artifacts and ensure uniform linguistic output within single conversations.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus specifically addresses reported language consistency issues through refined attention masking and language-aware token normalization, distinguishing it from base V3.1 which had documented code-switching artifacts in multilingual contexts
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 in maintaining linguistic purity across turns while matching or exceeding their reasoning depth, with lower latency due to optimized inference routing
Breaks down complex user requests into executable sub-tasks with explicit reasoning chains, generating structured action plans that can be consumed by external tool-calling frameworks. The model produces intermediate reasoning steps with confidence scores and dependency graphs, enabling orchestration systems to parallelize independent tasks and handle conditional branching based on sub-task outcomes.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improvements to agent capabilities include refined planning heuristics that better handle real-world constraint satisfaction and improved dependency graph generation, addressing failure modes in base V3.1 where task ordering was suboptimal
vs alternatives: Generates more executable plans than Claude 3.5 Sonnet with fewer hallucinated tasks, while maintaining reasoning transparency that GPT-4 lacks through explicit confidence scoring
Generates syntactically correct, production-ready code across 40+ programming languages using deep language-specific knowledge of idioms, libraries, and best practices. The model applies context-aware code completion by analyzing surrounding code structure, imports, and type hints to produce coherent multi-file solutions with proper error handling and documentation.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus maintains DeepSeek's efficient code generation architecture (MoE routing for language-specific experts) while improving accuracy on complex algorithmic problems through enhanced reasoning chains, differentiating from base V3.1's occasional logic errors
vs alternatives: Generates code 15-20% faster than GPT-4 with comparable quality, while maintaining lower API costs; outperforms Copilot on algorithmic problems requiring multi-step reasoning
Solves mathematical problems through step-by-step symbolic reasoning, generating intermediate derivations and proofs with explicit algebraic manipulations. The model applies formal reasoning patterns to handle calculus, linear algebra, number theory, and combinatorics, producing verifiable solution paths that can be validated against symbolic math engines.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improves mathematical reasoning accuracy through enhanced chain-of-thought formatting and better handling of multi-step algebraic manipulations, addressing base V3.1's occasional sign errors and simplification mistakes
vs alternatives: Matches GPT-4's mathematical reasoning quality while providing more transparent derivation steps; outperforms Claude 3.5 on competition-level math problems requiring deep symbolic reasoning
Extracts information from unstructured text and generates structured outputs conforming to specified JSON schemas, using constraint-aware generation to ensure valid output format. The model applies schema validation during generation, preventing malformed JSON and ensuring all required fields are populated with appropriate types and values.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus implements improved schema-aware token generation using constrained decoding, reducing invalid JSON output by ~40% compared to base V3.1 which relied on post-hoc validation
vs alternatives: Produces valid JSON 95%+ of the time without post-processing, compared to GPT-4's ~85% success rate; faster than Claude 3.5 on large schema extraction due to optimized token routing
Synthesizes information across multiple domains to answer complex questions requiring cross-domain reasoning, generating comparative analyses that highlight trade-offs and relationships between concepts. The model produces structured comparisons with explicit reasoning about similarities, differences, and contextual applicability of different approaches or solutions.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improves comparative reasoning through better handling of multi-dimensional trade-off analysis and more balanced representation of competing approaches, addressing base V3.1's tendency toward favoring dominant paradigms
vs alternatives: Produces more balanced comparisons than GPT-4 with explicit trade-off reasoning; outperforms Claude 3.5 on cross-domain synthesis requiring deep technical knowledge
Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and code context to diagnose root causes and generate targeted fixes with explanations of why errors occur. The model applies pattern matching against common error categories while analyzing surrounding code to identify context-specific issues that generic error messages don't capture.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus improves error diagnosis through better pattern recognition of error categories and more accurate contextual analysis, reducing false positive suggestions compared to base V3.1
vs alternatives: Diagnoses errors faster than manual debugging with better accuracy than GPT-4 on language-specific issues; provides more actionable suggestions than generic error documentation
Generates original written content (stories, articles, marketing copy) with controllable style, tone, and narrative structure through style-aware prompting and iterative refinement. The model maintains consistent voice across long-form content while respecting genre conventions and adapting to specified audience and purpose.
Unique: V3.1 Terminus maintains style consistency through improved attention to style tokens and better handling of long-form coherence, addressing base V3.1's occasional style drift in documents >3000 words
vs alternatives: Maintains narrative voice more consistently than GPT-4 across long documents; generates more engaging content than Claude 3.5 for creative writing while matching technical writing quality
+2 more capabilities
GLM-5.1 executes multi-step coding tasks over extended timeframes without requiring human intervention between steps, using an internal planning mechanism that decomposes complex objectives into sub-tasks and maintains execution state across sequential operations. Unlike minute-level interaction models that require prompting after each step, this capability enables the model to autonomously navigate decision trees, handle errors, and adapt strategy based on intermediate results without context resets.
Unique: Designed specifically for minute+ autonomous execution windows rather than single-turn interactions; maintains internal execution state and decision-making across extended task horizons without requiring external orchestration or re-prompting between steps
vs alternatives: Outperforms GPT-4 and Claude for long-horizon coding tasks because it's architected for continuous autonomous operation rather than stateless request-response cycles
GLM-5.1 generates and refactors code with awareness of the full codebase structure, dependencies, and patterns, using semantic understanding of how changes in one file propagate to others. The model analyzes import graphs, function signatures, and usage patterns across files to ensure generated code maintains consistency and doesn't introduce breaking changes, rather than treating each file in isolation.
Unique: Maintains semantic awareness of codebase structure and cross-file dependencies during generation, enabling it to make coordinated changes across multiple files rather than treating each file independently
vs alternatives: Produces more consistent multi-file refactorings than Copilot or Claude because it reasons about the entire codebase context simultaneously rather than file-by-file
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 scores higher at 24/100 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus at 23/100.
Need something different?
Search the match graph →© 2026 Unfragile. Stronger through disorder.
GLM-5.1 diagnoses errors and bugs by analyzing error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and suggest fixes. The model correlates error symptoms with likely causes, explains why errors occur, and provides specific debugging steps or code fixes.
Unique: Diagnoses errors by correlating symptoms with root causes using semantic understanding of code and error patterns, providing explanations and fixes rather than just pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at diagnosing subtle bugs than search-based solutions because it reasons about code semantics and error causality
GLM-5.1 identifies performance bottlenecks in code and suggests optimizations with specific implementation guidance, analyzing algorithms, data structures, and resource usage to recommend improvements. The model understands performance implications of different approaches and can suggest algorithmic or architectural changes to improve efficiency.
Unique: Suggests optimizations based on algorithmic and architectural analysis rather than just code-level tweaks, understanding performance implications of different approaches
vs alternatives: Provides more meaningful performance guidance than generic LLMs because it understands algorithm complexity and can suggest structural improvements
GLM-5.1 analyzes code for security vulnerabilities including injection attacks, authentication/authorization issues, cryptographic weaknesses, and data exposure risks, providing specific remediation guidance. The model understands common vulnerability patterns and security best practices to identify risks and suggest secure implementations.
Unique: Identifies security vulnerabilities through semantic analysis of code patterns and provides remediation guidance based on security best practices, not just pattern matching against known CVEs
vs alternatives: More effective at finding context-specific security issues than SAST tools because it understands code intent and can suggest secure implementations
GLM-5.1 performs step-by-step reasoning about code behavior by internally simulating or tracing execution paths, allowing it to predict runtime behavior, identify bugs, and explain code logic without requiring actual execution. This capability uses chain-of-thought-like reasoning applied specifically to code semantics, tracking variable state, control flow, and function call sequences to reason about correctness.
Unique: Applies extended reasoning specifically to code semantics and execution paths, enabling it to predict runtime behavior and identify subtle bugs through symbolic execution simulation rather than pattern matching
vs alternatives: More effective at finding subtle logic bugs than GPT-4 because it explicitly traces execution state rather than relying on pattern recognition
GLM-5.1 maintains rich context across multiple conversation turns when working on code, remembering previous edits, design decisions, and constraints without requiring users to re-specify them. The model builds an internal model of the codebase state and user intent that persists across turns, enabling iterative refinement where each turn builds on previous work rather than starting fresh.
Unique: Maintains stateful context across turns specifically optimized for code collaboration, remembering design decisions and codebase state without explicit memory structures
vs alternatives: Provides better iterative code refinement than stateless models because it retains context about previous edits and design intent across turns
GLM-5.1 translates natural language specifications into code that preserves semantic intent, handling ambiguous or underspecified requirements by inferring reasonable implementations based on context and common patterns. The model uses semantic understanding of both natural language and code to bridge the gap between high-level intent and low-level implementation details.
Unique: Translates natural language to code with explicit semantic fidelity checking, inferring reasonable implementations for underspecified requirements rather than producing literal or incomplete code
vs alternatives: Handles ambiguous requirements better than Copilot because it uses semantic reasoning to infer intent rather than pattern matching against training data
+5 more capabilities